The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
- Authors: Zuev A.S.1, Slugina V.A.2
- Novosibirsk State University
- Institute of History SB RAS
- Issue: Vol 20, No 3 (2021): Political Communication Models of the Russian State with the Peoples of the Ural-Volga Region, Siberia and Central Asia in the 16th–19th Centuries
- Pages: 340-352
- Section: Political Communication Models of the Russian State with the Peoples of the Ural-Volga Region, Siberia and Central Asia in the 16th–19th Centuries
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/russian-history/article/view/27266
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-3-340-352
Full text / tables, figures
The article studies the methods that substantiated the legitimacy of the power of the Russian monarch over the vast territories of Siberia. The context of this study is the Russian political culture of the late 16th to early 18th centuries. Based on information from chronicles as well as diplomatic and administrative documents, the authors identify and systematize the main political, ideological, and legal arguments that were most often used by the Russian government to justify the Tsars’ rule over Siberia. The arguments can be divided into two groups according to the target audience: the first group was intended for conversation with the heads of foreign countries, the second one addressed the Siberian peoples and also the Russian people broadly. In foreign policy, the representatives of the Moscow Tsar emphasized the “antiquity” and the “strength” of the bond between these territories and the Russian state. The diplomats tended to exaggerate the scale of the Russian military, socio-economic, political, and cultural (religious) development of the new territories. At the same time, they were silent about the resistance of the local population to the tsarist servicemen. At home the authorities applied other legal arguments to bolster their legitimacy. In interaction with indigenous populations, the Russian governors and service people usually forced the communities (in the form of an ultimatum) to accept the claim that the Tsar owned the Siberian lands as a fiefdom. With this the socio-political status of the Siberian peoples radically changed: they became subjects to the Russian Tsar, as kholops or yasak-payers. The Russian combatants and colonists, in direct contact with the indigenous population, informed the Siberian peoples about recent government directives and fully identified with the official claim to authority. In the eyes of the Russian population, an additional element was the religious and political idea that the Tsar had been chosen by God, from which followed the duty to expand the Russian Orthodox tsardom.
About the authors
Andrey S. ZuevNovosibirsk State University
Author for correspondence.
Doktor Istoricheskikh Nauk [Dr. habil. hist.], Professor, Head of the Department of Russian History, Director of the Institute for Humanities1, Pirogova Str., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
Viktoriya A. SluginaInstitute of History SB RAS
Kandidat Istoricheskikh Nauk [PhD in History], Research Scientist of the Sector of Archeography and Source Study, Institute of History SB RAS; Assistant of the Russian History Department, Institute for Humanities, Novosibirsk State University8, Nikolaev Str., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
- Avdeev, A.G. “Titulatura Ivana III v latinskoi i russkoi nadpisiakh na Spasskoi bashne Moskovskogo Kremlya.” In Voprosy epigrafiki, vol. 1 Moscow: Universitet Dmitriia Pozharskogo, 2006: 25–35 (in Russian).
- Barakhovich, P.N. “The instruction (‘Nakaz’) of tsar Mikhail Fyodorovich to the yeniseisk voivode Zh.V. Kondyrev, January 31, 1631.” Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, vol. 17, no. 1: History (2018): 91–103 (in Russian). doi: 10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-1-91-103
- Belokurov, S.A. Snosheniia Rossii s Kavkazom, vol. 1. Moscow: University typography Publ., 1889 (in Russian).
- Berezhkov, M. Krymskie shertnye gramoty. Kiev: G.T. Korchak-Novitsky Publ. 1894 (in Russian).
- Filyushkin, A.I. Izobretaia pervuiu voinu Rossii i Evropy: Baltiiskie voiny vtoroi poloviny XVI v. glazami sovremennikov i potomkov. St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 2013 (in Russian).
- Golokhvastov, D.P., “Leonid, arkhimandrit. Blagoveshchenskii ierei Sil'vestr i egopisaniya.” In Chteniia v Obshchestve istorii i drevnostei rossiiskikh, vol. 1. Moscow: University typography Publ., 1874: 1–100 (in Russian).
- Ignatkin, P.S. “The official image of Siberia in Moscow State of the end of the 16th – early 17th century.” Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology 12, no. 1: History (2013): 99–103 (in Russian).
- Ivanov, V.N. Vkhozhdenie Severo-Vostoka Аzii v sostav Russkogo gosudarstva. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1999 (in Russian).
- Kashtanov, S.M. “Sibirskii komponent v titulature moskovskikh gosudarei XVI–XVII vv.” In Obshchestvennoe soznanie naseleniya Rossii po otechestvennym narrativnym istochnikam XVI–XX vv. Novosibirsk: Publishing House SB RAS Publ., 2006: 3–21 (in Russian).
- Kivelson, V. “Muscovite “Citizenship”: Rights without Freedom.” The Journal of Modern History 74, no. 3 (2002): 465–489.
- Miller, G.F. Istoriya Sibiri, vol. 1. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 1999 (in Russian).
- Miller, G.F. Istoriya Sibiri, vol. 2. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 2000 (in Russian).
- Miller, G.F. Istoriya Sibiri, vol. 3. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 2005 (in Russian).
- Myasnikov, S.A. “Legitimation and justification of policy: analysis of conceptual distinctions.” Political science (RU), no. 3 (2019): 222–235 (in Russian). DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.12
- Pchelov, E.V. “The territorial title of the Russian sovereigns: the structure and principles of construction.” Russian History, no. 1 (2010): 3–15 (in Russian).
- Preobrazhenskii, A.A. Ural i Zapadnaya Sibir' v kontse XVI – nachale XVIII veka. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1972 (in Russian).
- Romodanovskaya, E.K. “Pogodinskii letopisets (K voprosu o nachale sibirskogo letopisaniya).” In Sibirskoe istochnikovedenie i arkheografiya. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1980, pp. 18–58 (in Russian).
- Ryabinina, E.A. “Vneshniaia politika Kuchuma-khana v 1582–1598 gg.” In Istoriia, ekonomika i kul'tura srednevekovykh tiurko-tatarskikh gosudarstv Zapadnoi Sibiri, 90–95. Kurgan: Kurgan State University Publ., 2011 (in Russian).
- Slugina V.A., Konev A.Yu. “ ‘Granted word’ as a part of the instructions to Siberian governors: to the issue of genesis and evolution.” In Aktual'nye problemy otechestvennoi istorii, istochnikovedeniya i arkheografii: K 90-letiyu N.N. Pokrovskogo. Novosibirsk: Institute of History SB RAS Publ., 2020: 183–193 (in Russian).
- Trepavlov, V.V. Sibirskii yurt posle Ermaka: Kuchum i Kuchumovichi v bor'be za revansh. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 2012 (in Russian).
- Vershinin, E.V. Voevodskoe upravlenie v Sibiri (XVII vek). Ekaterinburg: Developing education Publ., 1998 (in Russian).
- Zuev, A.S., and Slugina V.A. “Annalistic Accounts on Siberian Peoples’ Shert (Fealty to the Tsar) during Ermak’s March and the Historical Realities.” Russian History, no. 3 (2015): 30–44 (in Russian).
- Zuev, A.S., Ignatkin, P.S., and Slugina, V.A. Pod sen’ dvuglavogo orla: inkorporatsiia narodov Sibiri v Rossiiskoe gosudarstvo v kontse XVI – nachale XVIII v. Novosibirsk: IPTS NSU Publ., 2017 (in Russian).