Value-orientation Differentiation of Volunteers Educating of the Internet Encyclopedia “Wikipedia” and the Project “Otvety.” Part 1

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The development of the Internet contributes to the activity of education volunteers who disseminate a variety of information on the Web. This study is limited to virtual volunteers who share useful knowledge in cyberspace. Although the issues of volunteering are covered quite widely in psychological science, the volitional mechanisms that encourage online educational activities have been poorly studied. The leading role in the deployment of such prosocial behavior is played by a specific value-orientation system. The purpose of this research is to identify and describe the systems of values and value orientations of online educators, namely representatives of the expert core of the online encyclopedia “Wikipedia” (N = 96) and the question-answer (Q&A) online project “Otvety” (N = 47). The study is based on the value-specific (SVS, PVQ) methodology developed by Sh. Schwartz and adapted by V.N. Karandashev; the participants belong to the abovementioned expert core groups of online education volunteers. The results reveal their relatively homogeneous set of values, which is developing into an altruistic meta-orientation towards autonomously given and situationally different dissemination of knowledge aimed at providing information (as a public utility) and regulated by self-transcendence and openness to changes. Intersubjective (in terms of normative ideals and individual priorities) and intergroup (in terms of communities) value-related comparison of the study participants - Wikipedia authors and Q&A “Otvety” service experts - optionally show that the Wikipedians are more inclined to avoid saturated social relationships (being socially inert), however, are much more hedonistic about life than the Q&A-experts. At the same time, both groups are brought together as close as possible by the radical condemnation of any factors that interfere with social harmony and limit the freedom to manifest oneself as a person. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that further understanding of the personal and group characteristics of education volunteers can expand the scope of education; therefore, in subsequent studies, it is proposed to use successive psychodiagnostic methods that measure value specificity in a psychosocial context.

About the authors

Evgeniy A. Bryzgalin

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: r0ld@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7365-174X

PhD Candidate, Department of General Psychology

11 Mokhovaya St, bldg 9, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation

Alexander E. Voiskounsky

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: vae-msu@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5213-1366

Ph.D. in Psychology, Leading Researcher, Faculty of Psychology

11 Mokhovaya St, bldg 9, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation

Stanislav A. Kozlovskiy

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: s_t_a_s@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2106-3815

Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology

11 Mokhovaya St, bldg 9, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation

References

  1. Bryzgalin, E.A. (2020a). Wikipedia through the prism of informational environmentalism. In V.I. Panov (Ed.), Ecopsychological Research – 6: Ecology of Childhood and Psychology of Sustainable Development. Conference Proceedings (pp. 435–438). Moscow: Psychological Institute of RAE; Kursk: Universitetskaya Kniga Publ. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.24411/9999-044A-2020-00100
  2. Bryzgalin, E.A. (2020b). Intercultural analysis of value orientations of Wikipedia authors. National Psychological Journal, 13(1), 3–17. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2020.0101
  3. Bryzgalin, E.A. (2022). Fundamentals about personal values and meanings (based on materials from Russian and foreign scientific sources). Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 2(15), 46–66. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2022-2-46-66
  4. Bryzgalin, E.A., Voiskounsky, A.E., & Kozlovskiy, S.A. (2019). Psychological analysis of practical experience in “Wikipedia” development. Siberian Journal of Psychology, (73), 17–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/73/2
  5. Bryzgalin, E.A., Voiskounsky, A.E., & Kozlovskiy, S.A. (2020). Psychological characteristics of the organizational behavior of Wikipedia online volunteers: A theoretical review. Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 129–150. (In Russ.)
  6. Chataigné, C. (2021). Psychologie des valeurs. Kharkiv: Gumanitarnyi Tsentr Publ. (In Russ.)
  7. Geramanis, O. (2021). Mini-Handbuch Gruppendynamik. Moscow: FLINTA Publ. (In Russ.)
  8. Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2021). Wikipedia and Wikis. In M. O'Neil, C. Pentzold & S. Toupin (Eds.), The Handbook of Peer Production (pp. 169–184). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119537151.ch13
  9. Jorgensen, R.F. (2013). Framing the net. The Internet and human rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782540809
  10. Karandashev, V.N. (2004). Schwartz methodology for the study of personality values: Concept and methodological guidance. St. Petersburg: Rech’ Publ. (In Russ.)
  11. Karandashev, V.N. (2009). The conception of cultural values by S. Schwartz. Voprosy Psychologii, (1), 81–96. (In Russ.)
  12. Karandashev, V.N. (2014). Some methodological aspects of the use of techniques for the study of Schwartz's values and culture of the individual. Psihologičeskaâ Diagnostika, (1), 57–73. (In Russ.)
  13. Mamadouh, V. (2020). Wikipedia: Mirror, microcosm, and motor of global linguistic diversity. In S. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.), Handbook of the Changing World Language Map (pp. 3773–3799). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_200
  14. Matei, S.A., & Britt, B.C. (2017). Structural differentiation in social media: Adhocracy, entropy, and the “1% effect.” Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64425-7
  15. O'Neil, M., Pentzold, C., & Toupin, S. (Eds.). (2021). The handbook of peer production. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119537151
  16. Rudnev, M. (2021). Caveats of non-ipsatization of basic values: A review of issues and a simulation study. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104118
  17. Saxena, A., & Reddy, H. (2022). Users roles identification on online crowdsourced Q&A platforms and encyclopedias: A survey. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5(1), 285–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00125-9
  18. Schwartz, S., Butenko, T.P., Sedova D.S., & Lipatova, A.S. (2012). A refined theory of basic personal values: Validation in Russia. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 9(2), 43–70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2012-2-43-70
  19. Schwartz, S.H. (2011). Values: Cultural and individual. In F.J.R. Van de Vijver, А. Chasiotis & S.M. Breugelmans (Eds.), Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 463–493). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974090.019
  20. Schwartz, S.H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11. http://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  21. Schwartz, S.H. (2021). A repository of Schwartz value scales with instructions and an introduction. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1173
  22. Schwartz, S.H., & Butenko, T. (2014). Values and behavior: Validating the refined value theory in Russia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2053
  23. Shirky, C. (2012). Gin, television, and social surplus. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), Social Media Reader (pp. 236–241). New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814763025.003.0020
  24. Smart, P.R., O’Hara, K., & Hall, W. (2021). Applying mechanical philosophy to web science: The case of social machines. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00388-z
  25. Spaeth, S., & Niederhöfer, S. (2021). User motivations in peer production. In M. O'Neil, C. Pentzold & S. Toupin (Eds.), The Handbook of Peer Production (pp. 123–136). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119537151.ch10
  26. Valsala, P., & Menon, P. (2019). Psychospiritual basis of altruism: A review. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 002216781983051. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819830517
  27. Van Dijk, Z. (2021). Wikis und die Wikipedia verstehen: Eine Einführung. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839456453
  28. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J.B., & Jackson, D.D. (2000). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. Moscow: Aprel'-Press, EKSMO Press. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2022 Bryzgalin E.A., Voiskounsky A.E., Kozlovskiy S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies