Plurilingual Intercultural Creative Keys: An Author Educational Program Developing Soft Skills
- Authors: Kharkhurin A.V.1, Kashirskaya E.V.1, Pasechnik-Lyle A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- HSE University
- Issue: Vol 21, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 705-738
- Section: PERSONALITY AND EDUCATION IN MULTICULTURAL DIMENSION
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/43756
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-3-705-738
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FELVYW
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article introduces the Plurilingual Intercultural Creative Keys (PICK) program, which aims to enhance individual adaptability by developing creative, intercultural, and linguistic competencies. Drawing on empirical studies from the past 25 years, PICK emphasizes the interconnectedness of these competencies and their role in fostering personal and cognitive adaptability. The program takes a holistic approach, complementing existing curricula by addressing the educational environment’s curricular, psychological, and sociocultural dimensions. Importantly, PICK seeks to reform educators’ pedagogical methods without altering the existing curriculum, focusing instead on transforming teaching practices within current educational structures. Targeted at teachers, tutors, and homeschooling parents, PICK equips educators with both theoretical insights and practical tools to innovate their teaching approaches. The program consists of training modules centered on each competency, supported by lectures and workshops that promote intrinsic motivation, critical thinking, and a positive psychological climate through project-based learning. Additionally, PICK provides continuous psychological and methodological support to ensure the effective application of its methods. This article also presents a theoretical framework that integrates the concepts of plurilingualism, creativity, intercultural competence, and systemic adaptation. Rather than introducing new empirical data, it synthesizes existing theories and research from educational psychology, cognitive development, and cross-cultural studies. This synthesis forms the basis of the PICK program, offering a conceptual model that positions plurilingual creativity - the ability to think creatively and communicate across languages and cultures - as a catalyst for systemic adaptation. By uniting theories of cognitive adaptability, psychological resilience, and educational methodologies, the article contributes to advancing theoretical understanding while laying the groundwork for future research and practical applications. By bridging traditional academic instruction with the evolving demands of a globalized world, PICK offers a robust framework for integrating soft skills into education. The program’s potential to foster adaptive, innovative, and globally competent learners underscores its contribution to advancing contemporary educational paradigms.
Full Text
Introduction This article presents an educational framework that enhances adaptability by fostering creativity, intercultural competence, and linguistic skills in both educators and students. It offers a systematic analysis highlighting the framework’s contribution to a more holistic approach to education, addressing the evolving demands of global learning environments. The rapid changes in technology and innovation have significantly influenced education, leading to an increased focus on soft skills by various stakeholders such as policymakers, educational psychologists, and researchers. Soft skills encompass various categories, including traits, values, and predispositions (Touloumakos, 2020). Soft skill curricula are being developed for all levels of students (Schulz, 2008), including graduates and on-the-job training programs (Thompson, 2019). Developing personal and cognitive qualities is essential for students to adapt effectively to the ever-changing realities of modern-day life. To cultivate and evaluate soft skills in students, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2017) has devised a framework consisting of three categories of skills: creative engagement with diverse tools, communication and collaboration with individuals from varying cultural and societal backgrounds, and the ability to act independently, regulate behavior, and take ownership of decisions in different social situations. Recent research on learning standards in 152 countries reveals that developing creativity, communication, and critical thinking is now a top priority in education (Care et al., 2019). The main objective of education today is to help individuals develop their personalities through learning. This approach includes enhancing their abilities to solve various tasks and realize their potential. The educational process should not only focus on gaining subject knowledge but also on developing personal and cognitive skills. To help students adjust to the modern world, we have developed a new ed-ucational program, Plurilingual Intercultural Creative Keys (PICK: https://pick.hse.ru/en/). The PICK program aims to enhance students’ linguistic, intercultural, and creative competencies. It is grounded in the plurilingual creativity theoretical framework (Kharkhurin, 2021), formulated after more than 25 years of empirical research on the relationship between creativity, multilingualism, and intercultural communication. These competencies form essential personal characteristics and cognitive abilities that enable individuals to adapt flexibly and actively to the contemporary world, not only adapting but also transforming themselves and their surroundings. The 4Cs framework, introduced by the “P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning” in 2009, focuses on essential soft skills for the modern workforce: communication, cooperation, creativity, and critical thinking. It has become globally recognized in educational standards due to its thorough research and validation. Developing creative, intercultural, and plurilingual competencies significantly enhances the 4Cs framework. Creativity encourages innovative problem-solving, directly contributing to one of the core 4Cs. Intercultural competence, vital for effective communication and collaboration in a globalized world, helps individuals navigate cultural differences and foster inclusive environments. Plurilingual competence expands communication abilities, allowing for deeper connections and understanding across diverse languages and cultures. These competencies prepare individuals for a rapidly changing world, promoting innovation, understanding, and interconnectedness in both personal and professional contexts. Further, recent studies highlight the potential link between multilingualism and creativity (Kharkhurin, 2024), yet there is a notable absence of educational programs that foster these skills concurrently. Additionally, the education system often prioritizes academic achievements over soft skills (Ouchen et al., 2022), compounded by rigid curriculums and a shortage of resources and training for integrating soft skills into education (Susilawati et al., 2020). The PICK program addresses these challenges by offering educators a structured method to boost students’ linguistic, intercultural, and creative skills. It provides tools and training for easily integrating soft skills into existing curricula without the need for major teaching practice changes. In essence, PICK is a strategic response to the need for a more holistic approach to education that balances academic rigor with developing essential soft skills. It prepares students more effectively for the demands of the modern job market. PICK: Theory The PICK program is grounded in two decades of research, linking multilingual individuals’ cognitive mechanisms and personality traits to their creative abilities (Kharkhurin, 2024). This body of work establishes a robust link between linguistic skills, cultural understanding, and creative capabilities. The plurilingual creativity framework (Kharkhurin, 2021) underscores the essential role of these competencies in fostering a range of skills, abilities, and personality traits essential for an individual’s systemic adaptation (Figure 1). Figure 1. The constituents of plurilingual creativity framework S o u r c e : https://pick.hse.ru/en/. ©Anatoliy Kharkhurin Plurilingual creativity The plurilingual creativity framework (Kharkhurin, 2021) suggests that linguistic diversity and creative processes are interconnected and influenced by individual agency, the sociocultural environment, motivational dynamics, and educational settings. Central to this framework are four concepts: plurilingualism, pluriculturalism, intercultural competence, and creativity. Plurilingualism is the ability to engage with multiple languages in a dynamic, integrated manner, challenging the traditional monolingual paradigm (Gogolin, 2002) and emphasizing linguistic competence’s fluid and adaptable nature (Piccardo et al., 2021). This concept extends to pluriculturalism, which focuses on the interaction between linguistic skills and cultural knowledge, advocating for a holistic understanding of multilingual practices (Council of Europe, 1996/2001). Intercultural competence, another cornerstone of the framework, highlights the enhanced ability of plurilingual individuals to navigate and communicate across cultural boundaries effectively, facilitated by crucial personality attributes such as flexibility, empathy, tolerance of ambiguity, and mindfulness (Deardorff, 2009). Creativity, traditionally seen as the production of novel and appropriate outputs (Mayer, 1999), is reconceptualized within this framework as a complex interplay of cognitive processes, personality traits, motivational drives, and sociocultural influences, emphasizing a multifaceted and dynamic understanding of creative expression (Runco, 2014). Overall, the plurilingual creativity framework offers a comprehensive perspective on how multilingualism and creativity are fostered through the interaction of diverse linguistic abilities, cultural experiences, and intercultural competencies, highlighting the importance of a holistic approach to understanding and nurturing these skills within educational and sociocultural contexts. Kharkhurin (2024) presented an exhaustive overview of empirical investigations in plurilingual creativity. These studies revealed that bilingual and multilingual individuals consistently outperform their monolingual counterparts across various dimensions of creativity. These studies underscore the cognitive benefits of bilingualism, highlighting superior performance in tasks requiring divergent thinking (Guilford, 1967), a core component of creativity. The recent project adopted a multidimensional approach and considered language repertoire, multicultural experience, and intercultural competence as crucial factors in plurilingual creativity. A series of regression analyses revealed that these factors significantly contribute to divergent thinking, with personality traits and motivational characteristics playing moderating and mediating roles, respectively. Further analyses expanded these findings to other creativity measures, demonstrating the positive effects of these factors on creative personality and motivation for creativity. Systemic adaptation The interrelated development of plurilingual, intercultural, and creative skills significantly influences an individual’s adaptation. Traditionally explored within biological sciences as a mechanism of person-environment fit, this concept has broadened significantly to include psychological and social dimensions. This expansion acknowledges the multifaceted adjustments - cognitive, behavioral, and affective - individuals or groups make in response to new environmental demands, aiming to meet basic needs, enhance efficiency, and sustain the quality of life (VandenBos, 2007; Schmitt & Pilcher, 2004). Psychological adaptation, or the ability to adjust to novel conditions, is influenced by various factors, including stress, crises, and psychological traits such as emotional stability, self-esteem, self-regulation, reflectivity, internal locus of control, and psychological flexibility (Burton & Bonanno, 2016; Lazarus, 1974; Martin et al., 2013; Zimmerman, 2002; Rotter, 1966). These factors are essential for fostering physiological and psychological resilience (Selye, 1979) and proficiency in managing complex situations (Zhou & Lin, 2016). Social adaptation refers to adjusting thoughts and behaviors for effective engagement with one’s social environment, emphasizing the importance of emotion management, positive social connections, and sensitivity to social cues (Samadi & Sohrabi, 2016; Sarmiento et al., 2019). Extending these perspectives, systemic adaptation (Rean et al., 2008) integrates cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions of adaptability, emphasizing the interplay between an individual’s active efforts to adapt externally and internally. It identifies four distinct modes of adaptation: external adaptation, where individuals adjust their behaviors to external conditions; internal adaptation, involving personal psychological adjustments; maladaptation, characterized by unsuccessful attempts to adapt; and systemic adaptation, deemed optimal. Systemic adaptation is characterized by a harmonious blend of active external and internal adaptation efforts, facilitating a transformative engagement with the environment. It involves a comprehensive analysis of current social and psychological contexts, aligning behaviors with goals, and an awareness of personal needs and capabilities, advocating for a holistic approach to navigating life’s challenges (Guastello, 1995). Thus, systemic adaptation is both a process and an outcome of active engagement with social and psychological situations, leading to individual transformation and integration. Contribution of plurilingual and creative competencies to systemic adaptation The synthesis of creative, intercultural, and linguistic competencies is posited as not merely beneficial but essential for the cultivation of adaptive capabilities in an ever-changing world. The following analysis attempts to elucidate how these competencies enhance systemic adaptation. Firstly, creativity significantly contributes to individual well-being and resilience (Torrance, 1995), thereby serving as a critical mechanism for adaptation. Creative thinking enables individuals to navigate complex situations more effectively (Orkibi, 2021). The foundational premise of creativity asserts that creativity is imperative for adapting to unforeseen challenges, suggesting that survival itself is contingent upon the creative capacities of individuals. Empirical research further corroborates that creativity-related attributes - such as flexibility, originality, and self-awareness - are intrinsically linked to adaptability (Shalley et al., 2004; Meneely & Portillo, 2005). This body of work collectively advocates for the nurturing of creativity as a means to foster systemic adaptation. Intercultural competence is essential for systemic adaptation within a globally interconnected society. Gudykunst et al. (1994) and Pusch (1994) mentioned above highlight the necessity of developing the ability to effectively interact with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds, emphasizing attributes such as empathy and tolerance for ambiguity. This competence is characterized by an understanding and appreciation of cultural differences, alongside an ability to adapt communication styles and behaviors to align with various cultural norms (Berry, 1997; Sam et al., 2008). The significance of intercultural competence extends beyond mere interaction, encompassing the potential for conflict resolution and contributing to an individual’s spiritual and moral development (Ting-Toomey, 2009). The correlation between intercultural competence and systemic adaptation is evident in research demonstrating that such competence can improve personal effectiveness and resilience (Chahar Mahali & Sevigny, 2022; Yakunina et al., 2013). Lastly, plurilingualism is also identified as a critical competency for systemic adaptation. The Council of Europe emphasizes the importance of plurilingualism in enhancing communication skills and facilitating intercultural relationships (Council of Europe, 2018). The ability to navigate and adapt to cultural differences is significantly bolstered by linguistic proficiency, with research indicating that plurilingual individuals exhibit greater flexibility and tolerance for ambiguity (Piccardo, 2021). This competency not only enriches communicative culture but also fosters mutual understanding and facilitates successful personal adaptation through positive communication and collaboration (Fu & Charoensukmongkol, 2023). Thus, the interplay between creativity, intercultural competence, and multilingual experience constitutes a foundational framework for systemic adaptation. The synthesis of these competencies not only facilitates individual adaptability across diverse contexts but also underscores the importance of integrating these dimensions into educational paradigms to enhance the adaptive capacities of learners. Plurilingual and creative education Synthesizing creative, intercultural, and linguistic competencies within a singular pedagogical framework is predicated on discerning two prevailing tendencies within contemporary educational paradigms. The first trend underscores initiatives aimed at nurturing creativity. Contrarily, the second trend is primarily concerned with advancing linguistic competencies. Regrettably, the operational frameworks governing these domains function in isolation. This dichotomy is further exacerbated by the fact that scholars and educators within these spheres often possess expertise that is either anchored in creativity or language learning to the exclusion of the other (Kharkhurin, 2021). Moreover, educational constructs designed to impart multilingual instruction frequently neglect the imperative of fostering intercultural competence, an indispensable facet of the plurilingual experience (Council of Europe, 2018; Kharkhurin, 2021). Despite accumulated empirical evidence supporting the link between plurilingualism and creativity and recognizing plurilingual and creative pedagogies as advantageous for students’ prospects, their integration within educational systems remains sporadic. In response to this pedagogical chasm, our innovative plurilingual creative educational program seeks to amalgamate the strengths inherent in both educational systems while proposing non-disruptive amendments to the existing school curricula. This initiative embraces a comprehensive approach to cultivating soft skills, integrating cognitive, personal, and sociocultural dimensions into a cohesive educational experience. PICK: Practice This section delineates the PICK educational program’s methodology through an exhaustive step-by-step analysis. It scrutinizes the program’s objectives and guiding principles, outlines the participant demographics and the overarching training methodology, offers an in-depth examination of each module, and elucidates the content of ancillary lectures and workshops. Furthermore, it ventures into the specifics of methodological support provided to project participants and drafts the assessment framework employed to evaluate the efficacy of the PICK educational program. The PICK educational program is predicated on three principal objectives: enhancing students’ linguistic, intercultural, and creative competencies, which collectively facilitate their systemic adaptation to the exigencies of the contemporary milieu (Figure 2). Figure 2. Development of systemic adaptation through the PICK educational program S o u r c e : https://pick.hse.ru/en/. ©Anatoliy Kharkhurin The first objective is cultivating creativity within students by fostering the development of cognitive skills and capacities crucial for addressing various social and educational quandaries. Although the program does not exclusively prioritize attaining significant creative milestones, it lays a foundational framework conducive to exploring and realizing students’ creative potential. The second objective seeks to augment students’ linguistic proficiencies. The program aims to mitigate linguistic anxiety and dismantle barriers to communication in unfamiliar languages. Furthermore, it champions cultural heterogeneity by permitting the use of native languages within the context of foreign language instruction, thereby acknowledging the perpetual nature of language acquisition as a mechanism for achieving specific objectives while fostering global awareness and understanding. The third objective is to promote intercultural competence among students from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. By amalgamating students of varied origins, the program advocates for linguistic and ethnic equity, equipping learners with the skills necessary for intercultural dialogue. This component is especially salient within multicultural settings, where it underscores the importance of tolerance and understanding across disparate linguistic, cultural, ethnic, and religious divides. Collectively, these objectives amalgamate three fundamental soft competencies essential for students’ systemic adaptation to the modern world. The PICK educational program represents a paradigmatic shift in educational practices, preserving curricular integrity while redefining the educational journey. This holistic approach considers the multifaceted dimensions of education, including the individual’s psychological well-being and sociocultural milieu. By integrating methodologies from various disciplines - psychology, sociology, anthropology, and linguistics - the PICK initiative offers a unique didactic framework that significantly enhances the educational experience. PICK didactic and psychological principles The PICK educational program is meticulously designed to facilitate the development of students’ creative, intercultural, and linguistic competencies. This endeavor is underpinned by foundational principles (Table 1) delineating the norms and guidelines for effective pedagogical practice. The PICK framework is anchored in a holistic and structured pedagogical approach, distinguished by its didactic and psychological principles. These principles are pivotal in sculpting the educational landscape, thereby enabling educators to formulate and execute teaching strategies that are both efficacious and conducive to learning. The didactic principles of the PICK program, encompassing socio-pedagogical partnership, problematization, and action-oriented learning, serve as cornerstones for the educational architecture. These principles are instrumental in delineating the learning process’s objectives, enabling educators to design and implement strategies tailored to enhance the learning experience. Table 1 PICK didactic and psychological principles Sociо-pedagogical partnership The cornerstone of efficacious socio-pedagogical partnerships is cultivating trust and collaborative synergies among students, parents, educators, and administrative personnel, all united by shared objectives, values, and accountability for educational progression. Problematization This principle underscores the imperative of empowering students to formulate educational tasks autonomously, engage in rigorous research, and operate independently. Such competencies are pivotal in fostering motivation and instilling a sense of personal accountability within the educational milieu. Action-oriented learning Each instructional session is designed to facilitate opportunities for learners to discern the practical applicability of the knowledge acquired, either through autonomous exploration or under the tutelage of their instructor. Educators are adeptly trained to underscore this dimension, offering pertinent examples to bridge theoretical knowledge with realworld contexts. Consistency and integrity To ensure the holistic development of each student, all program components must be meticulously integrated, fostering consistency and integrity across cognitive, personal, and sociocultural dimensions. This integrative approach facilitates sustained daily engagement in activities that enhance creativity, foreign language proficiency, and intercultural competence. Individualization Acknowledging and valuing the diverse perspectives of all educational stakeholders is imperative for cultivating self-confidence and active engagement. Recognizing that individual differences play a central role in applying these principles is vital. The program excels in engaging a broad spectrum of students in diverse activities while concurrently honoring their unique attributes and interests. Personification The application of the personification principle holds significant promise in augmenting emotional intelligence within the student cohort. This approach facilitates a more profound comprehension of one’s emotions and experiences, thereby reducing the propensity for negative responses in social exchanges. Dialogue Active engagement plays a pivotal role in the PICK program, serving as the foundation for cultivating a conducive learning atmosphere and advancing the dual objectives of enhancing communication proficiencies and mitigating bullying. Promoting reciprocal dialogue between students and educators is fundamental to this pedagogical strategy. The socio-pedagogical partnership emphasizes collaborative interactions between teachers and students, fostering a cooperative learning environment. Problematization encourages critical thinking and inquiry, urging students to engage with complex problems actively. Action-oriented learning facilitates experiential learning oppor-tunities, allowing students to apply theoretical knowledge in practical settings. Complementing the didactic principles, the psychological underpinnings of the PICK program - consistency and integrity, individualization, personification, and dialogue - are vital in addressing students’ diverse needs and characteristics. These principles advocate for an education attuning to the individual’s developmental level and unique traits, enabling personalized and effective learning interventions. Consistency and integrity ensure a coherent and holistic educational experience, while individualization and personification cater to the distinct learning paths of each student. Dialogue fosters an open and communicative learning atmosphere, essential for developing critical thinking and interpersonal skills. By amalgamating these didactic and psychological principles, educators are empowered to cultivate a learning environment that is both nurturing and challenging, tailored to the individual and collective needs of the student body. This integration not only facilitates the operationalization of the pedagogical objectives but also provides a metric for evaluating the efficacy of the educational interventions. Adjustments and enhancements to teaching methodologies can then be informed by a reflective analysis of these principles in practice. Therefore, integrating didactic and psychological principles within the PICK educational program is paramount, as well as crafting an educational framework responsive to students’ unique dispositions and instrumental in their holistic development. PICK program The PICK program represents an integrated approach to education, emphasizing the enhancement of students’ creative, intercultural, and linguistic competencies. It is a transformative resource, poised to redefine the educational trajectory while preserving curricular coherence. The program stands out for its exceptional adaptability in using diverse teaching techniques, such as associative, metaphorical, dialogic, project-based, and gamified approaches. It aims to improve the communication between educators and learners by combining psychological methodologies with didactic strategies. The primary goal is to foster a supportive and inspiring educational environment rather than relying solely on particular instructional tools or methods. Program content The program includes a set of three training modules. These modules are meticulously crafted to cultivate essential soft skills: creativity, intercultural competence, and multilingual aptitude. The PICK program parallel organizes lectures and workshops across three thematic clusters. These sessions aim to stimulate intrinsic motivation, establish a supportive psychological environment, and equip participants with critical thinking and project management capabilities. Furthermore, the program extends psychological and methodological support to educators as they navigate the implementation of the PICK program within the educational milieu. Finally, the program thoroughly evaluates academic performance, ensuring a holistic teacher and student progress assessment throughout its implementation. Target audience The PICK program is designed to provide comprehensive training to educators to enhance their pedagogical approach. Its overarching aim is to revolutionize the methodologies of educators by integrating the nurturing of soft skills into their instructional repertoire. The program champions the importance of soft skills alongside academic knowledge to foster an educational environment that is adaptive, forward-thinking, and aligned with the evolving demands of the global landscape. The program recognizes that the demands of the 21st-century educational landscape go beyond the transmission of traditional academic knowledge. Teachers must possess refined soft skills to facilitate effective instruction and student learning. Teachers are envisioned not merely as conduits of subject-specific knowledge but as facilitators capable of navigating student emotions and cultivating a constructive classroom environment. Empirical evidence suggests that teachers’ self-regulation and self-confidence significantly influence student discipline and accountability (Bruna et al., 2023). Moreover, educators proficient in emotional intelligence and creativity are particularly effective in nurturing these competencies in their students (Valente & Lourenço, 2022). Hence, the role of teachers extends beyond the confines of academic instruction, as their application of diverse and adaptable skills markedly influences students’ comprehensive success (Ulug et al., 2011). Integrating soft skills training into standard curricula has thus emerged as a crucial pedagogical strategy (Almeida & Morais, 2021). By embedding soft skills into their professional attitudes and behaviors, educators themselves become exemplars of lifelong learning and adaptability. This approach not only enhances their teaching efficacy but also fosters a learning environment that is dynamic, inclusive, and responsive to the needs of all students. Consequently, integrating soft skills into educational practices addresses the holistic development of students, preparing them for the complexities of modern life and work environments. By equipping educators with the tools and methodologies to cultivate these competencies, the PICK program seeks to instill a pedagogical culture that values and promotes the development of the whole student. This not only benefits students by equipping them with critical life skills but also enriches the educational profession by expanding the scope and impact of teaching beyond traditional academic outcomes. The program’s multifaceted training schema is designed to be universally applicable across a broad spectrum of academic disciplines, thus making it conducive for educators in the humanities, natural sciences, and technical fields. This approach underscores the program’s commitment to fostering an inclusive and adaptable learning environment that can be tailored to meet the diverse needs and pedagogical challenges faced by educators across different disciplines. The versatility of the PICK program ensures that it serves not only as a methodological resource but also as a catalyst for pedagogical innovation, enabling teachers to cultivate a dynamic and engaging learning experience that transcends conventional disciplinary boundaries. Although the PICK program was initially devised for school educators, its adaptable framework also extends its utility to tutors, university faculty, and parents involved in homeschooling, thereby enhancing its reach and significance within the broader educational landscape. Training structure Educators participating in the PICK program have an exhaustive training regimen structured into three modules. Each module is designed to correspond with the foundational competencies integral to the PICK ethos: plurilingualism, intercultural competence, and creativity. Through these modules, participants are immersed in a rigorous exploration of the requisite knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary for mastery in these areas. Training sessions. The instructional design of each module unfolds across five sessions. The first session outlines the module’s curriculum and establishes the operational guidelines. Participants are encouraged to articulate their objectives for the module, setting the stage for targeted learning. This session also introduces the theoretical underpinnings of the designated competency, elucidating its relevance and applicability to student development. Sessions two and three delve into pedagogical strategies for fostering the target competency within an educational setting. Emphasis is placed on a detailed examination of various methods and techniques across cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions, enabling participants to holistically apprehend, internalize, and apply these approaches. The fourth session serves as a reflective forum where participants evaluate their learning journey, focusing on the personal attributes essential for nurturing the respective competencies in their students. This session also includes a quiz on critical elements of the target competency. Then, participants receive a home assignment to design a demonstration lesson incorporating the methods and techniques explored. The culmination of the module is the fifth session, where participants present their demonstration lesson. This exercise affords educators the autonomy to select the techniques or procedures most resonant with their pedagogical philosophy within the broader pedagogical framework of the program. Upon successful completion and presentation of their lesson project, participants are awarded professional development certificates, recognizing their achievement and commitment to enhancing their pedagogical practice through the PICK program. Daily routine. Each day of the PICK training adheres to a meticulously structured format grounded in standardized corrective psychological principles, encompassing multiple sequential phases. The initiation of the training day is marked by the Warm-up phase, which is strategically designed to optimize participants’ physiological well-being, catalyze the mobilization of their intrinsic resources, and foster emotional equilibrium. This phase is characterized by a ritual known as “New Good,” which facilitates sharing positive experiences, encourages water consumption to promote hydration, and includes breathing exercises to enhance physiological and psychological readiness for the day’s activities. Following the initial warm-up, the Main phase commences, dedicating its focus to the substantive content of the training. During this phase, participants are engaged with theoretical frameworks and/or practical applications pertinent to the target competency. This stage offers a conducive environment for participants to actively engage with and apply the methods and techniques introduced, fostering a deeper understanding and practical proficiency in the target competency. The subsequent Relaxation phase provides a structured opportunity for participants to alleviate both muscular and psychological tension. This segment is essential for restoring participants’ energy levels and ensuring their continued engagement with the training process. The Reflection phase concludes the day’s activities. It offers a reflective space for participants to articulate feedback regarding their mental and emotional states, evaluate the work undertaken during the day, and anticipate future ses-sions. This stage integrates bodywork and meditative practices, underscoring the program’s holistic approach to professional development by promoting a harmonious alignment among the participants’ physical, cognitive, and emotional faculties. This structured daily regimen within the PICK training is instrumental in creating a balanced and effective learning environment. It enables educators to engage deeply with the content while maintaining their well-being and fostering a continuous learning, application, and reflection cycle. Now, let us proceed to delineate the content encompassed within each module of the PICK training with greater specificity. Training modules The curricular framework of each training module is structured according to the competency approach (Kashirskaya & Kharkhurin, 2022). This approach is an educational framework that emphasizes the development of key competencies necessary for effective participation in society and the workforce (Council of The European Union, 2018). It defines competencies as a dynamic combination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes that individuals require to perform tasks successfully in various contexts. Knowledge refers to the theoretical and factual understanding of areas relevant to specific competencies. Skills encompass applying knowledge and using know-how to complete tasks and solve problems. Attitudes involve the disposition to behave in ways conducive to successful outcomes, including values, motivations, and ethical considerations. This approach moves beyond the traditional focus on content knowledge alone, advocating for an integrated and practical application of what is learned in real-world situations. Throughout each training module, participants are engaged in a series of tasks and instructed in various methods and techniques to develop specified competencies across the dimensions of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. This comprehensive approach ensures a holistic enhancement of their professional capabilities, aligning with the overarching objectives of the PICK program. Appendix A outlines the learning outcomes across three competency dimensions for educators participating in each module and the expected outcomes for the students under their instruction. Module I: Creativity creates a creator. This module aims to equip educators with the essential skills to nurture and expand students’ creative abilities. It spans about 34 hours, including 24 hours of interactive sessions and 10 hours of independent study featuring detailed homework assignments. The module begins with exploring creativity, outlining its definition and components of creative competence. It then progresses to practical skills crucial for creativity development, such as creative problem-solving, fostering divergent thinking, multitasking, balancing thinking processes, brainstorming, developing associative thinking, cultivating mindfulness, exploring risky topics, pushing ideas to limits, and evaluating creative solutions. Additionally, the module focuses on nurturing personal attitudes conducive to creativity, including encouraging creative instincts and embracing individual learning styles. The module thoroughly addresses methodological approaches to unlock students’ creative potential, teaching educators to apply problem-solving, idea generation, and synthesis skills to produce valid, creative outcomes. It provides a methodological framework that aligns with educators’ disciplines and backgrounds, ensuring they can effectively promote creativity. Module II: The world is open to everyone. This module is designed to provide educators with essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes for fostering intercultural competence in their respective academic disciplines while enhancing their intercultural awareness. The module comprises about 68 academic hours, split between 40 hours of interactive sessions and 28 hours of self-study. The module begins with defining intercultural competence and highlighting its significance, emphasizing the role of cultural awareness in the educational process. Then, it explores methods to enhance students’ cultural awareness, including the importance of both verbal and non-verbal communication, active listening, dialogue practices, role-playing, communicative games, and presentation skills. Further, it examines the impact of creative personality traits on intercultural competence, outlining strategies to develop these traits and foster students’ independence of judgment, support for individual uniqueness, and a culture where making mistakes is not feared. Participants learn strategies to develop students’ intercultural competencies, promoting unique thinking and distinctiveness. The training includes building cultural awareness, enhancing communicative skills for cross-cultural dialogue, and improving conflict resolution abilities. It emphasizes developing students’ emotional maturity, empathy, emotional intelligence, and assertiveness and stimulating creative engagement with other cultures to encourage open-mindedness and tolerance for ambiguity. Module III: A new language is a new life. This module, titled after a Persian proverb, encapsulates the quintessential aim of this pedagogical initiative: to enhance foreign language acquisition through facilitating plurilingual communication. This competence transcends mere linguistic knowledge to encompass the flexible application of this knowledge, thereby enriching cognitive variability and creative decision-making processes (Kharkhurin, 2021). This module does not teach foreign language instruction but provides strategies to facilitate foreign language learning in a classroom setting. It is tailored for educators involved in foreign language instruction and those teaching specialized subjects in a language different from their students’ mother tongue. It unfolds over 24 academic hours, with half of this duration allocated to interactive sessions. The module is designed to acquaint educators with the conceptual underpinnings of plurilingualism (Piccardo et al., 2021), distinguishing it from traditional bi- or multilingual approaches. Participants are guided to appreciate the pedagogical significance of plurilingual education. They are equipped with pedagogical tools for nurturing plurilingual competence, thereby inspiring student autonomy and confidence in foreign language use (Starks, 2005). In this regard, specific attention is paid to the dynamics of code-switching - alternating and mixing different languages in the same episode of speech production - and applying codeswitching techniques to enable fluid language transitions and promote flexible thinking (Auer, 1998). These methods encourage students to embrace their native language as a cognitive asset, amplify their language competency, and facilitate social integration. The module also explores the genesis of foreign language anxiety (Böttger & Költzsch, 2020) and methods to mitigate it. Lectures and workshops In conjunction with the training designed to enhance the principal PICK competencies (plurilingual, intercultural, and creative), the program furnishes educators with ancillary resources to incorporate them into their routine pedagogical practice. These resources are structured into three distinct clusters comprising lectures and workshops. These educational interventions are crafted to augment students’ intrinsic motivation and stimulate intellectual curiosity, to engender a conducive psychological environment within both classroom and broader school settings, and to advance the development of critical thinking abilities throughout the execution of projects. These lectures and workshops are strategically interspersed among the PICK training modules, affording educators enhanced methodological and psychological support in enacting the foundational PICK curriculum. A compilation of the lectures and workshops is delineated in Appendix B. Each session is designed to last two academic hours. The ensuing subsections explicate the pivotal role of incorporating these supplementary resources into the PICK program’s curriculum. Cluster I: Where is their button? The first cluster aims to enhance intrinsic motivation and sustain student curiosity towards educational activities, emphasizing the critical link between motivation, curiosity, and learning satisfaction (Oudeyer et al., 2016). It recognizes that human desires for novelty, achievement, and selfimprovement are primary motivators for engaging in educational pursuits (Baranauskienė et al., 2020). This approach is grounded in the understanding that intrinsic motivation is integral to fostering learner autonomy and engagement and is positively associated with adaptive behaviors and strategies (Rean et al., 2008). To address these aspects, the program includes lectures about boosting learning by enhancing intrinsic motivation, cultivating curiosity, personalizing education, mastering focus, fostering competitive collaboration, and promoting independent thinking through the influence of adult role models. In addition, the workshops cover techniques such as guided visualization, gamification, collaborative problem-solving, storytelling, managing deviant behavior, and empowering students through self and peer assessment to enhance learning and motivation. Cluster II: Comfort zone. The goal of the second cluster is to cultivate a favorable psychological climate in educational settings. We advocate that soft skills development is enhanced in a calm, emotionally supportive atmosphere rather than in one marred by fear and guilt (Scheerens et al., 2020). The latter appears counterproductive to forming an independent and mature individual. Research shows that creating an ambiance that supports rather than impedes the assimilation of educational content is essential for facilitating students’ comprehension and contextual understanding of educational tasks (Baeva & Bordovskaia, 2015). These ideas are presented in a lecture series encompassing the importance of psychological climate in education, strategies for its cultivation and maintenance, stress management, the role of ergonomics and aesthetics in enhancing learning spaces, and implementing a person-centered approach in educational environments. Further, in a workshop series, we emphasize the strategic application of color and illumination in the school environment as a critical factor in amplifying the learning experience. In addition, we offer workshops dedicated to the refinement of the educational experience through the application of aromatherapy and music therapy. The intentional integration of these sensory elements is demonstrated to significantly elevate learners’ engagement with and responsiveness to the educational material (Baper et al., 2021). The workshop series also aims to enhance educators’ proficiency in incorporating somatic and meditative methodologies into pedagogical practices. This includes the implementation of kinesthetic warm-ups, respiratory exercises, and practices of silence. Cluster III: Simply about the complex. In the third cluster, educators delve into various technological methodologies for fostering student engagement in projectbased learning. Project-based learning is an esteemed pedagogical strategy that promotes learning through participation in meaningful and complex projects, extending over a significant duration. This approach has been recognized for enhancing learners’ critical thinking skills. It produces an environment conducive to exploring real-world issues, thereby enriching students’ comprehension and practical application of knowledge (Kokotsaki et al., 2016). This pedagogical model engages students in analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating content, which significantly bolsters critical thinking capacities (Bell, 2010). The iterative cycle of planning, execution, and reflection inherent in projectbased learning mandates a reflective practice wherein students critically appraise their contributions as well as those of their peers, which appears to be an essential process for the cultivation of critical thinking (Krajcik & Blumenfeld, 2006). Additionally, the project-based learning setting nurtures the development of inquiry, problem-solving, and decision-making skills as students traverse the intricacies of project work (Markham et al., 2003). Confronted with complex problems, students must employ diverse problem-solving strategies, thereby refining their critical thinking skills and equipping them for contemporary challenges. Project-based learning also facilitates interdisciplinary integration, augmenting the educational experience (Colliver, 2000), and heightens student engagement by promoting curiosity and personal interest in the subject matter (Pecore, 2015). Furthermore, it is pivotal in developing adaptable competencies such as creativity, communication, and collaboration across languages (Doppelt, 2003; Knoll, 2012). The lectures guide educators through the processes of designing compelling projects, implementing advanced techniques to stimulate critical thought, assessing critical thinking outcomes, and refining project-based learning practices for educational excellence. The workshop series guides educators through the fundamentals of project-based learning, from design and implementation to assessment, focusing on strategies to enhance critical thinking skills in students through interactive, practical exercises and collaborative reflection. PICK methodological and psychological support In conjunction with training modules, lecture series, and workshops, the PICK program provides comprehensive online and offline support for the effective assimilation and application of PICK methodologies and techniques. This scaffolded support is designed to assist educators in navigating the stress and emotional challenges inherent in their professional endeavors, develop self-regulation competencies, and bolster interpersonal dynamics with colleagues and students. The program endeavors to hone the professional aptitudes and personal attributes indispensable for navigating the contemporary educational terrain by weaving psychological and methodological assistance into the fabric of professional development initiatives for educators. Psychological backing empowers them to dismantle prevalent assumptions and biases linked to diverse cultures, thereby facilitating culturally attuned interactions with their students. The program offers online consultations with PICK curators and monthly support groups for a detailed examination of the PICK implementation process, supplemented by thematic webinars and masterclasses for theoretical and practical pedagogical enhancement. Curators provide essential methodological and psychological support, addressing questions, monitoring progress, and facilitating the adoption of new technologies, thereby aiding educators in integrating innovative strategies into their teaching practices. Finally, the PICK program provides an array of webinars, master classes, and memos for parents and administrators within educational institutions to foster a cohesive and constructive social and pedagogical collaboration. PICK: Effectiveness Empirical evaluation The efficacy of the PICK program was evaluated through a longitudinal research design, employing both pre-test and post-test assessments and experimental and control groups. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach, integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection methodologies to ensure a comprehensive analysis. Quantitative strategies were utilized to examine the study’s hypotheses, while qualitative techniques, including diaries and interviews, provided indepth perspectives on the participants’ experiences. Drawing on diverse sources of evidence ensured data triangulation, which bolstered the research’s validity and corroborated its conclusions (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011). Data collection occurred in three stages. The first stage involved a quantitative assessment of teachers’ competencies, evaluation of students’ creative, intercultural, and plurilingual competencies, systemic adaptation, and teachers’ evaluation of their students’ competencies. The second stage entailed qualitative data collection with online diaries administered to teachers to monitor the transformation of the educational process and a series of semi-structured post-experimental interviews with teachers. The third stage involved post-test quantitative data collection, identical to the first. Empirical еvidence The evaluation program is currently in progress, yet preliminary findings indicate the effectiveness of individual training modules. In August 2022, ten teachers attended Module I (creativity) of the PICK training at Reshit Chochma School in Moscow (Russia). They rated it highly, with an average score of 9.5 out of 10. The training, deemed highly effective with a 9.2 for practical applicability in teaching, fostered a significant transformation among participants, particularly enhancing their group work enthusiasm and pedagogical skills. Teachers reported gaining specific skills such as leadership, increased selfesteem, and innovative teaching techniques for enhancing student creativity and group management. They also emphasized the clarity of instructions for developing creativity through everyday teaching materials and methods. In addition, teachers highlighted the importance of intrinsic motivation and regular creative exercises in nurturing student creativity. Participants have successfully integrated the PICK approaches into their teaching practices, underscoring the training’s impact on enhancing educator and student creativity. In February 2023, the same teachers attended Module II (intercultural competence) and rated it exceptionally high (9.7). Participants found the training highly beneficial, with overall satisfaction at 9.6, and expressed appreciation for the facilitator’s effectiveness and engagement, scoring 9.8 and 8.9, respectively. Supplementary materials, including presentations and workbooks, were also deemed highly useful, with scores of 9.8 and 9.2. Feedback from participants underscored the program’s significant influence. One educator emphasized the critical role of emotional comprehension, another lauded the content’s engagement level and practical relevance, while a third found the exploration of emotional intelligence profoundly enlightening. Additionally, guidance on conflict resolution and the promotion of tolerance, encapsulated by the resonant statement, “We can love what we are without hating what and who we are not,” was particularly appreciated for its impact on fostering a more inclusive environment. The training notably enhanced teachers’ recognition of intercultural competence as vital for effective communication and conflict resolution, with participants applying these insights in their teaching practice. Module III (plurilingualism) was effectively piloted in an elective course attended by 60 graduate students from HSE University (Russia). The module received an average evaluation score of 8.1, reflecting its perceived usefulness, the relevance of its assignments, and overall student engagement. Participants particularly valued the inclusion of code-switching techniques, bilingual assignments, and dynamic discussions. Moreover, 70% of the participants were willing to recommend this module to fellow students. The “New Good” ritual was highlighted as especially noteworthy by the students. A student majoring in philology commented on the course’s format, noting its motivational aspect that encourages active participation, learning new things, meeting deadlines, attending exhibitions, or simply relaxing. Completing the course allowed another student to view familiar concepts from new perspectives and discover aspects previously overlooked, with the theoretical content effectively filling existing knowledge gaps. Benefits of participating in the PICK project The PICK educational program offers manifold benefits to all stakeholders within the educational ecosystem. First, the program is an invaluable asset for educational institutions aiming to enhance their faculty’s pedagogical competencies and equip students with the requisite skills to thrive in contemporary society. The program delivers an exhaustive curriculum to facilitate students’ acclimatization to global challenges and offers educators access to advanced training aligned with international benchmarks. Second, the program is meticulously crafted to support educators, tutors, and parents involved in homeschooling in nurturing students’ creativity, intercultural competence, and plurilingual capabilities. Participants will be awarded certification upon program completion. Moreover, they receive access to seminars and workshops offered by the PICK experts. The latter extends methodological and psychological support to ensure the effective enactment of the PICK initiatives. Third, students instructed by the educators trained under the PICK program enjoy many advantages. These encompass the development of soft skills essential for navigating the rapidly transforming global landscape, enhancing goal-setting proficiencies, unlocking creative capacities, and cultivating critical thinking abilities. Furthermore, the program lays down a robust foundation for foreign language learning, enhances communicative competencies, and aids in resolving conflicts across diverse cultural and national backgrounds. This pedagogical approach also bolsters self-assurance and nurtures a persistent inquisitiveness, preparing students for a dynamic and interconnected world. Conclusion This article provides a detailed account of the PICK educational program, a novel educational framework to enhance students’ soft skills and prepare them for today’s global challenges. Highlighting the critical importance of soft skills, the framework seeks to integrate them with traditional academic knowledge, focusing on creativity, intercultural understanding, and linguistic skills as essential elements for success. PICK is designed for educators and includes a structured training program with three main modules focusing on developing creative, intercultural, and plurilingual competencies. It also offers additional resources like lectures and workshops to improve motivation, critical thinking, and a positive learning environment. The program provides methodological and psychological support through mentorship and evaluates its effectiveness in enhancing students’ adaptation skills using elaborate assessment batteries. Currently in its pilot phase, the program demonstrates potential benefits for educators and organizational managers by improving workforce soft skills. HSE University offers online courses based on the PICK framework, accessible to educators, tutors, and homeschooling parents, aiming to build a professional community around the program for broader dissemination.About the authors
Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin
HSE University
Author for correspondence.
Email: tovyharhur@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5970-5003
SPIN-code: 3301-8800
PhD in Experimental Psychology, M.Sc. in Cognitive Science, is Associate Professor of Faculty of Social Sciences / School of Psychology
20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian FederationEkaterina V. Kashirskaya
HSE University
Email: ekashirskaya@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6806-5586
SPIN-code: 4754-8981
candidate of sciences (PhD), is Senior Lecturer of Faculty of Social Sciences / School of Psychology
20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian FederationAgniya S. Pasechnik-Lyle
HSE University
Email: agniya.lyle@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6561-7560
postgraduate student of Faculty of Social Sciences / School of Psychology
20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian FederationReferences
- Almeida, F., & Morais, J. (2023). Strategies for developing soft skills among Higher engi-neering courses. Journal of Education, 203(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211016417
- Auer, P. (Ed.). (1998). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017883
- Baeva, I. A., & Bordovskaia, N. V. (2015). The psychological safety of the educational envi-ronment and the psychological well-being of Russian secondary school pupils and teachers. Psychology in Russia: State of Art, 8(1), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2015.0108
- Baper, S. Y., Husein, H. A., & Salim, S. S. (2021). The impact of colour on students’ perception in learning spaces. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 28(2), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.28.2.03
- Baranauskienė, I., Serdiuk, L., & Kovalenko, A. (2020). Psychological factors of students’ internal motivation. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1 (pp. 45-55). Rezekne: Rezekne Academy of Technologies. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol1.5184
- Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
- Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
- Böttger, H., & Költzsch, D. (2020). The fear factor: Xenoglossophobia or how to overcome the anxiety of speaking foreign languages. Training, Language and Culture, 4(2), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2020-4-2-43-55
- Bruna, D., Pérez, M. V., Bustos, C., & Villarroel, V. (2023). The impact of a university teacher training program promoting self-regulated learning on teacher knowledge, self-efficacy, and practices. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1007137. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1007137
- Burton, C. L., & Bonanno, G. A. (2016). Regulatory flexibility and its role in adaptation to aversive events throughout the lifespan. In A.D. Ong & C.E. Löckenhoff (Eds.). Emotion, Aging, and Health (pp. 71-94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14857-005
- Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education system alignment for 21st century skills: Focus on assessment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
- Chahar Mahali, S., & Sevigny, P. R. (2022). Multicultural classrooms: Culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy among a sample of Canadian preservice teachers. Education and Urban Society, 54(8), 946-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245211062526
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Colliver J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic medicine, 75(3), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200003000-00017
- Council of Europe (1996/2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Council of Europe (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learn-ing, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
- Council of The European Union (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, 61(C 189), 1-13.
- Deardorff, D. K. (2009). The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071872987
- Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026125427344
- Fu, L., & Charoensukmongkol, P. (2023). Effect of cultural intelligence on burnout of Chinese expatriates in Thailand: The mediating role of host country national coworker support. Current Psychology, 42(5), 4041-4052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01728-1
- Gogolin, I. (2002). Linguistic and Cultural Diversity in Europe: A Challenge for Educational Research and Practice. European Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2002.1.1.3
- Guastello, S. J. (1995). Chaos, catastrophe, and human affairs: Applications of nonlinear dynamics to work, organizations, and social evolution. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203773895
- Gudykunst, W., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., & Karimi, H. (1994). Measuring self-construals across cultures: A derived etic analysis. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention in Sydney, Australia.
- Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
- Kashirskaya, E. V., & Kharkhurin, A. V. (2022). Competency approach to education in the framework of the PICK learning system. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 19(4), 757-783. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2022-4-757-783
- Kharkhurin, A. V. (2021). Plurilingual creativity: A new framework for research in plurilingual and creative practices. In E. Piccardo, A. Germain-Rutherford, & G. Lawrence (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Plurilingual Language Education (pp. 225-244). New York: Routledge.
- Kharkhurin, A. V. (2024). A paradigmatic shift in the relationship between bilingualism and creativity: Plurilingual creativity approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728924000919
- Knoll, M. (2012). “I Had Made a Mistake”: William H. Kilpatrick and the Project Method. Teachers College Record, 114(2), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211400202
- Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
- Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2005). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 317-334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.020
- Lazarus, R. S. (1974). Psychological stress and coping in adaptation and illness. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 5(4), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.2190/t43t-84p3-qdur-7rtp
- Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project-based learning handbook: A guide to standards focused project-based learning for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
- Martin, A. J., Nejad, H. G., Colmar, S., & Liem, G. A. D. (2013). Adaptability: How students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their academic and non-academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 728-746. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032794
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity (pp. 449-460). Cambridge University Press.
- Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cog-nitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1702&3_3
- OECD (2017). Education 2030 - Conceptual learning framework: background papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Orkibi, H. (2021). Creative adaptability: Conceptual framework, measurement, and outcomes in times of crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 588172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588172
- Ouchen, L., Tifroute, L., & El-Hariri, K. (2022). Soft skills through the prism of primary school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2303-2313. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2303
- Oudeyer, P.-Y., Gottlieb, J., & Lopes, M. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies. In B. Studer, & S. Knecht (Eds.). Motivation - Theory, Neurobiology and Applications. Progress in Brain Research, 229 (pp. 257-284). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.005
- Pecore, J. L. (2015). From Kilpatrick’s project method to project-based learning. In M.Y. Eryaman & B.C. Bruce (Eds.). International Handbook of Progressive Education (pp. 155-171). New York: Peter Lang Verlag.
- Piccardo, E. (2021). The mediated nature of plurilingualism. In E. Piccardo, A. Germain-Rutherford, & G. Lawrence (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Plurilingual Language Education (pp. 65-81). New York: Routledge.
- Piccardo, E., Germain-Rutherford, A., & Lawrence, G. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Plurilingual Language Education. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351002783
- Pusch, M. (1994). The chameleon capacity. In R. D. Lambert (Ed.). Educational exchange and global competence (pp. 205-210). New York: Council on International Educational Exchange.
- Rean, A. A., Kudashev, A. R., & Baranov, A. A. (2008). The psychology of personality adaptation. Saint Petersburg: Praim-Evroznak. (In Russ.)
- Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of rein-forcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
- Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2012-0-06920-7
- Sam, D. L., Vedder, P., Liebkind, K., Neto, F., & Virta, E. (2008). Immigration, acculturation and the paradox of adaptation in Europe. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620701563348
- Samadi, M., & Sohrabi, N. (2016). Mediating role of the social problem solving for family process, family content, and adjustment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 1185-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.141
- Sarmiento, A. V., Pérez, M. V., Bustos, C., Hidalgo, J. P., & del Solar, J. I. V. (2019). Inclusion profile of theoretical frameworks on the study of sociocultural adaptation of international university students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 70, 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.02.004
- Scheerens, J., van der Werf, G., & de Boer, H. (2020). Soft skills in education: Putting the evidence in perspective. Cham: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54787-5
- Schmitt, D. P., & Pilcher, J. J. (2004). Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: How do we know one when we see one? Psychological Science, 15(10), 643-649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00734.x
- Schulz, B. (2008). The importance of soft skills: Education beyond academic knowledge. NAWA Journal of Language and Communication, 2(1), 146-154.
- Selye, H. (1979). Stress and the reduction of distress. Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association, 75(11), 562-566.
- Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
- Starks, D. (2005). The effects of self-confidence in bilingual abilities on language use: Per-spectives on Pasifika language use in South Auckland. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26(6), 533-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630508668424
- Susilawati, Aznam, N., Paidi, & Ngadimin (2020). Teachers’ perspectives toward soft skills in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012111. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012111
- Ting-Toomey, S. (2009). Intercultural conflict competence as a facet of intercultural compe-tence development: Multiple conceptual approaches. In D.K. Deardorff (Ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence (pp. 100-120). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071872987.n5
- Thompson, S. (2019). The power of pragmatism: How project managers benefit from coaching practice through developing soft skills and self-confidence. International Journal of Evidence-Based Coaching and Mentoring, (S13), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.24384/86ee-ps25
- Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly: A philosophy of creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
- Touloumakos, A. K. (2020). Expanded yet restricted: A mini-review of the soft skills literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02207
- Ulug, M., Ozden, M. S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). The effects of teachers’ attitudes on students’ personality and performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 738-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.144
- Valente, S., & Lourenço, A. A. (2022). Editorial: The importance of academic training in emotional intelligence for teachers. Frontiers in Education, 7, 992698. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.992698
- VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2007). APA Dictionary of Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Yakunina, E. S., Weigold, I. K., Weigold, A., Hercegovac, S., & Elsayed, N. (2013). International students’ personal and multicultural strengths: Reducing acculturative stress and promoting adjustment. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(2), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00088.x
- Zhou, M., & Lin, W. (2016). Adaptability and life satisfaction: The moderating role of social support. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01134
- Zimmerman B. J. (2002). Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Academic motivation of adolescents (Vol. 2, pp. 1-27). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
