Nomads of the Steppe Ciscaucasia during the Great Reforms in Russia
- Authors: Lidzhieva I.V.1, Kidirniyazov D.S.2
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Research Centre the Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Daghestan Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 20, No 1 (2021): History of relations with the center and national regions of Russia
- Pages: 74-87
- Section: HISTORY OF RELATIONS WITH THE CENTER AND NATIONAL REGIONS OF RUSSIA
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/russian-history/article/view/25758
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-1-74-87
Cite item
Full text / tables, figures
Abstract
Based on an analysis of archival documents and periodical press materials, the present paper studies the impact of the liberal reforms of Alexander II on the policies of the imperial authorities for the nomadic peoples of the steppe of Ciscaucasia: the Kalmyks, Nogais and Turkmens. The liberal reforms of the 1860s and 1870s had a direct impact on the formation of the national intelligentsia, which during the revolutionary events of the early 20th century led to the rise of the national movement in the empire’s peripheries and to the struggle for self-determination of the non-Russian populations during the Russian Revolution of 1917. The article reconstructs individual facts and events from the life of the nomadic population under specific socio-economic and political-legal conditions. Using the historical-genetic method, the influence of liberal reforms on the vital activity of the nomadic peoples of the Stavropol province is revealed. The authors focus on the activities of regional authorities during the period under review, which were liberal in nature and carried out in the context of the reforms of Alexander II. The authors conclude that the pre-Caucasus steppe, the territory of the nomadic Kalmyks, Nogais and Turkmens, being the national edge of the Russian Empire and falling under a special system of governance related to the ethnic and religious characteristics of the populations, was not drawn into the orbit of liberal reforms. Meanwhile, a number of measures were approved by the regional executive authorities on the ground, of course, first of all, aimed at satisfying the needs of the imperial policy for incorporating the region into the common imperial space, but at the same time improving the lives of the nomadic peoples of the Stavropol province, in particular in the field of education and legal procedures.
Full text / tables, figures
Table 1. Number of literate foreigners by age
Age limits, years | Total number, peoples | Literate among them, peoples (%) | ||
Men | Women | Men | Women | |
10–19 | 5 134 | 3 974 | 527 (10,3) | 147 (3,7) |
20–29 | 5 395 | 4 123 | 606 (11,3) | 134 (3,3) |
30–39 | 4 133 | 2 697 | 452 (11) | 90 (3,3) |
40–49 | 2 823 | 1 851 | 296 (10,4) | 26 (1,4) |
50–59 | 1 911 | 1 306 | 128 (6,7) | 13 (1) |
60–69 | 1 054 | 711 | 78 (7,4) | 10 (1,4) |
70–79 | 323 | 245 | 13 (4) | 1 (0,4) |
80–89 | 66 | 46 | 3 (4,5) | – |
90–99 | 7 | 10 | – | – |
Source: N.A. Troynitskiy ed. Pervaya Vseobshchaya perepis' naseleniya Rossiyskoy imperii 1897 g. Vyp. 67. Stavropol'skaya guberniya. Tetrad' II (poslednyaya). St. Petrsburg, 1905.
About the authors
Irina V. Lidzhieva
Federal Research Centre the Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: irina-lg@yandex.ru
Doktor Istoricheskikh Nauk [Dr. habil. hist.], Leading Researcher of the Department of Humanitarian Research
41, Chehova St., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, RussiaDaniyal S. Kidirniyazov
Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Daghestan Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: daniyal2006@rambler.ru
Doktor Istoricheskikh Nauk [Dr. habil. hist.], Professor, Leading Researcher of the Department of Ancient and Medieval History of Dagestan, Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography
75, M. Yaragskogo St., Makhachkala, Republic of Daghestan, 367030, RussiaReferences
- Bentkovskiy, I.V. “Beglyy obzor razvitiya ekonomicheskogo sostoyaniya Stavropol'skoy gubernii za 25-letie tsarstvovaniya Gosudarya Imperatora.” Stavropol'skiye gubernskiye vedomosti, no. 8 (1880): 2–12 (in Russian).
- Dzhumagulova, A.T. “Trends in the administrative and legal development of the Nogai of the North Caucasus as part of the Russian Empire at the end of XVIII – 60s. XX century.” Modern Science and Innovation, no. 3 (2014): 35–40 (in Russian).
- Dzhumagulova, A.T. “Traditsionnyye instituty obychnogo prava nogaytsev v kontse XVIII–XIX vv.” In Nogaytsy: XXI vek. Istoriya. YAzyk. Kul'tura. O istokov – k gryadushchemu. Materialy Tret'yey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 66–72. Cherkessk: Karachayevo-Cherkesskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. U.D. Aliyeva, Karachayevo-Cherkesskiy institut gumanitarnykh issledovaniy pri Pravitel'stve KCHR Publ., 2019 (in Russian).
- Farforovskiy, S.V. Nogaytsy Stavropol'skoy gubernii. Istoriko-etnograficheskiy ocherk. Tiflis: Tipografiya K.P. Kozlovskogo Publ., 1909 (in Russian).
- Farforovskiy, S.V. Narodno yuridicheskiye obychai turkmen Stavropol'skoy gubernii. Etnograficheskiy ocherk. 1909 goda. Stavropol'-Kavkazskiy: Elektropechatnya Vaynblat Publ., 1910 (in Russian).
- Kochekayev, B.B. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoye i politicheskoye razvitiye nogayskogo obshchestva v XIX – nachale XX vv. Alma-Ata: Stavropol'skoye knizhnoye izdatel'stvo Publ., 1973 (in Russian).
- Kurbanov, A.V. Stavropol'skiye turkmeny: istoriko-etnograficheskiye ocherki. St. Petersburg: Yazykovoy tsentr SPbGU Publ., 1995 (in Russian).
- Lidzhiyeva, I.V. “Protection of public order by foreign bodies of local self-government in the XIX and early XX centuries.” Tomsk State University Journal, no. 427 (2018): 132–136. doi: 10.17223/15617793/427/17
- Magomaev, V.Hk., and Kidirniyazov, D.S. Nogaytsy v severokavkazskom istoricheskom protsesse v XVI – nachale XX v. Groznyy: AN Chechenskoy respubliki Publ., 2017 (in Russian).
- Mamedov, K.N. “The rights of subjects in different periods of the existence of Russian absolutism.” State and Law in XXI, no. 1 (2017): 10–14 (in Russian).
- Miller, A. “The Empire and Nation in the Imagination of Russian Nationalism.” In Imperial Rule, 9–26. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2004.
- Miller, A.I. Imperiya Romanovykh i natsionalizm: Esse po metodologii istoricheskogo issledovaniya. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2010 (in Russian).
- Saratorim P., and Shabley, P. Eksperimenty znaniy: adat, shariat i proizvodstvo znaniy v Kazakhskoy stepi. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2019 (in Russian).
- Shcheglov, I.L. Trukhmeny i nogaytsy Stavropol'skoy gubernii. Stavropol': Svedeniya o khozyaystve osedlykh i kochuyushchikh inorodtsev, russkikh krest'yan i khutoryan-ovtsevodov v Trukhmenskoy i Achikulakskoy stepi Stavropol'skoy gubernii. Stavropol': Tipografiya Gubernskogo pravleniya Publ., 1910–1911 (in Russian).
- Tvalchrelidze, A. Stavropol'skaya guberniya v statisticheskom, geograficheskom, istoricheskom i sel'skokhozyaystvennom otnosheniyakh. Stavropol': Kavkazskaya biblioteka Publ., 1991 (in Russian).
- Vasin, K.L. Administrativnyye i sudebnyye reformy 60–90-kh gg. XIX v. v stepnykh oblastyakh Zapadnoy Sibiri (Akmolinskoy, Semipalatinskoy i Semirechenskoy). Omsk: Omskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 2008 (in Russian).
- Volodin, A.A. “Trukhmenskaya step' i trukhmeny.” In Sbornik materialov dlya opisaniya mestnostey i plemen Kavkaza, 1–98. Tiflis: Tip. Kantselyarii Namestnika Yego Imperatorskogo Velichestva na Kavkaze i K. Kozlovskogo Publ., 1908 (in Russian).