Public relations on the mediatization context: a conceptual research framework

Cover Page

Cite item


The paper presents the first in Russian scientific discourse public relations (PR) concept analysis on the digital data-driven mediatization context. These phenomena comparative analysis results offer a more relevant research approach, conceptual framework and tools for the public relations and mediatization studies. It is important to use the subject-to-object research paradigm to identify the main subjects - communication customers - to determine the parameters of the communicative figuration in the mediatization studies more accurately. The practical and conceptual mediatization and public relations framework is being transformed due the newest “deep” mediatization paradigm which provokes a conceptual mediation and public relations convergence.

About the authors

Marina G. Shilina

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Author for correspondence.

DPhil in Philology, Professor at the Department of Advertising, Public Relations and Design of the Faculty of Marketing

36 Stremyannyi Lane, Moscow, 115093, Russian Federation


  1. Krotz, F. (2009). Mediatization: A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In K. Lundby (ed.), Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from
  2. Sharonov, D.I. (2008). O kommunikativnom smysle mediatizatsii [On the communicative meaning of mediatization]. Vestnik VSU. Series: Philology. Journalism, (2), 234–239.
  3. Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Routledge, London, UK.
  4. Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2014). Human interaction and communicative figurations. The transformation of mediatized cultures and societies. In K. Lundby (ed.), Mediatization of Communication (pp. 249–271). Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton.
  5. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). Mediated Construction of Reality. Wiley, London, UK.
  6. Ampuja, M., Koivisto, J., & Väliverronen, E. (2014). Strong and weak forms of mediatization theory: A critical review. Nordicom Review, 35, 11–123.
  7. Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 314–324. doi: 10.1177/0163443715573835.
  8. Krivonosov, A.D., Filatova, O.G., & Shishkina, M.A. (2018). Osnovy teorii svyazey s obshchestvennost'yu [Fundamentals of public relations theory]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ.
  9. Hepp, А., & Krotz, F. (2014). Mediatized worlds – understanding everyday mediatization. Mediatized Worlds. Culture and Society in a Media Age (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke, Palgrave.
  10. Krotz, F. (2014). Media, Mediatization and mediatized worlds: A discussion of the basic concepts. In A. Hepp, F. Krotz (eds.), Mediatized Worlds. Culture and Society in a Media Age (pp. 72–87). Basingtoke, Palgrave. DOI: 10.1057Ed./9781137300355_5.
  11. Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of Mediatization. Cambridge, Polity.
  12. Andrianova, T.V., & Rakitov, A.I. (1991). Sovremennyye tendentsii informatizatsii i mediatizatsii obshchestva [Modern trends of informatization and mediatization of society]: Scientific and analytical overview. Moscow, INION Publ.
  13. Vartanova, Ye.L. (2017). Mediasistema Rossii [Russian Media System]: Textbook for university students. Moscow, Aspekt Press.
  14. Zemlyanova, L.M. (1999). Setevoye obshchestvo, informatsionalizm i virtual'naya kul'tura [Network society, informationalism and virtual culture]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, (2), 58–69.
  15. Gureyeva, A.N. (2016). Teoreticheskoye ponimaniye mediatizatsii v usloviyakh tsifrovoy sredy [Theoretical understanding of mediation in the digital environment]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, (1), 192−208.
  16. Gureyeva, A.N. (2017). Mezhdistsiplinarnost' teoreticheskikh kontseptsiy v rossiyskikh i zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh protsessa mediatizatsii [Interdisciplinarity of theoretical concepts in Russian and foreign mediatization studies]. Mediaskop (issue 4). Retrieved June 26, 2020, from
  17. Nim, Ye.G. (2017). Issleduya mediatizatsiyu obshchestva: Kontsept mediatizirovannykh mirov [Exploring the mediation of society: The concept of mediated worlds]. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal, 23(3), 8–25. doi: 10.19181/socjour.2017.23.3.5361.
  18. Wiesenberg, M., & Tench, R. (2019). Deep Strategic Mediatization: Organizational Leaders’ Knowledge and Usage of Social Bots in an Era of Disinformation. International Journal of Information Management. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102042.
  19. Shishkina, M.A. (2002). Pablik rileyshnz v sisteme sotsial'nogo upravleniya [Public relations in the social management system]. Saint Petersburg.
  20. Thompson, J.B. (1995). The Media and Modernity. A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge, Polity.
  21. Schultz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87−101.
  22. Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2014). Mediatization of Communication. Handbooks of Communication Science. Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton.
  23. Krotz, F. (2014). From a social worlds perspective to the analysis of mediatized worlds. In L. Kramp, N. Carpentier, A. Hepp et al. (eds.), Media Practice and Everyday Agency in Europe (pp. 83–99). Bremen, Edition Lumière.
  24. Elias, N. (1990). Izbrannyye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow, Progress Publ.
  25. Hepp, А. (2014). Communicative figurations: Researching cultures of mediatization. In L. Kramp, N. Carpentier, A. Hepp et al. (eds.), Media Practice and Everyday Agency in Europe. Bremen, Edition Lumière.
  26. Buari, F. (2001). Pablik rileyshnz, ili Strategiya doveriya [Public Relations, or Trust Strategy]. Moscow, Infra-M Publ.
  27. Pisarskiy, I. (2020, June 26). Sozdavaya tkan' obshchestvennoy svyazannosti [The social cohesion fabric creation]. MediaTrendy, 3(75), 2. Moscow, Fakul'tet zhurnalistiki MGU Publ. Retrieved June 28, 2020, from MediaTrendi_75.pdf
  28. Yavdolyuk, N. (ed.). (2020, June 26). “Serebryanyy Luchnik”: Otkryvaya novyye kompetentsii [“Silver Archer”: Discovering new competencies]. MediaTrendy, 3(75), 5. Moscow, Fakul'tet zhurnalistiki MGU Publ. Retrieved June 28, 2020, from

Copyright (c) 2020 Shilina M.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies