Comparison of the Effectiveness of Methods for Measuring Perceived Economic Inequality in the Russian Sociocultural Context

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

To date, a large body or research has been accumulated on the topic of economic inequality. Assessments of the perceived level of economic inequality make a significant contribution to social behavior, such as willingness to support initiatives aimed at reducing inequality. However, there is no consensus among researchers on the methods used to assess perceived economic inequality, and the previously identified classes of methods show that each of them has both advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this paper is to test the effectiveness of various methods for measuring the features of perception of economic inequality in the Russian sociocultural context, using data from 761 respondents ( M age = 36.58, SD age = 10.85). The internal validity is measured by the relationship among the assessments of different methods. The external validity is measured based on the relationship between the obtained assessments and the willingness to justify the existing system, as well as with the support of various procedures and initiatives aimed at reducing inequality (support for a universal basic income and support for the introduction of progressive taxation). Of all the methods tested (3 direct inequality assessment tasks, 2 alternative choice tasks, task of accordance and a self-categorization task), representations of inequality in consumption and self-categorization in social hierarchy have been found to be the most effective ways to assess perceived inequality. Using more effective methods for measuring perceived economic inequality, it is possible to increase the measurement accuracy, make the findings of the work more valid and facilitate comparison of results from different studies.

About the authors

Elena R. Agadullina

HSE University

Email: eagadullina@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1505-1412

PhD in Psychology, is Associate Professor

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Daria I. Lavelina

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dlavelina@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2816-7673

Research Intern, Laboratory for Psychology of Social Inequality

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Agadullina, E.R., Lavelina, D.I., & Tatarenko, M.K. (2023). Measuring perceived economic inequality: A comparison of methods. Psychological Studies, 16(90), 5. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v16i90.1437
  2. Agadullina, E.R., & Lavelina, D.I. (2023). The contribution of the system justification to social cohesion. Social Psychology and Society, 14(4), 89-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140406
  3. Adler, N.E., Epel, E.S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J.R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
  4. Agadullina, E., Ivanov, A., & Sarieva, I. (2021). How do Russians perceive and justify the status quo: Insights from adapting the system justification scales. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 717838. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717838
  5. Boll, T., Ferring, D., & Filipp, S.-H. (2005). Effects of parental differential treatment on relationship quality with siblings and parents: Justice evaluations as mediators. Social Justice Research, 18(2), 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-7367-2
  6. Buttrick, N.R., & Oishi, S. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), e12304. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304
  7. Castillo, J.C. (2011). Legitimacy of inequality in a highly unequal context: Evidence from the Chilean case. Social Justice Research, 24(4), 314-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-011-0144-5
  8. Choi, G. (2019). Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences. European Journal of Political Economy, 58, 220-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.12.004
  9. Du, H., & King, R.B. (2022). What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12468
  10. Engelhardt, C., & Wagener, A. (2014). Biased perceptions of income inequality and redistribution. CESifo Working Paper No. 4838. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2463129
  11. Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2012). What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), 741-745. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500003284
  12. Flake, J.K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063
  13. Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103
  14. Goudarzi, S., Pliskin, R., Jost, J.T., & Knowles, E.D. (2020). Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality. Nature Communications, 11(1), 383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14193-z
  15. Hadavand, A. (2018). Misperceptions: An analysis of subjective economic inequality. In J.A. Bishop, J.G. Rodríguez (Eds.). Inequality, Taxation and Intergenerational Transmission (Research on Economic Inequality, Vol. 26) (pp. 247-281). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1049-258520180000026011
  16. Hauser, O.P., & Norton, M.I. (2017). (Mis)perceptions of inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.024
  17. Hegtvedt, K.A., & Isom, D. (2014). Inequality: A matter of justice? In McLeod, J., Lawler, E., & Schwalbe, M. (Eds.). Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research (pp. 65-94). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4_4
  18. Heiserman, N., & Simpson, B. (2021). Measuring perceptions of economic inequality and justice: An empirical assessment. Social Justice Research, 34(2), 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00368-x
  19. Jackson, J.C., & Payne, K. (2021). Cognitive barriers to reducing income inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620934597
  20. Jedinger, A., & Kaminski, S. (2024). The association between system-justifying ideologies and attitudes toward the social market economy in Germany. Current Psychology, 43(4), 3562-3572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04483-7
  21. Jost, J.T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
  22. Jost, J.T., & Thompson, E.P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
  23. Kim, H., Huh, S., Choi, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Perceptions of inequality and attitudes towards redistribution in four East Asian welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12266
  24. Kuhn, A. (2019). The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 59, 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.04.004
  25. McCall, L., Burk, D., Laperrière, M., & Richeson, J.A. (2017). Exposure to rising inequality shapes Americans’ opportunity beliefs and policy support. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9593-9598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706253114
  26. Melita, D., Velandia-Morales, A., Iruela-Toros, D., Willis, G.B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020). Spanish version of the Status Anxiety Scale (Versión española de la Escala de Ansiedad por el Estatus). International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicología Social, 35(2), 342-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1721050
  27. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095-1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417262
  28. Radke, H. R. M., Kutlaca, M., Siem, B., Wright, S.C., & Becker, J.C. (2020). Beyond allyship: Motivations for advantaged group members to engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(4), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320918698
  29. Wakslak, C.J., Jost, J.T., Tyler, T.R., & Chen, E.S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18(3), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01887.x
  30. Wegener, B. (1990). Equity, relative deprivation, and the value consensus paradox. Social Justice Research, 4(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01048536

Copyright (c) 2024 Agadullina E.R., Lavelina D.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies