Types of Attitudes toward Traits and Their Role in Selfand Other Assessments

Cover Page

Cite item


The study integrates the experimental and descriptive approaches to the attitudes. The assumptions that the emotional, cognitive and behavioral components of attitudes toward personality traits, as well as the types of these attitudes mediate the selfand the Other assessments are under consideration. The study involved 314 students aged 18 to 30 years old (M = 20.23; SD = 1.59), of which 79 men (25%) and 235 women (75%). To measure attitudes toward traits, as well as the selfand the Other assessments, a list of 20 antonymic adjectives denoting personality characteristics was used. The objects of perception were young man and woman who answered the questions of the Short Dark Triad Questionnaire as an absolutely “good” or “bad” person. Using cluster analysis, different types of attitudes toward traits were highlighted within each component (cognitive, emotional, and behavioral). These types were determined by the participants’ position in relation to positive and negative traits. The attained results indicate that the subject’s self-esteem depends on the attitudes toward traits and detects different severity depending on the attitudes type. The highest self-esteem is observed in those subjects who: 1) consider that positive traits are more common than negative; 2) give highly contrast emotional ratings to positive and negative traits; 3) believe that positive traits are less controlled than negative ones. The assessment of the Other also reveals a connection with the types of the attitudes toward traits: the “good” Other is rated higher when the emotional attitudes toward traits are highly contrast, while the “bad” Other is rated higher when: 1) the negative traits are treated as more common; 2) the contrast between positive and negative traits is perceived as moderate. The results obtained open up the new perspectives for the correction of the selfand the Other assessments through the formation of attitudes toward traits.

About the authors

Milena V. Baleva

Perm State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: milenabaleva@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 8439-0852

Ph.D. in Psychology, is Associate Professor at Developmental Psychology Department

15 Bukirev St., Perm, 614099, Russian Federation

Olga I. Polyanina

Perm State University

Email: helgapol72@gmail.com
SPIN-code: 7559-3205

Ph.D. in Psychology, is Associate Professor at Developmental Psychology Department

15 Bukirev St., Perm, 614099, Russian Federation

Irina V. Smirnova

Moscow City University

Email: smirnovai@mgpu.ru
SPIN-code: 6609-2405

senior lecturer at Institute of Culture and Arts

4 2-i Sel’skokhozyaistvennyi proezd, bldg.1, Moscow, 129226, Russian Federation


  1. Alicke, M.D., Klotz, M.L., Breitenbecher, D.L., Yurak, T.J., & Vredenburg, D.S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 804–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804
  2. Bem, D.J. (1972). Constructing cross-situational consistencies in behavior – some thoughts on Alker’s critique of Mischel. Journal of Personality, 40(1), 17–26.
  3. Breckler, S.J., & Wiggins, E.C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/00221031(89)90022-X
  4. Breckler, S.J., & Wiggins, E.C. (1991). Cognitive responses in persuasion: Affective and evaluative determinants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 180–200. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90021-W
  5. Devine, P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
  6. Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  7. Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.59.2.202
  8. Egorova, M.S., Sitnikova, M.A., & Parshikova, O.V. (2015). Adaptation of the Short Dark Triad. Psihologicheskie Issledovanija, 8(43), 1. http://psystudy.ru/index.php/ num/2015v8n43/1181-egorova43.html (In Russ.)
  9. Fazio, R.H., & Olson, M.A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude-behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In J.W. Sherman, B. Gawronski & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual Process Theories of the Social Mind (pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  10. Folomeeva, T.V. (2012). Consumer’s attitudes and loyalty. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika, 2, 184–193. (In Russ.)
  11. Goodwin, G.P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
  12. Greenwald, A.G. (1989). Why attitudes are important: Defining attitude and attitude theory 20 years later. In A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler & A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), The Third Ohio State University Vol. on Attitudes and Persuasion. Attitude Structure and Function (pp. 429–440). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  13. Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L., & Banaji, M.R. (2009). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575
  14. Kaiser, F.G., & Wilson, M. (2019). The Campbell paradigm as a behavior-predictive reinterpretation of the classical tripartite model of attitudes. European Psychologist. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000364
  15. Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A.E., Axt, J.R., Carroll, T.J., Karapetyan, A., Kaushik, N., Tomezsko, D., Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (2018). Predicting intergroup discrimination using the Implicit Association Test: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and recommendations for future research. American Psychologist. Advance Online Publication. https://doi. org/10.1037/amp0000364
  16. La Piere, R. (1967). Attitude versus action. In M. Fishbein & N. John (Eds.), Attitude Theory and Measurement (pр. 26–31). N.Y.
  17. Mann, T.C., & Ferguson, M.J. (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 823–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000021
  18. Miketta, S., & Friese, M. (2019). Debriefed but still troubled? About the (in)effectiveness of postexperimental debriefings after ego threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 282–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000155
  19. Millar, M.G., & Millar, K.U. (1990). Attitude change as a function of attitude type and argument type. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 217–228. https://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.217
  20. Pahl, S., & Eiser, J.R. (2005). Valence, comparison focus and self-positivity biases: Does it matter whether people judge positive or negative traits? Experimental Psychology, 52(4), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.303
  21. Prygin, G.S., & Kayumov, A.T. (2017). The manifestation of social attitudes: “altruism – egoism”, “process – result”, “freedom – power”, “labor – money” among autonomous and dependent students (gender aspect). Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 27(2), 196–202. (In Russ.)
  22. Rosenberg, M.J., & Hovland, C.I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In C.I. Hovland & M.J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components (pp. 1–14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  23. Rothermund, K., Bak, P.M., & Brandtstädter, J. (2005). Biases in self-evaluation: Moderating effects of attribute controllability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.250
  24. Shchebetenko, S.A. (2015). Reflexive characteristic adaptations within the five-factor theory of personality framework. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 36(6), 55–65. (In Russ.)
  25. Triandis, H.C. (1971). Attitude and Attitude Change. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  26. Zanna, M.P., & Rempel, J.K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Knowledge (pp. 315–334). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; Paris, France: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

Copyright (c) 2019 Baleva M.V., Polyanina O.I., Smirnova I.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies