Adaptability of the tongue during orthodontic apparatus treatment

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

To date, most dentoalveolar deformities are associated with bad habits such as thumb sucking, tongue sticking out, and so on. According to the authors, protrusion of the tongue is normal in newborns, in which the tongue lies between the gingival pads, and the lower jaw is stabilized by the facial muscles during swallowing. With the eruption of temporary teeth, this physiological phenomenon disappears. The authors pointed out that there are such concepts as «simple tongue push» and «complex tongue push». The first relates to open bite push-outs. The second is observed in children with an open bite, as well as with respiratory complications and / or with a history of chronic diseases of the nasopharynx. The act of swallowing in the physiological sense is divided into 3 stages: oral, pharyngeal and esophageal. Each stage is characterized by different positions of the tongue in the oral cavity. Orthodontic hardware treatment of such patients is aimed at eliminating these habits, as well as correcting the bite. Although many studies have been conducted since 1965, to this day, aimed at studying the tongue protrusion in infantile swallowing, as well as in various malocclusion deformities, the authors found that these studies have shortcomings. For each patient, the shape, size, as well as the trajectory of movements may vary due to anatomical features (short frenulum of the tongue). In this review article, the authors consider such concepts as the adaptive ability of the tongue during infantile swallowing, as well as its trajectory of movements when using various methods of hardware treatment; various orthodontic devices for the treatment of tongue misalignments, their components and their purposes are described. The current classification, main characteristics of this pathological condition and its connection with the dentoalveolar system are considered. Based on the study, it can be concluded that there are several directions in the treatment of infantile swallowing. One of these areas is hardware treatment in the form of the use of plates with a flap for the tongue.

About the authors

Maria B. Vasilyeva

Dental Clinic «Center for Modern Dentistry»

Email: nid.gus@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4483-5275
Moscow, Russian Federation

Nidjat A. Guseynov

Dental Clinic «Center for Modern Dentistry»

Author for correspondence.
Email: nid.gus@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7160-2023
Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Meka BP, Suryadevara S. A simplified method of fabricating a habit breaking appliance. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(1): ZH01. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11581.5405
  2. Tulley WJ. A critical appraisal of tongue-­thrusting. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(6):640-650. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90040-22
  3. Mangold AR, Torgerson RR, Rogers RS 3rd. Diseases of the tongue. Clin Dermatol. 2016;34(4):458-469. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2016.02.018
  4. Kühn D, Miller S, Schwemmle C, Jungheim M, Ptok M. Frühkindliches Schlucken [Infantile swallowing]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2014;93(4):231-236. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1355374
  5. Becelli R, De Sanctis C, Matarazzo G. Infantile swallowing: surgical meaning. Clin Ter. 2019;170(3): e174-e176. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2128
  6. Saccomanno S, Antonini G, D’Alatri L, D’Angeloantonio M, Fiorita A, Deli R. Case report of patients treated with an orthodontic and myofunctional protocol. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(2 Suppl):184-186.
  7. Gil H, Fougeront N. Treatment of tongue dysfunction: rehabilitation for prescribers practice. J Dentofacial Anom Orthod. 2018;21(4):504. doi: 10.1051/odfen/2018137
  8. Kosyreva TF, Belfer ML, Syomnyy dvuchelyustnoy silikonovyy ortodonticheskiy apparat. Patent RF, no. 2018121085, 2018.
  9. Klammt G. Der offene Aktivator [The open activator]. Dtsch Stomatol. 1955;5(6):322-327.
  10. Brauer JS, Holt TV. Tongue Thrust Classification. Angle Orthod. 1965;35:106-112. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1965)035<010:TTC>2.0.CO;2
  11. Maguire JA. The evaluation and treatment of pediatric oral habits. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;44(3):659-69.
  12. Pannbacker J. Speech. Comment on Hanson’s «Tongue Thrust: A Point of View». Hear Disord.1976;41:55.
  13. Fink FS. The tongue, the lingometer, and the role of accommodation in occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1986;56(3):225-233. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056<0225: TTTLAT>2.0.CO;2
  14. Weiss CE. A directional change in tongue thrust. Br J Disord Commun. 1972;7(2):131-134. doi: 10.3109/13682827209011565
  15. Peng CL. Comparison of tongue functions between mature and tongue-­thrust swallowing - an ultrasound investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125(5): 562-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.003
  16. Subtelny JD, Sakuda M. Open-bite: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:37-58.
  17. Fujiki T, Takano-­Yamamoto T, Noguchi H, Yamashiro T, Guan G, Tanimoto K. A cineradiographic study of deglutitive tongue movement and nasopharyngeal closure in patients with anterior open bite. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:284-289.
  18. Cleall JF. Deglutition: a study of form and function. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:566-591.
  19. Subtelny JD. Malocclusions, orthodontic corrections and orofacial muscle adaptation. Angle Orthod. 1970;3:170-201.
  20. Proffit RW. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2000:135-137.
  21. Foucart JM, Carpentier P, Pajoni D, Rabischong P, Pharaboz C. Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of swallowing: a new approach to pharyngeal function. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20:53-55.
  22. Anagnostara A, Stoeckli S, Weber OM, Kollias SS. Evaluation of the anatomical and functional properties of deglutition with various kinetic high-speed MRI sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:194-199.
  23. Logemann JA. Upper digestive tract anatomy and physiology. In: Bailey BJ, ed. Head and Neck Surgery-­Otolaryngology. 1993; 1: 485-491.
  24. Hartl DM, Albiter M, Kolb F, Luboinski B, Sigal R. Morphologic parameters of normal swallowing events using single-shot fast spin echo dynamic MRI. Dysphagia. 2003;18:255-262.
  25. Akin E, Sayin MO, Karaçay S, Bulakbaşi N. Real-time balanced turbo field echo cine-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of tongue movements during deglutition in subjects with anterior open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(1):24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.002
  26. Cuozzo GS, Bowman DC. Hyoid positioning during deglutition following forced positioning of the tongue. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:564-570.
  27. Nayak M, Patil SDS, Kakanur M, More SA, Kumar SR, Thakur R. Effects of Habit-­Breaking Appliances on Tongue Movements during Deglutition in Children with Tongue Thrust Swallowing using Ultrasonography - A Pilot Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2020;11(4):350-355. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_415_19
  28. Singaraju GS, Kumar C. Tongue thrust habit - a review. Annals Essence Dentistry. 2009;1:14-23.
  29. Zhao W, Chen Y, Kyung HM, Xu JS. Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(6):668-676. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1855
  30. Matsumoto MA, Romano FL, Ferreira JT, Valério RA. Open bite: diagnosis, treatment and stability. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):768-778. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000600024
  31. Sayin MO, Akin E, Karaçay S, Bulakbaşi N. Initial effects of the tongue crib on tongue movements during deglutition: a Cine-­Magnetic resonance imaging study. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(3):400-405. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0400: IEOTTC]2.0.CO;2
  32. Caruso S, Nota A, Darvizeh A, Severino M, Gatto R, Tecco S. Poor oral habits and malocclusions after usage of orthodontic pacifiers: an observational study on 3-5 years old children. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1668-3
  33. Vaugeois M. «L’apparecchio di Hawley» [Hawley’s apparatus]. Dental Cadmos. 1967;35(9):1213-22.
  34. Birnie DJ, McNamara TG. The quadhelix appliance. Br J Orthod. 1980;7(3):115-120. doi: 10.1179/bjo.7.3.115
  35. Mehta S, Wang D, Kuo CL. Long-term effects of mini-screw-­assisted rapid palatal expansion on airway. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(2):195-205. doi: 10.2319/062520-586.1
  36. Moore NL. Suffer the little children: fixed intraoral habit appliances for treating childhood thumbsucking habits: a critical review of the literature. Int J Orofacial Myology. 2002;28:6-38.
  37. Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Effect of Clark’s twin-block appliance (CTB) and non-extraction fixed mechano-­therapy on the pharyngeal dimensions of growing children. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(6):82-88. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.082-088.oar
  38. Defraia E, Marinelli A, Baroni G, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal open-bite malocclusion with the open-bite bionator: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(5):595-598. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.035
  39. Erbay E, Uğur T, Ulgen M. The effects of Frankel’s function regulator (FR-4) therapy on the treatment of Angle Class I skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(1):9-21. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70061-7
  40. Shah SS, Nankar MY, Bendgude VD, Shetty BR. Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy in Tongue Thrust Habit: A Narrative Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(2):298-303. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1926

Copyright (c) 2023 Vasilyeva M.B., Guseynov N.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies