Intergroup Contact and Personal and Cultural Stereotypes in Intercultural Relations: A Case of the Stereotype Content in Moscow for Belarusians, Chinese, Uzbeks, and Chechens

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The authors use the Stereotype Content Model to consider the relationship between positive and negative intergroup contact and personal and cultural ethnic stereotypes. The introduction poses the theoretical foundations through defining acculturation and adaptation, and also outlining their relationship with stereotypes and intergroup contact in the context of intercultural relations. The empirical part examines intergroup contact and ethnic stereotypes in Moscow about Belarusians, Chinese, Uzbeks, and Chechens with a gender-balanced sample consisted of 316 ethnic Russians aged 16 to 68 (34 years on average). Three competing hypotheses about the correspondence of valence of intergroup contact and stereotypes were considered: (1) constant valence asymmetry; (2) usefulness of stereotype-inconsistent information; (3) epistemic defense. As a result in linear mixed models that (1) personal stereotypes were more positive than cultural ones; (2) however, they were located relative to each other in accordance with the quadrants of cultural stereotypes; (3) intergroup contact was associated with personal stereotypes in the direction according to the valence of the contact; (4) no evidence for interaction between negative contact and cultural stereotypes, whereas the beneficial effect of positive contact was stronger for those ethnic groups with more negative cultural stereotypes. It was concluded that personal experience has only limited scope for improving an already positive attitude, or worsening a negative one. Therefore, only a social policy aimed at changing cultural stereotypes might be efficient.

About the authors

Dmitry Sergeevich Grigoryev

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dgrigoryev@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4511-7942
SPIN-code: 1807-9739

PhD, Research Fellow, Center for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Elizaveta Shamilevna Komyaginskaya

HSE University

Email: eshkomyaginskaya@edu.hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8841-1722

student, master program “Applied Social Psychology”

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Aberson, C.L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(6), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214556699
  2. Aberson, C.L., Ferguson, H., & Allen, J. (2021). Contact, threat, and prejudice: A test of intergroup threat theory across three samples and multiple measures of prejudice. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(4), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.107
  3. Awale, A., Chan, C.S., & Ho, G.T.S. (2019). The influence of perceived warmth and competence on realistic threat and willingness for intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 857–870. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2553
  4. Bai, X., Ramos, M.R., & Fiske, S.T. (2020). As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(23), 12741–12749. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000333117
  5. Barlow, F.K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M.J., Radke, H.R.M., Harwood, J., Rubin, M., & Sibley, C.G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953
  6. Batkhina, A. (2020). Values and communication apprehension as antecedents of conflict styles in intercultural conflicts: A study in Germany and Russia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 26(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000429
  7. Berry, J.W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013
  8. Berry, J.W. (2019). Ecocultural psychology (D. Grigoryev, Trans.). Cultural-Historical Psychology, 15(4), 4–16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150401
  9. Berry, J.W., & Grigoryev, D. (2022). An adaptationist framework to examine intergroup contact. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 15(4), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0406
  10. Berry, J.W., Lepshokova, Z., MIRIPS Collaboration, & Grigoryev, D. (2022). How shall we all live together? Meta-analytical review of the mutual intercultural relations in plural societies project. Applied Psychology, 71(3), 1014–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12332
  11. Brigham, J.C. (1971). Ethnic stereotypes. Psychological Bulletin, 76(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031446
  12. Crisp, R.J., & Turner, R.N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021840
  13. Devine, P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
  14. Dover, T.L., Kaiser, C.R., & Major, B. (2020). Mixed signals: The unintended effects of diversity initiatives. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 152–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12059
  15. Drobizheva, L.M. (2015). The potential of interethnic consent: Comprehension of the concept and social practice in Moscow. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, (11), 80–90. (In Russ.)
  16. Eagly, A.H., & Koenig, A.M. (2021). The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211013775
  17. Eagly, A.H., Nater, C., Miller, D.I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
  18. Filippova, E.I. (2014). Multiculturalism as a policy and as a figure of speech. Vestnik Rossijskoj Natcii, (2), 127–137. (In Russ.)
  19. Fiske, S.T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.48.6.621
  20. Fiske, S.T. (2015). Intergroup biases: A focus on stereotype content. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.010
  21. Fiske, S.T. (2017). Prejudices in cultural contexts: Shared stereotypes (gender, age) versus variable stereotypes (race, ethnicity, religion). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708204
  22. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  23. Grigoryev, D. (2022). Ethnic stereotype content beyond intergroup relations within societies: Exploring the North-South hypothesis for competence and warmth. Cross-Cultural Research, 56(4), 345–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971221080618
  24. Grigoryev, D., Berry, J.W., & Zabrodskaja, A. (2021). Editorial: Stereotypes and intercultural relations: Interdisciplinary integration, new approaches, and new contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 728048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728048
  25. Grigoryev, D., Fiske, S.T., & Batkhina, A. (2019). Mapping ethnic stereotypes and their antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643
  26. Grigoryev, D.S. (2020a). Contact – Emotion – Prejudice model: The role of colorblindness and perceived ethnic density. Social Psychology and Society, 11(3), 167–184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110311
  27. Grigoryev, D.S. (2020b). The Stereotype Content Model and ethnic stereotypes in Russia. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 23(2), 215–244. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.2.9
  28. Grigoryev, D.S. (2022). Cognitive and motivational foundations underlying acculturation expectations: Applications of ethnic group position model. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(1), 86–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-1-86-109
  29. Grigoryev, D.S., Batkhina, A.A., & Dubrov, D.I. (2018). Assimilationism, multiculturalism, colorblindness, and polyculturalism in the Russian context. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 14(2), 53–65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140206
  30. Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., & Rubinstein, R.S. (2015). Stereotype (in)accuracy in perceptions of groups and individuals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415605257
  31. Kosmarskaya, N., & Savin, I. (2021). Perception of migrants by Muscovites through the lens of the contact hypothesis. Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie, (1), 94–111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S086954150013600-0
  32. Kotzur, P.F., & Wagner, U. (2021). The dynamic relationship between contact opportunities, positive and negative intergroup contact, and prejudice: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 418–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000258
  33. Kotzur, P.F., Schäfer, S.J., & Wagner, U. (2019). Meeting a nice asylum seeker: Intergroup contact changes stereotype content perceptions and associated emotional prejudices, and encourages solidarity‐based collective action intentions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 668–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12304
  34. Kotzur, P.F., Veit, S., Namyslo, A., Holthausen, M.-A., Wagner, U., & Yemane, R. (2020). ‘Society thinks they are cold and/or incompetent, but I do not’: Stereotype content ratings depend on instructions and the social group's location in the stereotype content space. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 1018–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12375
  35. Kozlova, M., & Ryabichenko, T. (2021). Ideologies of intergroup relations in pedagogical discourse: Representation of cultures and intercultural interaction in the educational books for migrant children. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(6), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1910065
  36. Kuznetsov, I.M. (2017). The balance of interethnic attitudes as an indicator of state of interethnic relations. Universe of Russia, 26(1), 58–80. (In Russ.)
  37. Lebedeva, N., Tatarko, A., & Berry, J.W. (2016). Intercultural relations among migrants from Caucasus and Russians in Moscow. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 52, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.03.001
  38. Montreuil, A., & Bourhis, R.Y. (2001). Majority acculturation orientations toward “valued” and “devalued” immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(6), 698–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032006004
  39. Mukomel', V.I. (2021). Migration situation and migrants in the perception of Russians. Vestnik Rossijskoj Natcii, (1–2), 53–68. (In Russ.)
  40. Neuberg, S.L., Williams, K.E.G., Sng, O., Pick, C.M., Neel, R., Krems, J.A., & Pirlott, A.G. (2020). Toward capturing the functional and nuanced nature of social stereotypes: An affordance management approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 245–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.004
  41. Novikov, A.L., & Novikova, I.A. (2019). Ethnic stereotypes in intercultural communication: Psychological and semantic aspects. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 10(4), 977–989. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-4-977-989
  42. Paolini, S., & McIntyre, K. (2019). Bad is stronger than good for stigmatized, but not admired outgroups: Meta-analytical tests of intergroup valence asymmetry in individual-to-group generalization experiments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317753504
  43. Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
  44. Popper, M., & Kollárová, V. (2018). Testing SCM questionnaire instructions using cognitive interviews. Human Affairs, 28(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0024
  45. Reimer, N.K., Becker, J.C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., Neji, S., Rychlowska, M., Schmid, K., & Hewstone, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478
  46. Riek, B.M., Mania, E.W., & Gaertner, S.L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
  47. Sam, D.L., & Berry, J.W. (2010). Acculturation: When individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 472–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610373075
  48. Shamionov, R.M. (2018). Formation of discriminatory personal attitudes in the process of socialization. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 7(2), 129–135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-2-129-135
  49. Soldatova, G.U. (1993). Research on dynamics of ethnic stereotypes. In P.N. Shikhirev (Ed.), Socio-Psychological Studies of Interethnic Relations. Moscow: Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
  50. Stanciu, A., Vauclair, C.-M., & Rodda, N. (2019). Evidence for stereotype accommodation as an expression of immigrants’ socio-cognitive adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 72, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.07.003
  51. Stepanov, V.V., & Tishkov, V.A. (Eds.). (2014). Social factors of ethnic intolerance (results of an interdisciplinary study). Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Russian Academy of Science. (In Russ.)
  52. Varshaver, E.A. (2015). Contact theory: Review. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (5), 183–214. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2015.5.13
  53. Visintin, E.P., Voci, A., Pagotto, L., & Hewstone, M. (2017). Direct, extended, and mass-mediated contact with immigrants in Italy: Their associations with emotions, prejudice, and humanity perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(4), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12423
  54. Voronina, N.S., & Fadeev, P.V. (2020). Who is set against migrants in Russia? Analyzing certain socio-demographic characteristics. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 11(4), 99–125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2020.11.4.681
  55. Walsh, S.D., & Tartakovsky, E. (2021). Personal value preferences, threat-benefit appraisal of immigrants and levels of social contact: Looking through the lens of the Stereotype Content Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 609219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609219
  56. Zingora, T., Vezzali, L., & Graf, S. (2021). Stereotypes in the face of reality: Intergroup contact inconsistent with group stereotypes changes attitudes more than stereotype-consistent contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(8), 1284–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220946816

Copyright (c) 2023 Grigoryev D.S., Komyaginskaya E.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies