Basic Approaches to the Typology of Digital Media Platforms
- Authors: Polyakov M.L.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
- MGIMO University
- Issue: Vol 27, No 2 (2022): THE RECEPTION OF SILVER AGE RUSSIAN LITERATURE ABROAD
- Pages: 399-413
- Section: JOURNALISM
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/literary-criticism/article/view/31465
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2022-27-2-399-413
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Digital platforms are in a spotlight for researchers all around the world. These studies are done in areas of communications, sociology, economics, information technologies, management. Scholars use a lot of approaches to define platforms, make their typology and systematization. The article describes and analyzes theoretical approaches, definitions, conceptualization, and typologies of digital platforms of ten recent years from 2010 till 2021. As a result, I conclude some common definition. Part of this typology and platform segment are platforms based on advertising business model. That type of digital platforms have generated new media industry segment - context and target advertising - and some of these platforms concentrated a significant part of global adverting market. They may be defined as digital media platforms . Typology and definitions of platforms could be used in universities with such studies like “Communications”, “Journalism”, “Advertising and public relations”, “Economics”.
About the authors
Maksim L. Polyakov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA);MGIMO University
Author for correspondence.
Email: polyakov-ml@ranepa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6110-7045
Academic director of Master program “Digital communications and new media”, Institute of Social Science, Russian Presidential Academy of National
Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Senior Lecturer of Department of Integrated Communications. Professor of International Journalism Department, MGIMO University.
References
- Asadullap, A., Faik, I., & Kankanhalli, A. (2018). Digital Platforms: A Review and Future Directions. PACIS.
- Boudreau, K.J., & Lakhani, K.R. (2009). How to Manage Outside Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69–76.
- Bratton, B. (2016). The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. MIT Press.
- Carr, N. (2009). The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2006). Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1057–1071. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0549
- Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M.W. (2006). Strategies for Two-Sided Markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 1–12.
- Eriksson, M., Fleischer, R., Johansson, A., Snickars, P., & Vonderau, P. (2019). Spotify Teardown: Inside the Black Box of Streaming Music. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Evans, D.S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). The Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
- Faraj, S., Krogh, G. Von, Monteiro, E., & Lakhani, K.R. (2016). Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 668–684.
- Farrell, J., & Garth, S. (1985). Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70–83.
- Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2002). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Brighton: Harvard Business School Press.
- Hagiu, A. (2007). Merchant or Two-Sided Platform? Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 115–133.
- Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic Decisions for Multisided Platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 71–80.
- Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C. (1985). Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.
- Koh, T.K., Fichman, M. (2014). Multihoming users’ preferences for two-sided exchange networks. Mis Quarterly, 38(4), 977–996.
- Markova, V. (2018). Company business models based in platforms. Voprosy Economiki, (10), 127–135. (In Russ.)
- McAfee, A., & Brynjolfson, E. (2019). Machine, Plarform, Crowd. Moscow: Mann-Ivanov-Farber. (In Russ.)
- Nielsen, R.K., & Ganter, S.A. (2018). Dealing with Digital Intermediaries: A Case Study of the Relations between Publishers and Platforms. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1600–17.
- NGO Digital Economy. (2018). About platforms types. Retrieved from https://dataeconomy.ru/ 20180428_01 (In Russ.)
- Parker, G.G., Van Alstyne, M.W., & Choudary, S.P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. New York: WW Norton & Co.
- Parker, G.G., & Van Alstyne, M.W. (2005). Two-Sided Network Effects. A Theory of Information Product Design, Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504.
- Poell, Th. (2020). Three Challenges for Media Studies in the Age of Platforms. Television and Media. SAGE Journals. Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420918833
- Poniatowski, M., Lüttenberg, H., Beverungen, D., & Kundisch, D. (2021). Three layers of abstraction: a conceptual framework for theorizing digital multi-sided platforms. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 20, 257–283.
- Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.
- Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645–667.
- Seamans, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Responses to Entry in Multi-Sided Markets: The Impact of Craigslist on Local Newspapers. NET Institute Working Paper. (10–11). Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1694622
- Sehl, A., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R.K. (2018). Public Service News and Social Media. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
- Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. (2008). Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to The Network Economy. Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.2307/1183273
- Srnicek, N. (2019). Platform Capitalism. Moscow: HSE Publishing. (In Russ.)
- Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A.A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.
- Vaculenko, M., & Singh, S. (2016). The Guide to Platform Business Models. Platform Hunt blog. Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://medium.com/platform-hunt/the-platformbusiness-model-guide-6e86f5c5679b
- Van der Aalst, W., Hinz, O. & Weinhardt, C. (2019). Big Digital Platforms. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61, 645–648.
- Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408.