Interpersonal Synchrony and Dispositional Empathy: A Review of International Research
- Authors: Vodneva A.R.1, Oreshina G.V.1, Grigorenko E.L.1,2,3,4,5
-
Affiliations:
- Sirius University of Science and Technology
- Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
- University of Houston
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Yale University
- Issue: Vol 21, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 35-54
- Section: INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN PSYCHOLOGY: NEW RESEARCH TRENDS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/41490
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-1-35-54
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SUVBCQ
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Interpersonal synchrony is the process of alignment of participants in social interaction at the behavioral, physiological, or interbrain levels. This phenomenon is closely interrelated with the establishment of social contacts, the results of joint actions, the enhancement of relationships, and the development of social skills. Despite the popularity of studies of such attunement abroad, in Russian science, it is only beginning to appear. In the literature, a theoretical assumption has been made about the significance of the contribution of trait empathy to interpersonal synchrony. We understand trait empathy as the ability to experience the affective and cognitive states of another person while maintaining one’s own self. The present review is the first attempt to assess the extent to which foreign empirical studies of dyadic synchrony support the proposed hypothesis. The analysis of the literature allows us to note the heterogeneity of the studies in terms of the methods used to assess empathy and interpersonal synchrony, the experimental tasks used, and the interaction contexts studied. The results of the included works reflect contradictory results, which may be related to the mentioned heterogeneity of research designs. It has been shown that empathy can contribute to interpersonal synchrony, but this occurs primarily in dyads of previously familiar participants or in specific contexts that require the use of appropriate empathic skills. In some contexts, the level of empathy of only one of the dyad participants is more important. However, it should be noted that due to the small sample sizes and limited number of studies on the topic, conclusions about the validity of the hypothesis can only be preliminary. There is a need for more relevant studies with sample sizes reaching sufficient power, and unified experiment designs facilitate the possibility of comparing their results.
About the authors
Alena R. Vodneva
Sirius University of Science and Technology
Author for correspondence.
Email: vodneva.alena.ruslanovna@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0585-3603
SPIN-code: 7656-9240
Junior Researcher, Sirius Center for Cognitive Sciences
1 Olympiysky Ave., Sirius urban-type settlement, Federal Territory “Sirius”, Krasnodar Territory, 354340, Russian FederationGalina V. Oreshina
Sirius University of Science and Technology
Email: oreshinagalina.kosm@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5955-6471
SPIN-code: 8084-3501
Junior Researcher, Sirius Center for Cognitive Sciences
1 Olympiysky Ave., Sirius urban-type settlement, Federal Territory “Sirius”, Krasnodar Territory, 354340, Russian FederationElena L. Grigorenko
Sirius University of Science and Technology; Moscow State University of Psychology and Education; University of Houston; Baylor College of Medicine; Yale University
Email: Elena.Grigorenko@times.uh.edu
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9646-4181
SPIN-code: 4453-4618
PhD in General and Educational Psychology, PhD in Developmental Psychology and Genetics, Scientific Supervisor, Sirius Center for Cognitive Sciences, Sirius University of Science and Technology (Sirius, Krasnodar Region, Russia); Leading Scientist, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (Moscow, Russia); Hugh Roy and Lillie Cranz Cullen Distinguished Professor of Psychology, University of Houston (Houston, TX, USA); Professor, Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX, USA); Professor, Yale University (New Haven, CT, USA). Honorary Editor of RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
1 Olympiysky Ave., Sirius, Federal Territory “Sirius”, Krasnodar Territory, 354340, Russian Federation; 2 Karetny Ryad, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation; 4300 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX, 77204, USA; 1 Baylor Plz, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06518, USAReferences
- Altmann, U., Strauss, B., & Tschacher, W. (2022). Cross-correlationand entropy-based measures of movement synchrony: Non-convergence of measures leads to different associations with depressive symptoms. Entropy, 24(9), 1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24091307
- Arellano-Véliz, N.A., Jeronimus, B.F., Kunnen, E.S., & Cox, R.F.A. (2024). The interacting partner as the immediate environment: Personality, interpersonal dynamics, and bodily synchronization. Journal of Personality, 92(1), 180-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12828
- Ayache, J., Connor, A., Marks, S., Kuss, D.J., Rhodes, D., Sumich, A., & Heym, N. (2021). Exploring the “dark matter” of social interaction: Systematic review of a decade of research in spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 718237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718237
- Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00
- Basile, C., Lecce, S., & van Vugt, F.T. (2022). Synchrony during online encounters affects social affiliation and theory of mind but not empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 886639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886639
- Bizzego, A., Azhari, A., Campostrini, N., Truzzi, A., Ng, L.Y., Gabrieli, G., Bornstein, M.H., Setoh, P., & Esposito, G. (2019). Strangers, friends, and lovers show different physiological synchrony in different emotional states. Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010011
- Brown, C.L., West, T.V., Sanchez, A.H., & Mendes, W.B. (2021). Emotional empathy in the social regulation of distress: A dyadic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(6), 1004-1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220953987
- Chen, K.-H., Brown, C.L., Wells, J.L., Rothwell, E.S., Otero, M.C., Levenson, R.W., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2021). Physiological linkage during shared positive and shared negative emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1029-1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000337
- Coutinho, J., Beiramar, A., Silva, C., Lema, A., Lima, V., Grace, R., Oliveira-Silva, P., Gonçalves, Ó., & Sampaio, A. (2016). Validity evidence of the Portuguese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples. Revista Avaliação Psicológica, 14(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2015.1403.02
- Coutinho, J., Pereira, A., Oliveira-Silva, P., Meier, D., Lourenço, V., & Tschacher, W. (2021). When our hearts beat together: Cardiac synchrony as an entry point to understand dyadic co-regulation in couples. Psychophysiology, 58(3), e13739. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13739
- Cross, L., Turgeon, M., & Atherton, G. (2019). How moving together binds us together: The social consequences of interpersonal entrainment and group processes. Open Psychology, 1(1), 273-302. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0018
- Cuadros, Z., Hurtado, E., & Cornejo, C. (2020). Infant-adult synchrony in spontaneous and nonspontaneous interactions. PLoS ONE, 15(12), e0244138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244138
- Davis, M. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85 p.
- Dikker, S., Michalareas, G., Oostrik, M., Serafimaki, A., Kahraman, H.M., Struiksma, M.E., & Poeppel, D. (2021). Crowdsourcing neuroscience: Inter-brain coupling during face-to-face interactions outside the laboratory. NeuroImage, 227, 117436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117436
- Feldman, R. (2017). The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.007
- Ferguson, A.M., Cameron, C.D., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). When does empathy feel good? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.011
- Fujiwara, K., Kimura, M., & Daibo, I. (2020). Rhythmic features of movement synchrony for bonding individuals in dyadic interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 44(1), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00315-0
- Gordon, I., Tomashin, A., & Mayo, O. (2023). A theory of flexible multimodal synchrony. PsyArXiv. April 23. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9u7q8
- Grames, E.M., Stillman, A.N., Tingley, M.W., & Elphick, C.S. (2019). An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co-occurrence networks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(10), 1645-1654. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13268
- Guthridge, M., & Giummarra, M.J. (2021). The taxonomy of empathy: A meta-definition and the nine dimensions of the empathic system. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 002216782110180. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678211018015
- Hall, J.A., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442
- Hoehl, S., Fairhurst, M., & Schirmer, A. (2021). Interactional synchrony: signals, mechanisms and benefits. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa024
- Hoyniak, C.P., Quiñones-Camacho, L.E., Camacho, M.C., Chin, J.H., Williams, E.M., Wakschlag, L.S., & Perlman, S.B. (2021). Adversity is linked with decreased parent-child behavioral and neural synchrony. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 48, 100937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100937
- Hu, Y., Cheng, X., Pan, Y., & Hu, Y. (2022). The intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of interpersonal synchrony. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103513
- Levy, J., & Feldman, R. (2019). Synchronous interactions foster empathy. Journal of Experimental Neuroscience, 13, 117906951986579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069519865799
- Limpo, T., Alves, R.A., & Castro, S.L. (2013). Medir a empatia: Adaptação portuguesa do Índice de Reactividade Interpessoal. Laboratório de Psicologia, 8(2), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.640
- Liu, T., Saito, G., Lin, C., & Saito, H. (2017). Inter-brain network underlying turn-based cooperation and competition: A hyperscanning study using near-infrared spectroscopy. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 8684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09226-w
- Long, Y., Zheng, L., Zhao, H., Zhou, S., Zhai, Y., & Lu, C. (2021). Interpersonal neural synchronization during interpersonal touch underlies affiliative pair bonding between romantic couples. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1647-1659. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa316
- McNaughton, K.A., & Redcay, E. (2020). Interpersonal synchrony in autism. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(3), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-1135-8
- Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy1. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
- Meskova, E.S., Murtazina, E.P., & Ginzburg-Shik, Yu.A. (2022). Joint action coordination: Systemic aspects and socio-psychophysiological factors (review). Psychology. Psychophysiology, 15(3), 91-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps220309
- Mestre, M.V., Carlo, G., Samper, P., Malonda, E., & Mestre, A.L. (2019). Bidirectional relations among empathy-related traits, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 28(3), 514-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12366
- Murtazina, E.P., & Buyanova, I. S. (2021). Studies of interrelated changes in brain activity during social interactions using hyperscanning. Experimental Psychology, 14(4), 205-223. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2021140411
- Murtazina, E.P., Matyul'ko, I. S., Zhuravlev, B.V., & Golubeva, N.K. (2019). Somatoautonomic components of social interactions (review). Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 7(3), 349-362. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2542-1298.2019.7.3.349
- Nelson, B.W., Laurent, S.M., Bernstein, R., & Laurent, H.K. (2017). Perspective-taking influences autonomic attunement between partners during discussion of conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(2), 139-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515626595
- Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrtička, P., & Hoehl, S. (2021). Neural synchrony in mother-child conversation: Exploring the role of conversation patterns. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa079
- Oreshina, G.V., & Zhukova, M.A. (2023). The historical evolution and modern research of the alliance in psychotherapy and counseling. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 12(3), 30-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2023120302
- Oreshina, G.V., & Zhukova, M.A. (2024). Nonverbal synchrony and alliance in exposure therapy for pediatric anxiety: A case report. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 13(1), 10-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2024130101
- Paulus, C. (2009). Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF(IRI) Zur messung von empathie: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.9249
- Péloquin, K., & Lafontaine, M.-F. (2010). Measuring empathy in couples: Validity and reliability of the interpersonal reactivity index for couples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890903510399
- Pizarro, J.J., Basabe, N., Amutio, A., Telletxea, S., Harizmendi, M., & Van Gordon, W. (2020). The mediating role of shared flow and perceived emotional synchrony on compassion for others in a mindful-dancing program. Mindfulness, 11(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01200-z
- Ramseyer, F.T. (2020). Motion energy analysis (MEA): A primer on the assessment of motion from video. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(4), 536-549. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000407
- Reddan, M.C., Young, H., Falkner, J., López-Solà, M., & Wager, T.D. (2020). Touch and social support influence interpersonal synchrony and pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(10), 1064-1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa048
- Romero-Martínez, Á., Rodríguez, A., & Moya-Albiol, L. (2019). Is it easy to synchronize our minds when we are forced to cooperate? Brain Sciences, 9(10), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9100282
- Sakurai, S. (1988). The relationship between empathy and helping behavior in college students. Bulletin of Nara University of Education, 37(1), 149-153.
- Schiavenato, M., & Chu, F. (2021). PICO: What it is and what it is not. Nurse Education in Practice, 56, 103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103194
- Tschacher, W., Ramseyer, F., & Koole, S.L. (2018). Sharing the now in the social present: Duration of nonverbal synchrony is linked with personality. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12298
- Tzanaki, P. (2022). The positive feedback loop of empathy and interpersonal synchronisation: Discussing a theoretical model and its implications for musical and social development. Music & Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043221142715
- Vakhrushev, D.S., & Zhukova, M.A. (2021). Current view on the dyadic synchrony mechanism. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 10(2), 86-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100209
- Vodneva, A.R., Oreshina, G.V., Kustova, T.A., Tkachenko, I.O., Tcepelevich, M.M., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2024). Interpersonal synchrony in mentor-mentee dyads: An analysis of nonverbal synchrony and trait-empathy. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 13(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2024130104
- Washburn, A., Román, I., Huberth, M., Gang, N., Dauer, T., Reid, W., Nanou, C., Wright, M., & Fujioka, T. (2019). Musical role asymmetries in piano duet performance influence alpha-band neural oscillation and behavioral synchronization. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01088
- Yalçın, Ö.N., & DiPaola, S. (2020). Modeling empathy: Building a link between affective and cognitive processes. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(4), 2983-3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09753-0
- Zhang, M., Jia, H., & Zheng, M. (2020). Interbrain synchrony in the expectation of cooperation behavior: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 542093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542093