Designing a Teacher's Horizontal Career based on Additional Types of Pedagogical Activities and Professional Achievements: Russian and International Experiences

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The relevance of developing approaches to the formation of organizational and regulatory conditions for teachers’ professional careers is determined by the goals of implementing the Russian Federal project Teacher of the Future and the necessity to provide the quality of Russian education by improving teachers’ professional competence. The aim of the present study is to develop a model of a teacher’s career based on the institutionalization of the professional roles of “mentor” and “methodologist” as additional types of pedagogical acti- vities and professional achievements. The official concept of the National Teacher Growth System (NTGS) was based in different periods on the research of different scholar teams that proposed the formation of a vertical teacher’s career by introducing from two to five new positions, and has changed several times in recent years, but has not been implemented. Based on the analysis and theoretical comprehension of Russian and international practices of stimulating the professional growth of teachers, a project of a diversified professional career trajectory in relation to the teacher’s position (horizontal career) is proposed; framework requirements for the amount and quality of additional types of pedagogical activities are identified for their differentiated assessment at each stage of a teacher’s career. The proposed model can be used as an intermediate one and developed at the next stages of the implementation of the federal project Teacher of the Future towards the introduction of new positions, new qualification categories, new opportunities to form teachers’ professional growth trajectories for career-building and professional development.

About the authors

Alla G. Kuznetsova

Pacific National University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kuznetsova85@gmail.com

Doctor in Pedagogics, is Professor of the Department of Pedagogy

136 Tikhookeanskaya St, Khabarovsk, 680035, Russian Federation

Elena B. Yarovaya

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: yarovaya.e@gmail.com

Director of the International Centre for Continuing Education

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Agranovich, M.L., Zaitseva, O.V., & Ermachkova, Yu.V. (2015). Rossiiskoe obrazovanie v kontekste mezhdunarodnykh indikatorov. Shkol'nyi uchitel': obrazovanie, nagruzka, zarplata: Report for Interregional Association for Monitoring and Education Statistics. Retrieved February 8, 2020, from: http://www.mamso.ru/node/73540 (In Russ.)
  2. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Limited. (2020). Nine National Frameworks. Versions in July 2020. Retrieved February 10, 2021, from: https://www.aitsl.edu.au/about-aitsl/9-national-frameworks
  3. Bershadskiy M.E. (2017). Formirovanie natsional'noi sistemy uchitel'skogo rosta. Vestnik Obrazovaniya, (10), 56–64. (In Russ.)
  4. Brümmer, F., Durdel, A., Fischer-Münnich, C., Fittkau, J., & Weiger, W. (2018). Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung: Zwischenbericht der Evaluation. Hamburg: Ramboll Management Consulting GmbH. Retrieved February 10, 2021, from: https://de.ramboll.com/-/media/81b4df30a5364631875f142bf7034b15.pdf
  5. Center on International Education Benchmarking. (2016). Singapore: A Teaching Model for the 21st Century. Retrieved February 10, 2021, from: http://ncee.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/SingaporeCountryBrief.pdf
  6. Chernyavskaya, A.P., & Danilova, L.N. (2019). Teacher-mentor as an assistant in adaptation of the young teacher in school. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, (4), 62–70. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10453
  7. Dudina, E.A. (2017). Mentoring as an educational activity: Essential characteristics and structure. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 7(5), 25–36. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1705.02
  8. Edinye rekomendatsii po ustanovleniyu na federal'nom, regional'nom i mestnom urovnyakh sistem oplaty truda rabotnikov gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uchrezhdenii na 2019 god. (2019, January 11). Rossiiskaya Gazeta. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://rg.ru/2019/01/11/zarplata-dok.html (In Russ.)
  9. Gokhberg, L.M., Kovaleva, N.V., & Kuzminov, Ya.I. (Eds.). (2018). Obrazovanie v tsifrakh: 2018. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russ.)
  10. Ilaltdinova, E.Yu., & Frolova, S.V. (2016). Problems and foreign experience of technologization of mentoring in professional development of the teacher. Problemy Sovremennogo Pedagogicheskogo Obrazovaniya, 53(10), 17–23. (In Russ.)
  11. Kamka, S.V., & Fomenko, S.L. (2019). Designing of a system of teachers' growth on the municipal level. Munitsipal'noe Obrazovanie: Innovatsii i Eksperiment, (2), 46–52. (In Russ.)
  12. Kolesnikova, K. (2019, January 11). Ministr prosveshcheniya rasskazal, kakie novye dolzhnosti poyavyatsya v shkolakh. Rossiiskaya Gazeta. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://rg.ru/2020/08/10/ministr-prosveshcheniia-rasskazal-kakie-novye-dolzhnosti-poiaviatsia-v-shkolah.html (In Russ.)
  13. Koroleva L.N., Bezmaternykh T.A., & Protopopova, V.A. (2018). Sreda professional'nogo razvitiya uchitelya rossiiskoi shkoly, “ustremlennoi v budushchee”: Strategii, praktiki, perspektivy. Rostov-na-Donu: GBU DPO RO RIPK i PPRO Publ. (In Russ.)
  14. Kuzminov, Ya.I., Popova, S.A., & Yakobson L.I. (Eds.). (2017). Effektivnyi kontrakt dlya professionalov sotsial'noi sfery: Trendy, potentsial, resheniya: Ekspertnyi doklad. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russ.)
  15. Liang, X., Kidwai, H., & Zhang, M. (2016). How Shanghai Does It: Insights and Lessons from the Highest-Ranking Education System in the World. Washington: World Bank Grour. Retrieved February 10, 2021, from http://www.iberchina.org/files/2017/shanghai_education.pdf
  16. Logvinova, I.M., & Kopoteva, G.L. (2017). Metodicheskaya kompetentnost' pedagoga v protsesse realizatsii FGOS: soderzhanie ponyatiya i sposoby otsenki. Nepreryvnoe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v kontekste innovatsionnykh proektov obshchestvennogo razvitiya: Conference Proseedings (pp. 578–587). Moscow: Institut strategii razvitiya obrazovaniya RAO Publ. (In Russ.)
  17. Margolis, A.A., Arzhanykh, E.V., & Khusnutdinova, M.R. (2019). Institutionalization of mentoring as a resource for professional development of Russian teachers. Educational Studies. Moscow, (4), 134–159. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-4-133-159
  18. Masyukova, N.G. (2015). Methodical competence as a component of professional competence of a teacher. Mir Nauki, Kultury, Obrazovaniya, (3), 67–68. (In Russ.)
  19. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). Supporting Mathematics Teachers in the United States and Finland: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24904
  20. Navazova, T.G., Bubnova, I.S., Pirozhkova, O.B., & Shibankova, L.A. (2019). The role and place of socio-psychological readiness for innovation in the system of professional teacher’s growth. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, (6), 122–132. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.34772/KPJ.2019.137.6.007
  21. Nugumanova, L.N., & Yakovenko, T.V. (2018). Nastavnichestvo kak sposob preodoleniya professional'nykh defitsitov pedagoga. Professional'noe Obrazovanie. Stolitsa, (9), 34–37 (In Russ.)
  22. Pastukhova, I.P. (2017). Problems of teachers’ methodical competence formation in the context of introducing professional standards for teachers. Srednee Professional'noe Obrazovanie, (2), 3–9. (In Russ.)
  23. Pudenko, T.I. (2019). Сonceptual foundations of the professional growth model teachers taking into account the possession of professional competencies. Management of Education: Theory and Practice, (4), 4–13. (In Russ.)
  24. Sevastyanova M. (2019, June 5). Chto izmenitsya s vvedeniem dolzhnostei starshego i vedushchego uchitelya. (In Russ.) Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://activityedu.ru/Blogs/teacher/chto-izmenitsya-s-vvedeniem-dolzhnostey-starshiy-uchitel-i-vedushchiy-uchitel/
  25. Shilova, O.N., Ermolaeva, M.G., & Akhtieva, G.R. (2018). Current state and problems of mentoring ofinstitute for young teachers development. Chelovek i Obrazovanie, (4), 202–209. (In Russ.)
  26. Vasilevskaya, E.V. (2017). Obshchenatsional'naya sistema professional'nogo rosta uchitelei: professional'nye kompetentnost' i kompetentsii. Conference proceedings on National Teacher Growth System implementation (pp. 94–103). Moscow. (In Russ.)
  27. Veidt, V.P. (2020). New professional roles and competencies of teachers in the additional professional education system. Nepreryvnoe Obrazovanie, (1), 27–31. (In Russ.)
  28. Zabrodin, Y.M., Sergomanov, P.A., Gayazova, L.A., & Leonova, O.I. (2015). Development of the Differentiation System of Skill Levels in Teaching Professional Standards. Psychological Science and Education, 20(5), 65–76. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/pse.2015200506

Copyright (c) 2021 Kuznetsova A.G., Yarovaya E.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies