Governmental Discussion on the Private Capital Participation in the Trans-Caspian Railway Construction in the Late XIX Century

Cover Page

Cite item

Full text / tables, figures

Abstract

The ambivalence of the approaches of Russian ministries at the end of the XIX century is demonstrated, in relation to public-private partnership in the framework of the implementation of the railway project in the Trans-Caspian General Government.There is presented a system of arguments in support of this approach and against it; the author clarifies the reason for the government’s rejection of the idea of public-private partnership in the construction of the Trans-Caspian railway. The source base of the study is the protocols of the meeting of the government commission, letters from government officials, statistical information on the turnover of commodities with Persia and other materials stored in the Foreign Policy Archive of the Russian Empire and in the Central State Archive of Moscow. The author concludes that the formal basis for rejecting the application of entrepreneurs for the implementation of this railway was the ineffectiveness of the financial model of their participation in the framework of this project. The real reason for this decision was the position of the officials of the government departments that opposed attracting private investors to the implementation of this transport project in the Central Asian region due to the military-strategic and geopolitical aspects.

About the authors

Saken Zh. Toktamysov

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: toktamysov-szh@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4284-9638
SPIN-code: 7711-5160

Ph.D. in History, Associate Professor of the Russian History Department

6, Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russia

References

  1. Akhmedzhanova, Z.K. K istorii stroitelstva zheleznykh dorog v Srednei Azii (1880-1917) [On the history of railway construction in Central Asia (1880-1917)]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1965 (in Russian).
  2. Annenkov, M.N. Zakaspiiskaia zheleznaia doroga, kak novyi put dlia sredneaziatskoi torgovli [Transcaspian railway as a new route for Central Asian trade]. St. Petersburg: Tipogradiia E. Evdokimova Publ., 1887 (in Russian).
  3. Gulishambarov, S.I. Ekonomicheskii obzor Turkestanskogo raiona, obsluzhivaemogo sredneaziatskoi zheleznoi dorogoi [Economic overview of the Turkestan region, served by the central asian railway]. Askhabad: Elektropechatnia Z.D. Dzhavrova Publ., 1913 (in Russian).
  4. Kitanina, T.M. Proniknovenie krupnogo rossiiskogo finansovogo kapitala v ekonomiku Srednei Azii v kontse XIX - nachale XX v. (Finansovo-promyshlennaia gruppa A.I. Putivlova i zheleznodorozhnoe stroitelstvo) [Pervasion of large Russian financial capital into the economy of Central Asia at the end of the XIX - beginning of the XX centuries (Financial and industrial group of A.I. Putivlov and railway construction)]. St. Petersburg: Gumanitarnaia Akademiia Publ., 2019 (in Russian).
  5. Litvinov, V.P. “First railway in Central Asia and its protection: legal historical aspect.” Power 29, no. 1 (2021): 240-246 (in Russian).
  6. Mazaev, N.A. “Transcaspian military railway as a factor of regional policy of the Russian Empire.” Lyudi imperii - imperiia lyudei: personalnaia i institutsionalnaia istoriia Aziatskikh okrain Rossii, 635-640. Omsk: Izdatelstvo Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. F.M. Dostoevskogo Publ., 2021 (in Russian).
  7. Petrov, Yu.I. “Private or government administration on the railways: Russia's choice in the second half of the XIX century.” Transport Law and Safety, no. 4 (2020): 180-187 (in Russian).
  8. Rozhkova, M.K. Ekonomicheskie sviazi Rossii so Srednei Aziei: 40-60-e gody XIX v. [Economic relations of Russia with Central Asia: 40-60s of the XIX century]. Moscow: izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR Publ., 1963 (in Russian).
  9. Shmidt, R.Z. “Vliianie Sredneaziatskoi zheleznoi dorogi na razvitie khlopkovodstva Turkestanskogo kraia (1880-1914) [The influence of the central asian railway on the development of cotton growing in the Turkestan region (1880-1914)].” In Proceedings of the Uzbek State University, no. 83 (1958): 139-161 (in Russian).
  10. Soloveva, A.M. Zheleznodorozhnyi transport Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX v. [Railway transport of Russia in the second half of XIX century]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1975 (in Russian).
  11. Testov, V. N. “Railway control-financial reform: sources and consequences (80 - first half 90th XIX of century).” In Bulletin of the State University of Education, no. 1 (2010): 49-55 (in Russian).
  12. Timaev, K.A. “K dorozhnomu voprosu v Turkestane [To the road issue in Turkestan].” Trudy III S’’ezda deiatelei po selskomu khoziaistvu Turkestanskogo kraya. Tashkent: Turkestanskoe selsko-khoziaistvennoe obshhestvo Publ., 1914 (in Russian).
  13. Vaczlik, I.Ya. Zakaspiiskaia zheleznaia doroga I eia znachenie i budushhnost [Transcaspian railway: its significance and future]. St. Petersburg: Parovaia skorpechatnia Iablonskii i Perott Publ., 1888 (in Russian).
  14. Zenkov, P. Turkestanskaia zheleznaia doroga v sviazi s drugimi ekonomicheskimi voprosami kraia [Turkestan railway in connection with other economic issues of the region]. Moscow: Tipografiya M.P. Shchepkina Publ.,1881 (in Russian).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. Expenses and income of the Trans-Caspian Railway in 1885–1895, thousand roubles

Download (126KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Toktamysov S.Z.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies