TEACHERS’ INNOVATIVE READINESS AND SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL CLIMATE OF PEDAGOGICAL COLLECTIVES OF HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In connection with the changes taking place in the modern education system, there is a growing need for the development and use of innovative technologies by university professors, who, however, are not always ready for such innovations. The main objective of the study presented in the article is to identify the relationship between the level of the innovative readiness of university teachers and the peculiarities of the socio-psychological climate of pedagogical collectives of higher educational institutions (which is considered as one of the possible factors of innovative readiness). The study involved the pedagogical collectives of nine higher educational institutions of Russia. The total number was 2036 teachers with experience of pedagogical work from 5 to 40 years (1252 women, 784 men). The psychodiagnostic toolkit included various methods: the express methodology “Evaluation of the socio-psychological climate in the team” (A.Yu. Shalyto, O.S. Mikhalyuk), the Inventory of innovative staff readiness (V.V. Panteleeva, T.P. Knysheva), the diagnostics technique of the personality motivation for success by T. Ehlers. The mathematical and statistical methods of processing the obtained data included the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, the linear regression method. The conducted research made it possible to identify the presence of a favorable socio-psychological climate, an average level of the innovative readiness and a sufficiently high level of motivation for success in the majority of the pedagogical collectives of higher education institutions that are represented. A positive correlation between the innovative readiness and the socio-psychological climate of pedagogical collectives of the higher educational institutions has been established, which is confirmed by the results of the linear regression analysis (the higher the level of the socio-psychological climate, the higher the level of innovative readiness). The results obtained can be used as a basis for purposeful work on the psychological and pedagogical support of the innovative activity of teachers in the conditions of maintaining a favorable social and psychological climate in the pedagogical collective.

About the authors

Inna B Avakyan

The military educational and scientific center of the Air Force “The Air Force Academy named after prof. N.E. Zhukovsky and Yu.A. Gagarin”

Author for correspondence.
Email: avakjaninna@rambler.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, Senior Lecturer of Department of Humanitarian and Socio-Economic Disciplines, the military educational and scientific center of the Air Force “The Air Force Academy named after prof. N.E. Zhukovsky and Yu.A. Gagarin”

1, Marshala Zhukova str., Syzran, 446007, Russian Federation

Galina A Vinogradova

Tolyatti State University

Email: vinograd.psy@yandex.ru

Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of Theoretical and Applied Psychology Department, Tolyatti State University

14, Belorusskaya str., Tolyatti, 445020, Russian Federation

References

  1. Avakyan, I.B. (2017). Comparative analysis of the features of innovative readiness of teachers and the socially psychological climate of pedagogical colleges. Innovations in Education, (1), 65—84. (In Russ.).
  2. Atlasova, A.A., & Tovarishcheva F.D. (2016). Innovacionnaya pedagogicheskaya deyatel’nost’ kak fenomen sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Nauchno-metodicheskij ehlektronnyj zhurnal “Koncept”, (30), 119—124. (In Russ.).
  3. Bardina, N.Yu. (2015). Sposoby preodoleniya problem v innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti vysshego uchebnogo zavedeniya. Ekonomika i pravo, (5), 32—35. doi: 10.15350/2221-7347.2015.5 (In Russ.).
  4. Bicheva, I.B., & Kitov A.G. (2014). O gotovnosti prepodavatelej k innovacionnym preobrazovaniyam v uchebno-professional’noj deyatel’nosti. Naukovedenie, 6(25), 1—12. doi: 10.15862/45PVN614 (In Russ.).
  5. Busoedov, I.A., Grebenyuk T.A., & Semenova N.K. (2016). Social’no-psihologicheskij klimat organizacii. Molodoj uchenyj, (10), 634—636. (In Russ.).
  6. Bürgisser T. “Schulklima” als Vision. Programm für das KOMPEZ Schulklima. Tagung Praxis-ForschungsVerbund. Bern, 2005.
  7. Danilov, D.L. (2014) Putevaya model’ razrabotki ehmpiricheskogo instrumentariya sub“ektivnyh pokazatelej gotovnosti prepodavatelej vuza k osushchestvleniyu innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti. Novye obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii v vuze: Conference Proseedings (pp. 518—527). Ekaterinburg. (In Russ.).
  8. Edelstein, W. (2002). Selbstwirksamkeit, Innovationen und Schulreform. Zur Diagnose der Situation. In M. Jerusalem & D. Hopf (Eds.), Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen. Weinheim (pp. 13—27). Beltz.
  9. Emmrich R. Motivstrukturen von Lehrerinnen und Lehrer in Innovations und Transferkontexten. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. (in German).
  10. Fil’chenkova, I.F. (2017) Sistematizaciya obrazovatel’nyh produktov innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti prepodavatelya vuza. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3(43), 148—154. (In Russ.).
  11. Fil’chenkova, I.F., & Samsonova N.V. (2016). Faktory innovacionnoj aktivnosti prepodavatelej vuza. Vestnik Baltijskogo universiteta im. Kanta. Ser. Filologiya. Pedagogika. Psihologiya, (2), 102—108. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2017-3-4 (In Russ.).
  12. Hutorskoj, A.V. (2005). Tipologii pedagogicheskih novovvedenij. Shkol’nye tekhnologii, (5), 10—24. (In Russ.).
  13. Schellenbach-Zell, J. (2009). Motivation und Volition von Lehrkräften in Schulinnovationsprojekten: Thesis zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.). Wuppertal: Am Fachbereich Bildungs- und Sozialwissenschaften der Bergischen Universität Wuppertal. (In German).
  14. Fussangel, K. (2008). Subjektive Theorien von Lehrkräften zur Kooperation. Eine Analyse der Zusammenarbeit von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern in Lerngemeinschaften. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades des Doktors der Philosophie (Dr. phil.). Wuppertal. (In German).
  15. Kryukova, E.M., Guley I.A. (2015). Theoretical aspects of the study of psychological preparedness of teachers to innovative activity. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, (2), 44—47. (In Russ.).
  16. Kulikova, O.V. (2014). Osobennosti innovacionnoj modeli vysshego obrazovaniya. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 6. Retrived from: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/ view?id = 16425 doi: 10.21686/2500-3925-2014-6-99-100 (In Russ.).
  17. Latuha, O.A., & Pushkarev, Yu.V. (2012). Innovacionnaya deyatel’nost’ sovremennogo vuza: tendencii razvitiya. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 8(4), 44—50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365 (In Russ.).
  18. Melikyan, A.V., & Zhelezov, B.V. (2013). Innovacionnaya deyatel’nost’ mezhdunarodnyh sotrudnikov rossijskogo vuza. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizacij, 1(40), 274—286. (In Russ.).
  19. Mironova, I.V. (2016). Nauchnye podhody v izuchenii voprosa razvitiya innovacionnogo potenciala prepodavatelya vuza. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal, (1), 25—27. doi: 10.18454/ IRJ.2016.45.084 (In Russ.).
  20. Nekhvyadovich, Eh.A., Kosinova, E.P., Parfenov, Yu.A., Kirsanova, A.B., Korotenkova, R.G., & Gibova, I.M. (2015). Sravnitel’naya ocenka ehffektivnsoti deyatel’nosti prepodavatelej vuza v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2(21), 4760—4764. (In Russ.).
  21. Panteleeva, V.V., & Knysheva Т.P. (2016). Inventory of innovative staff readiness. Akmeologiya, 3, 81—86. (In Russ.).
  22. Podymova, L.S. (2015). Specifika innovacionnoj vospriimchivosti prepodavatelya vuza. Psihologopedagogicheskij zhurnal Gaudeamus, 1(25), 46—49. (In Russ.).
  23. Prishchepa, T.A. (2014). Osobennosti podgotovki pedagogov k innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti. Vestnik TGPU (TSPU Bulletin), 6(147), 47—52. (In Russ.).
  24. Tolstouhova, I.V., & Fugelova, T.A (2015). K voprosu o specifike professional’noj deyatel’nosti prepodavatelya Vuza v usloviyah innovacionnyh preobrazovanij. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2(11), 2483—2487. doi: 10.15862/173PVN515 (In Russ.).
  25. Vinogradova G.A. (2010). Klimat v pedagogicheskom kollektive i sub“ektivnoe blagopoluchie lichnosti pedagoga. Tolyatti: TSU Publ. (In Russ.).
  26. Vladimirov A.I. (2012). Ob innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti vuza. Moscow: Izdatel’skij dom Nedra. (In Russ.).
  27. Volkov A.A., Nazarov I.N., & Chursinova O.V. (2015). Formirovanie psihologicheskoj gotovnosti pedagoga k innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2(23), 5223—5227. (In Russ.).
  28. Zhurkin M.G., & Borisova E.V. (2015). Tipologiya prepodavatelej vuza s pozicij innovacionnoj aktivnosti v professional’noj sfere. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 3(2), 90—94. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2018 Avakyan I.B., Vinogradova G.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies