The Phenomenon of Conversion from Orthodoxy to the Armenian Faith in the Russian Empire in the 19th - early 20th Century

Cover Page

Cite item

Full text / tables, figures


The article analyzes why and how persons of the Orthodox confession converted to the Armenian faith in the nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Russian Empire. This phenomenon is linked to the practice of mixed marriages between persons belonging to the Orthodox and Armenian confessions. While the status of non-Orthodox Christian confessions in Russia during the synodal period has received a good amount of scholarly attention, not much research has been devoted to the conversion from Orthodoxy to the Armenian faith, and to the issue of marriages between persons belonging to these faiths. The present paper identifies the motives and circumstances of religious conversions and the peculiarities of mixed marriages. It does so on the basis of unpublished documents from the funds of the National Archive of the Republic of Armenia. Equally new is the authors’ suggestion to consider these phenomena as an integral component in the history of Russian-Armenian church relations in the period 1828-1917. Until 1905, the regulations of the Orthodox Church demanded that after the conduction of an interreligious marriage, both spouses continued to practice their respective faiths, and their children were baptized in Orthodoxy. This is reflected in the metric books of the Erivan Pokrovsky Orthodox Cathedral (1880-1885). The analysis of archival documents allows us to conclude that after 1905, most of the conversions from Orthodoxy to the Armenian faith were performed by women who intended to marry men of the Armenian confession. The reason for this phenomenon is that interreligious marriages and the baptism of children born from mixed couples was still in the competence of the Russian Orthodox Church. Only if both partners belonged to the Armenian faith, the wedding could take place in the Armenian Church, and their children were brought up in the Armenian faith. In addition to matrimonial reasons, the article underlines some other important motives behind conversions from Orthodoxy to the Armenian confession.

About the authors

Vladimir S. Blokhin

Yekaterinburg Orthodox Theological Seminary; Ural State University of Railway Transport

Author for correspondence.

Kandidat Pedagogicheskikh Nauk [PhD in Pedagog.], Associate professor of the Department of Church History and Philology, Yekaterinburg Orthodox Theological Seminary; Associate professor of the Department of World Economy and Logistics, Ural State University of Railway Transport.

57, R. Luxemburg Str., Yekaterinburg, 620026, Russia; 66, Kolmogorova Str., Yekaterinburg, 620034, Russia


  1. Ambartsumov, I.V. “Problems and conflicts of the marriage law of the Russian Empire (late XX – early XX century).”Christian Reading, no. 1 (2013): 61–63 (in Russian).
  2. Ambartsumov, I.V. Nepravoslavnyye khristianskiye ispovedaniya v sisteme rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: konets XIX v. – iyul' 1914 g. St. Petersburg: SPbGU Publ., 2014 (in Russian).
  3. Ayrapetyan, A. “Demographic policy of Russia in Eastern Armenia in the XX century and the begining of the twentieth century (on the example of the Alexandropol district).” Armenovedeniye, no. 2 (2016): 83–94 (in Russian).
  4. Baturkin, A. “Religious policy of the Russian Empire in the second half of the 20th century.” Power, no. 2 (2009): 77–79 (in Russian).
  5. Blokhin, V.S. “Overcoming theological stereotypes about the Armenian Church in the Russian public consciousness of the XX – early XX century.” Bulletin of Yerevan university, no. 141 (2013): 45–51 (in Russian).
  6. Dorskaya, A.A. “Legal status of the Russian Empire subjectat the beginning of the XX century: religious aspect.” Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, no. 2 (2002): 213–224 (in Russian).
  7. Gavrilenkov, A.F. “Religious policy of the Russian state during the period of the empire (1721–1917): periodization, principles and historical lessons.” Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Education, no. 4 (2015): 30–34 (in Russian).
  8. Kail', M.V. “Confessions of Russia in the Policies of the Provisional Government: 1917.” Herald of an Archivist, no. 1 (2019): 299–311 (in Russian).
  9. Korkodinova, A.V., and Glavatskaya, Ye.M. “Religiozno-smeshannyye braki po materialam metricheskikh knig lyuteranskoy obshchiny Yekaterinburga za 1886–1919 gg.” In Dokument. Arkhiv. Istoriya. Sovremennost': Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Yekaterinburg, 2–3 dekabrya 2016 g., 374–378. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta Publ., 2016 (in Russian).
  10. Kuliyev, F.M. “Formation of a governance system for Christian non-Orthodox confessions in the 20th century in the North Caucasus.” Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin, no. 28 (2009): 126–133 (in Russian).
  11. Kuliyev, F.M. “Legal regulatioin of confession’s activity in the Russian Empire in the end of XVIII – early XX century.” Izvestiya SOIGSI, no. 15 (2015): 14–24 (in Russian).
  12. Minenko, S.V. “Russian legislation on the protection of the ruling Orthodox Church on proselytism of the other faiths Churches (XVIIII – XX century).” Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, no. 1 (2011): 46–50.
  13. Mokhovaya, T.A. “Formation and development of the institution of marriage in the legislation of the Russian Empire of the XX century.” Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences, no. 4 (2014): 250–253 (in Russian).
  14. Sofronov, A.A. “Regulation of the activities of heterodox and non-faith religions by the Ministry of Internal Affairs.” Bulletin of Kostroma State University, no. 5 (2006): 32–35 (in Russian).
  15. Sofronov, V.Yu. “State legislation of Russia on confessional issues and Orthodox missionary work at the end of the XVII – early XX century.” Izvestiya of Altai State University, no. 4 (2007): 138–144 (in Russian).
  16. Shingareva, N.V. “The role of the Department of Spiritual Affairs of Foreign Confessions in the implementation of state policy in the religious sphere.” Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, no. 10 (2015): 54–56 (in Russian).
  17. Teryukova, Ye.A. “Department of Spiritual Affairs of Foreign Confessions and Ethno-Confessional Policy of the Russian State (XVIIII – early XX centuries).” State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, no. 4 (2010): 204–208 (in Russian).
  18. Teryukova, Ye.A. “Russian Religious Legislation of the early 20th centuryabout interreligious conversions.” Religiovedenie, no. 3 (2013): 163–177 (in Russian).
  19. Tunyan, V.G. “Echmiadzin i samoderzhaviye: vopros adaptatsii.” In Yezhegodnik bogoslovskogo fakul'teta Yerevanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 225–240. Yerevan: YEGU Publ., 2017 (in Russian).
  20. Tunyan, V.G. Echmiadzinskiy prestol XIX – nachala XX v. Yerevan: GIUA Publ., 2001 (in Russian).
  21. Troynitskiy, N.A. Pervaya vseobshchaya perepis' naseleniya Rossiyskoy imperii 1897 goda. St. Petersburg: [S.n.], 1897–1905 (in Russian).
  22. Vartanyan, V.G. Armyano-Grigorianskaya tserkov' v politike imperatora Nikolaya I. Rostov-on-Don: «Firma «Irbis» Publ., 1999 (in Russian).
  23. Vedyayev, A.V. “Mixed marriages in the Russian Orthodox Church during the Synodal period.” Christian Reading, no. 6 (2017): 203–219 (in Russian).
  24. Vert, P. “Head of the Church, subject of the emperor: Armenian Catholicos at the crossroads of domestic and foreign policy of the Russian Empire, 1828–1914.” Ab Imperio, no. 3 (2006): 99–138 (in Russian).
  25. Vert, P. Pravoslaviye, inoslaviye, inoveriye: Ocherki po istorii religioznogo raznoobraziya Rossiyskoy imperii. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2012 (in Russian).

Copyright (c) 2020 Blokhin V.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies