What are We to Do with ‘Muslim Subjectivity’? Prospects and Pitfalls of the Research Approach in a Historiographical Context

Cover Page

Cite item

Full text / tables, figures

Abstract

The author discusses, in the historiographical context, problems posed by the growing wave of research on the “history of Muslim subjectivity.” Noting the paradoxical danger of the reorientalization of and the loss of historicity in Islamic studies, the author insists on the importance of the very designation of the emerging approach and suggests as a more correct term “history of Muslim subjectivities”. Some aspects of the nowadays’ interpretations of the interaction between the individual and the social and cultural in history, of the role of agency and subjecthood of historical actors are considered, as well as the correlation between persona studies and studies of the “techniques of the self.” Proceeding from the approaches that presume the “return of the subject,” the author emphasizes the expediency, for the studies of Muslim subjectivities, of microhistorical approaches, in particular, the “pragmatic turn” and the Russian version of microhistory with its characteristic attention to the individual and its complex vision of the historical context.

About the authors

Olga Iu. Bessmertnaia

Higher School of Economics

Author for correspondence.
Email: obessmertnaya@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4588-1035

PhD in Cultural Studies, Ass. Professor, Senior Researcher, the Academic Director of the MA Program “Muslim Worlds in Russia (History & Culture),” Institute for Oriental and Classical Studies

21/4, Staraya Basmannaya Str., bld. 3, Moscow, 105066, Russia

References

  1. Akel'ev, E.V., and Velizhev, M.B. “I snova ‘Kazus’? [And the “Kazus” again?].” Kazus. Individual'noe i unikal'noe v istorii: Antologiia, 18-27. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2022 (in Russian).
  2. Amselle, J.-L. “Tensions within culture.” Social Dynamics 18, no. 1 (1992): 42-65.
  3. Atnashev, T., and Velizhev, M., eds. “Mikroistoriia v Rossii: The State of the Art [Microhistory in Russia: The State of the Art].” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie 160, no. 6 (2019): 83-122 (in Russian).
  4. Bessmertnaia, O.Iu. “Snova mikroistoriia? [The Microhistory again?].” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie 160, no. 6 (2019): 96-101 (in Russian).
  5. Bessmertnyi, Iurii. “Chto za ‘Kazus’ [What ‘Kazus’ is it?]?” Kazus. Individual'noe i unikal'noe v istorii: Antologiia. Moscow: Novoe literaturn. obozrenie Publ., 2022: 54-77 (in Russian).
  6. Bhabha H.K. The Location of Culture. London; New York: Routledge, 1994.
  7. Boym, Svetlana. “How is the Soviet Subjectivity Made?” Ab Imperio, no. 3 (2002): 285-296 (in Russian).
  8. Bustanov, Alfred. “Introduction.” In Bustanov, A., and Usmanov, V., eds. Muslim Subjectivity in Soviet Russia: The Memoirs of ‘Abd al-Majid al-Qadiri. Leiden: Brill, 2022: 1-83.
  9. Butler, J. Gendernoe bespokoistvo: Feminizm i podryv identichnosti [Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity]. Moscow: V-A-C Press Publ., 2022 (in Russian).
  10. Clifford, J. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Harvard Univ. Press, 1988.
  11. Daston, L., and Galison, P. Ob"ektivnost' [Objectivity]. Moscow: Novoe literaturn. obozrenie Publ., 2018 (in Russian).
  12. Daston, L., and Sibum, H.O. “Introduction: Scientific Personae and Their Histories.” Science in Context 16, no. 1-2 (2003): 1-8.
  13. Davis, N. Z. “Boundaries and the Sense of Self in Sixteenth Century France.” In T.C. Heller, M. Sosna, D.E. Wellbery, eds. Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought. Stanford: Stanford Univ Press, 1986: 53-63
  14. Dosse, F. “De la structure au sujet. L'humanisation des sciences humaines ?” Éditions sciences humaines. Hors-série (ancienne formule), no. 21 (Juin/Juillet 1998), https://www.scienceshumaines.com/de-la-structure-au-sujet-l-humanisation-des-sciences-humaines_fr_11738.html (in French).
  15. Dosse, F. L'empire du sens. L'humanisation des sciences humaines. Paris: La Découverte, 1995 (in French)
  16. Felek, Ö., and Knysh, A.D., eds. Dreams and Visions in Islamic Societies. New York: Suny Press, 2012
  17. Foucault, M. Ispol'zovanie udovol'stvii. Istoriia seksual'nosti [Usage des plaisirs. L’Histoire de la sexualité]. Vol. 2 of Volia k istine: po tu storonu znaniia, vlasti i seksual'nosti [The will to truth: Beyond knowledge, power and sexuality], 269-306. Moscow: Kastal’ Publ., 1996 (in Russian)
  18. Gardet, L. Les hommes de l'islam, approche des mentalités. Paris: Hachette, 1977 (in French).
  19. Gerasimov, I. “Becoming a Soviet Plebeian Subject: The Story of Mark Miller Narrated by Himself.” Ab Imperio, no. 1 (2017): 184-210.
  20. Gofman, I. Predstavlenie sebia drugim v povsednevnoi zhizni [The presentation of self in everyday life]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2000 (in Russian).
  21. Hellbeck, J. “Working, Struggling, Becoming: Stalin-Era Autobiographical Texts.” Russian Review 60, no. 3 (2001): 340-359.
  22. Jung D., Sinclair K., eds. Muslim Subjectivities in Global Modernity: Islamic traditions and the construction of modern Muslim identities. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2020.
  23. Jung, D. “The Formation of Modern Muslim Subjectivities: Research Project and Analytical Strategy.” Tidsskrift for Islamforskning 11, no. 1 (2017): 11-29.
  24. Jung, D., Petersen M.J., and Lei Sparre, S. Politics of Modern Muslim Subjectivities. Islam, Youth, and Social Activism in the Middle East. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
  25. Kafadar, C. “Self and Others: The Diary of a Dervish in Seventeenth Century Istanbul and First Person Narratives in Ottoman Literature.” Studia Islamica, no. 69 (1989): 121-150.
  26. Khalfin, I. Avtobiografiia bol'shevizma: Mezhdu spaseniem i padeniem [The Autobiography of Bolshevism: Between Salvation and Fall]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2023 (in Russian).
  27. Khell'bek, J. Revoliutsiia ot pervogo litsa: Dnevniki stalinskoi epokhi [Revolution on My Mind: Writing a Diary under Stalin]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2021 (in Russian).
  28. Krylova, A. “The Tenacious Liberal Subject in Soviet Studies.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 1, no. 1 (2000): 119-146.
  29. Kuper, A. Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
  30. Lepetit, B. “Histoires des pratiques, pratique de l’histoire.” In Lepetit, B., ed. Les forms des l’expérience: Une autre histoire sociale, 9-22. Paris: Albin Michel, 1995.
  31. Levi, G. “Mikroistoriia i global'naia istoriia [Microhistory and Global History].” Kazus. Individual'noe i unikal'noe v istorii, no. 14 (2019): 359-378 (in Russian).
  32. Levi, G. “On Microhistory.” In Burke, P., ed. New Perspectives on Historical Writing. 2nd ed., 97-119. Malden: Polity Press, 2001.
  33. Marshall, D.P. Moore Ch., Barbour K. Persona Studies: An Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019.
  34. Marshall, P.D., and Barbour, K. “Making Intellectual Room for Persona Studies: A New Consciousness and a Shifted Perspective.” Persona Studies 1, no. 1 (2015): 1-12.
  35. Mogilner, M., transl. “Interviews with Igal Halfin and Jochen Hellbeck.” Ab Imperio, no. 3 (2002): 217-260.
  36. Paul, H. “Introduction: Scholarly Personae in the History of Orientalism, 1870-1930.” In Engberts, Ch., and Paul, H., eds. Scholarly Personae in the History of Orientalism, 1870-1930. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
  37. Pinskii, A. Posle Stalina: Pozdnesovetskaia sub"ektivnost' (1953-1985) [After Stalin: Late Soviet subjectivity (1953-1985)]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg European Univ. Publ., 2018 (in Russian).
  38. Pisarev, A. “Obzor rossiiskikh intellektual'nykh zhurnalov [Review of Russian intellectual journals (Who came after the subject?)].” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, November 27, 2022, https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/neprikosnovennyy_zapas/135_nz_1_2021/article/23399/?sphrase_id=477390 (in Russian).
  39. Plotnikov, N. “Ot ‘individual'nosti’ k ‘identichnosti’ (istoriia poniatii personal'nosti v russkoi kul'ture) [From ‘individuality’ to ‘identity’ (the history of the concepts of personality in Russian culture)].” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 3 (2008): 64-83
  40. Revel, J. “Micro-analyse et construction du social.” Odissei: Chelovek v istorii. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1996: 110-127 (in Russian).
  41. Revel, J. “Vozvrashchenie k sobytiiu: puti istoriopisaniia [Retour sur l’événement: un itinéraire historio-graphique].” Homo Historicus: K 80-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia Iu.L. Bessmertnogo. Bk. 1, 238-254. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2003 (in Russian).
  42. Rizvi, K., ed. Affect, Emotion, and Subjectivity in Early Modern Muslim Empires. New Studies in Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Art and Culture. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
  43. Scherrer, J. Kulturologie: Rußland auf der Suche nach einer zivilisatorischen Identität. Göttingen: Wallstein-Verlag, 2003.
  44. Sheikh, F.M. Forging Ideal Muslim Subjects. Discursive Practices, Subject Formation, & Muslim Ethics. London: Lexington Books, 2020.
  45. Spivak, G.Ch. Can the Subaltern Speak? Basingstoke: [S.n.], 1988.
  46. Tabachnikova, S.V. Mishel' Fuko: istorik nastoiashchego [Michel Foucault: a historian of the present].” In Foucault, M. Volia k istine: po tu storonu znaniia, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Moscow: Kastal’ Publ., 1996: 396-443 (in Russian).
  47. Talal, A. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 2003.
  48. Thum, R. “What is Islamic History?” History and Theory 57 (2019): 7-19.
  49. Trüper, H. “Dispersed Personae: Subject-Matters of Scholarly Biography in Nineteenth-Century Oriental Philology.” Asiatische Studien 67 (2013): 1325-60.
  50. Zaretskii, Iu. “Istoriia sub"ektivnosti i istoriia avtobiografii: vazhnye obnovleniia [The history of subjectivity and the history of autobiography: important updates].” Neprikosnovennyi zapas, no. 3 (2012), https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/neprikosnovennyy_zapas/83_nz_3_2012/article/18790/ (in Russian).
  51. Zaretskii, Iu.P. “ ‘Iomne tvoriu izvestie’: Russkie srednevekovye avtobiograficheskie rasskazy [‘And I am creating news about me’: Russian medieval autobiographical stories].” In Istoriia sub"ektivnosti: Drevniaia Rus'. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2010: 11-48 (in Russian)
  52. Zaretskii, Iu.P. “Fenomen srednevekovoi avtobiografii [The phenomenon of medieval autobiography].” In Istoriia sub"ektivnosti: Srednevekovaia Evropa. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2009: 9-52 (in Russian)

Copyright (c) 2023 Bessmertnaia O.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies