Semiotic codes of the “new existence” myth in the novel “The Diary of Satan” by L. Andreev

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the problem of identification of semiotic components of the author's neo-myth about the “humanized Satan” in L. Andreev's novel “The Diary of Satan” in the system of analysis of interdisciplinary metamorphic model by the tools of existential method. The novelty of this research is determined by the analysis of the semiotic component of the concepts of “Man - Satan” in the context of the concept of “living ontolo- gical corporeality” in the system of interdisciplinary metamorphic model of Zaltman. The object of the research was the linguistic and cultural concepts of “Man - Satan” as the key symbols of the metamorphic model of “humanized Satan”, reflecting the most important categories and settings of the anthropological and religious-philosophical concept of the writer.

About the authors

Gulchira T. Garipova

Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs

Author for correspondence.
Email: ggaripova2017@yandex.ru

Doctor of Philosophy (in Philology), Associate Professor of the Department of Russian and Foreign Philology

1 Nikitskaya St, Vladimir, 600000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Andreev, L. (1993). Dnevnik Satany: infernalnye metamorfozy v izlozhenii russkih pisatelej [The diary of Satan: infernal metamorphoses in the presentation of Russian writers]. Tashkent: Shark Publ.
  2. Ahutin, A.V. (1990). Sofija i chjort (Kant pered licom russkoj religioznoj metafiziki) [Sophia and the devil (Kant in the face of Russian religious metaphysics)]. Voprosy filosofii [Question of philosophy], (1), 51–69.
  3. Berdjaev, N. (2008). Russkaja ideja [The Russian idea]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika Publ. Retrieved from http://az.lib.ru/b/berdjaew_n_a/text_1948.shtml (accessed: 10.12.2019).
  4. Zamanskaja, V.V. (2002). Jekzistencialnaja tradicija v russkoj literature XX veka: Dialogi na granicah stoletij [Existential tradition in Russian literature of the twentieth century: Dialogues on the borders of centuries]: textbook. Moscow: Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ.
  5. Krebel, I.A. (2010). Mifopojetika Serebrjanogo veka: Opyt topologicheskoj refleksii [Mythopoetics of the Silver age: the Experience of topological reflection]. Saint Petersburg: Aletejja Publ.
  6. Moiseev, V.I. (2019). Ontologija zhivoj telesnosti [Ontology of living corporeality]. Lection 8. Retrieved from http://www.neoallunity.ru/lec/lec8.pdf (accessed: 10.12.2019).
  7. Ozhegov, S.I. (1975). Slovar' russkogo jazyka [Dictionary of the Russian language]. 11th ed. Moscow: Rus. jaz. Publ.
  8. Ortega-i-Gasset, H. (1990). Dve velikie metafory [Two great metaphors]. Teorija metafory [Metaphor theory] (pp. 68–81). Moscow: Progress Publ.
  9. Romanjuha, S. (2010). Metamorfnaja model Zaltmana ZMET – istorija i sut metodologii [Zaltman's metamorphic model ZMET – the history and essence of the methodology]. Retrieved from http://psyfactor.org/lib/zmet.htm (accessed: 26.10.2019).
  10. Tynjanov, Ju. (1965). Problema stihotvornogo jazyka [The problem of poetic language]: Articles. Moscow: Sov. Pisatel Publ.
  11. Shafranskaja, Je.F. (2016). Kontekstualnaja semantika zaglavija romana Mihaila Shishkina “Vzjatie Izmaila” [Contextual semantics of the title of Mikhail Shishkin's novel “The Taking of Ishmael”]. Respectus Philologicus, 30(35), 2–10.

Copyright (c) 2020 Garipova G.T.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies