Text, Discourse, Dicteme, Language Personality as Basic Concepts of Text Linguistics

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study is devoted to the consideration of the terms, which are the most frequently used and significant for the formation of meaning in linguistics. The relevance of the study is, on the one hand, determined by the variety of approaches to their definition and interpretation, and, on the other hand, by the necessity to specify them to facilitate academic communication and linguistic analysis. The purpose of this work is to consider a number of such concepts and substantiate our approach to them and their interpretation. The study uses both general theoretical and linguistic research methods. Particular attention is paid to phenomenological analysis while considering the terms themselves, as well as semantic, categorical-constitutive, positional and pragmatic analysis while studying empirical material. There are considered the concepts of text, discourse, dicteme as a text unit, language personality of an author, or a narrator and a reader/listener. The article analyzes differences between the text and discourse concepts. The work substantiates heuristic potential of a dicteme as a minimum text unit. The dicteme is studied both - from elementary and holistic approaches, as a fractal that forms the space of the whole text according to synergistic laws. The study emphasizes the ideological role of a linguistic personality both at the stages of creation and consumption of a text. There is carried out a linguistic analysis of an English literary text in order to identify denotative and conceptual information in its ideological and aesthetic manifestation in it. The study highlights the role of strong positions of text in the transfer of conceptual information and considers the function of influence in an artistic and media works, which, in the first case, is mainly emotive in nature, and, in the second, manipulative. It underlines the interdependence of the conceptual priorities of the creator and consumer of a media text.

About the authors

Zoya D. Asratyan

MISIS University of Science and Technology; Hulunbuir University

Author for correspondence.
Email: asratyan@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 4579-5483
Dr.Sc. in Philology, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages and Communication Technologies, MISIS University of Science and Technology b. 1, 4, Lenin avenue, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119049; 89, Xuefu Road, Hulunbuir, Hailaer District, Inner Mongolia, China, 021008

References

  1. Werlich, E.A. (1976). Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
  2. Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Ltd.
  3. Galperin, I.R. (2007). Text as an object of linguistic research. Moscow: KomKniga. (In Russ.).
  4. Solganik, G.ya. (1984). On the problem of text modality. In: Russian language: Functioning of grammatical categories. Text and context. Vinogradov Readings XII—XIII. Moscow: Nauka. pp. 176–177. (In Russ.).
  5. Belyanin, V.P. (1988). Psycholinguistic aspects of a literary text. Moscow: Moscow University Publ. (In Russ.).
  6. Lukin, V.A. (1999). Literary text: Fundamentals of linguistic theory and elements of analysis: textbook. for philological specialties of universities. Moscow: Os’-89. (In Russ.).
  7. Sorokin, yu.A. (1985). Psycholinguistic aspects of text study. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  8. Bolotnova, N.S. (1992). Literary text from the communicative approach and complex analysis of lexical units. Tomsk: Tomsk University Publ. (In Russ.).
  9. Bloch, M.ya. (2013). Text in the dynamics of formation and its seven lives. Language. Culture. Speech communication, 3, 5–9. (In Russ.).
  10. Bart, R. (1989). Selected Works: Semiotics: Poetics. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.).
  11. Asratyan, Z.D. (2020). The meaning-forming role of the dicteme in the artistic text: monograph. Moscow: MPSU. (In Russ.).
  12. Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Proposition. In: Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. V.I. yartseva (Ed.). Moscow: Sov. Encyclopedia. (In Russ.).
  13. Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Language and knowledge. On the way to gaining knowledge about language: parts of speech from a cognitive point of view. The role of language in the perception of the world. Moscow: yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. (In Russ.).
  14. Dymarsky, M.ya. (2006). Problems of text formation and literary text (on the material of Russian prose of the 19th—20th centuries). Mjscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.).
  15. Manaenko, G.N. (2005). Cognitive foundations of the information-discursive approach to the analysis of linguistic expressions and text. In: Language. Text. Discourse: Interuniversity scientific almanac. G.N. Manaenko (Ed.). Iss. 3. Stavropol: PSLU Publ. pp. 22–32. (In Russ.).
  16. Krasnykh, V.V. (2001). Fundamentals of psycholinguistics and communication theory: A course of lectures. Moscow: Gnosis. (In Russ.).
  17. Dijk, T.A. van. (1989). Language. Cognition. Communication. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.).
  18. Stepanov, yu.S. (1995). Alternative world, discourse, fact and principles of causality. In: Language and science of the end of the XX century. yu.S. Stepanov (Ed.). Moscow: RSHU. pp. 35–73. (In Russ.).
  19. Serio, P. (2001). Discourse analysis wthin the French school (Discourse and inter-discourse) // Semiotics: Anthology. Moscow: Academic Project, рр. 549–562. (In Russ.).
  20. Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. A.M. Sheridan Smith (Trans.). New york: Pantheon books. URL: monoskop.org/images/9/90/… (accessed: 22.04.2022).
  21. Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Discourse. In: Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary, V.I. yartseva (Ed.). Moscow: Sov. Encyclopedia. (In Russ.).
  22. Guespin, L. (1971). Problematique des travaux sur le discours politique. Languages, 23, 3–24.
  23. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2006). Discourse of power and power of discourse: problems of speech influence. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  24. Stepanov, yu.S. (2001). In the world of semiotics. In: Semiotics. Moscow: Academic project. pp. 5–42. (In Russ.).
  25. Brown, G. & yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Van Dijk, T.A. (1980). Macrostructures. An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  27. Grimes, J.E. (1975). The thread of discourse. The Hague; P.: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886474
  28. Givon, T. (1979). From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy. In: Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. T. Givon (Ed.). Vol. 12. New york: Academic Press. pp. 81–112.
  29. Moskalskaya, O.I. (1981). Text Grammar. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. (In Russ.).
  30. Asratyan, Z.D. & Asratyan, N.M. (2019). Topic and its Linguistic Aspects. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 8–2(27), 209–213. https:10.26140/bgz3-2019-0802-0048 (In Russ.).
  31. Tarasenko, V.V. (1998). Fractal Metaphysics. URL: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/ s00/z0000254/index.shtml (accessed: 01.26.2023). (In Russ.).
  32. Benveniste, E. (1974). General linguistics. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.).
  33. Arshinov, V.I. & Voitsekhovich, V.E. (2000). Synergetic knowledge: between network and principles [Electron. resource] In: Synergetic paradigm. Variety of searches and approaches. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. pp. 107–120. URL: http://esoterika303.narod.ru/yoga27.htm (accessed: 01.24.2023). (In Russ.).
  34. Budanov, V.G. (2002). Principles of synergetics and the language. Philosophy of Science. Iss. 8: Synergetics of human-dimensional reality. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of RAS. pp. 340–353. (In Russ.).
  35. Lotman, yu.M. (2014). A Text within a text. Educational technologies, 1, 30–42. (In Russ.).
  36. Kravchenko, A.V. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics Today: Integration Processes and Method Problems. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 1, 37–52. (In Russ.).
  37. Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Mozheiko, M.A. (2002). Synergetics. In: World Encyclopedia: Philosophy of the XX century. A.A. Gritsanov (Ed.). Moscow: AST, Minsk.: Harvest, Modern writer. (In Russ.).
  39. Novikov, L.A. (2007). Fiction text and its analysis. Moscow: LK. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2024 Asratyan Z.D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies