Reflection of the works of F.M. Dostoevsky in W. Faulkner’s novel “Absalom, Absalom!”

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

As part of comparative studies of the works of F.M. Dostoevsky and W. Faulkner, the implementation of the archetypal pattern of “underground” thinking and behaving (most completely embodied in the narrator of Dostoevsky’s novella “Notes from Underground”) in the character of Thomas Sutpen, the main character of Faulkner’s novel “Absalom, Absalom!”, is considered. The mere appearance of a stable association of Faulkner’s works with Dostoevsky’s novels by the early 1940s which subsequently gave impetus to a number of comparative studies not only in Western literary criticism but also (later on) in national literary studies is noted. The traits of the Underground Man (non-acceptance of God-created world, Man-god consciousness, awareness of inconsistency with Man-god ideal, cruel self-punishment and aesthetization of it, moral alienation, and spiritual decay) are realized in many characters of Dostoevsky and Faulkner (Raskolnikov, Svidrigailov, Ippolit Terentyev, Stavrogin, Arkady Dolgoruky, Ivan Karamazov; young Bayard Sartoris, Quentin Compson, Joe Christmas). As for Thomas Sutpen, the opinion has long been established in criticism that considering such characters of Dostoevsky as Raskolnikov and Arkady Dolgoruky, one can discover a portrait, which prefigures his character in almost every detail. In this study, given that Thomas Sutpen is the bearer of the “underground” of the “Stavrogin” type (without self-punishment for inconsistency with the ideal), a comparison between Stavrogin and Sutpen is made. Nikolai Stavrogin committed monstrous crimes for the sake of anesthetization of his immoral existence. Thomas Sutpen who sought to establish his dynasty at any cost went to any crime to achieve his goal. But both of them, trampling on the feelings of people, fell out of the human race and suffered a crushing defeat.

About the authors

Yuri A. Romanov

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: romanov-yua@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7819-3119

кандидат филологических наук, старший преподаватель, кафедра русского языка № 2, Институт русского языка

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Банах-Маникина А.В. Тема «случайного семейства» в творчестве Ф.М. Достоевского и ее рецепция в США: автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук. Томск, 2006. 25 с.
  2. Гарин И.И. Многоликий Достоевский. М.: ТЕРРА, 1997. 396 с.
  3. Долинин А.С. Достоевский и Герцен // Статьи и материалы / Ф.М. Достоевский; под ред. А.С. Долинина. Пб.: Мысль, 1922. С. 275-324.
  4. Достоевский Ф.М. Полное собрание сочинений: в 30 томах. Л.: Наука, 1972-1990.
  5. Лосский Н.О. О природе сатанинской // Статьи и материалы / Ф.М. Достоевский; под ред. А.С. Долинина. Пб.: Мысль, 1922. С. 67-92.
  6. Фолкнер У. Собрание сочинений: в 9 томах. М.: ТЕРРА - Книжный клуб, 2001.
  7. Фолкнер У. Статьи, речи, интервью, письма. М.: Радуга, 1985. 488 с.
  8. Bloshteyn M.R. “Anguish for the Sake of Anguish” - Faulkner and His Dostoevskian Allusion // The Faulkner Journal. 2004. Vol. 19. No. 2. Pp. 69-90.
  9. Chamberlain J. Dostoyefsky’s Shadow in the Deep South // New York Times Book Review. 1931, 15 February. P. 9.
  10. Frank J. Dostoevsky: The Stir of Liberation, 1860-1865. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986. 395 p.
  11. Leavis F.R. Dostoevsky or Dickens? // Scrutiny. 1933. Vol. II. No. 1. Pp. 91-93.
  12. McCullers С. The Russian realists and southern literature // The Mortgaged Heart. Selected Writings / ed. by M.G. Smith. Boston - New York: A Mariner Book, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005. Pp. 252-258.
  13. Patmore D. A study in madness // Critical Essays on William Faulkner: The Compson Family / ed. by A.F. Kinney. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1982. P. 97.
  14. Romanov Yu. The reflection of Dostoevsky’s Underground Man in Faulkner’s Sartoris // Quaestio Rossica. 2021. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 1458-1472. http://doi.org/10.15826/ qr.2021.4.649
  15. Sartre J.-P. William Faulkner’s Sartoris // Critical Essays on William Faulkner: The Sartoris Family / ed. by A.F. Kinney. Boston, 1985. Pp. 142-146.
  16. Saxon L. A family breaks up // Critical Essays on William Faulkner: The Compson Family / ed. by A.F. Kinney. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1982. Pp. 81-82.
  17. Scott E. On William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury // Critical Essays on William Faulkner: The Compson Family / ed. by A.F. Kinney. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1982. Pp. 115-118.
  18. Weisgerber J. Faulkner and Dostoevsky: Influence and confluence. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1974. 383 p.
  19. Weisgerber J. Faulkner’s monomaniacs: Their indebtedness to Raskolnikov // Comparative Literature Studies. 1968. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 181-193.

Copyright (c) 2024 Romanov Y.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies