Role of Perceptual Processes in the Formation of the Phenomenon of Giftedness

Cover Page

Cite item


Currently, there is an obvious shortage of Russian studies of perceptual processes in the gifted. The study is focused on theoretical and organizational issues of research in the cognitive sphere of giftedness, in particular, perception, which is relevant not only in its fundamental but also applied aspects, - this explains the high research activity of foreign psychologists in this area nowadays. The empirical data presented in the literature on the importance of perceptual processes in the formation of the phenomenon of giftedness are considered from the methodological positions of the perceptual psychology, which allows to identify new approaches in the study of giftedness. The array of empirical evidence that is emerging today is systematized according to the main tasks to be solved in the research: (1) to identify (to measure) the cognitive characteristics of the gifted and to establish connections between them; (2) to determine the parameters of cognitive processes specific to giftedness; (3) to establish the connections between the phenomenon of giftedness and specific cognitive resources. The typical organizational features of modern cognitive psychology of giftedness are highlighted: the use of psychometric tools and comparative research methods, the predominance of child and adolescent samples, the preoccupation with the phenomenon of mathematical giftedness and the involvement of neuroscientific research resources; their capabilities and limitations are shown. Using the neurocognitive studies of mathematical giftedness as an example, the theoretical and organizational threats to the validity of the conclusions drawn in them are discussed, as well as the ways to increase the argumentativeness of the research in the cognitive sphere of giftedness, i.e., to ensure its ecological validity, integrity, ontologicality, particularly by covering a larger number of studied variables on significant groups of participants. The empirical evidence of the key role of visual-spatial processing (spatial thinking) in the cognitive structure of giftedness is systematized. Based on the thesis about the special functional significance of the direct sensory perception, the task of determining the functional characteristics of perceptual processes under the conditions of giftedness is set. The integration of knowledge from different subject areas of psychology for studying the problems of unique cognitive and social functioning, the personality organization of a gifted person is also provided.

About the authors

Galina V. Shookova

Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9864-0641

PhD in Psychology, is leading researcher of the Laboratory of Psychology of Giftedness

9 Mokhovaya St, bldg 4, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation


  1. Arancibia, V., Boyanova, D., & González, P. (2016). Cognitive characteristics of gifted and not gifted fifth-grade Chilean students from economically vulnerable contexts. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 744–754.
  2. Artemenkov, S.L. (2020). The problem of positioning the perception process as a special function of the psyche. In G.V. Shookova (Ed.), Psychology of Perception: Transcendental Vector of Development (pp. 34–66). Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ. (In Russ.)
  3. Berg, D.H., & McDonald, P.A. (2018). Differences in mathematical reasoning between typically achieving and gifted children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 281–291.
  4. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B, & Bogoyavlenskaya, M.E. (2013). Odarennost': Priroda i diagnostika. Moscow: ANO TsNPRO Publ. (In Russ.)
  5. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (Ed). (2003). Rabochaya kontseptsiya odarennosti. Moscow. (In Russ.)
  6. Carman, C.A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 52–70.
  7. Clore, G.L., & Proffitt, D.R. (2016). The myth of pure perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39(1), e235.
  8. Dalinger, V.A. (2016). Cognitive-visual approach to mathematic teaching as a factor of student success in the educational process. International Journal of Experimental Education, (5–2), 206–209. (In Russ.)
  9. Doniy, E.I., & Shumakova, N.B. (2020). Comparative analysis of cognitive characteristics and creativity of younger adolescents with intellectual and artistic gifts. Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 12(3), 110–123. (In Russ.)
  10. Druzhinin, V.N. (1995). Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostei. Moscow: Lanterna Vita Publ. (In Russ.)
  11. Freeman, J. (1991). Gifted children growing up. London: Cassell.
  12. Grabner, R.H., Neubauer, A.C., & Stern, E. (2006). Superior performance and neural efficiency: The impact of intelligence and expertise. Brain Research Bulletin, 69(4), 422–439.
  13. Kholodnaya, M.A. (2017). Intellectual endowments as developing intellectual competence. In L.I. Larionova, A.I. Savenkov (Eds.), Psychology of Giftedness and Creativity (pp. 149–163). Saint Petersburg: Nestor- Istoriya Publ. (In Russ.)
  14. Kholodnaya, M.A. (2019). Conceptual abilities as a basic component in the structure of intellectual giftedness.. In V.A. Mazilov (Ed.), Psychology of Abilities and Giftedness: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, 21–22 November 2019 (pp. 112–125). Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University Publ. (In Russ.)
  15. Kinnari, A., Uttal, D.H., & Stieff, M. (2020). Situating space: Using a discipline-focused lens to examine spatial thinking skills. Cognitive Research, 5(1).
  16. Konogorckaya, C.A. (2019). Features of the development of the components of spatial thinking of schoolchildren at different levels of general education. Scientific Notes of the Russian State Social University, 18(4), 91–99. (In Russ.)
  17. Lang, M., Matta, M., Parolin, L., Morrone, C., & Pezzuti, L. (2019). Cognitive profile of intellectually gifted adults: Analyzing the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Assessment, 26(5), 929–943.
  18. Larionova, L.I., & Savenkov, A.I. (Eds.). (2017). Psychology of giftedness and creativity. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ. (In Russ.)
  19. Lykken, D.T. (2006). The mechanism of emergenesis. Genes Brain and Behavior, 5(4), 306–310.
  20. Mazilov, V.A. (Ed.). (2019). Psychology of abilities and giftedness: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, 21–22 November 2019. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University Publ. (In Russ.)
  21. Mirakyan, A.I. (1999). The contours of transcendental psychology (book 1). Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Publ. (In Russ.)
  22. Mirakyan, A.I. (2004). The contours of transcendental psychology (book 2). Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Publ. (In Russ.)
  23. Myers, T., Carey, E., & Szücs, D. (2017). Cognitive and neural correlates of mathematical giftedness in adults and children: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
  24. Paz-Baruch, N., Leikin, R., & Leikin, M. (2016). Visual processing in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(3), 237–258.
  25. Pritulsky, C., Morano, C., Odean, R., Bower, C., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Michnick Golinkoff, R. (2020). Spatial thinking: Why it belongs in the preschool classroom. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(3), 271–282.
  26. Rinn, A.N., & Bishop, J. (2015). Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213–235.
  27. Shadrikov, V.D. (2019). Sposobnosti i odarennost' cheloveka. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  28. Shcheblanova, E.I. (2004). Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika odarennosti shkol'nikov: Problemy, metody, rezul'taty issledovanii i praktiki. Moscow: MPSI Publ.; Voronezh: NPO MODEK Publ. (In Russ.)
  29. Shcheblanova, E.I. (2016). New trends in the study of giftedness in the XXI century. In O.I. Clyuchko (Ed.), A Child in the Educational Space of a Metropolis: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 17–23). Saint Petersburg: NITS ART Publ. (In Russ.)
  30. Shcheblanova, E.I. (2018). The problem of identifying and developing the giftedness of primary school students. Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Child Development in Modern Socio-Cultural Conditions: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation (Kursk, 29–31 March 2018) (pp. 121–124). Kursk: Kursk State University Publ. (In Russ.)
  31. Shookova, G.V., & Artemenkov, S.L. (2020). Methodological and methodological issues of modern psychology of perception. In G.V. Shookova (Ed.), Psychology of Perception: Transcendental Vector of Development (pp. 9–33). Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ. (In Russ.)
  32. Solé-Casals, J., Serra-Grabulosa, J.M., Romero-Garcia, R., Vilaseca, G., Adan, A., Vilaró, N., ... & Bullmore, E.T. (2019). Structural brain network of gifted children has a more integrated and versatile topology. Brain Structure and Function, 224(7), 2373–2383.
  33. Solovyova, E.N. (2016). Research of the cognitive processes of gifted children of primary school age. North of Russia: Strategies and Development Prospects: Proceedings of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (vol. I, pp. 157–162). Surgut: Surgut State University Publ. (In Russ.)
  34. Sternberg, R.J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(7), 152–169.
  35. Sternberg, R.J. (Ed). (1998). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Stieff, M., Werner, S., DeSutter, D., Franconer, S., & Hegarty, M. (2020). Visual chunking as a strategy for spatial thinking in STEM. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5.
  37. Thomas, M.S.C. (2018). A neurocomputational model of developmental trajectories of gifted children under a polygenic model: When are gifted children held back by poor environments? Intelligence, 69(7–8), 200–212.
  38. Wei, M., Wang, Q., Jiang, X., Guo, Y., Fan, H., Wang, H., & Lu, X. (2020). Directed connectivity analysis of the brain network in mathematically gifted adolescents. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 3.
  39. Winner E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.
  40. Zaboski, B.A., Kranzler, J.H., & Gage, N.A. (2018). Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell – Horn – Carroll theory. Journal of School Psychology, 71(12), 42–56.

Copyright (c) 2021 Shookova G.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies