Integration of didactic concepts in using of multi-level mobile computer books of problems in teaching the “Logic” section of school curricula

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Problem and goal. The article actualizes the issues of searching for didactic-methodological bases and their integration in teaching of the “Logic” section within the framework of school curricula of computer science. The goal of the described research is an attempt to consider the content of the discipline and teaching using the multi-level mobile computer books of problems developed in the course of study as a didactic-methodological factor. Methodology. Implementation in the school educational process on computer science of mechanisms that contribute to the maximum immersion of students in the practice-oriented and professionalcontextual field through the use of multi-level mobile computer books of problems. Result. The research found that the use of multi-level mobile computer-based books of problems concerning the provisions of modern didactic concepts in the methodology of teaching computer science provides the opportunity to access education anytime and anywhere. In this, the approach based on the use of multi-level mobile computer books of problems serves as the most efficient means of developing students’ logical, analytical and critical thinking, since their content is based on multilevel basic knowledge of logic and computer science. Conclusion. The research shows that the use of multi-level mobile computer books of problems in teaching logic in the course of computer science at the stage of school education makes it possible to effectively implement didactic-methodological synthesis, making the educational process practiceoriented and professional-contextual.

About the authors

Sergey Yurievich Kamyanetsky

Moscow City Pedagogical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: i@ksergey.ru

post-graduate student of the department of informatization of education

29 Sheremetyevskaya St., Moscow, 127521, Russian Federation

References

  1. Viktorova N.V. Sistema tvorcheskih zadach po informatike [The system of creative tasks in Informatics]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Informatika i informatizacija obrazovanija [Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: Informatics and Informatization of Education]. 2018. No. 2(44). Pp. 8—16.
  2. Grebneva D. Obzor metodicheskih podhodov k obucheniyu programmirovaniyu v shkole [Review of methodological approaches to teaching programming at school]. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Pedagogicheskie nauki [Scientific review. Pedagogical science]. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 13—27.
  3. Grigoriev S.G., Grinshkun V.V., Remorenko I.M. “Umnaya auditoriya”: ot integracii tekhnologij k integracii principov [“Smart audience”: from the integration of technologies to integrate the principles of]. Informatika i obrazovanie [Informatics and education]. 2013. No. 10(249). Pp. 3—8.
  4. Grinshkun V.V., Remorenko I.M. Frontiry “Moskovskoj ehlektronnoj shkoly” [Frontiers of “Moscow electronic school”]. Informatika i obrazovanie [Informatics and education]. 2017. No. 7(268). Pp. 3—8.
  5. Dacun N., Urazaeva L. Innovacii dlya preodoleniya razryva mezhdu IT-obrazovaniem i ITindustriej [Innovations to bridge the gap between IT education and IT industry]. Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya vertikal’noj integracii sistemy obrazovaniya, nauki i biznesa: ehkonomicheskie, pravovye i social’nye aspekty [Actual problems of development of vertical integration of education, science and business: economic, legal and social aspects]: materialy III Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii. Voronezh: Voronezhskij centr nauchno-tekhnicheskoj informacii, 2015. Pp. 188—193.
  6. Kagan E.M. Primenenie vizual’nyh yazykov programmirovaniya dlya povysheniya ehffektivnosti obucheniya razdelu “Algoritmizaciya i programmirovanie” shkol’nogo kursa informatiki [The use of visual programming languages to improve the efficiency of training section “Algorithmization and programming” school course of Informatics]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Informatika i informatizacija obrazovanija [Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: Informatics and Informatization of Education]. 2018. No. 1(43). Pp. 99—104.
  7. Mirzoev M. Formirovanie universal’nyh vidov uchebnyh dejstvij na urokah informatiki [Formation of universal types of educational activities at the lessons of Informatics]. Informacionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii [Information technologies in education]: materialy IV Vserossijskoj (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Saratov, 2012. Pp. 44—45.
  8. Semakin I. Ehvolyuciya shkol’noj informatiki [Evolution of the school of computer science]. Informatika v shkole [Computer science in school]. 2011. No. 225. Pp. 2—7.
  9. Fedyukova A.A., Gubanova O.M. Soderzhanie i metodika izucheniya temy “Algebra logiki” v shkol’nom kurse informatiki s ispol’zovaniem ehlektronnyh izdanij “1C: Shkola. Informatika” [Content and methods of studying the theme of “Algebra of logic” in the school course of Informatics using electronic publications “School. Informatics”]. Vestnik Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Penza State University]. 2016. No. 3(15). Pp. 3—9.
  10. Filippov V.M., Krasnova G.A., Grinshkun V.V. Transgranichnoe obrazovanie [Cross-Border education]. Platnoe obrazovanie [Paid education]. 2008. No. 6. Pp. 36—38.
  11. Halitova Z.R. Razvitie abstraktno-logicheskogo myshleniya budushchih uchitelej informatiki pri obuchenii programmirovaniyu na osnove integracii razlichnyh paradigm [Development of abstractlogical thinking in future teachers in the teaching of programming based on the integration of different paradigms]. Filologiya i kul’tura [Philology and culture]. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 273—277.
  12. Chemekov V., Krylov D. STEM — novyj podhod k inzhenernomu obrazovaniyu [STEM — a new approach to engineering education]. Vestnik Marijskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Mari State University]. 2015. No. 20. Pp. 59—64.
  13. Battaglino T.B., Haldeman M., Laurans E. The Costs of Online Learning. A Working Paper Series from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 2011. https://www.flvs.net/docs/default-source/research/ Thomas-Fordham-Institute-Dec-2011.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2018).
  14. Hylén J. Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. OECD Publishing, 2007. P. 30.
  15. Rodriguez C.O. MOOC s and the AI-Stanford like courses: two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 2012. http://www.eurodl.org/?article=516 (accessed: 20.10.2018).
  16. Wiley D., Hilton III J.L., Ellington S., Hall T. Preliminary Examination of the Cost Savings and Learning Impacts of Using Open Textbooks in Middle and High School Science Classes. 2012. http:// www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1153/2256 (accessed: 20.10.2018).

Copyright (c) 2019 Kamyanetsky S.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies