Speaker as a Deontic Agent in Political Speech (on the Material of German and Russian Languages)

Cover Page


This work is devoted to the problem of semantic and functional variability of deontic constructions, where the speaker himself is deontic agent, in the nuclear genre of political discourse - political speech - in German and Russian linguistic cultures. As the material deontic expressions with prototypical modal explicators are used, such as dolzen, ich muss, kann, darf, nado / nuzhno . It is fixed that the speaker in political speech can be deontic agent only in the structures with verbs of speaking. On the basis of contextual analysis the semantic polysemy of theses modal constructions is defined that is determined by the socio-cultural context is revealed. The method of functional-semantic description allows revealing the discursive polyfunctionality of these deontic statements.

About the authors

Anna W. Sytko

Minsk State linguistic university

Author for correspondence.
Email: anns55555@yahoo.de
Zacharov str., 21, Minsk, Republic of Belarus, 220035

PhD, Head of German phonetics and grammar department


  1. Zadvornaja, E.G. (2001). Discourse. In Postmodernism. Encyclopedia. Minsk: Interpresservis; Knizhnyj Dom. URL: http://textarchive.ru/c-1069760-pall.html (accessed: 14.03.2019). (In Russ.).
  2. Grejmas, A.Zh. & Fontanij, Zh. (2007). Semiotics passions. From the state of things to the state of the soul, I.G. Merkulovа (Transl.). Moscow: LKI. (In Russ.).
  3. Nacional'nyj korpus russkogo jazyka. URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru. (accessed: 31.01.2019). (In Russ.).
  4. Paducheva, E.V. (2016). Modality. URL: http://rusgram.ru/Modal'nost'#212. (accessed: 14.02.2019). (In Russ.).
  5. Karasik, V.I. (1991). Language of social status. Moscow: The Institute of Linguistics, USSR Academy of Sciences, Volgograd Pedagogical Institute. (In Russ.).
  6. Apresjan, Ju.D. (1995). Performances in grammar and vocabulary In: Selected Works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Shkola “Jazyki russkoj kul'tury”. 199—219. (In Russ.).
  7. Dobrovol'skij, D.O. & Paducheva, E.V. (2010). Statements from the 1st person: semantics and pragmatics In Logical analysis of the language. Mono-, dia-, polylogue in different languages and cultures. Moscow: Indrik. pp. 104—121. (In Russ.).
  8. Paducheva, E.V. (2008). The statement and its correlation with reality: the referential aspects of the semantics of pronouns. Moscow: URSS LKI. (In Russ.).
  9. Apresjan, Ju.D. (1995). Pragmatic information for the explanatory dictionary In Selected Works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Shkola “Jazyki russkoj kul'tury”. pp. 135—155. (In Russ.).
  10. Das Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache des 20. Jahrhunderts. URL: http://www.dwds.de. (accessed: 12.06.2019). (In Russ.).
  11. Vasil'ev, L.M. (1981). Semantics of the Russian verb. Ufa: Bashkir State University. (In Russ.).
  12. Shilikhina, K.M. (2013). Discursive markers of non-trivial lexical choice. Komp'juternaja lingvistika i intellektual'nye tehnologii. Proceedings of the annual International Conference “Dialog”. Vol. 1. Russian State University for the Humanities. Moscow. pp. 625—633. (In Russ.).
  13. Shmeleva, T.V. (1987). “Tak skazat'” and “kak govoritsja”. Grammatical Words [Sluzhebnye slova]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University. pp. 125—132. (In Russ.).
  14. Shmeleva, T.V. (1983). Code of speech behavior, Russian language abroad, 1, 72—77. (In Russ.).
  15. Paducheva, E.V. (2012). Indefinite-personal sentence and its implied subject, Topics in the study of language, 1, 27—41. (In Russ.).



Abstract - 167

PDF (Russian) - 63




Copyright (c) 2019 Sytko A.W.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies