Development of public-private partnership in Belarus

Cover Page


In the Republic of Belarus, the authorities chose public-private partnership as an alternative to privatization which allows to keep socially important objects in the state property. The results of the survey of entrepreneurs and civil servants show the readiness of the authorities and business for equal partnership under the proclaimed socially oriented market economy. On the example of the metropolitan region, the authors analyzed the institutional-adaptation period in the development of public-private partnership in Belarus. The sociological approach to the study of public-private partnership aims at considering the relationship ‘power-business-society’ as a system of interdependent actions of civil servants, entrepreneurs and population. The analysis of behavioral strategies of participants of this interaction was conducted through their social expectations with the methods of expert surveys of entrepreneurs and civil servants and an opinion poll of the population of Minsk. The authors made the following conclusions: society is only an observer due to the poor knowledge of public-private partnership; the behavioral strategies of entrepreneurs are determined by regulatory-legal factors, of civil servants - by system-legal factors; the key barrier for the public-private partnership projects is the low assessment of one’s qualifications by civil servants and entrepreneurs; entrepreneurs consider civil servants as competitors in conflict situations and define their style of behavior as ‘pressing’; the state prefers contracts as the main form of interaction with business, which emphasizes the independence of partners. Therefore, the state and entrepreneurs take risks and responsibilities in the public-private partnership projects in the agreed shares, and the authorities fully control such projects.

About the authors

I. A. Andras

Belarusian State University

Author for correspondence.
Kalvariyskaya St., 9, Minsk, 220004, Belarus

A. V. Kabiak

Belarusian State University

Kalvariyskaya St., 9, Minsk, 220004, Belarus


  1. Varnavsky V.G. (Ed.) Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnyorstvo: teoriya i praktika [Public Private Partnership: Theory and Practice]. Moscow; 2010 (In Russ.).
  2. Verkhovodko I. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo prihodit v Belarus [Public-private partnership comes to Belarus]. Yurist. 2016; 4 (In Russ.).
  3. Vorotnikov A.M., Korolyov V.A. Otsenka sostoyaniya gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnyorstva v regionah (po rezultatam monitoringa) [Assessment of the Public-Private Partnership in the Regions (the monitoring results)]. Moscow; 2009 (In Russ.).
  4. Gerasimenko A. Dengi — chastnye, delo — gosudarstvennoe [Money — private, business — public]. Direktor. 2014; 3 (In Russ.).
  5. Goosen E.V., Nikitenko S.M., Pakhomova E.O. Opyt realizatsii proektov GChP v Rossii [Implementation of the PPP-projects in Russia]. EKO. 2015; 2 (In Russ.).
  6. Deryabina M.A. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnyorstvo: teoriya i praktika [Public-private partnership: Theory and practice]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2008; 8 (In Russ.).
  7. Zakon Respubliki Belarus ot 30 dekabrya 2015 g. No 345-Z “O gosudarstvenno-chastnom partnerstve” [The Law of the Republic of Belarus of December 30, 2015 No. 345-Z “On Public-Private Partnership”]. files/G4P/Zakon-Respubliki-Belarus-o-GChP-2.pdf (In Russ.).
  8. Kozhenko Ya.V., Goloborodko A.Yu. Mezhdunarodnaya i otechestvennaya praktika otsenki effektivnosti kontraktnoj sistemy GChP na primere gosudarstvennyh zakupok [International and national estimates of the contract system of PPP efficiency on the example of state procurements]. Uspekhi Sovremennoj Nauki i Obrazovaniya. 2017; 3 (1) (In Russ.).
  9. Kuzina O.E. Bariery razvitiya gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v Rossii: socialny analiz [Barriers to the development of public-private partnership in Russia: A social analysis]. Sociologicheskij Zhurnal. 2011; 3 (In Russ.).
  10. Maloe i srednee predprinimatelstvo v Respublike Belarus [Small and Medium Business in the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk; 2016 (In Russ.).
  11. Proekty GChP Respubliki Belarus [Projects of PPP of the Republic of Belarus]. (In Russ.).
  12. Shavel S.A., Rakov A.A., Rubanov A.V., Smirnova R.A. Chto dumaet naselenie Belarusi o privatizatsii [What the Population of Belarus Thinks about Privatization]. Minsk; 1992 (In Russ.).
  13. Akintoye А., Hardcastle С., Beck M., Chinyio E., Asenova D. Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement. Construction Management and Economics. 2003; 21 (5).
  14. Blau P. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York; 1964.
  15. Kwak Y.H., Chih Y.Y., Ibbs C.W. Towards a comprehensive understanding of public private partnerships for infrastructure development. California Management Review. 2009; 51 (2).
  16. Thomas K.W., Kilmann R.H. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument //
  17. Wang S.Q. et al. Political risks: Analysis of key contract clauses in China’s BOT Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1999; 125 (3).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.



Abstract - 90

PDF (Russian) - 35




Copyright (c) 2020 Andras I.A., Kabiak A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies