Fractal Semiotics Modeling of Concept Cup in Religious Texts

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article considers the concept CUP as a special fractal-semiotic object in the field of the interaction of language and culture. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the increased interest in the application of a systematic approach to the study of a linguistic object, in particular to the use of a fractal approach to analyze the structure of a concept, including figurative and reflective components. The subject of the review is the fractal organization of the concept CUP in the speech-thought process. The mechanism of this concept, correlating between the mega-level (the spiritual semiosphere) and the micro-level (text), depends on the features of speech organizational patterns with which the synergistic principle of integrity is manifested. The novelty of the work lies in the fact that it reveals the experience of representing the structure of the concept CUP, reconstructed on the basis of Russian contexts with religious content. The “fractality” of this structure is due to the “non-linear” nature of the development by a number of symbolized values (LSW) cup . Quantitative data makes it possible to trace the features of symbolization (a movement from subject to symbol) and to justify the possibility of using the concept of fractal as a linguistic approach. The material for the analysis was religious texts that are distinguished by a pattern of implicit meanings and hierarchical internal organization, such as interpretations of scripture, instruction on spiritual life, patristic heritage, and sermons. The aim of the work is to present the structure of the concept CUP and to reveal its specifics of a dynamic nature by taking into account external and self-referential signs, as well as to consider the corresponding patterns of thinking that are repeatedly represented in religious contexts. The analysis showed that the semantics of the concept CUP incorporate a large volume of symbolic meanings. It has been established that at the lexical level, the language unit cup is formed over time and an abstract complex meaning or invariant meaning would be activated. These complex invariants are more likely open conceptual schemes that are given importance depending on contextual conditions, and this occurs as a result of cognitive operations at the conceptual level.

About the authors

Chiung-ying Ko

National Chengchi University

Author for correspondence.
Email: keqy@nccu.edu.tw

PhD of Philology, assistant professor of department of Slavic languages and literatures

64, Sec.2, Zhinan Rd. Taipei, Republic of China (Taiwan), 11605

References

  1. Kravchenko, A.V. (2009). About traditions, linguistics and cognitive approach In Horizons of contemporary linguistics: Traditions and novelty. Moscow: Languages of Slavic cultures. pp. 51—65. (In Russ.).
  2. Maturana, H.R. & Valera, F.J. (2001). Tree of knowledge. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. (In Russ.).
  3. Mandelbrot, B. (2002). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Moscow: Institute of computer searching. (In Russ.).
  4. Tarasenko, V.V. (2012). Fractal Semiotics: Blind Spots, Peripeteia and Recognition. Moscow: URSS. (In Russ.).
  5. Stepanov, Yu. (2004). Proteus. Essays on chaotic revolution. Moscow: Language of Slavic cultures. (In Russ.).
  6. Kubriakova, E.S. & Iriskhanova, O.K. (2007). Language abstraction in category naming. Izvestiia of RAS. Serie literature and language, 2, 3—12. (In Russ.).
  7. Kubriakova, E.S. (2004). Language and knowledge: on the way to acquiring knowledge about language. Moscow: Languages of Slavic cultures. (In Russ.).
  8. Ponomarenko, E.V. (2015). Fundamental functional linguistics synergy. Moscow: MGIMO university. (In Russ.).
  9. Florenskii, P. (2004). The Philosophy of Cult (An experience of Orthodox anthropodice). Moscow: Russian language. (In Russ.).
  10. Kolesov, V.V. (2016). Introduction into the conceptology: teaching aids. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  11. Lotman, Yu.M. (1999). Inside the thinking worlds: Man — Text — Semiosphere — History. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture. (In Russ.).
  12. Dal’, V.N. (2006). Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian Language in 4 vols, vol. 2. Moscow: RIPOL classic. (In Russ.).
  13. Sreznevskii, I.I. (1983). Materials for a dictionary of the old Russian Language, vol. 3. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.).
  14. Chernykh, P.Ia. Historical ethymological of the modern Russian language in 2 vol., vol. 2. Moscow: Russian Language. (In Russ.)
  15. Efremova, T.F. (2000). New explanatory derivation Russian dictionary. Moscow: Russian Language. (In Russ.).
  16. Kuznetsov, S.A. (2000). Big Explanatory Dictionary of Russian, S.A. Kuznetsov (Ch. ed.). St. Petersburg: NORINT. (In Russ.).
  17. Fasmer, M. (2004). Etymological dictionary of Russian language in 4 vol., vol. 4. Moscow: Astrel, AST. (In Russ.).
  18. D’iachenko, G. (1993). Complete dictionary of Church Slavonic language. Moscow: Patriarchate. (In Russ.).
  19. Babenko, L.G. (2007). An explanatory dictionary of Russian verbs, L.G. Babenko (Ch. ed.). Moscow: AST-Press book. (In Russ.).
  20. Babenko, L.G. (2005). An explanatory dictionary of Russian nouns, L.G. Babenko (Ch. ed.). Moscow: AST-Press book. (In Russ.).
  21. Babenko, L.G. (2011). Thesaurus of Russian Adjectives Classified by Focus Groups. Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russ.).
  22. Werth, P. (1999). Text words: Representing Conceptual Space in discourse In Serie: textual explorations. London: Longman.
  23. Kniazeva, E.N. & Kurdyumov, S.P. (1994). Laws of Evolution and Self-Organization of Complex Systems. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  24. Zhabotinska, S.A. (2009). Principles of building onomosiological models and event schema In Horizons of contemporary linguistics: Traditions and novelty. Moscow: Languages of Slavic cultures. pp. 381—400. (In Russ.).
  25. Metropolitan Macarius of Crinth, Nicodemus the Hagiorite. (2010). Philokalia in 5 vol. Moscow: Siberia Blagozvonnica. (In Russ.).
  26. Strizhev, A.N. (2001—2007). Complete creation of St. Ignatius Brianchaninov in 8 Vol., A.N. Strizhev (Ed.). Moscow: Pilgrim. (In Russ.).
  27. Tereschenko, T.N. (2008). Symphony on creations of St. John Chrysostom in 2 vol., T.N. Tereschenko (Ed.). Moscow: Dar. (In Russ.).
  28. Tereschenko, T.N. (2007). Symphony on creations of St. John of Kronstadt, T.N. Tereschenko (Ed.). Moscow: Dar. (In Russ.).
  29. TSW (2003—2011). Treasure of Spiritual wisdom in 12 vol. Moscow: Moscow Theological academy and Vvedenskii Optina desert. (In Russ.).
  30. Tereschenko, T.N. (2008). Symphony on creations of St. Gregory Nazianzus, T.N. Tereschenko (Ed.). Moscow: Dar. (In Russ.)
  31. Oden, T.K. (2001—2011). Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture I—VIII centuries. Tver’: Hermeneutics. (In Russ.)
  32. Vinogradov, V.V. (1935). Pushkin's language. Pushkin and history of Russian literary language. Moscow: Leningrad: Academy. (In Russ.)
  33. Lopukhin, A.P. (2008). Explanatory Bible, or Commentary on Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. Old Testament in 5 vol. Miscow: Dar. (In Russ.).
  34. Laguta, O.N. (2004). Soul healing: Metaphor systems of soteriology and sciences. Criticism and semiotics, 7, 264—278. (In Russ.)
  35. Arutiunova, N.D. (1999). Language and world of man. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture. (In Russ.)
  36. Tereschenko, T.N. (2009). Symphony on creations reverend Optina elders in 2 vol., T.N. Tereschenko (Ed.). Moscow: Dar. (In Russ.).
  37. Agarkova, N. (2007). Money In Anthology of concepts. Moscow: Gnosis. (In Russ.).
  38. Balakin, S.V. (2016). Fractal nature of proposition in derivational processes In Proceedings of the international conference “Word, Utterance, Text: Cognitive, Pragmatic and Cultural Aspects”, April 20—22, Chelyabinsk: Encyclopedia. pp. 8—11. (In Russ.).
  39. Bronnik, L.V. (2009). Fractal Self-similarity in language. Izvestija of Volgograd State University, 10, 15—19. (In Russ.).
  40. Zhatkin, D.S. (2006). “Bowl of life” in Russian poetry. Russian speech, 1, 9—13. (In Russ.).
  41. Zhukov, D.S. & Liamin, S.K. (2010). Methodology of fractal modeling in historical, political and other social researchers: reculiarities conceptual and analytical apparatus. Journal of TGU, 7 (87), 223—234. (In Russ.).
  42. Manakov, N.A. & Moskol'chuk, G.G. (2000). The fractal nature of language In Linguistic synergy: problems and perspectives. Barnaul: Altai state university. pp. 24—33. (In Russ.).
  43. Archimandrite John (Krest’iankin) (2011). Gardian angel. Moscow: Brotherhood of St. John the Apostle. (In Russ.).
  44. Archimandrite John (Maslov) (1993). St. Ambrose of Optina and his epistolary heritage. Moscow: Brotherhood of St. Alexius. (In Russ.).
  45. Archimandrite Panteleimon (1992). Father John. Uusi Valamo: New Valaam Monastery. (In Russ.).
  46. Abbot Nikon (Vorob’ev). (2013). About the beginning of life. Moscow: Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church. (In Russ.).
  47. Abbot Sergii (Rybko). (2005). Life is an exam foe love. Moscow: Red Proletarian. (In Russ.).
  48. Kazachenko, V. (2013) What do we live for, V. Kazachenko (Ed.). Moscow: Kovcheg. (In Russ.).
  49. Metropolitan Veniamin (Fedchenko). (1992). About faith, unbelief and doubt. Moscow: Ruslo. (In Russ.).
  50. Archpriest Konstantin Ostrovskii. (2010). Eternity is at the door. Priest’s notes. Krasnoyarsk: Uspenskii church. (In Russ.).
  51. Archpriest Nikolaev Sergii (2012). Secrets of love. For advice and comfort to a priest. Sermons and thoughts. Moscow: Kovcheg. (In Russ.).
  52. Tereschenko, T.N. (2008). Symphony on creations of St. Ephrem the Syrian, T.N. Tereschenko (Ed.). Moscow: Dar. (In Russ.).
  53. Tereschenko, T.N. (2008). Symphony on creations of St. Brasil the Great, T.N. Tereschenko (Ed.). Moscow: Dar. (In Russ.).
  54. Tereschenko, T.N. (2007). Symphony on creations of St. Tikhon of Zadonsk, T.N. Tereschenko (Ed.). Moscow: Dar. (In Russ.).
  55. Chernyshev, V.I. (1965). Dictionary of modern Russian literary language in 17 vol., vol. 17, V.I. Chernyshev (Ch. ed.). Moscow: Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  56. Shaposhnikov, A.K. (2010). Etymological Dictionary of the Contemporary in 2 vol., vol. 2, A.K. Shaposhnikov (Ch. ed.). Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  57. Shvedova, N.Yu. (2002). Russian Semantic Dictionary. Dictionary systematized according to classes of words and meanings, N.Yu. Shvedova (Ch. ed.). Moscow: V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).
  58. Shvedova, N.Yu. (2011). The explanatory dictionary of the Russian language, N.Yu. Shvedova (Ch. ed.). Moscow: Azbukovnik. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2020 Ko C.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies