Becoming a Member of the Russian Nation: The Content of National Identity Underlying the Social Markers of Acceptance for Immigrants in Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Acculturation expectations of the host society are an integral and important part of the process of mutual acculturation and subsequent adaptation due to intercultural contact. A new approach to acculturation of host society members is examined: the concept of social markers of acceptance, which analyzes socially constructed criteria that indicate immigrants’ inclusion in the larger society. The aim of the study was to understand specific social indicators of national identity that Russians consider important for the inclusion of an immigrant into Russian society. The relationship between these markers and a general attitude toward immigrants were investigated, as well as how perceived immigrant status moderates these relationships. A survey with 1,009 participants, the majority of whom identified as ethnic Russian, was conducted. The results indicated that civic indicators of national identity, especially compliance with laws and regulations, were considered the most important and ease of acquiring for immigrants, while ethnic indicators were considered the least important and ease of acquiring. Additionally, socioeconomic and sociocultural indicators were identified as being of intermediate importance and ease of acquiring, which suggested with the concepts of immigrant status and socioeconomic adaptation, along with immigrant intercultural competence and sociocultural adaptation respectively. Finally, the perceived higher status of immigrants was associated with more permeable intergroup boundaries. Research results suggest that the Russian population is inclined toward a civic conceptualization of national identity, preferring a liberal approach to citizenship over a more restrictive one. The study also underscores the influence of perceived immigrant status in shaping the host population’s acculturation expectations. As a practical implication of the findings, focusing on social and educational programs that promote legal and civic compliance among immigrants before adopting anti-discrimination measures on the part of the host society is recommend.

About the authors

Dmitry Sergeevich Grigoryev

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dgrigoryev@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4511-7942
SPIN-code: 1807-9739

PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Center for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Albina Alikovna Gallyamova

HSE University

Email: aagallyamova@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8775-7289
SPIN-code: 6639-2529

Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Elizaveta Shamilevna Komyaginskaya

HSE University

Email: eshkomyaginskaya@edu.hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8841-1722
SPIN-code: 4854-0374

Research Intern, Center for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Arutyunova, E.M. (2022). Analysis of the ideals about the Russian language in the All-Russian Identity: Expert discourse. Sociologicheskaja Nauka i Social’naja Praktika, 10(1), 95–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2022.10.1.8863
  2. Bail, C.A. (2008). The configuration of symbolic boundaries against immigrants in Europe. American Sociological Review, 73(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300103
  3. Batkhina, A. (2020). Values and communication apprehension as antecedents of conflict styles in intercultural conflicts: A study in Germany and Russia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 26(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000429
  4. Berry, J.W. (2019). Ecocultural psychology (D. Grigoryev, Transl. from Eng.). Cultural-Historical Psychology, 15(4), 4–16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150401
  5. Berry, J.W., Lepshokova, Z., MIRIPS Collaboration, & Grigoryev, D. (2022). How shall we all live together?: Meta-analytical review of the mutual intercultural relations in plural societies project. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 71(3), 1014–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12332
  6. Drobizheva, L.M. (2015). The potential of interethnic consent. Comprehension of the concept and social practice in Moscow. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya, (11), 80–90. (In Russ.)
  7. Drobizheva, L.M., Arutyunova, E.M., Evseeva, M.A., Kuznetsov, I.M., Ryzhova, S.V., Fadeev, P.V., Shchegolkova, E.Yu., & Endryushko, A.A (2021). Content Bases of Russian Identity. Regional and Ethnocultural Contexts. Moscow: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-374-4.2021
  8. Drobizheva, L.M., Arutyunova, E.M., Evseeva, M.A., Kuznetsov, I.M., Ryzhova, S.V., Fadeev, P.V., Shchegolkova, E.Y., & Endryushko, A.A. (2022). Russian Identity and Interethnic Relations. Public Discourse and Social Practice. Moscow: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-404-8.2022
  9. Grigoryev, D. (2020a). Views on cultural diversity as well as authoritarian and ethnocentric attitudes of Russians. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17(3), 473–490. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-3-473-490
  10. Grigoryev, D. (2020b). Problems of conceptualisation and operationalisation of attitudes toward immigrants in cross-national comparative research. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, (3), 89–100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2020-3-89-100
  11. Grigoryev, D. (2022). Cognitive and motivational foundations underlying acculturation expectations: Applications of ethnic group position model. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(1), 86–109. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-1-86-109
  12. Grigoryev, D., & Berry, J.W. (2017). Acculturation preferences, ethnic and religious identification and the socio-economic adaptation of Russian-speaking immigrants in Belgium. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46(6), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2017.1386122
  13. Grigoryev, D., & Berry, J.W. (2021). A taxonomy of intergroup ideologies. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(4), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170401
  14. Grigoryev, D., & van de Vijver, F. (2018). Acculturation expectation profiles of Russian majority group members and their intergroup attitudes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64(3), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.03.001
  15. Grigoryev, D., Fiske, S.T., & Batkhina, A. (2019). Mapping ethnic stereotypes and their antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643
  16. Gritsenko, V.V., Khukhlaev, О.Е., Zinurova, R.I., Konstantinov, V.V., Kulesh, Е.V., Malyshev, I.V., Novikova, I.А., & Chernaya, А.V. (2021). Intercultural competence as a predictor of adaptation of foreign students. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(1), 103–112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170114
  17. Jassi, A., & Safdar, S. (2021). The inclusion of immigrants in Canada: An examination of social markers of acceptance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 53(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000199
  18. Komisarof, A., & Leong, C.H. (2020). Viewing intercultural adaptation and social inclusion through constructs of national identity: An introduction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 78, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.06.001
  19. Komisarof, A., Leong, C.H., & Teng, E. (2020). Constructing who can be Japanese: A study of social markers of acceptance in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(2), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12396
  20. Kuznetsov, I. (2017) The balance of interethnic attitudes as an indicator of state of interethnic relations. Mir Rossii, 26(1), 58–80. (In Russ.)
  21. Leong, C.H. (2014). Social markers of acculturation: A new research framework on intercultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.006
  22. Leong, C.H., Komisarof, A., Dandy, J., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Safdar, S., Hanke, K., & Teng, E. (2020). What does it take to become “one of us?” Redefining ethnic-civic citizenship using markers of everyday nationhood. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 78, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.006
  23. Malikova, N.R. (2014). Globalization as a factor in the adaptation of migrants. Penza Psychological Bulletin, (1), 113–124. (In Russ.)
  24. Montreuil, A., & Bourhis, R.Y. (2001). Majority acculturation orientations toward “valued” and “devalued” immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(6), 698–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032006004
  25. Shamionov, R.M. (2020). The role of civic identity in the preferences of civil and political forms of social activity in Russian youth. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-3-459-472
  26. Smith, G., Law, V., Wilson, A., Bohr, A., & Allworth, E. (1998). Nation-building in the post-Soviet borderlands: The politics of national identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598876
  27. Terry, D.J., Pelly, R.N., Lalonde, R.N., & Smith, J.R. (2006). Predictors of cultural adjustment: Intergroup status relations and boundary permeability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206062080
  28. Voronina, N.S. (2023). Attitude of Russians towards immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021). Sociologicheskaja Nauka i Social’naja Praktika, 11(1), 104–123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2023.11.1.6
  29. Zenker, O. (2011). Autochthony, ethnicity, indigeneity and nationalism: Time-honouring and state-oriented modes of rooting individual-territory-group triads in a globalizing world. Critique of Anthropology, 31(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10393438

Copyright (c) 2023 Grigoryev D.S., Gallyamova A.A., Komyaginskaya E.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies