A conceptual framework for the instructional design of a Moodle-based e-learning course for mainstreaming informal master’s education outcomes into ESP teaching in a formal non-linguistic setting

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Problem statement. The paper conceptualizes the stages of requirements analysis and content development mandatory in the instructional design of a Moodle-based training course to mainstream master’s informal learning outcomes when teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP) at a non-linguistic university. The significance of this work lies in the necessity to devise a mechanism for structuring students’ non-institutional learning activities as they engage with their academic discipline within an ICT-supported formal environment, which bears many similarities to contemporary informal learning spaces. Methodology . The research is comprehensive in nature, based on the use of general scientific and empirical methods with the subsequent interpretation of its results in terms of theoretical triangulation. The analysis of existing approaches to integrating the outcomes of informal adult education into the formal context of their lifelong learning has made it possible to develop a conceptual framework for the instructional design of an electronic training course to enhance ESP proficiency of master students. The research algorithm was to analyze the target audience through the prism of their experience in informal language learning with an emphasis on the predominant types of such cognitive activity and preferred information resources; to define the objectives of ESP teaching taking into account the potential for the language development in the informal setting and the affordances of the Moodle-based learning environment; to create a competency model of an electronic course graduate and to develop assessment tools for monitoring and verifying expected outcomes within a formal context. Results . The research highlights the transformation of students’ informal cognitive activities from incidental and accidental learning to conscious and purposeful self-directed learning as a precondition for the successful implementation of a course on integrative mastering of an academic discipline in a formal context and beyond. This involves further development of the master’s systemic competencies and their deliberate transfer from formal to informal educational contexts while working with the learning resources of the lecture and project clusters within the thematic units of the online course. Their multifunctional assignments are crafted to effectively guide students towards productive, independent learning in informal settings, whether through direct, indirect, or subtle cues embedded within the task instructions. Conclusion. The empirical study highlights its practical importance, demonstrating that the proposed instructional design framework for the e-learning course, along with the didactic strategies developed from it, enhances educational content. This is achieved by integrating the outcomes of mastering the academic discipline across both formal and informal learning environments, ensuring cohesion and continuity throughout the educational process.

About the authors

Larisa M. Galchuk

Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management

Author for correspondence.
Email: galaris_nsk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4785-0603
SPIN-code: 1384-4890

Candidate of Philology, Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Basic Training

56 Kamenskaya St, Novosibirsk, 630099, Russian Federation

References

  1. Bakanova SA, Silkina GYu. Evolution of knowledge: modelling and application analysis. St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Journal. Economics. 2015;6(233):173–182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5862/JE.233.18
  2. Reyes-Fournier E. Lifelong and lifewide learning. In: P. Roubides (ed.) Distance learning: perspectives, outcomes and challenges. New York: Nova Science Publ.; 2017. p. 1–15. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/326070378_Lifelong_and_lifewide_learning
  3. Livingstone DW. Adults’ informal learning: definitions, findings, gaps and future research. NALL Working Paper. 2001;21. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/retrieve/4484/
  4. Latchem CR. Informal learning and non-formal education for development. Journal of Learning for Development. 2014;1(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1106082.pdf
  5. Cerasoli CP, Alliger GM, Donsbach JS, Mathieu JE, Tannenbaum SI, Orvis KA. Antecedents and outcomes of informal learning behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2018;33:203–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9492-y
  6. Bond M, Bergdahl N. Student engagement in open, distance, and digital education. In: Zawacki-Richter O, Jung I. (eds.) Handbook of open, distance and digital education. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_79-1
  7. Bergdahl N. Second language learning designs in online adult education. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2022:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2158202
  8. Yeh E, Swinehart N. Social media pathways: using social media to help language learners access target language communities. CALICO Journal. 2024;41(1):i–xiii. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.27345
  9. Rogers A. The base of the iceberg. Informal learning and its impact on formal and non-formal learning. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich; 2014. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2017/14844/pdf/Rogers_2014_Base_of_the_iceberg.pdf
  10. Knowles MS, Holton III EF, Swanson RA. The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2005. https://intrpr.info/library/books/knowles-the-adult-learner.pdf
  11. Tight М. Key concepts in adult education and training. London, New York: Routledge; 2006.
  12. Livingstone DW, Raykov M, Stowe S. The adult education and training survey: Interest in and factors related to participation in adult education and informal learning. Ottawa: Human Resources Development Canada Publ.; 2001. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349098135_The_adult_education_and_training_survey_Interest_in_and_factors_related_to_participation_in_adult_education_and_informal_learning
  13. Rogers A, Horrocks N. Teaching adults. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2010.
  14. Benson P, Reinders H. (eds.) Beyond the language classroom. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
  15. Okereshko AV. Types of informal education as meaning-forming factors of personal and professional development of a teacher. Man and Education. 2015;1(42):74–78. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23466333
  16. Mercer S, MacIntyre PD. Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 2014;4(2):153–172. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.2
  17. Dewaele J-M, Chen X, Padilla AM, Lake J. The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10(2128):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02128
  18. Polanyi M. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1978.
  19. Souto-Otero M. Validation of non-formal and informal learning in formal education: Covert and overt. European Journal of Education. 2021;56(3):365–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12464
  20. Vaindorf-Sysoeva ME, Vorobchikova EO. Instructional design as a systemforming category: approaches and definitions. Vestnik of Minin University. 2023;11(1). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2023-11-1-3
  21. Karthik B, Chandrasekhar B, David R, Kumar K. Identification of instructional design strategies for an effective e-learning experience. The Qualitative Report. 2019;24(7):1537–1555. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3870
  22. Galchuk LM. Conceptual approaches to the instructional design of e-learning course elements for mainstreaming the results of master’s informal education into formal teaching of English for Specific Purposes at a non-linguistic university. In: Innovative approaches to teaching foreign languages in formal, non-formal and informal educational space: from theory to practice: Collection of articles based on results of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management; 2022. p. 56–66. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48596154
  23. Zhelyazkova-Teya TK. What indicators of informal education say about its importance for the adults in the new century. Higher Education Today. 2020;8:47–51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25586/RNU.HET.20.08.P.47
  24. Sockett G. The online informal learning of English. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.
  25. Ahmed R, Al-kadi A, Hagar T. Enhancements and limitations to ICT-based informal language learning: Emerging research and opportunities. Hershey: IGI Global; 2020.
  26. Kenyonn C, Hase S. (eds.) Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic; 2013.
  27. Kolesnikov AA. On problem of foreign language acquisition in the context of informal education. Language and Culture. 2018;43:148–164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/43/10
  28. Seliverstova NA. Informal education: results of a qualitative research. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2018;3:112–122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2018.3.10
  29. Liskina TV, Bludov VV, Onoshko OYu. Informal education in process of studying foreign languages and types of tasks that aim students at working independently in terms of informal education. Baikal Research Journal. 2019:10(2). (In Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/informalnoe-obrazovanie-v-yazykovom-vuze-i-tipy-zadaniy-natselivayuschih-studentov-na-samostoyatelnuyu-rabotu-v-usloviyah-informalnogo

Copyright (c) 2024 Galchuk L.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies