Axiological Background of Vietnamese Students Adaptability
- Authors: Kudinov S.I1, Kudinov S.S1, Ho Vo Q.C.1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Issue: Vol 15, No 1 (2018)
- Pages: 38-52
- Section: PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/18179
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2018-15-1-38-52
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article analyzes the ratio of axiological orientation of Vietnamese students and their adaptability. The article demonstrates that the ratio of certain values, attitudes and needs forms a specific type of axiological orientation. The article finds out that the different types of orientation are interrelated with the selective personality adaptive indicators of Vietnamese students and can be regarded as predictors of the adaptation process. The article identifies the current trends of adaptability studies within the context of the system paradigm. The article points out the main determinants of the personal adaptability manifestations. The methodological basis of the research was the dispositional concept of personality and individual traits investigation by A.I. Krupnov, as well as the provisions of the theory of personal potential by D.A. Leontiev, developed within the framework of positive psychology. The aim of the study presented in this article is to identify the relationship between the indicators of axiological orientation and adaptability variables in Vietnamese students. At the first stage of the study, different types of students’ axiological orientation based on the results of cluster analysis have been identified and described: vocational-career, egocentric, socio-communicative orientation types. Statistically significant differences between the selected types were recorded for most of the components. The meaningful characteristics of these types at the behavioral level differ in their attitude to training activities, relationship with other people and personal self-conception. At the next stage the features of adaptability among the representatives with different types of axiological orientation were revealed. The correlation analysis was used to identify the correlation between the axiological variables and adaptability. It turned out that all the three groups are pressed by uncertainty, nostalgia and asthenic feelings. At the same time the representatives of the vocational and career axiological orientation type were more successful in adaptability, as compared to other groups. The students with egocentric orientation turned out less successful in adaptability. They are distinguished by the highest severity of negative background mood, uncertainty, difficulties in communication. As a conclusion, we defined the role of axiological orientation as the primary predictor of personal adaptability in multicultural environment.
Keywords
About the authors
Sergei I Kudinov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: kudinov_si@rudn.university
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of Social and Differential Psychology Department
Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6, Moscow, Russia, 117198Stanislav S Kudinov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: kudinov_ss@rudn.university
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Social and Differential Psychology Department
Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6, Moscow, Russia, 117198Que Chi Ho Vo
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: chiho20ussh@gmail.com
PhD Student of Social and Differential Psychology Department
Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6, Moscow, Russia, 117198References
- Antsyferova, L.I. (1990). Sistemnyi podkhod v psikhologii lichnosti. In D.N. Zavalishin (Ed.), Printsip sistemnosti v psikhologicheskikh issledovaniyakh (pp. 61—78). Moscow: Publishing house “Institute of Psychology of the RAS”. (In Russ.).
- Aibazova, S.R. (2015a). The subjective determination of self-realization of personality. Acmeology, 2(54), 90—98. (In Russ.).
- Aibazova, S.R. (2015b). Issledovanie tsennostno-smyslovoi napravlennosti lichnosti. Lichnost’ v prirode i obshchestve: Conference Proseedings (pp. 11—16). Moscow: PFUR Publ. (In Russ.).
- Barabanshchikov, V.V., & Demidov, A.A. (2011). Experimental psychology in Russia: current state and prospects of development. Experimental psychology, 4(1), 134—140. (In Russ.).
- Bratus, B.S. (1988). Anomalii lichnosti. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russ.).
- Đảng cộng sản Việt Nam. (2011). Văn kiện Đại hội toàn quốc lần thứ XI. Nhà xuất bản chính trị quốc gia, Hà Nội. (In Vietnamese).
- Hồ Sỹ Quy.́ (2010). Mấy vấn đề triết hoc̣ giá trị và sự biến đổi giá trị trong bối canh toaǹ cầu hoa. Nghiên cứu khoa học, Hà Nội. (In Vietnamese).
- Huỳnh Văn Sơn và nhóm tác giả. (2010). Thực trạng kỹ năng sống của sinh viên một số Trường Đại học tại TP Hồ Chí Minh hiện nay. Đề tài khoa học Cấp Bộ, Mã số. 19.64, Hồ Chí Minh. (In Vietnamese).
- Huỳnh văn Sơn và nhóm tác giả. (2009). Sự lựa chọn các giá trị đạo đức — nhân văn trong định hướng lối sống của sinh viên ở một số trường Đại học tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh trong giai đoạn hiện nay. Đề tài — Đề tài khoa học Cấp Bộ, Mã số. 19.27, Hồ Chí Minh. (In Vietnamese).
- Karelin, A. (2007). Bol’shaya entsiklopediya psikhologicheskikh testov. Moscow: Eksmo Publ. (In Russ.).
- Krupnov, A.I. (2006). System-dispositional approach to the study of personality and its traits. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, (1), 63—72. (In Russ.).
- Krupnov, A.I. (1993). Diagnostika svoistv lichnosti i individual’nosti. Moscow: Institute of Youth Publ. (In Russ.).
- Krupnov, A.I., Novikova, I.A., & Shlyakhta, D.A. (2016). Ethno-psychological and cross-cultural studies of personality traits: System-Functional approach. Psychology of education in a multicultural space, 35(3), 15—25. (In Russ.).
- Kudinov, S.I., Kudinov S.S., & Aibazova, S.R. (2016). Axiological predictors of self-realization of personality. Moscow: PFUR Publ. (In Russ.).
- Leontiev, D.A. (2000). Test of life orientations (DLC). Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.).
- Leontiev, D.A. (2011). Personal capacity: structure and diagnosis. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.).
- Lomov, B.F. (2003). Consistency in psychology. Selected works. Moscow: MPSI Publ.; Voronezh: MODEK Publ. (In Russ.).
- Nguyễn Quang Uẩn.(2010). Tâm lý học đại cương. Nhà xuất bản quốc gia Hà Nội, Hà Nội. (In Vietnamese).
- Nguyễn Văn Bốn. (2013). Giá trị truyền thống của người Việt Nam trong giai đoạn phát triển và hội nhập. Báo hội thảo. 2013. Tr. 23—26. (In Vietnamese).
- Petrovskiy, V.A. (1992). Psychology of non-adaptive activity. Moscow: Gorbunok Publ. (In Russ.).
- Petrovskiy, V.A. (2010). A man above the situation. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.).
- Ponomareva, M.A. (Ed.). (2008). Psychodiagnostics of personality: a guide for students. Minsk: Tesey Publ. (In Russ.).
- Piaget, J. (1969). Selected psychological writings: Psychology of intelligence. The genesis of the number in a child. Logic and psychology. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye Publ. (In Russ.).
- Wasserman, L., Berebin, M., & Kosenkov N.I. (1994). On the systematic approach in assessing mental adaptation. V.M. Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and medical psychology, (3), 6—24. (In Russ.).