Divine impoliteness: How Arabs negotiate Islamic moral order on Twitter

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In this paper, I examine impoliteness-oriented discourse on Arabic Twitter as a resource for the negotiation of Islamic moral order. I do so by highlighting the responses Arabs post in reaction to a tweet which attacks Islamic cultural face. As the triggering act poses an indirect request to change an authoritative Islamic practice deemed immoral by the instigator of the tweet, sundry responses were generated to repair the damaged collective face through keeping intact or arguing against the questionable moral order. The main strategy I identify as a response to the professed face-attack is divine (im)politeness, intertextually referencing religious texts in favor of (or against) the existing (im)moral order. The rites of moral aggression also draw upon questions, provocation, personal attacks and projection of Islamic behavior onto unaddressed third parties (e.g., Christians and Hindus). The findings capture one moment of a historic shift in Islamic moral order and the role that impoliteness plays in digital Arabic contexts.

About the authors

Najma Al Zidjaly

Sultan Qaboos University

Email: najmaz@gmail.com
доцент кафедры английского языка и литературы Колледжа гуманитарных и социальных наук (Университет имени Султана Кабуса, Оман), член редколлегии журнала Journal of Multimodal Communication P. O. Box. 42, Seeb, Oman

References

  1. Abdul Sattar, Salasiah Hiba, Che Lah & Raja Suleiman (2009). A study on strategies used in Iraqi Arabic to refuse suggestions. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 30, 81-95.
  2. Alaoui, Sakina (2011). Politeness principle: A comparative study of English and Moroccan Arabic requests, offers and thanks. European Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (1), 7-15.
  3. Al-Adaileh, Bilal A. (2011). When the strategic displacement of the main topic of discussion is used as a face-saving technique: Evidence from Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Politeness Research, 7, 239-257.
  4. Al-Shlool, Safaa (2016). (Im)politeness and gender in the Arabic discourse of social Media Network Websites: Facebook as a norm. International Journal of Linguistics, 8 (3), 1948-5425.
  5. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2006). Disability and anticipatory discourse: The interconnectedness of local and global aspects of talk. Communication & Medicine, 3 (2), 101-112.
  6. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2010). Intertextuality and constructing Islamic identities online. In: Rotimi T (ed.) Handbook of research on discourse behavior and digital communication: Language structures and social interaction. New York: IGI Global, 191-204.
  7. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2012). What has happened to Arabs? Identity and face management online. Multilingua, 31, 413-439.
  8. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2014). WhatsApp Omani teachers? Social media and the question of social change. Multimodal Communication, 3 (1), 107-130.
  9. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2015). Disability, discourse and technology: Agency and inclusion in (Inter)action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2017a). Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman. Discourse & Society, 28 (6), 573-594.
  11. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2017b). Mental health and religion on Islamweb.net. Linguistik Online. http://dx.doi.org/10.13092/lo.87.4178.
  12. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2019a). Digital activism as nexus analysis: A sociolinguistic example From Arabic Twitter. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, paper 221.
  13. Al Zidjaly, Najma (2019b). Society in digital contexts: New modes of identity and community construction (Introduction). Multilingua, 38 (4), 357-375.
  14. Al Zidjaly, Najma (Forthcoming in 2020). Multiscale repair as activism on Arabic Twitter. In Gordon, Cynthia (ed.). Approaches to discourse. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  15. Al Zidjaly, Najma & Cynthia Gordon (2012). Mobile phones as cultural tools: An Arabian example. Intercultural Management Quarterly, 13 (2), 14-17.
  16. Al-Zumor, Abdul Wahed (2011). Apologies in Arabic and English: An inter-language and cross-cul­tural study. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation, 23 (1), 19-28.
  17. Badarneh, Muhammad A. (2019). ‘Like a donkey carrying books’: Intertextuality and impoliteness in Arabic online reader responses. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00027.bad.
  18. Badarneh, Muhammad A & Fathi Migdadi (2018). Acts of positioning in online reader comments on Jordanian news websites. Language & Communication, 58, 93-106.
  19. Bakhtin, Michael (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
  20. Bateman, John (2014). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. Abingdon: Routledge.
  21. Beeman, William (1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  22. Blommaert, Jan (2018). Durkheim and the Internet: On sociolinguistics and the sociological ima­gination. London: Bloomsbury.
  23. Bou-Franch, Patricia & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar (2018). Relational work in multimodal networked interactions on Facebook. Internet Pragmatics 1:2. 134-160.
  24. Bousfield, Derek (2007). Beginnings, middles, and end: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, 39. 2185-2216.
  25. Brown, Penelope & Steven Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press.
  26. Culpeper, Jonathon (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25: 349-367.
  27. Culpeper, Jonathon (2010). Conventionalized impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (12), 3232-3245.
  28. Culpeper, Jonathon (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Ebadi, Saman & Salman, Ahmed Rawdhan (2015). Using compliment responses in Arabic and English: Focusing on male and female EFL learners in Iraq. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(7): 157-178.
  30. Eickelman, Dale (1989). National identity and religious discourse in contemporary Oman. International Journal of Islamic and Arabic Studies, 6 (1), 1-20.
  31. Eickelman, Dale & Jon Anderson (2003). New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  32. Emery, Peter (2000). Greeting, congratulating and commiserating in Omani Arabic. Language Culture and Curriculum, 13 (2), 196-216.
  33. Farhat, Emdelellah (2013). Gender, power, politeness and women in the Arab society. Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 1 (1), 50-60.
  34. Feghali, Ellen (1997). Arab culture communication patterns. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 345-378.
  35. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar (2010). The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization. In Rotimi T (ed.). Handbook of research on discourse behavior and digita, 134, 120-133.
  36. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus & Patricia Bou-Franch (2013). Relational work in anonymous, asynchronous communication: A study of (dis)affiliation in YouTube. In Kecskes I & J Romero-Trillo (eds.) Research trends in intercultural pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 343-366.
  37. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2017). ‘Whose context collapse?’ Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context. Applied Linguistics Review, 8 (2-3), 1-32.
  38. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra & Tereza Spilioti, (eds.) (2016). The Routledge handbook on language and digital communication. London: Routledge.
  39. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra & Maria Vasilaki (2018). Small stories and impoliteness in online discussions of the Greek crisis. Internet Pragmatics, 1(2), 215-240.
  40. Giddens, Anthony (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
  41. Goffman, Erving (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  42. Graham, Sage L. (2007). Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (4), 742-759.
  43. Graham, Sage L. (2008). A manual for (im)politeness? The impact of the FAQ in and electronic community of practice. In Bousfield, D. & M. Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 281-304.
  44. Graham, Sage L. (2018). Impoliteness and the moral order in online gaming. Internet Pragmatics, 1 (2): 303-328.
  45. Graham L. Sage & Scott Dutt (2019). “Watch the potty mouth”: Negotiating impoliteness in online gaming. In Ensslin, A. and I. Balteiro (eds.) Approaches to videogame discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 201-223.
  46. Graham, Sage L. & Claire Hardaker (2017). (Im)politeness in digital communication. In Jonathon Culpeper (ed.). The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 785-814. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Hammod, Najla & Arwa Abdul-Rassul (2017). Impoliteness strategies in English and Arabic Face­book comments. International Journal of Linguistics, 9 (5): 97-112.
  48. Hardaker, Claire (2015). “I refuse to respond to this obvious troll”: An overview of (perceived) trolling. Corpora, 10 (2), 201-229.
  49. Haugh, Michael (2015). Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  50. Haugh, Michael (2018). Afterword: theorizing impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 14 (1), 153-165.
  51. Hegland, Michael (1998). Flagellation and fundamentalism: (Trans)forming meaning, identity, and gender through Pakistani women's rituals of mourning. American Ethnologist 25(2), 240-266.
  52. Herring, Susan (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to Researching online behavior. In Barab, S., R. Kling & J. Gray (eds.) Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 338-376.
  53. Hofstede, Geert (1990). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  54. Jay, Timothy (1992). Cursing in America: A psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, in the movies, in the school yards and on the streets. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  55. Jay, Timothy (2000). Why we curse: A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  56. Kádár, Dániel (2017a). Politeness, impoliteness and ritual: Maintaining the moral order in inter­personal interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  57. Kádár, Dániel (2017b). Indirect ritual offence: A study on elusive impoliteness. In Cap, P. and M. Dynel (eds.) Impoliteness: From lexis to discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177-199.
  58. Kádár, Dániel & Michael Haugh (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer­sity Press.
  59. Kádár, Dániel, Michael Haugh & Chang, Wei-Lin Melody (2013). Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards. Multilingua, 32 (3), 343-372.
  60. KhosraviNik, Majid (2016). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In: Flowerdew F and Richardson J (eds.) Handbook of critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 582-596.
  61. KhosraviNik, Majid & Nadia Sarkhoh (2017). Arabism and anti-Persian sentiments on participatory web platforms: A social media critical discourse study. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3614-3633.
  62. Kristeva, Julia (1980/1967). Word, dialogue and novel. In Roudiez, L.S. (ed.) Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art (T. Gora, A. Jardine& L.S. Roudiez, Trans.) New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 64-91.
  63. Labben, Afef (2018). Face and identity in interaction: A focus on Tunisian Arabic. Journal of Prag­matics, 128, 67-81.
  64. Lewis, Bernard (2001). The multiple identities of the Middle East. New York: Schocken Books.
  65. Locher, Miriam A. (2006). Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua, 25, 249-267.
  66. Locher, Miriam A. (2008). Relational work, politeness, and identity. In G. Antos & E. Ventola (eds., in cooperation with T. Weber). Handbook of interpersonal communication, 509-540. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  67. Locher, Miriam A. (2015). Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 5-10.
  68. Locher, Miriam A. (2018). Politeness. In Chapelle, C (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0916.pub2.
  69. Locher, Miriam A. & Brook Bolander (2017). Facework and identity. In C.R. Hoffman and W. Bub­litz (eds.). Pragmatics of social media, 407-434. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  70. Locher, Miriam A. & Sage L Graham (2010). Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, Interpersonal pragmatics, 1-13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  71. Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 92-33.
  72. Mak, Bernie Chun Nam & Chui, Hin Leung (2014). Impoliteness in Facebook status updates: Strategic talk among colleagues ‘outside’ the workplace. Text & Talk, 34 (2), 165-185.
  73. Mazid, Mohammed (2006). (Translating) Emirati Arabic politeness formulas: An exploratory study and a mini-mini-dictionary. The Seventh Annual U.A.E University Research Conference, 76285.
  74. Mohammed, Hiba N. & Abbas, Nawal F. (2015). Pragmatics of impoliteness and rudeness. American International Journal of Social Science, 4 (6): 195-205.
  75. Morozov, Evelyn (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
  76. Najeeb, Zena M., Marlyna Maros & Fariza Mohd Nor (2012). Politeness in E-mails of Arab students in Malaysia. Journal of Language Studies, 12 (1): 125-145.
  77. Nelson, Gayle, Mohamoud Al Batal & Waguida El Bakary (2002). Directness vs. indirectness: Egyptian Arabic and US English communication style. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26: 39-57.
  78. Nishida, Kitarō (1958). Intelligibility and the philosophy of nothingness. Tokyo: Maruzen.
  79. Nordenson, Jon (2018). Online activism in the Middle East. London: Ibtauris.
  80. Reiter, Rosina & Sara Orthaber (2018). Exploring the moral compass: Denunciations in a Facebook carpool group. Internet Pragmatics, 1 (2), 241-270.
  81. Samarah, Abdullah (2015). Politeness in Arabic culture. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5 (10), 2005-2016.
  82. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  83. Schiffrin, Deborah (1989). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  84. Scollon, Ron (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.
  85. Sinatora, Francesco (2019a). Chronotopes, entextualization and Syrianpolitical activism on Facebook. In Najma Al Zidjaly (ed.). Society in digital contexts: New modes of identity and community construction. Multilingua, 38 (4): 427-458.
  86. Sinatora, Francesco (2019b). Language, identity, and Syrian political activism on social media. Lon­don: Routledge.
  87. Sinkeviciute, Valeria (2018). “Ya bloody drongo!!!” impoliteness as situated moral judgement on Facebook. Internet Pragmatics, 1 (2), 271-302.
  88. Sumiala, Johanna & Lilly Korpiola (2017). Mediated Muslim martyrdom: rethinking digital solidarity in the “Arab Spring”. New Media & Society, 19 (1), 52-66.
  89. Tetreault, Chantal (2015). “What do you think about having beauty marks on your - Hashek!”: Innovative and impolite uses of an Arabic politeness formula among French teenagers. Journal of linguistic Anthropology, 25 (3), 285-302.
  90. Ting-Toomey, Sue (2004). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. Gudy­kunst (ed.). Theorizing about intercultural communication, 71-92. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  91. Ting-Toomey, Sue (ed.) (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  92. Tracy, Karen (2008). ‘Reasonable hostility’: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research, 4, 169-191.
  93. Tovares, Alla (2006). Public medium, private talk: gossip about a TV show as ‘quotidian herme­neutics.’ Text & Talk, 26 (4/5), 463-491.
  94. Tovares, Alla (2019). Negotiating “thick” identities through “light” practices: YouTube metalinguistic comments about language in Ukraine. Multilingua, 38 (4), 459-484.
  95. Upadhyay, Shiv R. (2010). Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 105-127.
  96. Vásquez, Camilla (2014). The discourse of online consumer reviews. Indiana: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  97. Watts, Richard (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  98. Wilce, John (2005). Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: The circulation of discourse in metacultural context. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15 (1), 602-71.
  99. Xie, Chaoqun (2011). Politeness and memes: Philosophizing pragmatics. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.
  100. Xie, Chaoqun (2018). Introduction: (Im)politeness, morality and the internet. Internet Pragmatics, 1 (2), 205-214.
  101. Xie, Chaoqun, Ziran, He & Lin Dajin (2005). Politeness: Myth and truth. Studies in Language, 29 (2), 431-461.
  102. Zappavigna, Michelle (2011). Ambient Affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13 (5), 788-806.
  103. Zayani, Mohamed (2018). Digital Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Copyright (c) 2019 Zidjaly N.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies