“Forking Paths” as a principle for constructing the hero’s path: variations in P. Auster’s “City of Glass”

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The author examines the principle of constructing the hero's path in an early novel by the contemporary writer Paul Auster. In “City of Glass” Auster has already undertaken the problematization of a more traditional narrative form: he pays increasing attention not so much to constructing events that actually happen to the hero, as to pointing out events that could have happened, but did not happen within the narrative world. Such work with the event fits Auster's narrative search into an extensive tradition that problematizes possible worlds in the narrative in its own way. One of the techniques for creating such possible worlds is disnarration, which allows - due to indications of a possible alternative development of events - to create possible worlds within the narrative and even turn them into counterfactual ones. Feeling an interest in this problematic, Auster in his early novel also creates the path of his hero on the principle of variations - consistently presenting to the reader those paths that the hero could have followed, but which nevertheless remained unrealized in his life. This is how Auster in the narrative comprehends the idea of Borges' “forking paths”, simultaneously responding to the cinematic narrative experiments that were undertaken by directors in the second half of the 20thcentury. In this way he consistently develops his own narrative experiment, because several decades after the “City of Glass”, the principle of “forking paths” will be fully embodied in his novel in “4321” not only at the level of character construction, but at the level of the entire narrative structure, which therefore can be defined as forking-path narrative.

About the authors

Dina V. Shulyatyeva

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dshulyatyeva@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7498-7395

кандидат филологических наук, доцент школы философии и культурологии, факультет гуманитарных наук

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Зенкин С.Н. Теория литературы: проблемы и результаты. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2018.
  2. Alvarez M. Paul Auster's Ghosts. The Echoes of European and American Tradition. Lexington Books, 2018.
  3. Bökös B. Palimpsestuous intermediality: Paul Auster’s “City of Glass” (1985) and “City of Glass: The Graphic Novel” (1994) // Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies. 2014. Vol. 20. No. 2. Pp. 101-119.
  4. Coughlan D. Paul Auster’s “City of Glass”: the graphic novel // Modern Fiction Studies. 2006. Vol. 52. No. 4. Pp. 832-854.
  5. Dannenberg H. Coincidence and counterfactuality: plotting time and space in narrative fiction. University of Nebraska Press, 2008.
  6. Golden C. From punishment to possibility: Re-imagining Hitchcockian paradigms in “The New York Trilogy” // Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal. 2004. Vol. 37. No. 3. Pp. 93-108.
  7. Lambrou M. Disnarration and the unmentioned in fact and fiction. London: Palgrave Pivot, 2019.
  8. Little W.G. Nothing to go on: Paul Auster’s “City of Glass” // Contemporary Literature. 1997. Vol. 38. No. 1. Pp. 133-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/1208855
  9. Nealon J.T. Work of the detective, work of the writer: Auster’s City of Glass // Detecting Texts: The Metaphysical Detective Story from Poe to Postmodernism / ed. by P. Merivale, S.E. Sweeney. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999. Pp. 117-133.
  10. Prince G. The disnarrated // Style. 1988. Vol. 22. Pp. 1-8.
  11. Ryan M.-L. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1991.
  12. Shostack D. In the country of missing persons: Paul Auster’s narratives of trauma // Studies in the Novel. 2009. Vol. 41. No. 1. Pp. 66-87.
  13. Smith H. “A labyrinth of endless steps”: fiction making, interactive narrativity, and the poetics of space in Paul Auster’s City of Glass // Australasian Journal of American Studies. 2002. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 33-51.
  14. Söderlind S. Humpty Dumpty in New York: Language and regime change in Paul Auster’s “City of Glass” // Modern Fiction Studies. 2011. Vol. 57. No. 1. Pp. 1-16.
  15. Warhol R. Dickens narrative refusals // Counterfactual Thinking - Counterfactual Writing / еd. by D. Birke, M. Butter, T. Koeppe. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011. Pp. 227-240.

Copyright (c) 2024 Shulyatyeva D.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies