Hybrid educational technologies for forming competences of search and critical analysis among future bachelors in land management and cadastres

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Problem statement. The article examines the features of competency development among students within the context of hybrid learning. Particular attention is paid to developing universal skills in information search, critical analysis, and synthesis among future bachelor’s degree students in land management and cadastres during the study of Informatics discipline. Methodology. Using such methods as analysis of scientific literature, pedagogical observation, student surveys, and analysis of academic performance, the authors identified key directions for fostering these competencies within the Informatics course. Results. The study revealed that the use of hybrid educational technologies for developing students’ competencies in information search and critical analysis presents its own set of challenges and opportunities. By integrating various educational technologies, including synchronous and asynchronous learning, as well as individual and group activities, hybrid learning offers a multifaceted approach to education. Conclusion. The proposed methodological recommendations for organizing the educational process, taking these features into account, are of practical value for university instructors training bachelor’s degree students in land management and cadastres. Their implementation can enhance the effectiveness of developing the specified competencies within the hybrid learning framework.

About the authors

Igor D. Rudinsky

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: idru@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8365-5402
SPIN-code: 9822-8960

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor at the Educational and Scientific Cluster “Institute of Education and Humanities”

14 Alexander Nevsky St, 236041, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation

Oksana Yu Li

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: okaplife.39@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-0478-4515
SPIN-code: 2858-0955

PhD student at the Educational and Scientific Cluster “Institute of High Technologies”

14 Alexander Nevsky St, 236041, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation

References

  1. Watterston J. (ed.) Blended learning: A synthesis of research findings in Victorian education. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development; 2012.
  2. Gunawardena ChN, Linder-VanBerschot JA, LaPointe DK, Rao L. Predictors of learner satisfaction and transfer of learning in a corporate online education program. American Journal of Distance Education. 2010;24(4):207–226.
  3. Wang FL, Fong J, Zhang L, Lee VS. (eds.) Hybrid learning and education: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, 25–27 August 2009, Macau, China. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.
  4. Qi L, Tian A. Design and application of hybrid learning platform based on Joomla In: Zhou M, Tan H. (eds.) Advances in computer science and education applications: Proceedings of the International Conference, 9–10 July 2011, Qingdao, China. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 549–556.
  5. Huang KL. Planning and implementation framework for a hybrid e-learning model: The context of a part-time LIS postgraduate programme. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2010;42(1):45–69.
  6. Rudinsky ID, Davydov AV. Hybrid educational technologies: analysis of possibilities and prospects for application. Journal of Science and Education of North-West Russia. 2021;7(1):44–52. (In Russ.)
  7. Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2004;7(2):95–105.
  8. Vernadakis N, Antoniou P, Giannousi M, Zetou E, Kioumourtzoglou E. Comparing hybrid learning with traditional approaches on learning the Microsoft Office Power Point 2003 program in tertiary education. Computers & Education. 2011;56(1):188–199.
  9. Bralić A, Divjak B. Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2018;15(2).
  10. Khali M, Wong J, Koning B, Ebner M, Paas F. Gamification in MOOCs: A review of the state of the art. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON 2018), 17–20 April 2018, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. United States: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2018. p. 1629–1638.
  11. Schophuizen M, Kalz M. Educational innovation projects in Dutch higher education: bottom-up contextual coping to deal with organizational challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2020;17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00197-z
  12. Masalimova AR, Ryazanova EL, Tararina LI, Sokolova EG, Ikrennikova YuB, Efimushkina SV, Shulga TI. Distance learning hybrid format for university students in post-pandemic perspective: Collaborative technologies aspect. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. 2021;16(1):389–395.
  13. Rudinsky ID, Abdulhamid T. Experimental study of the effectiveness of using asr technology in foreign language classes. Tidings of the Baltic State Fishing Fleet Academy. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2018;1(43):121–132. (In Russ.)
  14. Rudinsky ID, Davydova NA, Petrov SV. Competence. Competence-based approach. 2nd ed., revised. Moscow: Hot Line – Telecom Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2024 Rudinsky I.D., Li O.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies