Cover Page

Cite item


Purpose of the study. To analyze the concept of creating patient-oriented medicine, the prerequisites for its emergence, the difficulties of introducing it into existing health systems based on foreign experience. Materials and methods. The main materials of the study were used sources of foreign literature, which presents the concept of patient-oriented medicine, analyzed the prerequisites for changing models of health care in the European Union, USA and Asia in accordance with the principles of patient-oriented medicine, as well as data on the components and levels of patient-oriented medicine in foreign countries Results. The analyzed literature quite fully describes the difficulties of introducing patient-oriented medicine into existing health care systems. Particular attention should be paid to a multidisciplinary approach, continuity at different levels of medical care and effective communication between the physician and the patient towards the integration of this model into clinical practice. The analysis of the availability of medical care in developed countries and its dependence on social status, ethnicity and disease of the patient. Conclusion. Patient-oriented medicine is a new model for planning, implementing and evaluating medical services, which is based on mutually beneficial partnerships between medical workers, patients and their families. Taking into account the current problems of domestic health care, the introduction of the patient-oriented model will significantly improve the quality of medical care provided to the population of our country. Globally, the implementation of the principles of this model is far from complete. In the Russian Federation, targeted work in this direction requires additional scientific research, systematization of available data, and development of new legal documents

About the authors

R. A. Khalfin

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
SPIN-code: 3332-6407
Moscow, Russia

V. V. Madyanova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

SPIN-code: 3430-5145
Moscow, Russia

O. E. Kachkova

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russia

I. D. Demina

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

SPIN-code: 3293-7360
Moscow, Russia

T. I. Krishtaleva

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

SPIN-code: 5890-6292
Moscow, Russia

E. N. Dombrovskaya

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

SPIN-code: 8200-4079
Moscow, Russia

K. S. Milchakov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

SPIN-code: 1176-1203
Moscow, Russia

Yu. Yu. Rozalieva

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

SPIN-code: 9971-0891
Moscow, Russia


  1. Thimbleby H. Technology and the future of healthcare. J. Public health Res. 2013. Т. 2. № 3. С. 28.
  2. Mellis C. Evidence-based medicine: What has happened in the past 50 years? J. Paediatr. Child Health. 2015. Т. 51. № 1. P. 65-68.
  3. Mathur S., Sutton J. Personalized medicine could transform healthcare (Review). Biomed. Reports. 2017.
  4. Thibaut F. From basic research to personalized medicine. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2016. Т. 18. № 3. P. 231-232.
  5. Rasool M. et al. The role of epigenetics in personalized medicine: challenges and opportunities. BMC Med. Genomics. 2015. Т. 8. № S1. P. S5.
  6. Zhang L., Hong H. Genomic Discoveries and Personalized Medicine in Neurological Diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2015. Т. 7. № 4. P. 542-553.
  7. Sorenson C., Drummond M., Khan B.B. Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: Disentangling the relationship. Clin. Outcomes Res. 2013. Т. 5. № 1. P. 223-234.
  8. Ha J.F., Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J. 2010. Т. 10. № 1. P. 38-43.
  9. Bardes C.L. Defining “Patient-Centered Medicine”. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Т. 366. № 9. P. 782-783.
  10. Ontario Medical Association. Patient-Centred Care: Policy Paper. 2010. 34-49 p.
  11. Hofmarcher M.M., Oxley H., Rusticelli E. Improved health system performance through better care coordination. OECD Pap. 2007. Т. 7. P. 1-85.
  12. Epstein N. Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A review. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2014. Т. 5. № 8. P. 295.
  13. Avisar N. et al. Multi-disciplinary patient-centered model for the expedited provision of costly therapies in community settings: The case of new medication for hepatitis C. Isr. J. Health Policy Res. 2017. Т. 6. № 1.
  14. Murray M. Process improvement and supply and demand: the elements that underlie integration. Healthc. Q. 2009. Т. 13 Spec No. № October. P. 37-42.
  15. Arpey N.C., Gaglioti A.H., Rosenbaum M.E. How Socioeconomic Status Affects Patient Perceptions of Health Care: A Qualitative Study. J. Prim. Care Community Health. 2017. Т. 8. № 3. P. 169-175.
  16. Schoen C. et al. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. Health Aff. (Millwood). 2009. Т. 28. № 6.
  17. Taber J.M., Leyva B., Persoskie A. Why do People Avoid Medical Care? A Qualitative Study Using National Data. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2015. Т. 30. № 3. P. 290-297.
  18. Jayadevappa R., Chhatre S. Patient centered care - A conceptual model and review of the state of the art. Open Health Serv. Policy J. 2011. Т. 4. P. 15-25.
  19. Beck A. et al. A randomized trial of group outpatient visits for chronically ill older HMO members: The Cooperative Health Care Clinic. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1997. Т. 45. № 5. P. 543-549.
  20. Barry H.C. et al. A randomized controlled trial of telephone management of suspected urinary tract infections in women. J. Fam. Pract. 2001. Т. 50. № 7. P. 589-94.
  21. Pinnock H. Accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness in primary care of routine telephone review of asthma: pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003. Т. 326. № 7387. P. 477-479.
  22. Blanchard J., Lurie N. R-E-S-P-E-C-T: patient reports of disrespect in the health care setting and its impact on care. J. Fam. Pract. 2004. Т. 53. № 9. P. 721-730.
  23. Johnson R.L. et al. Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits. Am. J. Public Health. 2004. Т. 94. № 12. P. 2084-2090.
  24. Kaplan S.H. et al. Patient and Visit Characteristics Related To Physicians Participatory Decision-Making Style Results From the Medical Outcomes Study. Med. Care. 1995. Т. 33. № 12. P. 1176-1187.
  25. Saha S. et al. Patient-physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch. Intern. Med. 1999. Т. 159. № 9. P. 997-1004.
  26. David R.A., Rhee M. The Impact of Language as a Barrier to Effective Health Care in an Underserved Urban Hispanic Community. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 1998. Т. 65. № 5-6. P. 393-397.
  27. Lee L.J. et al. Effect of Spanish interpretation method on patient satisfaction in an urban walk-in clinic. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2002. Т. 17. № 8. P. 641-646.
  28. Goodrich J., Cornwell J. Seeing the person in the patient - The Point of Care review paper. English. 2008. P. 63.
  29. McCabe R. Involvement in decision making: the devil is in the detail. World Psychiatry. 2017. Т. 16. № 2. P. 155-156.

Copyright (c) 2019 Khalfin R.A., Madyanova V.V., Kachkova O.E., Demina I.D., Krishtaleva T.I., Dombrovskaya E.N., Milchakov K.S., Rozalieva Y.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies