Shopping as ‘Best Practice’ - Analyzing Walmart’s Debated Sustainability Policies

Cover Page


Nowadays, companies who want to engage environment-friendly consumers increasingly rely on green-economy oriented campaigns. Such categories of (ethical) consumers are numerically increasing, and expressions evoking environmental friendliness are becoming particularly trendy. In this vein, words such as ‘sustainability’ have been variously recontextualized/reframed and have become an ‘ought to’ for media-savvy companies ‘with a vision’ - Walmart, the American multinational retail corporation, being a relevant case in point. It is no accident that, on the first Google page for ‘sustainability’, ‘Walmart’ proudly surfaces: The company has made an explicit commitment not just to expand the business but also to improve communities and enhance the sustainability of the products they sell, by encouraging more responsible production practices, while at the same time making product choices more affordable for customers, as reported on its website. However, as the world’s largest company, Walmart is an easy target for attack mainly by environmentalists. Sometimes, Walmart gives its critics grounds for some legitimate criticism in a variety of fields ranging from the supply chain emissions to renewable energy and preserving habitat. Such criticism resonates across the media, owing to their ‘lack of closure’ (Laclau and Mouffe 1985), finalized to offer an unbiased perspective. Against this ‘complexified’ (Macgilchrist 2007) background, our study aims to examine, from a broadly Multimodal and Positive Discourse Analysis perspective, the Walmart website ‘sustainability’ pages with their variety of communicative strategies, advertising ‘responsible’ Walmart positive attitudes to fundamental issues like Energy, Waste, Products and Responsible Sourcing.

About the authors

Lucia Abbamonte

Second University of Naples

Viale Beneduce 10, 81100, Caserta, Italy

Flavia Cavaliere

University of Naples Federico II

Via Porta di Massa 1 80133 Naples, Italy


  1. Abbamonte, L. (2014). Restorative Justice. L’importanza della diffusione e della condivisione. In Marco A. Quiroz Vitale (ed.). Diritto, il dono di Epimeteo. Dialoghi tra Diritto, Teoria e Sociologia del diritto. Milano: Mimesis
  2. Abbamonte, L., & Cavaliere, F. (2012). Restorative Justice and Mediation - The Healing Power of Language. In AAVV. Explorations in Language and Law. Approaches and Perspective. Aprilia (Lt): Novalogos vol. 1
  3. Abbamonte, L., & Cavaliere, F. (2013). Restorative Justice, a comparative analysis of discursive practices: dialogistic exchanges in the USA and Italy. In C. Williams & G. Tessuto (Eds), Language in the Negotiation of Justice: Contexts, Issues and Applications. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing
  4. Abbamonte, L. (2012). Integrated Methodology for Emotion Talk in Socio-legal Exchanges. Politeness, Accommodation and Appraisal Insights. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane
  5. Adams, C.J. & Gruen, L. (Eds.) (2014). Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth. New York: Bloomsbury Academic
  6. Ascher, S., & Pincus, E. (2013). The Filmmaker’s Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for the Digital Age. New York: Plume
  7. Bateman, J. (2014). Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. London and New York: Routledge
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Structure, habitus, practices. In P. Bourdieu. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers
  9. Caldas-Coulthard, C. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.) (1996). Text and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis xi-xii. London: Routledge
  10. Chandler, D. (2016). Camera Techniques: Distance and Angle. The ‘Grammar’ of Television and Film.
  11. Christie, F. &. Martin, J.R. (Eds.) (2000). Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School (3rd ed.). London, Cassell
  12. Cox, R. (2012). Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere. London: Sage
  13. Dyer, G. (1988). Advertising as Communication. London and New York: Routledge
  14. Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997).Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.). Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. II. London: Sage
  15. Falco S.N. (2015). Nasce il Marketing Transpersonale, il nuovo paradigma che cambia l’approccio alla disciplina. Retrieved from
  16. Fecteau, J. & Munoz, D.P. (2006). ‘Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection’. Trends Cogn Sci. 382-90
  17. Fisher, A. (2013). Radical Ecopsychology: Psychology in the Service of Life (2nd ed). New York: State University of New York Press
  18. Fowler, J. (1976). Mass Advertising as Social Forecast: A Method for Future Research. New York: Praeger Publishers
  19. Fowler, J. (1996). Advertising and Popular Culture (Feminist Perspective on Communication). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
  20. Garrard, G. (Ed). (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  21. Harré, R., Brockmeier, J., & Mühlhäuser, P.(1999). Greenspeak: A Study of Environmental Discourse. London: Sage
  22. Han, S., Lerner, J. & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and Consumer Decision Making: The Appraisal-Tendency Framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 158-168
  23. Humphreys, M., & Garry, J. (2000). ‘Thinking about salience’. Early drafts from Columbia: 1-55
  24. Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (2006). The Discourse Reader. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  25. Knickerbocker, S. (2012). Ecopoetics: The Language of Nature, the Nature of Language. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press
  26. Kress, G. (1996). Representational Resources and the Production of Subjectivity: Questions for the Theoretical Development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a Multicultural Society. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.). Text and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge
  27. Kress, G. (2000). Design and Transformation: New Theories of Meaning. In W. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge
  28. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge
  29. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. London and New York: Routledge
  30. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1990). Reading Images. The grammar of visual design. Geelong: Deakin University Press
  31. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
  32. Laclau E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York Verso, (2nd Edition, 2001)
  33. Lagerwerf, L., van Hooijdonk, C.M.J., & Korenberg, A. (2012). Processing visual rhetoric in advertisements: Interpretations determined by verbal anchoring and visual structure. Journal of Pragmatics. 1836-1852
  34. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  35. Lieberman, D. (2015). ‘YouTube Pitches Itself to Advertisers as the Medium of the Future’. Deadline. 29 April 2015. Retrieved from
  36. Martin, J.R. (1992). English text. System and structure Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company
  37. Martin, J.R. (2000). Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford UP
  38. Martin, J.R. (2001). Fair Trade: Negotiating Meaning in Multimodal Texts. In P. Coppock (Ed.). The Semiotics of Writing: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on the Technology of Writing. Turnhout (Belgium): Brepols Publishing
  39. Martin, J.R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179-200
  40. Macgilchrist, F. (2007). Positive Discourse Analysis: Contesting Dominant Discourses by Reframing the Issues. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines. 1 (1): 74-94
  41. Pallera, M. (2014). Un e-commerce ha quadruplicato il valore grazie all’amore. C’è un marketing che vende e migliora il mondo. Centodieci. Retrieved from
  42. Robbins, P. (2012). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. (2nd ed.). MA: Blackwell
  43. Saward, N. (2012). Lines of appeal. SSC Media Studies... Retrieved from http://sssfcmediastudies.
  44. Soojung, K. and Oh, J. S. (2009). Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 1-15
  45. Sperber, D. and Dan, W. [1986] 1995. Relevance: Communication &Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell
  46. Stevens, P. (2012). Towards an ecosociology. Sociology, 46(4), 579-595
  47. Stibbe, A. (2016). Ecolinguistics: the search for new stories to live by. Seminar - Catania (It) 7 September
  48. Stinson, J. (2012). All About Camera Angles. The Videomaker. Retrieved from
  49. van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Introducing Social Semiotics. London and New York: Routledge
  50. van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Colour Schemes. In M. Boeck, & N. Pachler (Eds.). Multimodality and Social Semiosis: Communication, Meaning-Making, and Learning in the Work of Gunther Kress. London: Routledge
  51. White, P.R.R. (1998). Telling Media Tales: the News Story As Rhetoric. Unpublished PhD, University of Sydney, Sydney. Retrieved from KeyReferences.html



Abstract - 2960

PDF (English) - 1516




Copyright (c) 2017 Аббамонте Л., Кавальери Ф.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies