A Study of the Scientist’s Image in the Context of S. Moscovici’s Theory of Social Representations

Cover Page

Cite item


The article describes the scientific and social aspects of the functioning of the scientific school created by S. Mosсoviсi, revealing various forms of this association: a research team, a scientific direction, an ‘invisible’ college. The authors focus on the possibility of studying social representations through the inclusion of new analytical methods in the diagnostic toolkit, in particular, iconographic documents and images of a social object, which indicates the current stage of the functioning of S. Mosсoviсi’s scientific school. The formation of social representations not only through verbal associations but also through drawings is explored by the authors through the example of how adolescents develop their social representations of a scientist. The purpose of this study is to highlight the categorical features of the image of a scientist in modern Russian adolescents, identified using the DAST drawing technique. The hypothesis of the research is the assumption that the system of social representations of a scientist among Russian adolescents contains both stable indicators of a person’s belonging to the professional scientific community and variable contextual elements of the scientist’s image, whereas the degree of expression and the ratio of stable and contextual elements reflect the characteristics of the scientist’s image in domestic respondents. The Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST) technique was used as the main diagnostic tool aimed at identifying adolescent representations of a scientist based on iconographic associations.The obtained drawings were analyzed by the expert evaluation method, involving the procedures of correlation and factor analysis. The results of the study show that Russian adolescents generally have a stereotypical representation of a scientist associated with the use of general indicators of external appearance, which determine the professional affiliation of the character depicted. Differences were found in the frequency of using stable and contextual iconographic elements of drawings. It has been shown that it is possible to use the drawing technique as a diagnostic tool for identifying social representations of a scientist based on an analysis of the meaning of an object through its iconographic fixation.

About the authors

Elena A. Volodarskaya

S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: eavolod@gmail.com

Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher at the Center for Organization of Science and Science Studies

14 Baltiyskaya St, Moscow, 125315, Russian Federation


  1. Anastassios, E., & Koutsianou, A. (2018). Greek primary school students’ images of scientists and their work: has anything changed? Research in Science & Technological Education, 36, (1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1366899
  2. Banchefsky. S., Westfall. J., Park. B., & Judd. C. (2016). But You Don’t Look Like A Scientist!: Women Scientists with Feminine Appearance are Deemed Less Likely to be Scientists. Sex Roles, 75(3–4), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1
  3. Bodzin, A., & Gehringer, M. (2011). Can meeting actual scientists change students’ perceptions of scientists? Science and Children, 39(1), 36–41.
  4. Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce37-30670213
  5. Dontsov, A.I., & Belokrylova, G.M. (1999) Professional representations of student psychologists. Voprosy Psilhologii, (2), 42–51. (In Russ.)
  6. Dontsov, A.I., & Emelyanova, T.P. (1985). Social representations as a subject of experimental research in modern French social psychology. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology, (1), 95–108. (In Russ.)
  7. Dushina, S.A., & Kupriyanov, V.A. (2020a). Ideya i real'nost' nauchnoy kommunikatsii v akademicheskikh sotsial'nykh setyakh. Vestnik Rossiyskogo fonda fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. Gumanitarnyye i obshchestvennyye nauki, (3), 81–91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22204/2587-8956-2020-100-03-81-91
  8. Dushina, S.A., & Kupriyanov, V.A. (2020b). Nauka kak chastnoye delo. K voprosu o kommertsializatsii issledovaniy. Upravleniye Naukoy: Teoriya i Praktika, 2(3), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.3. (In Russ.)
  9. Fando, R.A. (2016). Karikatura kak istoriko-nauchnyy istochnik. In. E.V. Minina (Ed.), Istoriya nauki: Istochniki, pamyatniki, naslediye: Vtoryye chteniya po istoriografii i istochnikovedeniyu istorii nauki i tekhniki (pp. 54–66). Moscow: Yanus-K Publ. (In Russ.)
  10. Farr, R. (1994). Attitudes, social representations and social attitudes. Papers on Social Representations, (3), 30–33.
  11. Gabidulina, S.E. (1986). To the substantiation of the methodology “Drawing of a nonexistent animal”. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology, (4), 56–57. (In Russ.)
  12. Gavrilova, Ye.V., & Ushakov, D.V. (2016). Lichnostnoye znaniye v strukture peredachi nauchnogo opyta. In. A.L. Zhuravlev & D.V. Ushakova (Eds.), Sotsial'naya psikhologiya znaniya (pp. 141–152). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  13. Gutsykova, S.V. (2011). Expert assessment method: theory and practice. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  14. Ilizarov, S.S. (2016). Istochnikovedeniye i istoriografiya istorii nauki i tekhniki: sostoyaniye i perspektivy In. E.V. Minina (Ed.), Istoriya nauki: Istochniki, pamyatniki, naslediye: Vtoryye chteniya po istoriografii i istochnikovedeniyu istorii nauki i tekhniki (pp. 33–44). Moscow: Yanus-K Publ. (In Russ.)
  15. Jerez, W.М., Middleton, K.V., & Rabaza, О.W. (2011). Using the DAST-C to explore Colombian and Bolivian students’ images of scientists. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 657–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9218-3
  16. Jodelet, D. (2015). Representations sociales et mondes de vie. Paris: Editions des Archives contemporaines.
  17. Kalampalikis, N., Jodelet, D., & Wieviorka, M. (2019). Un regard sur les mondes communs. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’Homme.
  18. Karthigeyan, S., Harrell, P., & Wojnowski, D. (2013). Analyzing Prospective Teachers’ Images of Scientists Using Positive, Negative and Stereotypical Images of Scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.742883
  19. Kupriyanov, V.A. (2020). Nauchnoye soobshchestvo (kommunikativnyye aspekty). The Problems of Scientist and Scientific Groups Activity, (6), 225–238. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2414-9241-2020-10015
  20. Le Moël, B., Moliner, P., & Ramadier, T. (2015). Représentation sociale du milieu marin et iconographie du territoire chez des élus de communes littorales françaises. Vertigo, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.16014
  21. Losh, S.C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “Draw a scientist test” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701250452
  22. Mahover, K. (2000). Projective drawing of a person. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)
  23. Meyer, C., Guenther, L., Joubert, M. (2019). The Draw-a-Scientist Test in an African context: Comparing students (stereotypical) images of scientists across university faculties. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1447455
  24. Moliner, P. (2016). Psychologie sociale de l'image. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
  25. Moliner, P., & Bovina, I.B. (2020). On Serge Moscovici’s 95th anniversary: The theory of social representations – history, postulates and dissemination. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17(3), 542–553. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-3-542-553
  26. Moliner, P., & Guimelli, C. (2015). Les représentations sociales. Grenoble: Presses Universitaire de Grenoble.
  27. Moliner, P., Bovina, I., Juventin, J. Ancrages et objectivations de la représentation sociale du luxe. Une comparaison France – Russie. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, (3–4), 175–191.
  28. Monaco, G.L., Delouvee S., & Rateau, P. (Eds.). (2016). Les representations sociales. Theories, methodes et applications. Louvain-la-Neuve: Editions De Boeck.
  29. Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of social representations? In. H. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the Social (pp. 153–170). Oxford: Blackwell.
  30. Paweł, B., & Dudek, K. (2017). Revisiting Students’ Perceptions of Research Scientists – Outcomes of an Indirect Draw-a-Scientist Test (InDAST). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 562–575.
  31. Perronnet, C. (2018). La culture scientifique des enfants en milieux populaires: étude de cas sur la construction sociale du goût, des pratiques et des représentations des sciences. Thèse de docrorat. Lyon : Université de Lyon.
  32. Polani, M. (1985). Personal knowledge. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)
  33. Potebnya, A.A. (2007). Simvol i mif v narodnoy kul'ture. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye Publ. (In Russ.)
  34. Sachkova, M.E., & Esina, G.K. (2019). Structure of Social Representations of Higher Education in Students with Different Intragroup Status. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 16(4), 582–599. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-4-582-599.
  35. Timoshina, I. (2017). Representations of high school students about high social status in society. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologicheskiye nauki, (2), 72–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2017-2-72-79
  36. Türkmen, Н. (2008). Turkish Primary Students’ Perceptions about Scientist and What Factors Affecting the Image of the Scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 55–61.
  37. Umrikhin, V.V. (2007). Istoriko-metodologicheskiye problemy analiza nauchnykh shkol v psikhologii. Metodologiya i Istoriya Psikhologii, 2(4), 5–14. (In Russ.)
  38. Venger, A.L. (2003). Psychological drawing tests. Moscow: Vlados-Press. (In Russ.)
  39. Vergès, P. (2001). L’analyse des représentations sociales par questionnaires. Revue Française de Sociologie, (3), 537–561.
  40. Volodarskaya, E., & Razinaа, Т. (2018). Opportunities and Specificity of Applying the Draw-A-Scientist Test Technique On Russian Schoolchildren. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 43, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.07.16
  41. Volodarskaya, E.A. (2019). Dynamics of the Criteria for Assessing Research Performance. Sociology of Science and Technology, 10(2), 120–128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-0910-2019-12007
  42. Volodarskaya, E.A., Razina, T.V., & Frolova, Ya.V. (2017). The Image of a Scientist Among Children with Disabilities. Uchenyye Zapiski RGSU, 16(5), 107–117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17922/2071-5323-2017-16-5-107-117
  43. Vygotskiy, L.S. (1998). Psikhologiya iskusstva. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks Publ. (In Russ.)
  44. Yemelyanova, T.P. (2016). Sotsial'nyye predstavleniya: Istoriya, teoriya i empiricheskiye issledovaniya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  45. Yurkin, I.N. (2016). Fil'my uzhasov kak istochnik dlya rekonstruktsii predstavleniy o nauke i uchenom v massovom soznanii amerikanskogo zritelya 1930-kh gg. (na materiale fil'mov o Frankenshteyne kinokompanii “Yuniversal”. In E.V. Minina (Ed.), Istoriya nauki: Istochniki, pamyatniki, naslediye: Vtoryye chteniya po istoriografii i istochnikovedeniyu istorii nauki i tekhniki (pp. 194–201). Moscow: Yanus-K Publ. (In Russ.)
  46. Zinina, A.A. (2017). Prestarelyye lyudi i psikhologicheskoye blagopoluchiye v starcheskom vozraste v sotsial'nykh predstavleniyakh raznykh grupp obshchestva. Nauchnyye Trudy MosGU, (1), 53–61. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2021 Volodarskaya E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies