Developing a Russian-Language Wisdom Diagnostics Questionnaire

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Wisdom is an ancient concept that has acquired a new status in modern psychology. Wisdom has been proven to promote both optimal self-development and the well-being of others. However, its study requires a reliable methodological arsenal. In Russian science, work on creating methods for studying wisdom is just beginning. The subject of this study is a methodological toolkit for the empirical study of wisdom. The purpose of the study is to analyze and evaluate various methods accumulated in international psychology in recent years, as well as to create an improved version of the author’s questionnaire for diagnosing wisdom. The author discuss various classifications of methods for diagnosing wisdom proposed, in particular, by such authors as R. Sternberg, W. Staudinger & J. Glück, I. Grossmann. The advantages and limitations of the available methods are considered. It should be noted that quite reasonably there are a large number of self-assessment methods (questionnaires) among them. The empirical part of the work is concerned with identifying the factor structure of the original version of the author’s questionnaire and its verification. The study involved 1,078 persons, including 621 women and 457 men aged 18-72. The respondents were residents of various Russian cities with higher or secondary specialized education. The IBM SPSS Statistics 18.0 and Amos 18.0 software packages were used for calculations. The conducted exploratory factor analysis revealed the four-factor structure of the developed wisdom diagnostics questionnaire (WDQ). The adequacy of the obtained model feature was proved by the confirmatory factor analysis. The empirical structure of the WDQ, formed from four correlating factors with high internal consistency, corresponds to the theoretical model, which includes four indicators: (1) cognitive sphere, (2) behavioral features, (3) humanistic orientation, and (4) spontaneity of the emotional sphere. In accordance with this model, a modified version of the WDQ has been developed. In practical terms, this will expand the possibilities of diagnosing and subsequently developing the individual’s abilities to find wise solutions to critical social or interpersonal problems.

About the authors

Natalya N. Mekhtikhanova

Yaroslavl Demidov State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: natnik1@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1531-6265

Ph.D. in Psychology, is Associate Professor of the General Psychology Department

14 Sovetskaya St, Yaroslavl, 150003, Russian Federation

References

  1. Antsiferova, L.I. (2004). Wisdom and its manifestations during the course of life. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 25(3), 17–24. (In Russ.)
  2. Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503025003004
  3. Asadi, S., Khorshidi, R., & Glück, J. (2019). Iranian children’s knowledge about wisdom. Cognitive Development, 52, 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100814
  4. Baltes, P.B., & Staudinger, U.M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.122
  5. Bangen, K.J., Meeks, T.W., & Jeste, D.V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(12), 1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.020
  6. Bergsma, A., & Ardelt, M. (2012). Self-reported wisdom and happiness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9275-5
  7. Brienza, J.P., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Social class and wise reasoning about interpersonal conflicts across regions, persons and situations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171870. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1870
  8. Byrne, В.M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644
  9. Carmines, E.G., & McIver, J.P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G.W. Bohrnstedt & E.F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  10. Clayton, V. (1975). Erikson’s theory of human development as it applies to the aged: Wisdom as contradictive cognition. Human Development, 18(1–2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271479
  11. Cochran, W.G. (1952). The χ2 test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729380
  12. Drovosekov, S.E., Mitina, O.V., & Nizovskikh, N.A. (2019). The scale of self-assessment of wisdom by J. Webster (SAWS): Psychometric analysis of the Russian version. Herald of Vyatka State University, (3), 160–171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25730/VSU.7606.19.047
  13. Glück, J. (2018). Measuring wisdom: Existing approaches, continuing challenges, and new developments. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(8), 1393–1403. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx140
  14. Glück, J. (2022). How MORE life experience fosters wise coping. In M. Munroe & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Post-Traumatic Growth to Psychological Well-Being. Lifelong Learning Book Series (vol. 30, pp. 131–149). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15290-0_14
  15. Glück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L., Straßer, I., & Wiedermann, W. (2013). How to measure wisdom: Content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00405
  16. Goryanova, L.N. (2012). Structures of the concepts ‘MUDROST’ and ‘WISDOM’ and ways of objectifying their features in the Russian and English language worldviews (Ph.D. in Philology Thesis abstract). Kemerovo: Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the RAS. (In Russ.)
  17. Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N.M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J.P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M.A., Hu, C.S., Nusbaum, H.C., & Vervaeke, J. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2020.1750917
  18. Gulliksen, H., & Tukey, J.W. (1958). Reliability for the law of comparative judgment. Psychometrika, 23(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289008
  19. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  20. Levenson, M.R., Jennings, P.A., Aldwin, C.M., & Shiraishi, R.W. (2005). Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.2190/xrxm-fyra-7u0x-grc0
  21. Mekhtikhanova, N.N., & Kutuzova, A.B. (2019). The problem of defining the phenomenon of wisdom in psychological science. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Imeni P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, (1), 97–100. (In Russ.)
  22. Mekhtikhanova, N.N., & Smulson, M.L. (2015). About interrelation of wisdom and success. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2(1), 124–128. (In Russ.)
  23. Mekhtikhanova, N.N., Murzina, J.S., & Rusakova, J.E. (2020). Wisdom as a factor in preventing emotional burnout among medical professionals. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17(4), 685–704. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-4-685-704
  24. Mickler, C., & Staudinger, U.M. (2008). Personal wisdom: Validation and age-related differences of a performance measure. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013928
  25. Nasledov, A.D. (2013). IBM SP SS Statistics 20 and AMOS: Professional statistical data analysis. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
  26. Nikitina, E.A. (2019). Ideas about wisdom of people of different age. In A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Nikitina & N.E. Kharlamenkova (Eds.), Methodology, Theory, History of Personality Psychology (pp. 425–432). Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the RAS Publ. (In Russ.)
  27. Nikitina, E.A. (2021). Modern research of wisdom: State and prospects. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 42(2), 15–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920014228-6
  28. Ognev, A.S., Goncharov, Yu.N., & Postnikova, N.V. (2002). Wisdom as an acmeological phenomenon. Akmeologiya, (3), 17–22. (In Russ.)
  29. Ozhiganova, G.V. (2019) Psychology of silence and productive life activity in the context of wisdom. Vestnik Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 25(3), 51–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2019-25-3-51-55
  30. Paul, U.K., & Baltes, B. (2003). Wisdom-related knowledge: Affective, motivational, and interpersonal correlates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1104–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254506
  31. Schmit, D.E., Muldoon, J., & Pounders, K. (2012). What is wisdom? The development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(2), 39–54.
  32. Staudinger, U.M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131659
  33. Sternberg, R.J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347
  34. Sternberg, R.J., & Glück, J. (Eds.). (2019). The Cambridge handbook of wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272
  35. Thomas, M.L., Bangen, K.J., Ardelt, M., & Jeste, D.V. (2017). Development of a 12-item abbreviated Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS-12): Item selection and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115595714
  36. Thomas, M.L., Bangen, K.J., Palmer, B.W., Sirkin Martin, A., Avanzino, J.A., Depp, C.A., Glorioso, D., Daly, R.E., & Jeste, D.V. (2019). A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: The San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 108, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.005
  37. Thomas, S., & Kunzmann, U. (2013). Age differences in wisdom-related knowledge: Does the age relevance of the task matter? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(6), 897–905. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt076
  38. Webster, J.D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020782619051
  39. Zacher, H., McKenna, B., & Rooney, D. (2013). Effects of self-reported wisdom on happiness: Not much more than emotional intelligence? Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1697–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9404-9
  40. Zhuravlev, A.L., & Charlamenkova, N.E. (2014). Wisdom of a person (to 90th anniversary of L.I. Antsiferova). Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 35(5), 99–101. (In Russ.)
  41. Znakov, V.V. (2019). Dynamic approach to the research of the personality and the procedural analysis in psychology of the subject. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 40(5), 27–34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920006073-6

Copyright (c) 2022 Mekhtikhanova N.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies