CONTEMPORARY VIEWS ON THE TERM ‘DISCOURSE’ IN PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Various branches of science that study homo loquens, а talking man, have made an important contribution to the development of the term ‘discourse’. It is obvious that most definitions have much in common. Firstly, discourse is realized in speech; secondly, it is formed in a wide communicative context as a result of interpersonal communication and interactions between people and society; and finally, discourse has significant impact on social and personal representations and can establish group norms. The paper discusses different approaches to discourse studies, including speech act theory, conversational analysis, discourse analysis, social and cognitive psychology. Special attention is paid to Intent-analysis which considers the basis of discourse as a hierarchy of its speech intentions and their different psychological determinants. These include interpersonal relationships, personality traits, social statuses, roles and the problems speakers solve in the communication process. Several terms related to discourse are given: discoursive practice, discoursive thinking, discoursive abilities etc. The urgent issues of discourse research such as the typology of discourses, the psychological impact and interpersonal interaction mechanisms connected to the various fields of the current reality are presented.

About the authors

Taisiya A Grebenshchikova

Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: gretiya@mail.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, Senior Research Fellow in Laboratory of Speech Psychology and Psycholinguistics, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences

13, Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, 129366, Russian Federation

Irina A Zachiosova

Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: zachiosova-2004@mail.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, Senior Research Fellow in Laboratory of Speech Psychology and Psycholinguistics, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences

13, Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, 129366, Russian Federation

Natalya D Pavlova

Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: pavlova_natalya@mail.ru

Doctor Sc. of Psychology, Head of the Laboratory of Speech Psychology and Psycholinguistics, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences

13, Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, 129366, Russian Federation

References

  1. Almaev, N.A. (2012). Primenenie kontent-analiza v issledovaniyah lichnosti: metodicheskie voprosy. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 167 р. (In Russ.).
  2. Bajkulova, A.N. (2010). Druzheskoe obshchenie v paradigme obydennogo obshcheniya. Izv. Sarat. un-ta. Nov. ser. Filologiya. Zhurnalistika (4). (In Russ.) URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ druzheskoe-obschenie-v-paradigme-obydennogo-obscheniya [date of access: 02/18/2018].
  3. Basalaeva, E.G., & Lappo, M.A. (2014). Konfliktnyj diskurs v kommunikativnom prostranstve (na primere Novosibirskoj oblasti). In: A.L. ZHuravlev, N.D. Pavlova (Eds.), Psihologicheskoe vozdejstvie v mezhlichnostnoj i massovoj kommunikacii (pp. 268—284). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2000). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Harlow. 487 р.
  5. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2006). Diskurs vlasti i vlast’ diskursa. Moscow: Flinta. 136 р. (In Russ.).
  6. Dement’ev, V.V. (2013). Kommunikativnye cennosti russkoj kul’tury: kategoriya personal’nosti v leksike i pragmatike. Moscow: Global Kom. 336 р. (In Russ.).
  7. Dijk, Teun A. van. (1989). Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikaciya. Moscow: Progress. 308 р. (In Russ.).
  8. Dijk, Teun A. van. (2013). Diskurs i vlast’: Reprezentaciya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikacii. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom LIBROKOM. 344 р. (In Russ.).
  9. Emel’yanova, T.P. (2016). Social’nye predstavleniya: Istoriya, teoriya i ehmpiricheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 476 р. (In Russ.).
  10. Foucalt, M. (1996). Archeology of Knowledge. Kiev: Nika-Centr. 208 р. (In Russ.).
  11. Grebenshchikova, T.A., & Pavlova, N.D. (2017). Diskurs i ego psihologicheskoe vozdejstvie: podhody k issledovaniyu. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 38(3), 18—31. (In Russ.).
  12. Grebenshchikova, T.A., Pavlova, N.D., & Afinogenova, V.A. (2016). Modifikaciya intencional’nogo prostranstva v postsobytijnom internet-diskurse. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, N.D. Pavlova, & I.A. Zachiosova (Eds.), Psihologiya diskursa: problemy determinacii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti (pp. 201—219). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  13. Grebenshchikova, T.A., & Zachiosova, I.A. (2014). Psikhologiya povsednevnogo diskursa. Intencional’nyj aspekt. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 208 р. (In Russ.).
  14. Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28(1), 1—30.
  15. Issers, O.S. (2008). Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoj rechi. Moscow: LKI. 288 р. (In Russ.).
  16. Karasik, V.I. (2010). Yazykovaya kristallizaciya smysla. Moscow: Gnozis. 351 р. (In Russ.).
  17. Karaulov, Yu.N., & Petrov, V.V. (1989). Ot grammatiki teksta k kognitivnoj teorii diskursa. In: T.A. Van Dejk. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikaciya (pp. 5—11). Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.).
  18. Kibrik, A.A., Koshelev, A.D., Kravchenko, A.V., Mazurova, Yu.V., & Fedorova, O.V. (Eds), (2015). Yazyk i mysl’: Sovremennaya kognitivnaya lingvistika. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury. 848 р. (In Russ.).
  19. Kibrik, A.A., & Plungyan, V.A. (2002). Funkcionalizm. In: A.A. Kibrik, I.M. Kobozeva, I.A. Sekerinaya. Sovremennaya amerikanskaya lingvistika: fundamental’nye issledovaniya (pp. 276—339). Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.).
  20. Kirilina, A.V. (Ed.) (2005). Gender i yazyk. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury. 624 р. (In Russ.).
  21. Kitajgorodskaya, M.V., & Rozanova N.N. (2005). Rech’ moskvichej. Kommunikativno-kul’turologicheskij aspekt. Moscow: Nauchnyj mir. 396 р. (In Russ.).
  22. Krippendorff, K. (2011). Discourse and the materiality of its artifacts. In: T.R. Khun (Ed.), Matters of communication: Political, cultural, and technological challenges to communication theorizing (pp. 23— 46). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
  23. Kubrak, T.A. (2007). Intenciya samoprezentacii sub”ekta v razlichnyh vidah diskursa. In: N.D. Pavlova, & I.A. Zachiosova (Eds.), Situacionnaya i lichnostnaya determinaciya diskursa (pp. 185—204). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  24. Kubrak, T.A. (2007) Informacionno-psihologicheskaya bezopasnost’ v kinodiskurse: sostoyanie problem. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, N.D. Pavlova, & I.A. Zachiosova (Eds), Psihologiya diskursa: problemy determinacii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti (pp. 220—241). Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN. (In Russ.).
  25. Kubryakova, E.S. (2000). O ponyatiyah diskursa i diskursivnogo analiza v sovremennoj lingvistike:
  26. obzor. In Diskurs, rech’, rechevaya deyatel’nost’: funkcional’nye i strukturnye aspekty (pp. 7—25). Moscow: INION RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  27. Lakoff, J., & Johnson, M. (2004). Metaphors we live by. Moscow: Editorial USSR. 256 р. (In Russ.).
  28. Latynov, V.V. (2013). Psikhologiya kommunikativnogo vozdejstviya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 386 р. (In Russ.).
  29. Luriya, A.R. (1998). Yazyk i soznanie. Moscow: Mosk. un-t Publ. 336 р. (In Russ.).
  30. Morozov, V.P. (2011). Neverbal’naya kommunikaciya: Ehksperimental’no-psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 526 р. (In Russ.).
  31. Morris, C. (1983). Osnovanie teorii znakov. In Yu.S. Stepanov (Ed.). Semiotika. Moscow: Raduga. 640 р. (In Russ.).
  32. Pavlova, N.D. (2003). Intent-analiz diskursa. In I.A. Sternin (Ed.). Kommunikativnye issledovaniya (pp. 19—24). Voronezh-Yaroslavl’: Istoki. (In Russ.).
  33. Pavlova, N.D., Afinogenova, V.A., & Grebenshchikova, T.A. (2017). Rechevoe vzaimodejstvie v neformal’nom povsednevnom diskurse: intencional’nyj aspect. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 38(5), 41—54. (In Russ.).
  34. Pavlova, N.D., & Grebenshchikova, T.A. (2017). Intent-analiz: osnovaniya, procedura, opyt ispol’zovaniya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 151 р. (In Russ.).
  35. Pavlova, N.D., & Grigor’eva, A.A. (2014). Intencional’nye modeli psihologicheskogo vozdejstviya v diskurse massmedia. In A.L. Zhuravlev, & N.D. Pavlova (Eds). Psikhologicheskoe vozdejstvie v mezhlichnostnoj i massovoj kommunikacii (pp. 45—53). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  36. Pavlova, N.D., & Peskova, E.A. (2012). Ponimanie intencional’nogo podteksta rechi adresatom. Ehksperimental’naya psikhologiya, 5(2), 74—82. (In Russ.).
  37. Pavlova N.D., & Zachiosova I.A. (Eds). (2007). Situacionnaya i lichnostnaya determinaciya diskursa. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 384 р. (In Russ.).
  38. Pavlova, N.D., & Zachiosova, I.A. (Eds). (2011). Diskurs v sovremennom mire. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 368 р. (In Russ.).
  39. Phillips, L., & Jorgensen, M.V. (2008). Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod. Har’kov: Gumanitarnyj centr. 354 р. (In Russ.).
  40. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 341—371.
  41. Sedov, K.F. (2004). Diskurs i lichnost’: ehvolyuciya kommunikativnoj kompetencii. Moscow: Labirint. 320 р. (In Russ.).
  42. Sergeeva, A.S., Kirillov, B.A., & Voronina, E.Yu. (2016). Kommentarij kak forma diskursa professional’nogo virtual’nogo soobshchestva (na primere IT). In Zhuravlev A.L., Pavlova N.D., Zachiosova I.A. (Eds). Psikhologiya diskursa: problemy determinacii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti (pp. 84—101). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  43. Shejgal, E.I. (2004). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Moscow: Gnozis. 326 р. (In Russ.).
  44. Spears, R, & Postmes, T. (2015). Group Identity, Social Influence and Collective Action Online. In S.S. Sundar (Ed.). The Handbook of Psychology of Communication Technology (pp. 23—47). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118426456.ch2
  45. Sternin, I.A. (2004). Obshchestvennye processy i razvitie sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Ocherk izmenenij v russkom yazyke konca XX veka. Voronezh: Nauchnoe izdanie. 93 р. (In Russ.).
  46. Stroud, N.J., Scacco, J.M., Muddiman, A., & Curry, A.L. (2015). Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations’ Facebook Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 188— 203. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12104
  47. Tannen, D. (1987). Conversational style. In Dechert, H., & Raupach, M. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic Models of Production (pp. 251—267). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. P. 251—267.
  48. Ushakova, T.N., Latynov, V.V., Pavlova, A.A., & Pavlova, N.D. (1995). Vedenie politicheskih diskussij. Psikhologicheskij analiz konfliktnyh vystuplenij. Moscow: Akademiya. 155 р. (In Russ.).
  49. Ushakova, T.N., Pavlova, N.D., Alekseev, K.I., & Latynov, V.V. (2000). Slovo v dejstvii. Intent-analiz politicheskogo diskursa. Saint Petersburg: Aletejya. 320 р. (In Russ.).
  50. Voronin, A.N. (2015). Diskursivnye sposobnosti: teoriya, metody izucheniya, psikhodiagnostika. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 176 р. (In Russ.).
  51. Vygotskij, L.S. (1999). Myshlenie i rech’. Moscow: Labirint. 352 р. (In Russ.).
  52. Wodak, R., Johnstone, B., & Kerswill, P. (Eds). (2011). The SAGE handbook of Sociolinguistics. London — USA — India — Sigapore: SAGE Publications Ltd. 648 р.
  53. Zachiosova, I.A. (2007). Osobennosti vzaimoponimaniya v semejnom dialoge. In V.A. Barabanshchikov, & E.S. Samojlenko (Eds), Obshchenie i poznanie (pp. 386—403). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  54. Zachiosova, I.A., & Grebenshchikova, T.A. (2007). Vzaimootnosheniya sobesednikov v dialoge. In N.D. Pavlova, I.A. Zachiosova. Situacionnaya i lichnostnaya determinaciya diskursa (pp. 162—184). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  55. Zanadvorova, A.V. (2001). Funkcionirovanie russkogo yazyka v malyh social’nyh gruppah. Ph.D. in Philology Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.).
  56. Zemskaya, E.A. (1987). Russkaya razgovornaya rech’: lingvisticheskij analiz i problemy obucheniya. Moscow: Russkij yazyk. 240 р. (In Russ.).
  57. Zhuravlev, A.L., & Pavlova, N.D. (Eds). (2012). Psikhologicheskoe vozdejstvie: mekhanizmy, strategii, vozmozhnosti protivodejstviya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 368 р. (In Russ.).
  58. Zhuravlev, A.L., Pavlova, N.D., & Zachiosova I.A. (Eds). (2016). Psikhologiya diskursa: problemy determinacii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. 315 р. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2018 Grebenshchikova T.A., Zachiosova I.A., Pavlova N.D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies