The Phenomenon of Cognitive Polyphasia in Social Representations on the Mentally

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The present study is focused on the phenomenon of cognitive polyphasia in the context of representations of mentally ill people by different groups of society. The authors put at the forefront the problem of finding the conditions for the actualization of cognitive polyphasia. The study was aimed at identifying manifestations of cognitive polyphasia in the structure of social representations (SRs) of the mentally ill in the groups of Orthodox respondents and non-believers. The sample consisted of Orthodox Christians: N = 114 (49 males and 65 females) and non-believers: N = 113 (76 males and 37 females) in the age ranges 18-23, 40-45 and 60-65 years, permanently residing in Moscow. The survey of the respondents at the main stage of the research was carried out using: (1) the authors’ questionnaire developed on the basis of the results of the search stage and including 29 statements; (2) a scale of self-assessed degree of religiosity; (3) a modified D. Feldes’ Psychological Distance Scale; (4) a modified sentence completion method; (5) the Bubbles technique and (6) a question pool for obtaining socio-demographic information. The results showed that the emotional component of SRs of the mentally ill changed their modality depending on the survey methods used. When the respondents evaluated the statements of the questionnaire, the core of SRs in both groups contained elements that were extremely sympathetic towards the mentally ill, and the statements revealing negative emotions (the possibility of contracting a mental illness or the need to isolate these people from society) were on the periphery of their representations. At the same time, the data of the projective methods showed that the negative representation background (as compared to the positive one) in relation to mentally ill people significantly predominated among both believers and non-believers. The negative representation of the mentally ill is most pronounced in the group of non-believers and reaches the highest rates in the group of 60-65-year-old respondents. We regard such ambivalence as a manifestation of cognitive polyphasia and, in particular, its variety, i.e., selective prevalence.

About the authors

Tatiana P. Emelyanova

Psychology Institute of Russian Academy of Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: t_emelyanova@inbox.ru
SPIN-code: 4338-1645

Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology

13 Yaroslavskaya St, bldg 1, Moscow, 129366, Russian Federation

Tatiana V. Israelyan

Insurance Company “RESO-Garantia”

Email: israelyan.tatiana@yandex.ru

Psychologist, Center for Psychological Assistance

12 Gasheka St, bldg 1, Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation

References

  1. Antipkin, M.A., & Antonov, G.V. (2013). Sotsial'no-demograficheskii portret auditorii sredstv massovoi informatsii i kommunikatsii (na primere g. Volgograda). Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, 1(19), 56–61. (In Russ.)
  2. Bovina I.B., & Panov, M.C. (2005). Obydennye predstavleniya o psikhicheski bol'nykh v studencheskoi srede. Sociological Research, (3), 103–117. (In Russ.)
  3. Bratus, B.S., Voeikov, V.L., & Vorobev, S.L. (1995). Nachala khristianskoi psikhologii: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
  4. Donahue, M.J., & Nielsen, M.E. (2005). Religion, Attitudes and Social Behavior. In R.F. Paloutzian & C.L. Park (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (рр. 274–291). New York: The Guilford Press.
  5. Duckworth, K., Halpern, J., Schutt, R., & Gillespie, C. (2003). Use of Schizophrenia as a Metaphor in U.S. Newspapers. Psychiatric services, 54(10), 1402–1404. http://doi:org/10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1402
  6. Eklund M., Hansson L., & Bejerholm U. (2001) Relationships between satisfaction with occupational factors and health-related variables in schizophrenia outpatients. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, (36), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001270050293
  7. Emelyanova, T.P. (2009). Konstruirovanie sotsial'nykh predstavlenii v usloviyakh transformatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva. Moscow: IP RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  8. Emelyanova, T.P. (2012). Ambivalentnost' soderzhaniya sotsial'nykh predstavlenii o dushevno-bol'nom v obshchestve. In A.L. Zhuravlev & E.A. Sergienko (Eds.), Psikhologicheskie problemy sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva (рр. 409–431). Moscow: IP RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  9. Emelyanova, T.P., & Israelyan, T.V. (2018). Obraz psikhicheski bol'nogo v massovoi kul'ture. In M.I. Volovikova, A.L. Zhuravlev & A.V. Yurevich (Eds.), Dukhovno-nravstvennye problemy sovremennoi lichnosti (рр. 404–415). Moscow: IP RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  10. Evans, E., & Lane, J. (2011). Contradictory or Complementary? Creationist and Evolutionist Explanations of the Origin(s) of Species. Human Development, 54, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329130
  11. Falade, B.A., & Bauer, M.W. (2018). ‘I have faith in science and in God’: Common sense, cognitive polyphasia and attitudes to science in Nigeria. Public Understanding of Science, 27(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517690293
  12. Feldes, D. (1976). Die soziale Distanz zu Entlassenen psychiatrischen Stationen in der Spwjetunion und der DDR. Sozialpsychiatrische Forschung und Praxis. Leipzig.
  13. Gervais, M.-C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (1998). Health and identity: the case of the Chinese community in England. Social Science Information, 37(4), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901898037004008
  14. Guimelli, Ch., & Lo Monaco, G. (2016). De la zone muette aux facettes d’une représentation sociale. In G. Lo Monaco, S. Delouvée & P. Rateau (Ed.), Les représentations sociales. Théorie, méthodes, et applications (pp. 505–516). Coordonné par Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur. (In French.) https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.5303
  15. Gureje, O., Lasebikan, V.O., Ephraim-Oluwanuga, O., Olley, B.O., & Kola, L. (2005). Community study of knowledge of and attitude to mental illness in Nigeria. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 186, 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.5.436
  16. Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and Social Representations. Harvester Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead.
  17. Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). The rehabilitation of common sense: Social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00378.x
  18. Jovchelovitch, S., & Priego-Hernández, J. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public spheres. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 163–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Kumagai, Y. (2015). Toward a New Perspective of the Shared Reality Theory: An Examination of Discussions about “Cognitive Polyphasia” in Social Representations Studies. The Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.5690/kantoh.2015.88
  20. Leavey, G., Loewenthal, K., & King, M. (2016). Locating the Social Origins of Mental Illness: The Explanatory Models of Mental Illness Among Clergy from Different Ethnic and Faith Backgrounds. Journal of Religion and Health, 55, 1607–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0191-1
  21. Martinez, R. (2018). Bridging cognitive polyphasia and cognitive dissonance: The role of individual differences in the tolerance and negotiation of discrepant cognitions. Papers on Social Representations, 27(2), 3.1–3.24.
  22. Melle, I., Friis, S., Hauff, E., & Vaglum, P. (2000). Social functioning of patients with schizophrenia in high-income welfare societies. Psychiatric Services, 51, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.51.2.223
  23. Moscovici, S. (1976). La psychanalyse son image et son public. Paris: PUF. (In French.)
  24. Paez, D. et al. (2016). Mémoire collective et représentations sociales de l’Histoire. In G. Lo Monaco, S. Delouvée & P. Rateau (Eds.), Les représentations sociales. Théorie, méthodes, et applications (pp. 539–552). Coordonné par Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur. (In French.)
  25. Panagiotou, E., & Kadianaki, I. (2019). From cognitive dissonance to cognitive Polyphasia: A sociocultural approach to understanding meat-paradox. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49(5), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12201
  26. Provencher , С. (2011). Towards A Better Understanding of Cognitive Polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 377–395. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00468.x
  27. Renedo, A., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Expert Knowledge, Cognitive Polyphasia and Health. А study on social representations of homelessness among professionals working in the voluntary sector in London. Journal of Health Psychology, 12(5), 779–790. http://doi.org/10.1177/1359105307080611
  28. Roberts, E., Bourne, R., & Basden, S. (2013). The representation of mental illness in Bermudian print media, 1991–2011. Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 64(4), 388–391. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200204
  29. Rohm, A., Hastall, M.R., & Ritterfeld, U. (2017). How Movies Shape Students' Attitudes Toward Individuals with Schizophrenia: An Exploration of the Relationships between Entertainment Experience and Stigmatization. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2016.1257672
  30. Rossiiskoe Bibleiskoe obshchestvo. (2016). Bibliya: Sovremennyi russkii perevod (Perevod s drevneevreiskogo, arameiskogo i drevnegrecheskogo). Moscow. (In Russ.)
  31. Sammut, G. (2016). Cognition sociale situationnelle: l’architecture imbriquée des représentations sociales, des attitudes et des points de vue. In G. Lo Monaco, S. Delouvée & P. Rateau (Eds.), Les représentations sociales. Théorie, méthodes, et applications (pp. 473–486). Coordonné par Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.
  32. Smith, G.A. (2017). A growing share of Americans say it’s not necessary to believe in God to be moral. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/16/a-growing-share-of-americans-say-its-not-necessary-to-believe-in-god-to-be-moral/ (accessed: 18.02.2021).
  33. Stroope, S., & Baker, J.O. (2018). Whose Moral Community? Religiosity, Secularity, and Self-rated Health across Communal Religious Contexts. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 59(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146518755698
  34. Tobalov, Y.P. (2004). Sovladanie s trudnymi zhiznennymi situatsiyami u veruyushchikh. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)
  35. Upham, P. & Johansen, K. (2020). A cognitive mess: Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101489
  36. Vergote, A. (1983). Religion, Foi, Incroyance: étude Psychologique. Psychologie Et Sciences Humaines. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
  37. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma J., & Themel, M. (1999). The Modernization of Tradition: Thinking about Madness in Patna, India. Culture & Psychology, 5(4), 413–445.
  38. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma, J., & Themel, M. (2000). „I have some faith and at the same time I don't believe in it” – Cognitive polyphasia and culture change. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 301–314.
  39. Yakushenko, A.V. (2015). Struktura i soderzhanie sotsial'nykh predstavlenii o psikhicheski bol'nykh lyudyakh u molodezhi razlichnykh professii. E-journal Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru, 7(2), 122–133. http://psyedu.ru/journal/2015/2/Yakushenko.phtml

Copyright (c) 2021 Emelyanova T.P., Israelyan T.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies