Russian Specialists’ Perception of Negotiations with Chinese Partners: Expectations, Strategies and Challenges

Abstract

In the context of global challenges and changing geopolitical situations around the world, Russian organizations are increasingly facing the necessity of active cooperation with countries in the Far East, especially China. The purpose of this exploratory study was to identify how Russian business representatives perceive and manage this process, with special attention to expectations and perceptions of communication effectiveness. The study focused on two key aspects: firstly, the analysis of expectations of Russian representatives, which shape their approaches to negotiations, and secondly, the assessment of their perception of the dynamics and effectiveness of these negotiations. The study sample included 13 Russian employees of Russian companies who had experience in negotiations with Chinese partners. The study used semi-structured qualitative interviews. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Further coding and analysis of the text were carried out in the Atlas.ti. As a result of the analysis of the interview, the main topics were identified that describe the perception of the negotiation process: expectations regarding the negotiation process, strategies for preparing for negotiations, behavior strategies in negotiations, perception of behavior strategies of partners in interaction, emotions in the negotiation process, perception of a communicative situation (characteristics), perception of oneself in the process of negotiations, the perception of a negotiating partner, the perception of the effectiveness of negotiations. The study showed that successful intercultural business communication requires a combination of professional and culturally oriented approaches. Attention to cultural features and specifics and consideration of their influence on communication contributes to more effective interaction. However, difficulties arise due to the indirect style of communication and differences in the manifestation of emotions, which can make negotiations difficult. In addition, situations that are threatening to the negotiator’s "face" may have an impact on professional and ethnic/ civil identity. As a result of the study, the features of Russian managers’perception of intercultural business communication with Chinese partners were identified, and recommendations were formulated regarding the preparation of Russian managers for international negotiations.

About the authors

Ekaterina D. Vasilyeva

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: edvasilyeva@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7814-953X
SPIN-code: 8077-0132
ResearcherId: X-8185-2018

PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Centre for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Albina A. Gallyamova

HSE University

Email: aagallyamova@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8775-7289
SPIN-code: 6639-2529
Scopus Author ID: 58182813400
ResearcherId: GLV-6876-2022

Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Elizaveta Sh. Komyaginskaya

HSE University

Email: ekomyaginskaya@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8841-1722
SPIN-code: 4854-0374
ResearcherId: HII-5216-2022

Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Nadezhda M. Lebedeva

HSE University

Email: nlebedeva@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2046-4529
SPIN-code: 8197-3858
Scopus Author ID: 8719892500
ResearcherId: H-4866-2015

Doctor of Psychology, Academic Supervisor, Centre for Sociocultural Research, Professor, Faculty of Social Science, School of Psychology

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Adair, W., Brett, J., Lempereur, A., Okumura, T., Shikhirev, P., Tinsley, C., & Lytle, A. (2004). Culture and negotiation strategy. Negotiation Journal, 20(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2004.00008.x
  2. Amanatullah, E.T., Morris, M.W., & Curhan, J.R. (2008). Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 723-738. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012612
  3. Batkhina, A.A., & Lebedeva, N.M. (2019). Рredictors of behavioral strategy choice among Russians in intercultural conflict. Social Psychology and Society, 10(1), 70-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100105
  4. Benetti, S., Ogliastri, E., & Caputo, A. (2021). Distributive/integrative negotiation strategies in cross-cultural contexts: A comparative study of the USA and Italy. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(4), 786-808. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2020.47
  5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  6. Cai, D.A. (2016). Looking below the surface: Comparing subtleties of U.S. and Chinese cultures in negotiation. In J. Weiss (Ed.). Tigers roar: Asia’s recovery and its impact (pp. 213-220). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315291413
  7. Cohen, W.A. (2003). The importance of expectations on negotiation results. European Business Review, 15(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340310464713
  8. Cullinan, M.E., Purtell, R., & Canary, H.E. (2022). Emerging professional identity in patient hand-off routines: A practical application of performative face theory. Health Communication, 37(5), 577-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1857518
  9. Dervin, F. (2010). Assessing intercultural competence in language learning and teaching: A critical review of current efforts. In F. Dervin & E. Suomela-Salmi (Eds.), New Approaches to Assessment in Higher Education (vol. 5, pp. 155-172). Berlin: Peter Lang Verlag.
  10. Grigoryev, D., Fiske, S.T., & Batkhina, A. (2019). Mapping ethnic stereotypes and their antecedents in Russia: The stereotype content model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643
  11. Grigoryev, D.S. (2022). Cognitive and motivational foundations underlying acculturation expectations: Applications of ethnic group position model. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(1), 86-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-1-86-109
  12. Grigoryev, D.S., & Komyaginskaya, E.S. (2023). Intergroup contact and personal and cultural Stereotypes in intercultural relations: A case of the stereotype content in Moscow for Belarusians, Chinese, Uzbeks, and Chechens. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 20(1), 41-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-1-41-66
  13. Holliday, A. (2020). Culture, communication, context, and power. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication (pp. 39-54). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036210-4
  14. Imahori, T.T., & Cupach, W.R. (2005). Identity management theory: Facework in intercultural relationships. In W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about Intercultural Communication (pp. 195-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  15. Jenks, C., Bhatia, A., & Lou, J. (2013). The discourse of culture and identity in national and transnational contexts. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.770862
  16. Kim, D., Pan, Y., & Park, H.S. (1998). High-versus low-context culture: A comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American cultures. Psychology and Marketing, 15(6), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199809)15:6<507::aid-mar2>3.0.co;2-a
  17. Kramer, R.M. (2004). The “dark side” of social context: the role of intergroup paranoia in intergroup negotiations. In M.J. Gelfand & J.M. Brett (Eds.), The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture (pp. 219-237). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  18. Malik, T.H. (2021). Sino-Russian negotiation styles: A cross-cultural analysis of situated patterns. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 6(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119887812
  19. Martin, J.N., & Nakayama, T.K. (2015). Reconsidering intercultural (communication) competence in the workplace: A dialectical approach. Language and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.985303
  20. Michailova, S., & Hutchings, K. (2006). National cultural influences on knowledge sharing: A comparison of China and Russia. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 383-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00595.x
  21. Michailova, S., & Worm, V. (2003). Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and Guanxi. European Management Journal, 21(4), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-2373(03)00077-x
  22. Moore, J. (2017). Performative face theory: A critical perspective on interpersonal identity work. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 258-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1315891
  23. Oliver, R.L., Balakrishnan, P.V. (Sundar), & Barry, B. (1994). Outcome satisfaction in negotiation: A test of expectancy disconfirmation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(2), 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1083
  24. Osland, J.S. (2008). Global leadership. AIB Insights, 8(1), 10-11.
  25. Osland, J.S., & Bird, A. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.2909840
  26. Pratt, M.G. (2016). Hybrid and multiple organizational identities. In M.G. Pratt, M. Schultz, B.E. Ashforth, & D. Ravasi (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (pp. 106-120). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199689576.013.28
  27. Puffer, S.M., & McCarthy, D.J. (2011). Two decades of Russian business and management research: An institutional theory perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.61020800
  28. Ramirez-Marin, J.Y., & Brett, J.M. (2011). Relational construal in negotiation: Propositions and examples from Latin and Anglo cultures. International Negotiation, 16(3), 383-404. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180611x592923
  29. Salacuse, J.W. (1998). Ten ways that culture affects negotiating style: Some survey results. Negotiation Journal, 14(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1998.tb00162.x
  30. Schaerer, M., Teo, L., Madan, N., & Swaab, R.I. (2020). Power and negotiation: Review of current evidence and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.013
  31. Schoop, M. (2021). Negotiation communication revisited. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 29, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00730-5
  32. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571
  33. Shapiro, D.L. (2010). Relational identity theory: A systematic approach for transforming the emotional dimension of conflict. American Psychologist, 65(7), 634-645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020004
  34. Smith, B., Sparkes, A.C., & Caddick, N. (2014). Judging qualitative research. In L. Nelson, R. Groom & P. Potrac (Eds.), Research Methods in Sports Coaching (pp. 192-201). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797549-18
  35. Thomas, S.P., Thomas, R.W., Manrodt, K.B., & Rutner, S.M. (2013). An experimental test of negotiation strategy effects on knowledge sharing intentions in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12004
  36. Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about Intercultural Communication (pp. 71-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
  37. Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Koveshnikov, A. (2019). From cultural differences to identity politics: A critical discursive approach to national identity in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 58(8), 2052-2081. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12517
  38. Vasilyeva, E.D. (2020). Psychological difficulties of Russian-Chinese intercultural communication: Qualitative study of Russian entrepreneurs and employees. Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 124-139. (In Russ.)
  39. Vasilyeva, E.D. (2022). The role of face-saving strategies in intercultural and monocultural business interaction. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow: HSE University. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2024 Vasilyeva E.D., Gallyamova A.A., Komyaginskaya E.S., Lebedeva N.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies