Assessing the effectiveness of using electronic distance learning methods and the relationship with the results of the Bennett and Unified State Exam tests

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Problem statement. This article examines application of electronic distance learning methods in the modern educational process. Effectiveness of such methods and importance of assessing the level of training of students are discussed. The question that the authors are trying to answer is whether distance learning increases students’ results on the Unified State Exam in physics and whether it develops their analytical skills. Methodology. One of the assessment methods under consideration is the Bennett test, which measures students’ ability to solve technical problems and analyze information. The results of the Unified State Exam in physics are also discussed as an indicator of the level of knowledge of students. The main focus of the article is on the study of correlation between results of the Bennett test and the Unified State Exam in physics among students who used electronic distance learning modules in teaching the subject “Physics”. Results. The results of the study show that there is a correlation between the use of electronic distance modules and the success of students on the Bennett test and the Unified State Exam in physics. However, the authors suggest that more accurate conclusions require additional studies with a large amount of data. Conclusion. The authors conclude that the use of electronic distance learning methods can be useful for preparing students for the Unified State Exam in physics and developing their analytical skills, but further research is needed to confirm this statement.

About the authors

Maksim S. Ivanov

Irkutsk State Transport University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vanov.maks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0754-2032
SPIN-code: 7758-2854

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Technosphere Safety, Face-toFace Teaching Faculty, Teacher of the highest qualification category, Lyceum, Zabaikalsk Rail Transport Institute

11 Magistralnaya St, Chita, 672040, Russian Federation

Lyudmila V. Vinogradova

Irkutsk State Transport University

Email: vinogradova@zab.megalink.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-5605-2317
SPIN-code: 2636-4772

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Technosphere Safety, Face-to-Face Teaching Faculty, Zabaikalsk Rail Transport Institute

11 Magistralnaya St, Chita, 672040, Russian Federation

Vera A. Patrina

Russian Railways Lyceum No. 17

Email: vektorperemen@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-9553-3359

Deputy Director for Academic Affairs, Teacher of the first qualification category

Pushkina St, Erofey Pavlovich Urban-Type Settlement, 676000, Russian Federation

Oksana V. Makarova

Russian Railways Lyceum No. 18

Email: school51oaorzd@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-6624-184X

Director, Teacher of the highest qualification category

34 Papanina St, Ulyakan Station, 673478, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kudryavtsev TV. Psychology of technical thinking. Process and methods of solving technical problems. Moscow: Pedagogy; 1975. (In Russ.)
  2. Petrova SD. Pedagogical tools for analyzing technical thinking of students of Buzuluk College of Industry and Transport. Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. 2013;9:156–165. (In Russ.)
  3. Kryazheva EV, Vinogradskaya MYu. Analysis of psychological structure of creative technical thinking. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2020;66(4):323–326. (In Russ.)
  4. Zvyagintseva EN. Assessment of the level of development of technical thinking of students of technical universities in Novokuznetsk. Scientific Notes of Lesgaft University. 2022;10(212):542–544. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2022.10.p542-545
  5. Rogalev AV. Model of laboratory work in physics in the aspect of the development of technical abilities among students of secondary vocational education institutions of railway transport. Scolarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series: Professional education, theory and teaching methods. 2013;6(53):107–116. (In Russ.)
  6. Siegel EJ. Arthur Sinton Otis and the American mental testing movement (PhD dissertation). Miami; 1992. https://scholarship.miami.edu/esploro/outputs/ 991031447295402976
  7. Kulagina IV. Psychodiagnostics in organizations: practicum. Tolyatti: Tolyatti State University Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.)
  8. Artyukhov AA. Some aspects of the theory and practice of organizing “distance learning” in primary school geography lessons. International Research Journal. 2021;5(107):49–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2021.107.5.111
  9. Larchenkova LA. Distance education and problems of specialized physics education at school. Science and School. 2008;2:75–78. (In Russ.)
  10. Marakhovskaya NV. Psychological and pedagogical means of overcoming cognitive barriers in distance learning (dissertation of Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences). Bryansk; 2002. (In Russ.) https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01002316453
  11. Guseva NA. (ed.) The use of remote technologies in the implementation of additional general education programs of various directions: a methodical guide. Yaroslavl: State Autonomous Institution of Additional Vocation Education at Yaroslalvl Region “Institute of Education Development” Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.)
  12. Aslezova LV. Theoretical foundations of the organization of monitoring the results of students’ educational activities in the process of modular distance learning (dissertation of Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences). Ulan-Ude; 2001. (In Russ.) https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000338349
  13. Kuzmina LV. Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. Bulletin of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2012;1:8–10. (In Russ.)
  14. Saprykina DI, Volokhovich AA. Problems of transition to distance learning in the Russian Federation through the eyes of teachers. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2020. (“Facts of Education” Series. Issue 4(29)). (In Russ.)
  15. Grinshkun VV, Krasnova GA. Information technologies effective use and other problems of improving the preparation of high qualified persons in the post-graduate study. RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education. 2018;15(2):135–143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2018-15-2-135-143

Copyright (c) 2024 Ivanov M.S., Vinogradova L.V., Patrina V.A., Makarova O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies