The role of museums in Russia’s and China’s cultural diplomacies
- Authors: Fokin V.I.1, Elts E.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State University
- Issue: Vol 18, No 4 (2019): RUSSIA AND CHINA
- Pages: 865-882
- Section: RUSSIA AND CHINA
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/russian-history/article/view/22311
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2019-18-4-865-882
Cite item
Full text / tables, figures
Abstract
Russia and China have both shown increasing interest in the promotion their cultural achievements and have utilized culture as essential soft-power resource. Moreover, the concept of ‘soft power’ has gained popularity in Russia’s and China’s academic and political discourse. Russian-Chinese cultural cooperation is gaining momentum due to this exchange, and the scale and the depth of the cultural projects have expanded. At the moment, museums are involved in development of diplomatic relations, including within the framework of friendship societies, and through the development of the Russian-Chinese tourism. ‘Red tourism’ (it means visiting the monuments of the revolutionary history of Russia) in particular has expanded through the implementation of cultural seasons, Cross-Years of Culture, and the promotion of cultural exchanges of contemporary art. As shown in the case of Hermitage, Moscow Kremlin Museums, National Museum of China, Palace Museum ‘Gugong’ in Beijing, famous world museums have been carrying out the ambitious development programmes, scaling up their resource capacities, and since the beginning of the 21st century have begun to promote their brand. The article considers the potential for museums to participate in the development of bilateral relations, and in improving the foreign-policy image of both countries. The authors’ research reveals the features of museum diplomacy, areas of museums’ international activities that enhanced the efficiency of Russia’s and China’s soft power and identifies the common avenues for disseminating the neoliberal messages in museum sphere. Moreover, particular attention is paid by the authors’ to ‘soft power’ rankings and to lists of the most visited museums. Furthermore, new modalities of international museum cooperation are discussed by the authors, with a focus on areas of joint collaboration within the framework of SCO, BRICS, and the “One belt, one road” initiative. The authors conclude that there is a need to improve the legal framework for Russian-Chinese museum cooperation in response to the deepening interaction and transformation of the role of museums in both international and bilateral relations.
About the authors
Vladimir I. Fokin
Saint Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: fokin.vladimir@mail.ru
Doktor istoricheskikh nauk [Dr. habil. hist.], Professor at the Department of International Humanitarian Relations, Saint Petersburg State University.
7/9, Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034, RussiaElena E. Elts
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: elenaelts@mail.ru
Kandidat istoricheskikh nauk [Ph.D. in History], Associate Professor at the Department of International Humanitarian Relations, Saint Petersburg State University.
7/9, Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034, RussiaReferences
- Alikberova, A.R. Rossiysko-kitayskiye otnosheniya v sfere kul’tury i obrazovaniya. Kazan’: Kazanskiy (Privolzhskiy) federal’nyy universitet Publ., 2014 (in Russian).
- Bodrova, O.I. Gumanitarnaya ekspansiya Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki v period s 1978 g. po 2012 g. Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. N.I. Lobachevskogo Publ., 2013 (in Russian).
- Changhong, Guo. “The Qing Palace: from a Forbidden City to a Public Heritage.” Museum International 60, no. 1–2 (2008): 78–88.
- Dzodin, Harvey. “Time to ramp up China’s soft power: China Daily Columnist.” The Straitstimes, December 28, 2016.
- Emily Sharpe, José da Silva. “Fashion provides winning formula.” The Art Newspaper. 28, no. 311 (April 2019): II.
- Grincheva, Natalia. “Mapping museum ‘Soft Power»:’ Adding geo-vizualization to the methodological framework.” Computers and the Humanities (December 2018): 1–22.
- Jesse, Sarah. “Museum Education: China’s Next Big Build-Out?” American Alliance of Museims, accessed April 19, 2019, https://www.aam-us.org/2017/07/24/museum-education-chinas-next-big-build-out//.
- Kharitonov, A.I. “Myagkaya sila” s kitayskoy spetsifikoy.” RUSH/RGU Bulletin. Series Political Science. History. International Relations, no. 1 (7) (2017): 113–120 (in Russian).
- Kong, Da. Imaging China. China’s cultural diplomacy through loan exhibitions to British museums. Leicester: University of Leicester Publ., 2015.
- Kulikova, G.V. Rossiya – Kitay. narodnaya diplomatiya. Moscow: ID FORUM Publ., 2012 (in Russian).
- Lomanov, A.V., and Kobelev, Ye.V. “Myagkaya sila” v otnosheniyakh Kitaya s vneshnim mirom. Moscow: IDV RAN Publ., 2015 (in Russian).
- Luzyanin, S.G., Safronova, Ye.I., and Morozov Yu.V. Strategiya razvitiya Shankhayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva do 2025 goda: iskhodnyye realii i faktor rossiysko-kitayskogo partnerstva. Moscow: IDV RAN Publ., 2015 (in Russian).
- Lord, Gail. “The soft power of museums.” In The Soft Power 30. A Global Ranking of Soft Power, 101–103. Portland: [N.s.], 2017.
- Lukin, A.V. Rossiya i Kitay: chetyre veka vzaimodeystviya. Istoriya, sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya rossiysko-kitayskikh otnosheniy. Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publ., 2013 (in Russian).
- Menlun, L. Kitaysko-rossiyskoye gumanitarnoye sotrudnichestvo v XXI v.: tendentsii i perspektivy. Moscow: RUDN University, 2018 (in Russian).
- Ming, Zhou. “Exhibitions as tools of diplomacy.” Museum development in China. Understanding the building boom. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publ., 2019.
- Raspertova, S.Yu. Sovremennyye kul’turnyye strategii Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki v praktike mezhdunarodnogo vzaimodeystviya. Moscow: Moscow State Linguistic University Publ., 2011 (in Russian).
- Rogachev, I. Rossiysko-kitayskiye otnosheniya v kontse XX – nachale XXI v. Moscow: Izvestiya Publ., 2005 (in Russian).
- Riftin, B.L. Redkiye kitayskiye narodnyye kartiny iz sovetskikh sobraniy. Leningrad: Avrora Publ.; Pekin: Narodnoye iskusstvo Publ., 1991 (in Russian).
- Rusakova, O., Kovba, D., Gribovod, E., and Popova, N. “Cultural diplomacy as the intellectual capital of soft power exercised by the Shanghai cooperation organization member states.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, no. 4 (2018): 277–284.
- Parama, S.P. “China’s cultural diplomacy: Historical origin, modern methods and strategic outcomes.” China Currents 12, no. 2 (2014), https://www.chinacenter.net/2014/china_currents/12-2/chinas-cultural-diplomacy-historical-origin-modern-methods-and-strategic-outcomes/
- Safonkina, Ye.V. “Kitayskoye predsedatel’stvo v BRIKS v 2017 g.: rasshiryaya gorizonty sotrudnichestva.” Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 18, no. 2 (2018): 356–367 (in Russian).
- Safronova, Ye.I. “Proyekt ‘Odin poyas, odin put’’ – kompleksnyy faktor ‘myagkoy sily’ Kitaya.” In Problemy i perspektivy realizatsii initsiativy ‘Ekonomicheskiy poyas Shelkovogo puti’ v kontekste SHOS, 60–78. Moscow: IDV RAN Publ., 2017 (in Russian).
- Seno, Alexandra. “Hong Kong branch of Palace Museum touches a political nerve.” The Art Newspaper, February 1, 2017.
- Song, Weiqing. “Feeling safe, being strong: China’s strategy of soft balancing through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.” International Politics, no. 50 (5) (2013): 664–685.
- Tarabarko, K.A. Myagkaya sila kul’tury Kitaya: Kontseptual’noye soderzhaniye i praktiki realizatsii. Chita: Zabaykal’skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 2014 (in Russian).
- Teryukova, Ye.A., Zavidovskaya, Ye.A., Khizhnyak, O.S., Kormanovskaya, M.V., and Mazurina, V.N. “Kitayskaya narodnaya kartina iz sobraniya GMIR: opyt sistematizatsii.” In Trudy Gosudarstvennogo muzeya istorii religii, 85–114. St. Petersburg: SPGUD Publ., 2017 (in Russian).
- Teryukova, E., and Zavidovskaya, E. “The archives of academician V. M. Alekseev from the collection of the State Museum of the History of Religion as a source for the study of popular religious beliefs in late imperial China.” Manuscripta Orientalia, no. 23 (1) (2017): 61–69.
- Tsui, Enid. “The irony of Louvre’s soft-power lesson for China, as museum’s history tour comes to Hong Kong.” South China Morning Post, March 15, 2017.
- Zhen’, L. “Kollektsiya pamyatnikov Dun’khuana v Gosudarstvennom Ermitazhe.” Scientific journal of Herzen University, no. 9 (29) (2007): 52–56 (in Russian).
- Valeyev, R.M. “Kasimova A.R. Rossiysko-kitayskiye kul’turnyye svyazi (1990–2000-ye gg.).” Bulletin of Kazan State University of Culture and Arts, no. 3 (2013): 151–156 (in Russian).
- Wu., You. “The Rise of China with Cultural Soft Power in the Age of Globalization.” Journal of Literature and Art Studies 8, no. 5 (2018): 764–765.
- Yureneva, T.Yu. Muzey v mirovoy kul’ture. Moscow: Russkoye slovo Publ., 2003 (in Russian).