Twin Cities Movement in the Development of Regional Policy: The Experience of the New Territories

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The institute of twin cities faces serious challenges due to the developing international crisis, when urban diplomacy, and successful practices of interstate civil cooperation, perceived for decades as unshakable and value-oriented, have been subjected to “suspension” or “cancellation”. On the other hand, the territorial changes of 2022, the entry of new territories into Russia, and the establishment of twinning relations between Russian cities and the cities of the Donbass region give the twin cities institute a new meaning and important political and cultural value. The formation and development of the twin cities’ axiosphere is an important factor in the development of interregional cooperation and the “linking” of Russian territories. The research is interdisciplinary. It deals with various issues of public policy, social philosophy, cultural studies, ethics, and economics. We discuss the specifics of a developing digital society and consider issues of regional governance from the standpoint of the axiological approach. The authors note the importance of civic initiatives and movements, social media, whose activities are aimed at maintaining the social sphere and forming a digital environment of trust, at intensifying urban, civic network cooperation as a counterbalance to the aggressive network practices of modern anti-Russian narratives.

About the authors

Anna V. Volkova

St. Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: AV.Volkova@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3687-5728

Doctor of Science in Political Sciences, Professor, Department of Political Governance of the Faculty of Political Science

Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Kulakova

St. Petersburg State University

Email: t.kulakova@spbu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3386-8079

Doctor of Science in Political Sciences, Professor, Department of Political Governance of the Faculty of Political Science

Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

References

  1. Bakulina, S.D. (2013). Axiosphere of the region: Experiences of translation and ways of representing the culture of the place (on the material of the southern regions of Western Siberia). Omsk: OmGPU Publishing House. (In Russian).
  2. Blatter, J. (2003). Beyond hierarchies and networks: Institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance, 4(16), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00226
  3. Danilov, A.N. (2022). Culture as a “melting pot” of history: The value profile of a new civilization. In A.A. Ivanenko (ed.), Philosophy of the History of Philosophy (pp. 7–19). St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian).
  4. Komninos, N. (2015). The age of intelligent cities: Smart environments and innovation-for-all strategies. L&NY: Routledge.
  5. Korab-Karpowicz, W. (2019). The Clash of epochs: Traditional, modern, postmodern, and evolutionity. Perspectives on Political Science, 3(48), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2019.1576435
  6. Kulakova, T.A., & Volkova, A.V. (2022). Digital vigilantism: Spectacle versus reality? In A.A. Ivanenko (ed.), Philosophy of the History of Philosophy (pp. 107–125). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.108
  7. Kulakova, T.A., & Volkova, A.V. (2023). Digital sovereignty and political and administrative regimes. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Philosophy and conflictology, 1(39), 92–105. (In Russian).
  8. Lauсht, C., & Allbeson, T. (2023). Twin Cities, Special ed.: Urban Internationalism: Coventry, Kiel, Reconstruction and the Role of Cities in British-German Reconciliation, 1945–49. Urban History file. Retrieved May 30, 2023, from https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/156273/1/TWIN_Cities_Spec_ed_Urban_Internationalism_Coventry_Kiel_1945_49_rev_final_final_ edit.pdf
  9. Martyanov, D.S., & Lukyanova, G.V. (2021). Emotional public sphere: Polarization of paralinguistic internet discourse. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 10: Journalism, (2), 25–48. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.2.2021.2548
  10. Mikhailova, E., & Wu, C.-T. (2017). Ersatz twin city formation? The case of Blagoveshchensk and Heihe. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 4(32), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1222878
  11. Nawratek, K. (2011). City as political idea. Plymouth: Plymouth University Press.
  12. Nawratek, K. (2012). Holes in the whole. Introduction to the urban revolutions. WinchesterWashington: Zero Books.
  13. Nye, J.S. (2005). Soft power: The means to success in worlds politics, New York: Public Affairs Press.
  14. Pashkus, V.Yu. (2022). Breakthrough positioning strategy and its application in the promotion of brands of territories. In V.A. Gutorov & D.A. Maltseva (Eds.), Modern political strategies (pp.164-188). SPb.: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. (In Russian).
  15. Popova, O.V. (2021). Student youth of Russian megalopolises: value orientations and effects of political online mobilization. Bulletin of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Humanities and social sciences, 5(107), 118–129. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22204/2587-8956-2021-107-05-121-132
  16. Pustoshinskoy, O.S., Simons, G., & Nikulenkov, V.V. (Eds.) (2021). Twin cities: State, development opportunities, challenges, priorities. International Scientific and Practical Conference. Tyumen: Tyumen Publishing House. (In Russian).
  17. Rozov, N.S. (1998). Values in a problematic world: Philosophical foundations and social applications of constructive axiology. Novosibirsk: NGU Publishing House, 1998.
  18. Schmidt, E., & Cohen, J. (2013). New digital world. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2013. (In Russian).
  19. Shcherbinin, A.I. (2021). Socio-political problems of the city in a rapidly changing world on the border of research. In T.A. Senyushkina (Ed.), Political space and social time: Global challenges and civilizational responses. Collection of scientific papers of the XXXVII International Harak Forum (pp. 483–488). Simferopol: Arial. (In Russian).
  20. Shcherbinin, A.I., & Shcherbinina, N.G. (2022). “Right to the city”: Political construction of the post-pandemic world order. Tomsk State University Bulletin, (474), 169–177. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/474/19
  21. Solovyov, A.I. (2021). Politics and government. Essays on theory and methodology. Moscow: Publishing House Aspect Press. (In Russian).
  22. Valley, M. (2018). Becoming a citizen scientist. Global Dialogue, 1(8), 18–19.
  23. Volkova, A.V., & Borisova, O.V. (2020). Civil assessment of the development of the innovation infrastructure of the metropolis: Challenges and lessons of modern administrative reform. Bulletin of the Perm University. Political science, 1(14), 88–96. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2020-1-88-96
  24. Volkova, A.V., & Kulakova, T.A. (2021). Network, procedural and cognitive components of digital public governance implementation designs: The experience of European countries. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 1(37), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.110
  25. Vulfovich, R.M. (2019). City as a platform: myth or reality? Scientific works of the North-Western Institute of Management RANEPA, 2(10), 63–68. (In Russian).
  26. Vyzhletsov, G.P. (2016). Axiology of culture at the turn of the century. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(23), 15–26. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2023 Volkova A.V., Kulakova T.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies