State Innovation Policy in the Conditions of Structural Reorganization of the Economy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Currently, the main role of the state in the implementation of the state innovation policy is to create infrastructure for innovation and to finance new developments and fundamental research. In today’s world, the speed of change is increasing, and the role of the state becomes even more important, especially in times of crisis and economic restructuring. State innovation policy can accelerate the pace of development of individual industries, stimulate inter-industry cooperation, and help to remove barriers to innovation (legislative and infrastructural). This study is devoted to the formation of effective innovation policy in the conditions of economic restructuring associated with the economic crisis, heavy international political and economic environment. In order to analyze and make recommendations on innovation policy, such main innovation factors are analyzed as: financing, creation of infrastructure, customer or initiator of innovations, development of competencies, as well as creation of innovation culture. The role of the state in the above factors is paramount. The study analyzes the data presented for the last 5 years and provides forecasts for 2023.

About the authors

Rozdon J. Mukhitdinov

The National Research University - Higher School of Economics (HSE University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: rmuhitdinov@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2987-695X

Postgraduate Student at the School of Politics and Governance

20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 101000

References

  1. Makroekonomicheskii opros Banka Rossii [Macroeconomic Questionnaire of the Bank of Russia]. URL: http://www.cbr.ru/statistics/ddkp/mo_br/ (accessed: 10.10.2022) (In Russ.).
  2. Alyab’ev S. i dr, Innovatsii v Rossii-neischerpaemyi istochnik rosta [Innovation in Russia Is an Inexhaustible Source of Growth]. Tsentr po razvitiyu innovatsii McKinsey Innovation Practice. 2018. 112 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Sukmanov E.V., Chemykhin A.V. Predprinimatel’stvo kak fenomen razvitiya innovatsionnoi ekonomiki (kontseptsiya I. Shumpetera) [Entrepreneurship as a Phenomenon of Innovation Economy Development (I. Schumpeter’s Concept)]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika. 2010;8:60–64 (In Russ.).
  4. Tax Incentives for Research and Development: Trends and Issues. OECD. Paris; 2003. 560 p.
  5. Nelson R.R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
  6. Barabashev A.G. Krizis gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i ego vliyanie na osnovnye administrativnye paradigmy gosudarstva i byurokratii. [The Crisis of Public Administration and its Impact on the Main Administrative Paradigms of the State and Bureaucracy]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya. 2016;3:163–194 (In Russ.).
  7. Acharya V., Zhaoxia Xu. Financial Dependence and Innovation: The Case of Public Versus Private Firms. Journal of Financial Economics. 2017; 2 (124): 223–243.
  8. Ryapukhina V.N., Doroshenko Yu.,A. Problema finansirovaniya nauki v kontekste ee effektivnoi integratsii v innovatsionnuyu sistemu v Rossii [The Problem of Science Funding in the Context of its Effective Integration into the Innovation System in Russia]. Vestnik BGTU im. V.G Shukhova. 2018;3:135–146 (In Russ.).
  9. Szarowska Ir. Does Public R&D Expenditure Matter for Economic Growth? Journal of International Studies. 2017; 2 (10): 90–103.
  10. Kolosova M.A. Opportunisticheskoe povedenie gosudarstva na rynke doveritel’nykh blag. Sovremennaya ekonomika: aktual’nye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii: sbornik statei VII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Opportunistic Behavior of the State in the Market for Fiduciary Goods. Modern Economy: Current Issues, Achievements and Innovations: A Collection of Articles of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Penza: MTsNS «Nauka i Prosveshchenie»; 2017: 14–18 (In Russ.).
  11. Nikulina O.V., Krstovski Ya.Ya. Rol’ i znachenie gosudarstvennoi podderzhki v finansovom obespechenii innovatsionnoi deyatel’nosti sovremennykh kompanii [Role and Importance of State Support in Financial Support of Innovation Activity of Modern Companies]. Ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2019; 1 (53): 3–9 (In Russ.).
  12. Korotkovskaya E.V. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka innovatsionnoi aktivnosti v usloviyakh finansovogo krizisa [State Support for Innovation Activity in the Context of the Financial Crisis]. Povolzhskii torgovo-ekonomicheskii zhurnal. 2010;3:30a-37 (In Russ.).
  13. Hottenrott H., Lopes-Bento S., Reinhilde V. Direct and Cross Scheme Effects in a Research and Development Subsidy Program. Research Policy. 2017; 6 (46): 1118–1132.
  14. Vanino E., Roper S., Becker B. Knowledge to Money: Assessing the Business Performance Effects of Publicly-funded R&D Grants. Research Policy. 2019; 7 (48): 1714–1737.
  15. Carboni O.A. The Effect of Public Support on Investment and R&D: An Empirical Evaluation on European Manufacturing Firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;17:282–295.
  16. Catozzella A., Vivarelli M. The Possible Adverse Impact of Innovation Subsidies: Some Evidence from Italy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2016; 2 (12): 351–368.
  17. Charbel E., Profiroiu C. Innovation in Public Administration Reform: A Strategic Reform through NPM, ICT, and e-Governance. A Comparative Analysis between Lebanon and Romania. Administratie si Management Public. 2020;35:75–89.
  18. Carvalho A. Wishful Thinking about R&D Policy Targets: What Governments Promise and What They Actually Deliver. Science and Public Policy. 2018; 3 (45): 373–391.
  19. Leyden D., Link A. Public Sector Entrepreneurship: US Technology and Innovation Policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  20. Il’ina I.E. Problemy povysheniya effektivnosti gosudarstvennykh raskhodov na NIOKTR [Problems of Increasing the Efficiency of Public Expenditures on R&D]. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie. 2015; 1 (10): 51–73 (In Russ.).
  21. Demenko O.G., Gretchenko A.A. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie innovatsionnoi deyatel’nosti v promyshlennosti: puti razvitiya na sovremennom etape [State Regulation of Innovation Activity in the Industry: Ways of Development at the Present Stage]. Vestnik altaiskoi nauki. 2015; 3–4 (25–26): 210–214 (In Russ.).
  22. Rybalko M.I. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie innovacionnoy predprinimatel’skoy deqtel’nosti: organizacionnie, ekonomicheskie, finansovje i normativno-pravovje aspekti. Strategiya social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya obshestva: upravlencheskie, pravovje, xozyaystvennie aspekti: sbornik nauchnyix statey 5-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno- prakticheskoy konferencii [State Regulation of Innovative Entrepreneurial Activity: Organizational, Economic, Financial and Regulatory Aspects. Strategy of Socio-economic Development of Society: Managerial, Legal, Economic Aspects: A Collection of Scientific Articles of the 5th International Scientific and Practical conference]. Kursk: ZAO “Universitetskaq kniga”; 2015: 259–261 (In Russ.).
  23. Jaffe A. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press; 2002
  24. Venaik S. Avoiding Uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies. 2010; 41 (8): 1294–1315.
  25. Karlson N., Christian S., Karl W. Bureaucrats or Markets in Innovation Policy? — a Critique of the Entrepreneurial State. The Review of Austrian Economics. 2021; 34 (1): 81–95.
  26. Bhatt S., Sharma A., Deepak K. Relationship Between Cultural Social Norms and Availability of Entrepreneurial Funding: Mediating Effect of Government Policies, Priorities, Support and Ease of Doing Business. International Journal of Manage. 2020; 9 (11): 803–820.
  27. Shinkl G., Suchard J. Innovation in Newly Public Firms: The Influence of Government Grants, Venture Capital, and Private Equity. Australian Journal of Management. 2019; 44 (2): 248–281.
  28. Ellis J., Jared S., Roger W. Corruption and Corporate Innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2020; 55 (7): 2124–2149.
  29. Huang Q., Tao Y. Does Political Corruption Impede Firm Innovation? Evidence from the United States. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 202; 56 (1): 213–248.
  30. Van Reenen J. Innovation Policies to Boost Productivity. Washington, DC: The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution; 2020.
  31. Eide A. Growth Aspirations in SMEs: Managerial Determinants and Organizational Outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2021; 4 (28): 640–665.
  32. Prosalova V., Loksha A., Petrova N. Mirovyye innovatsionnyye reytingi kak otsenka innovatsionnogo razvitiya gosudarstva [World Innovation Ratings as an Assessment of Innovative Development of the State]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo. 2019;8:129 (In Russ.).
  33. Ivanov V.G. The Influence of Dynamics of Export on the Level of Political Stability (on Example of Russia) [Vlijanie dinamiki jeksporta na uroven’ politicheskoj stabil’nosti na primere Rossii]. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2012;3:46–70 (In Russ.).
  34. Nikonov V. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka predprinimatelstva v razvitykh stranakh i adaptatsiya opyta v Rossii [State Support of Entrepreneurship in Developed Countries and Adaptation of Experience in Russia]. Gosudarstvennoye i munitsipalnoye upravleniye. Uchenyye zapiski. 2017;1:244–249 (In Russ.).
  35. Telnova N., Shekhovtsova S., Shatalova O. Funktsionirovaniye rossiyskogo predprinimatelstva v rynochnoy retsessionnoy srede. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy koferentsii: «Aktualnyye problemy ekonomicheskoy nauki». [Functioning of Russian Entrepreneurship in a Market Recessionary Environment. A Collection of Materials from the International Scientific and Practical Conference: “Current Problems of Economic Science”]. Armavir: FGBOU VO “Armavirskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheksiy universitet”; 2017: 240–244 (In Russ.).
  36. Tekhnologicheskiy proyekt «Gosraskhody» [“Public Expenditure” Technology Project]. URL: https://spending.gov.ru/np/ (accessed: 12.12.2022) (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2023 Mukhitdinov R.J.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies