Reproductive potential repair in men with varicocele

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Relevance. In majority of men, varicose veins of the testicle - varicocele - does not cause discomfort and is asymptomatic, and scrotal pain only bothers 10 % of patients. In 2/3 of cases, varicocele is a clinical finding. In this case, varicocele is the most common cause of male infertility. Aim of the study. Recovery of the reproductive potential of patients with varicocele. Materials and Methods. In 219 patients with varicocele, we’ve carried an ejaculate study out (WHO, 2010) 3, 6, 12 months after surgical treatment of varicocele. We considered the reproductive function restored by normozoospermia in the ejaculate and the onset of pregnancy in the spouse during the follow - up period of 12 months. Results and Discussion. The 2/3 men of the 219 patients with varicocele had ejaculate abnormalities. The age of patients who were diagnosed with pathospermia was 31+11 years. 66 (39.5 %) patients with varicocele had spermatozoa with reduced mobility. After surgical treatment (varicocelectomy according to Marmara), normozoospermia was present almost in every second man. Nevertheless, the number of pregnancies in a married couple was higher than 6 months after varicocelectomy - 24(32.8 %). The surgical method of treatment of varicocele allows to restore the reproductive function of a man in 30 %. In our study, normozoospermia after varicocelectomy was recorded in almost every second patient. Ultrasound changes in the testicle with varicocele are an unfavorable prognosis for the restoration of male fertility. Conclusion. Surgical treatment of varicocele can recover the reproductive potential of almost every second man of reproductive age. Moreover, a greater number of pregnancies six months right after the operation were registered in spouses.

About the authors

Grigory E. Roitberg

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Medicinа JSC

Email: 9023060@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0514-9114
Moscow, Russian Federation

Zhanna V. Dorosh

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: 9023060@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6078-9654
Moscow, Russian Federation

Tatyana V. Tarasova

Mordovia State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: 9023060@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9745-9739
Saransk, Russian Federation

Igor V. Saushev

Mordovia State University

Email: 9023060@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6077-193X
Saransk, Russian Federation

Elena P. Tyurina

Mordovia State University

Email: 9023060@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8178-9645
Saransk, Russian Federation

Irina V. Shuligina

Mordovia State University

Email: 9023060@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0645-9907
Saransk, Russian Federation

References

  1. Reyes JG, Farias JG, Henríquez-Olavarrieta S. The hypoxic testicle: physiology and pathophysiology. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/929285. 929285
  2. Myandina GI, Kulchenko NG, Alhejoj H. The frequency of polymorphism -262 C>T CAT gene of infertile men in the moscow region. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2019;14(3):478-481. https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2019.14116
  3. Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Roque M, Agarwal A. Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:246-253.
  4. Kulchenko NG. Inflammation and male infertility. What’s is common? RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2017; 21(4): 402-407. doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2017-21-4-402-407 (In Russian).
  5. Protasov AV, Kulchenko NG, Vinogradov IV. Association of tension-free inguinal hernia repair and pathospermia in fertile men. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2020;10:44-48. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202010144 (In Russian).
  6. Pimenov EP, Andryukhin MI. The role of DNA fragmentation in the pathogenesis of male infertility. Bulletin Biomedicine and Sociology. 2019;4(1):38-41. (In Russian).
  7. Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H. Predictive factors for sperm recovery after varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2017;197:485-490.
  8. Kostin AA, Kulchenko NG, Aliyev AR. Use of dynamic orchoscintigraphy in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic male infertility. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2012;13(4):29-32. (In Russian).
  9. Kulchenko NG, Moskvichev DV. The Experience of Determining Testicular Reserve in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia. Difficult patient. 2017;15(6-7):53-54. (In Russian).
  10. Kulchenko NG. Inguinal hernia repair and male health. Research and Practical Medicine Journal (Issled. prakt. med.). 2019;6(3):65-73. doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-3-6
  11. Zhukov ОB, Zubarev AR, Kulchenko NG. Pathological venous drainage of cavernous bodies at patients with varicocele. Medical visualization. 2006;1:82-89.
  12. Alsaikhan B, Alrabeeah K, Delouya G, Zini A. Epidemiology of varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):179-181. doi: 10.4103/1008682X.172640
  13. Levinger U, Gornish M, Gat Y, Bachar GN. Is varicocele prevalence increasing with age? Andrologia. 2007;39:77-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2007.00766.x
  14. Owen RC, McCormick BJ, Figler BD, Coward RM. A review of varicocele repair for pain. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(1):20-29. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.36
  15. Rotker K, Sigman M. Recurrent varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):229-233. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.171578
  16. Garolla A, Torino M, Miola P, Caretta N, Pizzol D, Menegazzo M, Bertoldo A, Foresta C. Twenty-four-hour monitoring of scrotal temperature in obese men and men with a varicocele as a mirror of spermatogenic function. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(5):1006-1013. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev057
  17. Hassanin AM, Ahmed HH, Kaddah AN. A global view of the pathophysiology of varicocele. Andrology. 2018;6(5):654-661. doi: 10.1111/andr.12511
  18. Kulchenko N.G. Prediction of success in assisted reproductive technology with the help of morphology of the testis. Research’n Practical Medicine Journal (Issled. prakt. med.). 2018;5(4):18-25. doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-4-2 (In Russian).
  19. Kulchenko NG. Antioxidant therapy for patospermia. Bulletin of the Medical Institute ‘Reaviz. 2018;1(31):41-48.
  20. Kulchenko NG. Qualitative criteria for morphological evaluation of spermatogenesisin azoospermia. Difficult patient. 2018;16(7):48-50. (In Russian).
  21. Masson P, Brannigan RE. The Varicocele. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):129-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.001
  22. Barazani Y, Nagler HM. Other work has highlighted the limitations of using histopathology to predict success after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:487. doi:10.1016/j. fertnstert.2010.11.058
  23. Taktarov VG, Strachuk AG, Gushchina Yu Sh, Korovyakova EA, Pashin SS, Freire Da Sivla T. Treatment of Male Infertility in Varicocele. Clinical Observation. Difficult patient. 2018;16(11):64-66. (In Russian).
  24. Roque M, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(4):583-603. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1839-4
  25. Shamsa A, Nademi M, Aqaee M, Fard AN, Molaei M. Complications and the effect of varicocelectomy on semen analysis, fertility, early ejaculation and spontaneous abortion. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010;21(6):1100-1105.

Copyright (c) 2022 Roitberg G.E., Dorosh Z.V., Tarasova T.V., Saushev I.V., Tyurina E.P., Shuligina I.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies