Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in political cartoons as a means of country image construction

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The interrelation of metaphors and metonymies often attracts the attention of linguists, but the combination of multimodal metaphors and metonymies, which are important components of cognition and are essential for the creation and understanding of multimodal texts, has not been sufficiently studied. The purpose of this study is to delineate the interaction between multimodal metaphors and metonymies in political cartoons and identify their role in forming the country image. The research material includes 30 political cartoons on the topic of the Sino-American trade dispute 2018-2021, selected from Yandex search engine according to keywords (tags, Hashtag). We considered the metaphors and metonymies contained in the cartoons and analyzed their cognitive interrelation. Since the currently existing categorization of the varieties of metaphtonymy does not meet the goal, we used our own typology of the interaction of multimodal metaphors and metonymies, which includes two categories: inclusive and interactive. We have identified 20 interactive and 10 inclusive political cartoons with characteristic cultural attributes. The use of cognitive-discursive analysis allowed us to reveal the features of visual, verbal and conceptual interaction of metaphorical transfers and metonymic shifts in the construction of the positive image of China and the negative image of the United States. The results showed that multimodal metaphors and metonymies in political cartoons are intertwined in different ways, they can make an impact on the mind of people and form the country image.

About the authors

Shaoyang Guan

Dalian University of Foreign Languages

Author for correspondence.
Email: guanshaoyang@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0763-9726

PhD, is a Lecturer at Dalian University of Foreign Languages. Her research interests are discourse analysis, intercultural communication, and political linguistics

Dalian, China

Yuhua Sun

Dalian University of Foreign Languages

Email: xzxx@dlufl.edu.cn
Professor, President of the Dalian University of Foreign Languages (until 2015 - Rector), Head of the SCO National Administration in China, Director of the Research Association for the Teaching of Chinese and Russian Languages, Deputy Head of the Russian Group of the National Committee for the Teaching of Foreign Languages. She is also Director of Pushkin National Association of Researchers, Chairman of the Liaoning Association for the Study of Foreign Literature, Deputy Chairman of the Association of Translators and member of the Association of Writers of Prov. Liaoning. She received honorary awards from the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Dalian, China

References

  1. Айнутдинов А.С. Карикатура как тип изображения комической интенции в современных российских печатных СМИ : дис. - Уральский государственный университет имени А.М. Горького., 2010. [Aynutdinov, Anton S. 2010. Caricature as a type of image of comic intention in modern Russian print media: Thesis. Yekaterinburg: Ural State University named after A.M. Gorky. (In Russ.)].
  2. Артемова Е.А. Карикатура как жанр политического дискурса : дис. - Волгоградский государственный педагогический университет, 2002. [Artemova, Evgenia A. 2022. Caricature as a genre of political discourse: Thesis - Volgograd State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.)].
  3. Бойко А.В., Солопова О.А. Моделирование будущего России сквозь призму физиологической метафоры (на материале американского социального сервиса Quora). Коммуникативные исследования. 2021. Т. 8. № 2. С. 335-350. [Boiko, Alena & Olga Solopova. 2021. Modelirovanie budushchego Rossii skvoz' prizmu fiziologicheskoi metafory (na materiale amerikanskogo sotsial'nogo servisa Quora) (Modelling Russia's future through the prism of physiological metaphor (on the American social service Quora). Kommunikativnye issledovaniya 8 (2). 335-350. (In Russ.)].
  4. Будаев Э.В., Солопова О.А., Зарипов Р.И., Бойко А.В. Метафорический образ будущего России в зарубежных СМИ. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство «Наукоемкие технологии», 2021. [Budaev, Eduard, Olga Solopova, Ruslan Zaripov & Alena Boiko. 2021. Metaforicheskii obraz budushchego Rossii v zarubezhnykh SMI (Metaphorical image of Russia's future in foreign media). Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo «Naukoemkie tekhnologiI». (In Russ.)].
  5. Ворошилова М.Б. Креолизованный текст в политическом дискурсе //Политическая лингвистика. 207. № 23. С. 73-78. [Voroshilova, Maria B. 2007. Creolized text in political discourse. Political Linguistics 3 (23). 73-78. (In Russ.)].
  6. Калинин О.И., Игнатенко А.В. Сравнительный анализ использования метафор в русских, английских и китайских медиатекстах информационного и воздействующего характера // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика. 2022. № 4. С. 1062-1082. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-4-1062-1082 [Kalinin, Oleg I. & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2022. Comparative analysis of the use of metaphors in Russian, English and Chinese media texts of informational and influencing nature. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 13 (4). 1062-1082. (In Russ.)].
  7. Константинова А.А. Лингвокультурные слои современного американского интернет-пространства: прецедентные феномены в «антитрамповском дискурсе» // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2022. № 3. C. 744-778. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-27521 [Konstantinova, Anna A. 2022. Linguocultural layers of the modern American Internet space: Precedent phenomena in the “anti-Trump discourse”. Russian Journal of Linguistics (26) 3. 744-778. (In Russ.)].
  8. Колосов А.В. Визуальные коммуникации в социально-политических процессах // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. 2006. № 6. С. 81-87. [Kolosov, Alexander V. 2006. Visual communications in socio-political processes. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science 1 (6). 81-87. (In Russ.)].
  9. Ли М., Солопова О.А. Метафорическое моделирование образа Китая в современном политическом дискурсе. Политическая лингвистика. 2021. Т. 86. № 2. С. 98-105. [Li, Mehitsi & Olga Solopova. 2021. Metaforicheskoe modelirovanie obraza Kitaya v sovremennom politicheskom diskurse (Metaphorical modelling of the image of China in contemporary political discourse). Politicheskaya linguistika 2 (86). 98-105. (In Russ.)].
  10. Павлина С.Ю. Прагматические и стилистические особенности британских и американских политических карикатур на тему COVID-19 // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2022. № 1. C. 162-193. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-27107 [Pavlina, Svetalana Y. 2022 Pragmatic and stylistic persperctives on British and American COVID-19 cartoons. Russian Journal of Linguistics (26) 1. 162-193. (In Russ.)].
  11. Падучева Е.В. Метафора и ее родственники // Сокровенные смыслы. Слово. Текст. Культура. Сборник статей в честь Н.Д. Арутюновой. 2022. С. 187-203. [Paducheva, Elena V. 2022. Metaphor and its relatives. Innermost meanings: The Word. Text. Culture. Collection of articles in honor of N.D. Arutyunova. 187-203. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. (In Russ.)].
  12. Солопова О.А., Будаев Э.В. Бойко А.В. Метафорический образ будущего России в неинституциональном политическом интернет-дискурсе КНР // Политическая лингвистика. 2020. № 6. C. 96-107. [Solopova, Olga A., Eduard V. Budaev & Alena V. Boyko. 2020. The metaphorical image of the future of Russia in the non-institutional political Internet discourse of the PRC. Political Linguistics (84) 6. 96-107. (In Russ.)].
  13. Сунь Ю., Калинин О.И., Игнатенко А.В. Использование индексов метафоричности для анализа речевого воздействия метафоры в текстах публичных выступлений политиков // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. № 1. C. 250-277. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-250-277 [Sun, Yuhua, Oleg I. Kalinin & Alexander V. Ignatenko. The use of metaphor power indices for the analysis of speech impact in political public speeches. Russian Journal of Linguistics (1). 250-277. (In Russ.)].
  14. Устарханов Р.И. Метафтонимия в английском языке (интерпретационно-когнитивный анализ). Пятигорск: Пятигорский государственный лингвистический университет, 2006. [Ustarkhanov, Ruslan.I. 2006. Metaphthonymy in English: Interpretative and cognitive analysis. Pyatigorsk: Pyatigorskii gosudarstvennyi lingvisticheskii universitet. (In Russ.)].
  15. Чудинов А.П. Россия в метафорическом зеркале: когнитивное исследование политической метафоры (1991-2000). Екатеринбург: Уральский государственный педагогический университет, 2001. [Chudinov, Anatoly P. 2001. Russia in a Metaphorical Mirror: A Cognitive Study of Political Metaphor (1991-2000). Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.)].
  16. Чудинов А.П., Будаев Э.В., Солопова О.А. Политическая метафорология: дискурсивный поворот. Москва: Флинта, 2020. [Chudinov, Anatoly P., Eduard V. Budaev & Olga A. Solopova. 2020. Political Metaphorology: A Discursive Turn. Moscow: Flint. (In Russ.)].
  17. Bounegru, Liliana & Charles Forceville. 2011. Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication 10 (2). 209-229.
  18. Forceville, Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  19. Goossens, Louis. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions for linguistic action Cognitive Linguistics 1 (3). 323-340.
  20. Hall, Edward. 1969. The Hidden Dimension. London: Bodley Head.
  21. Niu, Weigan. 2021. Two contemporary types of “China Threat” theories-taking India and the United States as an example [J]. Ningxia Social Sciences (2). 30-39. (In Chinese).
  22. Hu, Xiaoming. 2011. National Image. Beijing: People's Publishing House. (In Chinese).
  23. Kalinin, Oleg I. & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2022. Comparative analysis of the use of metaphors in Russian, English and Chinese media texts of informational and influencing nature. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 13 (4). 1062-1082. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-4-1062-1082
  24. Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images The Grammar of Visual Design. London/New York: Routledge.
  25. Kwon, Iksoo. 2019. Conceptual mappings in political cartoons: A comparative study of the case of nuclear crises in US-North Korean relations. Journal of Pragmatics143. 10-27.
  26. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  27. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  28. Leontovich, Olga A., Oleg I. Kalinin & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2023. Metaphor power and language typology: Analysis of correlation on the material of the United Nations Declarations. Training, Language and Culture 7 (2). 21-29. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-2-21-29
  29. Li, Yu & Quanwang Zhan. 2013. Conceptual Metaphor Analysis of Chinese Political Discourse. Jianghuai Forum (5). 85-89. (In Chinese).
  30. Lin, Su. 2021. Metaphor and Metonymy: Differences in Chinese Language and Culture. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 11 (2). 135-139.
  31. Liu, Jing. 2020. The development model of multimodal hidden metonymy ability of second-language learners: The perspective of Semantic wave theory J Journal of International Studies University 28 (4). 55-59. (In Chinese).
  32. Martinec, Radan & Andrew Salway. 2005. A system for image-text relations in new (an old) media. Visual Communication 4 (3). 339-374.
  33. Musolff, Andreas. 2019. Creativity in Metaphor interpretation. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (1). 23-39. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-23-39
  34. Musolff, Andreas. 2021a. Hyperbole and emotionalisation: Escalation of pragmatic effects of proverb and metaphor in the “Brexit” debate. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 628-644. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-628-644
  35. Musolff, Andreas. 2021b. Researching political metaphor cross-culturally: English, Hungarian, Greek and Turkish L1-based interpretations of the Nation As Metaphor. Journal of Pragmatic 183. 121-131.
  36. Pan, Yanyan. 2011. Multimodal metaphors and identity construction in political cartoons. Foreign Language Studies (1). 11-15. (In Chinese).
  37. Pang, Xun. 2019. Analysis of Sino-US relations based on massive event data-reciprocal response, policy inertia and third-party factors [J]. World Economy and Politics (5). 53-79. (In Chinese).
  38. Ponton, Douglas M. 2021. “Never in my life have I heard such a load of absolute nonsense. Wtf.” Political satire on the handling of the COVID-19 crisis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 767-788. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-767-788
  39. Tien, Tran Ba. 2022. Universality vs. cultural specificity of anger metaphors and metonymies in English and Vietnamese idioms. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26 (1). 74-94. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-24951
  40. Tiffany, Ying-Yu Lin & Wen-yu Chiang. 2015. Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on U. S. Beef imports into taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol 30 (2). 137-161.
  41. Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo. 2009. Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Mulitmodal metaphor, 95-143. Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  42. Wang, Yangang. 2021. The metaphors and its critical analysis in COVID-19-related cartoons. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 11 (4). 539-554.
  43. Way, Lyndon K. 2021. Trump, memes and the Alternative Right: Emotional criticism and praise. Russian Journal of Linguistics (25) 3. 789-809. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-789-809
  44. Xiao, Xi. 2020. The prevention and control of the new crown pneumonia epidemic and the shaping of the image of China's great power-Theory and practice based on signal expression [J]. Journal of Social Sciences of Jilin University (3). 5-18. (In Chinese).
  45. Yuan, Xiaoben. 2023. Metaphors and metonymies in the multimodal discourse of whaling: A cross genre comparative study. Metaphor and the Social World.
  46. Yu, Ning. 2009. Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Mulitmodal metaphor, 119-143. Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  47. Zhang, Hui & Zhan Weiwei. 2011. The dynamic construction of multimodal metonymy and metaphor in advertising discourse. Foreign Language Studies (1). 16-23. (In Chinese).
  48. Zhao, Xiufeng & Feng Dezheng. 2017. Multimodal metonymy and image text meaning construction. Journal of Foreign Languages (6). 8-13. (In Chinese).
  49. Zhao, Xiufeng. 2011. The new development of conceptual metaphor research - research on multimodal metaphor - comment on Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi “Multimodal metaphor”. Foreign Language Research (1). 1-10. (In Chinese).
  50. Zhao, Xiufeng. 2013. An integrated model of multimodal metaphor construction: Taking political cartoons as an example. Foreign Language Studies (5). 1-7. (In Chinese).
  51. Zhu, Yongsheng. 2007. Theoretical basis and research methods of multimodal discourse analysis. Journal of Foreign Languages (5). 82-86. (In Chinese).

Copyright (c) 2023 Guan S., Sun Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies