The Use of Modern Technologies to Increase the Level of Trust in Society

Abstract

One of the pressing issues of the modern world is the problem of trust in government. The election process is a pivotal event in society’s life, influencing a country’s future. Decreased trust in authority, including elections, leads to vulnerability in the voting and result tallying process. Simultaneously, the rapid advancement of information technology, automation, and computerization affecting almost all spheres of life, among other things, has a widespread impact on the functioning of government institutions. One of the key tasks addressed by new technologies is increasing trust levels in society. Blockchain technology, or distributed ledgers, has revolutionized the world of information technology and found applications in various domains, including the organization of elections at different levels. The use of blockchain technology in the electoral process can help address the trust issue by ensuring transparency, reliability, and confidentiality in voting, while minimizing the possibility of result tampering. In a blockchain-based system, voting can occur anonymously without intermediaries and intermediate technologies. This article examines the problem of trust in government institutions, highlights issues in the electoral process, presents a description of the blockchain technology-based solution, and provides examples of existing systems used during the electoral process. It concludes that the implementation of blockchain technology in the electoral process will ensure a more transparent and secure voting process, significantly increasing trust in authority.

About the authors

Denis A. Gromyko

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: da_gromyko@rudn.ru
Researcher of the Department of Public Administration 6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198

References

  1. Kautonen T. Trust as a Governance Mechanism in Inter-firm Relations: Conceptual Considerations. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review. 2006; 1 (3): 89–108.
  2. Nikitina Yu.N. Doverie kak jelement struktury rynka strahovanija zhizni [Trust as an Element of the Life Insurance Market Structure]. URL: http://www.ecsoc.msses.ru/pdf/ecsoc_t8_ n1.pdf/ (accessed: 20.08.2023) (In Russ.).
  3. Fukuyama F. Doverie: Social’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k procvetaniju [Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity]. Moscow: AST: Ermak; 2004 (In Russ.).
  4. Milner B.Z. Teorija organizacii: Uchebnik dlja studentov vuzov, obuchajushhihsja po special’nosti «Gosudarstvennoe i municipal’noe upravlenie» [Organization Theory: A Textbook for Students Majoring in “State and Municipal Management”. 4th ed.]. Moscow: INFA-M; 2004 (In Russ.).
  5. Schtompka P. Sociologija. Analiz obshhestva [Sociology. Society Analysis]. Moscow; 2005.
  6. Freik N.V. Koncepcija doverija v issledovanijah P. Shtompki [The Concept of Trust in the Research of P. Schtompka]. URL: http://www.ecsocman.edu.ru/images/pubs/2007/08/14/0000310977/002_Freik.pdf/ (accessed: 20.08.2023) (In Russ.).
  7. Luhmann N. Trust and Power. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1979.
  8. Seligman A. Problema doverija [The Problem of Trust]. Moscow: Idea-Press; 2002 (In Russ.).
  9. Baranov N.A. Vybory kak institut doverija: osobennosti funkcionirovanija v uslovijah pandemii COVID-19 [Elections as an Institution of Trust: Features of Functioning in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Management Consulting. 2021; 10 (In Russ.).
  10. Kokotov A.N. Doverie. Nedoverie. Pravo [Trust. Distrust. Law]. Moscow: Jurist; 2004 (In Russ.).
  11. Kravets I.A. Konstitucionnaja teologija i osnovy konstitucionnogo stroja [Constitutional Theology and Foundations of Constitutional System]. Moscow: Publisher’s Decisions; 2016 (In Russ.).
  12. Ebzeev B.S. Narod, narodnyj suverenitet i predstavitel’stvo: doktrinal’nye osnovy i konstitucionnaja praktika [People, Popular Sovereignty, and Representation: Doctrinal Foundations and Constitutional Practice]. State and Law. 2016; 4 (In Russ.).
  13. Fatenkov A.N. Kak vernut’ sebe doverie k vyboram? [How to Regain Trust in Elections?] Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019; 1 (45) (In Russ.).
  14. Kuteynikov D.L. Osobennosti primenenija tehnologij raspredelennyh reestrov i cepochek blokov (blokchejn) v narodnyh golosovanijah [Features of Applying Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain in Public Voting]. Current Issues in Russian Law. 2019; № 9 (106) (In Russ.).
  15. Baran P. On Distributed Communications. Rand Corporation. URL: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_memoranda/2006/RM3420.pdf (accessed: 20.08.2023).
  16. Nakomoto S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. URL: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf/ (accessed: 20.08.2023).
  17. Chto takoe tehnologija blokchejn prostymi slovami? [What is Blockchain Technology in Simple Terms?]. URL: https://www.bitbetnews.com/kriptovaljuty/chto-takoe-tehnologija-blokchejn-prostymi-slovami/.html/ (accessed: 20.08.2023) (In Russ.).
  18. Ne bitkoinom edinym. Blokchejn — tehnologija budushhego [Not Just Bitcoin. Blockchain — the Technology of the Future]. URL: http://racurs.ua/1690-ne-bitkoinom-edinym-blokcheyn-tehnologiya-buduschego/ (accessed: 20.08.2023) (In Russ.).
  19. Alexeev R.A. Blokchejn kak izbiratel’naja tehnologija novogo pokolenija — perspektivy primenenija na vyborah v sovremennoj Rossii [Blockchain as a Next-Generation Voting Technology — Prospects for Use in Modern Russia’s Elections]. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. 2018; 2 (In Russ.).
  20. Sychev V. V S’erra-Leone proshli blokchejn-vybory prezidenta [Blockchain Elections for President Held in Sierra Leone]. URL: https://nplus1.ru/news/2018/03/15/votes/ (accessed: 20.08.2023) (In Russ.).
  21. Kibervybory v1.0: kak sozdavalas’ sistema blokchejn-golosovanija v Moskve [Cyberelections v1.0: How the Blockchain Voting System Was Created in Moscow]. DIT Company. URL: https://habr.com/ru/specials/480152/ (accessed: 20.08.2023) (In Russ.).
  22. Ivanov V.G. Krizis koncepcii tehnokratii v kontekste izuchenija post-industrial’nogo obshhestva [The Crisis of the Concept of Technocracy in the Context of the Study of Post- industrial Society]. Voprosy gumanitarnyh nauk. 2007;1:428–433 (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2023 Gromyko D.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies