Adaptation of R. Schwarzer’s Proactive Attitudes Scale: Validation and Psychometric Testing on a Sample of Russian Youth

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of studying proactive coping and proactive attitudes in early adulthood is determined by the fact that planning the future and predicting difficult situations are important skills for an adult. In theoretical terms, our study is based on R. Schwarzer’s approach to proactive coping and proactive attitudes as well as the research work of Russian authors on creating and adapting methods for studying proactive coping (E.P. Belinskaya, A.I. Erzin, E.S. Starchenkova, T.L. Kryukova, E.V. Kuftyak, and others). The purpose of the study was to describe the psychometric indicators of The Proactive Attitudes Scale by R. Schwarzer on a sample of Russian university students. The research objectives were as follows: (1) to make an adequate translation of the original version of the scale; (2) to determine the factor structure of the scale and evaluate its internal consistency and discriminativity; and (3) to estimate the test-retest reliability and validity of the scale as well as the average indicators for the period of early adulthood. The following research methods were involved: the construct validity was examined using A. Erzin’s Proactive Behavior Technique and R. Schwarzer’s Self-Efficacy Scale; the external validity was assessed using the Proactive Coping Behavior Technique (adapted by E.P. Belinskaya et al.), Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (adapted by A. Syrtsova et al.) and Folkman and Lazarus’ Ways of Coping Questionnaire (adapted by T.L. Kryukova et al.). The sample consisted of 467 people aged 20-25 (312 women and 155 men). The main study (for scale standardization and validation) involved 400 respondents (272 women and 128 men); 67 respondents participated in the second survey (after 2 and 4 weeks). The study was conducted online in Google Forms. An exploratory factor analysis made it possible to single out the one-dimensionality of the scale (the Possibility of Independent Choice factor) and its acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, α = 0.78). The indicators of test-retest reliability and discrimination were satisfactory. The scale showed acceptable external and construct validity, the average values on the scale were highlighted, and gender differences were presented. The Proactive Attitudes Scale has the necessary psychometric characteristics and can be used for express diagnostics of young people.

About the authors

Anna A. Bekhter

Pacific National University

Email: behter2004@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1017-558X

PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, is Associate Professor of the Psychological Department, Director of the Psychological Center

68 Karla Marksa St, Khabarovsk, 68000, Russian Federation

Olesya A. Filatova

Pacific National University

Author for correspondence.
Email: 0409800911@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4948-3678

Lecturer, Postgraduate Student of the Psychological Department

68 Karla Marksa St, Khabarovsk, 68000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Agadullina, E.R., Belinskaya, E.P., & Dzhuraeva, M.R. (2020). Personal and situational predictors of proactive coping with difficult life situations: cross-cultural differences. National Psychological Journal, (3), 30–38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2020.0304
  2. Ananiev, B.G. (2001). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
  3. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (2005). Psychological testing. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
  4. Atitsogbe, K.A., Hansenne, M., Pari, P., & Rossier, J. (2020). Normal personality, the dark triad, proactive attitude and perceived employability: A cross-cultural study in Belgium, Switzerland and Togo. Psychologica Belgica, 60(1), 217–235. http://doi.org/10.5334/pb.520
  5. Balashova, E.Yu. (2017). Perception of time and some methodical possibilities of its study in clinical psychological research. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 6(2), 97–108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2017060208
  6. Bechter, A.A. (2019). Research оf proactive coping behavior and proactive attitudes at younger pupils: Statement of the problem. Psikhologiya Stressa i Sovladayushchego Povedeniya: Vyzovy, Resursy, Blagopoluchie: Conference Proceedings (vol. 1, pp. 314–318). Kostroma: Kostroma State University Publ. (In Russ.)
  7. Bekhter, A.A. (2020). Psychological analysis of reactive-proactive coping of drug-dependent men. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 9(4), 21–35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2020090402
  8. Bekhter, A.A., & Filatova, O.A. (2021). Vremennaya perspektiva i reaktivnye strategii kak faktory proaktivnogo sovladaniya v molodom vozraste Anan'evskie Chteniya – 2021: Conference Proceedings (pp. 173–174). Saint Petersburg: Skifia-print. (In Russ.)
  9. Bekhter, A.A., & Golovacheva, M.V. (2020). Relationship of styles of proactive coping behavior of students and general stress level. Lichnost’ v Obrazovatel’nom Prostranstve: Variativnost’ Podkhodov k Soderzhaniyu i Tekhnologiyam Psikhologo-Pedagogicheskogo Soprovozhdeniya: Conference Proceedings (pp. 34–39). Khabarovsk: Pacific National University. (In Russ.)
  10. Bekhter, A.A., Gagarin, A.V., & Filatova, O.A. (2021). Reactive and proactive coping behaviors in Russian first-year students: Diagnostics and development opportunities. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 18(1), 85–103. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-85-103
  11. Belinskaya, E.P. (2021). Youth perceptions of difficult life situations: Cross-cultural differences. New Psychological Research, (4), 109–121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2021_01_04_06
  12. Belinskaya, E.P., Vecherin, A.V., & Agadullina, E.R. (2018). Proactive coping inventory: Adaptation to a non-clinical sample and the predictive capability. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 7(3), 192–211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2018070312
  13. Bhat, A.M., Najar, S.A., Dar, M., & Saini, N. (2013). Self-efficacy and proactive attitude among patients with diabetes. Indian Journal of Health And Wellbeing, 4(2), 333–338.
  14. Bui, T.H.T., Nguyen, T.N.T., Pham, H.D., Tran, C.T., & Ha, T.H. (2021). The mediating role of self-compassion between proactive coping and perceived stress among students. Science Progress, 104(2), 368504211011872. http://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211011872
  15. Bukharina, A.Yu., & Tolstykh, N.N. (2019). Time perspective and temporal competence as factors of learning motivation. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 8(2), 36–48. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2019080204
  16. Dumitrescu, A.L., Dogaru, B.C., Dogaru, C.D., & Manolescu, B. (2011). The relationship between self-reported oral health, self-regulation, proactive coping, procrastination and proactive attitude. Community Dental Health, 28(2), 170–173.
  17. Erzin, A.I. (2014). Pro-active behavior technique: scales description and primary assessment of psychometric indicators. Aktual'nye Problemy Psikhologicheskogo Znaniya, (4), 59–69. (In Russ.)
  18. Erzin, A.I., & Antokhin, E.Yu. (2015). Aprobatsiya metodiki diagnostiki proaktivnosti v klinicheskikh vyborkakh. Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika, (5), 493–500. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2070-8955.2015.5.13777
  19. Freire, C., Ferradás, M.D.M., Regueiro, B, Rodríguez, S., Valle, A., & Núñez, J.C. (2020). Coping strategies and self-efficacy in university students: A person-centered approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841
  20. Greenglass, E., Schwarzer, R., Jakubiec, D., Fiksenbaum, L., & Taubert, S. (1999). The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR): Proceeding of the 20th International Conference. Cracow, Poland, July 12–14, 1999. Retrieved February 9, 2021, from https://estherg.info.yorku.ca/files/2014/09/pci.pdf
  21. Grigaitytė, I., Österman, K., & Björkqvist, K. (2019). Proactive attitudes towards integration and intense group identification, in a sample of the Swedish-speaking minority of Western Finland. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 6(3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v6i3.p23-36
  22. Griva, F., & Anagnostopoulos, F. (2010). Positive psychological states and anxiety: The mediating effect of proactive coping. Psychological Reports, 107(3), 795–804. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.20.PR0.107.6.795-804
  23. Kovyazina, M.S., & Fomina, K.A. (2016). Neuropsychological potential of the method of “fixed set” of D.N. Uznadze. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 9(3), 91–102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2016090308
  24. Kryukova, T.L., Kuftyak, E.V., & Zamyshlyaeva, M.S. (2005). Adaptatsiya metodik, izuchenie sovladayushchego povedeniya Way of Coping Questionnaire (oprosnik sposobov sovladaniya R. Lazarusa i S. Folkmana). Psikhologicheskaya Diagnostika, (3), 57–76. (In Russ.)
  25. Kuftyak, E.V., & Bekhter, A.A. (2020). Stress i proaktivnoe sovladayushchee povedenie v period pandemii COVID-19: Dannye onlain oprosa. Medicinskaâ Psihologiâ v Rossii, 12(6), 2. (In Russ.)
  26. Kuftyak, E.V., & Sekatskaya, E.O. (2021). Svyaz’ proaktivnogo sovladaniya i individual’no-lichnostnykh pokazatelei v period vzroslosti. Anan’evskie Chteniya – 2021: Conference Proceedings (pp. 682–683). Saint Petersburg: Skifia-print. (In Russ.)
  27. Leontiev, D.A. (2007). Psikhologiya smysla: Priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoi real'nosti. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)
  28. Nabeel, T., & Zafar, H. (2012). Parental attachment and proactive attitude among adolescents. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 281–301.
  29. Nakano, G., & Yamoria, K. (2021). Disaster risk reduction education that enhances the proactive attitudes of learners: A bridge between knowledge and behavior. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 66, 102620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102620
  30. Nakano, G., Suwa, S., Gautam, A., & Yamori, K. (2020). Long-term evaluation of proactive attitudes toward disaster education in Nepal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101866
  31. Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. (2015). The psychological sovereignty as a predictor of emotional resilience in youth and early adulthood. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 4(1), 15–28. (In Russ.)
  32. Nasledov, A.D. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics 20 i AMOS: Professional'nyi statisticheskii analiz dannykh. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
  33. Petrash, M.D. (2011). Psychological content and factors of incipient professional-development crises at the early stages of professional activity. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 4(4), 88–100. (In Russ.)
  34. Pilishvili, T.S., & Starostina, A.A. (2017). Features of stress resistance of students with different time perspective. Acmeology, (1), 94–97. (In Russ.)
  35. Romek, V.G., Schwarzer, R., & Jemsalem, M. (1996). Russian version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Foreign Psychology, (7), 71–77. (In Russ.)
  36. Sachs, J. (2003). Psychometric properties of the proactive attitude scale in students at the University of Hong Kong. Psychological Reports, 93(3Pt1), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3.805
  37. Schmitz, G.S., & Schwarzer, R. (1999). Proaktive Einstellung von Lehrern: Konstruktbeschreibung und psychometrische Analysen. Zeitschrift für Empirische Pädagogik, 13(1), 3–27.
  38. Schwarzer, R. (2001). Stress, resources, and proactive coping. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 400–407.
  39. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
  40. Sekatskaya, E.O. (2020). The temporal perspective of the individual as a determinant of proactive coping behavior. Nauka: Kompleksnye Problemy, (2), 19–24. (In Russ.)
  41. Sircova, A., Sokolova, O.V., & Mitina, O.V. (2008). Adaptation of F. Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Psihologicheskij Zhurnal, 29(3), 101–109. (In Russ.)
  42. Sivrikova, N.V., Ivanov, F.A., & Kharlanova, E.M. (2021). Correlation of proactivity and satisfaction with distance learning during a pandemic COVID-19. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 9(5), 03PSMN521. (In Russ.)
  43. Slabinsky, V., Voischeva, N., Neznanov, N., Nikiforov, G., & Ulyanov, I. (2019). Psychological features of reactive, active and proactive types of coping behavior: Level approach. Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology, 10(3), 539–545. (In Russ.)
  44. Slabinsky, V.Y., Voishcheva, N.M., Kabieva, A.A., & Levadnaya, M.O. (2021). Estimating the efficiency of the “Proactive Behavior Training” in the formation of the doctor’s adherence to preventive work. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 18(4), 893–914. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-4-893-914
  45. Slabinsky, V.Yu., Voishcheva, N.M., Chekhlatyi, E.I., & Podsadnyi, S.A. (2018). Professional burnout and time perception in posttraumatic stress disorder. Human Ecology, (2), 45–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33396/1728-0869-2018-2-45-50
  46. Sławińska, M., & Kubasiński, S. (2021). Designing the conditions for the proactive attitude of employees to increase organizational resilience. European Research Studies Journal, XXIV(5), 697–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2760
  47. Sleczka, P., Braun, B., Grüne, B., Bühringer, G., & Kraus, L. (2016). Proactive coping and gambling disorder among young men. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(4), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.080
  48. Starchenkova, E. (2020). Phenomenon of Proactive coping behavior in occupational health psychology. Organizacionnaâ Psihologiâ, 10(4), 156–183.
  49. Starchenkova, E., Nikiforov, G., Vodopyanova, N., Dudchenko, Z., & Rodionova, E. (2019). Interrelation of the attitude to time, proactive coping behavior, and burnout syndrome among teachers of the higher school. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Development of Cross-Border Regions: Economic, Social and Security Challenges (ICSDCBR 2019): Proceeding of the International Conference (pp. 922–926). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsdcbr-19.2019.190
  50. Starchenkova, E.S. (2009). The concept of proactive coping behavior. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Education, (1–2), 198–205. (In Russ.)
  51. Starchenkova, E.S. (2016). Proactive coping with professionally difficult situations and stresses at work as a resource of occupational health. Psikhologiya Stressa i Sovladayushchego Povedeniya: Resursy, Zdorov'e, Razvitie: Conference Proceedings (vol. 2, pp. 191–193). Kostroma: Nekrasov Kostroma State University. (In Russ.)
  52. Stephanou, G., Gkavras, G., & Doulkeridou, М. (2013). The role of teachers’ self- and collective-efficacy beliefs on their job satisfaction and experienced emotions in school. Psychology, 4(3A), 268–278. http://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.43A040
  53. Tsilmak, A.N. (2012). Typology of life-activity-related mindsets of personality. Psychological-Educational Studies, 4(1), 380–390. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2022 Bekhter A.A., Filatova O.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies