Soft Power for Russia: from Adoption to Latent Governance Skills

Cover Page

Cite item


This article is devoted to the study of Russian perception of soft power, which was initially conceptualized within the American political theory and is still being discussed in terms of its application to real political relations in the modern world. Scientific novelty of the article lies in identifying, based on retrospective analysis of Russian language publications on soft power, gradual shift from descriptive approach to soft power as exclusive instrument of American foreign policy towards an emerging independent category of Russian soft power. The latter incorporates perceptions about the ability of the state to rely on the most effective social structures in interaction, first of all, with external actors, which, however, can also have a domestic civil dimension in terms of expanding the tools for latent management of social processes. Besides considering the publication dynamics in scientific journals, the author also analyzes the gradual entry of the concept of soft power into discourse of real Russian politics through the public rhetoric of country’s top leadership and strategic foreign policy documents. Initially, Russian priorities articulated through the search for mechanisms to resist soft power from the outside. Later a consecutive postulate emerged to develop sovereign soft power instruments, based on the active engagement of civil society institutions into foreign policy process. Activation of latter, as well as the growing practices of different countries in building relations with non-governmental organizations in the implementation of their national interests, are becoming important factors to encourage government efforts for soft power. Russian experience demonstrates a two-way process in search for the corresponding national model: while the state expresses interest in developing additional mechanisms that support its policy in the international arena, the society demonstrates a demand for increasingly universal forms of self-realization in a competitive global market.

About the authors

Alexander E. Konkov

Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.

PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor at Policy Analysis Department, School of Public Administration

27-4 Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation


  1. Russell B.A History of Western Philosophy. Novosibirsk: Sib. univ. izd-vo, 2003. 992 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Gramsci A. Prison Notebooks. Moscow, Politizdat, 1991. 560 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Tao Te Ching. Drevnekitajskaya filosofiya. Moscow, Mysl’, 1972. 114–138 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Gallarotti G.M. Soft Power: What it is, Why it’s Important, and the Conditions Under Which it Can Be Effectively Used. Journal of Political Power. 2011; 4 (1): 25–47. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886
  5. Nye J.S. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York, Basic Books, 1990. 336 p.
  6. Nye J.S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, Public Affairs, 2004. 192 p.
  7. Nye J.S. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2011. 320 p.
  8. Nye J. Soft Power and American-European relations. Svobodnaya mysl’ – XXI vek. 2004; 10: 33–41.
  9. Inozemcev V.L. Helpful Recommendations for American Political Class. Polis. Political Studies. 2002; 5: 180–185. (In Russ.).
  10. Ivanov I.S. Competing Models and Scenarios for Forming New World Order: Sense and Perspective for Realization. Politiya. 2004; 4: 5–14. (In Russ.).
  11. Rogov S.M. Strategic Solitude of Russia. Economic Strategies. 2004; 4: 12–17. (In Russ.).
  12. Utkin A. I. What is Russia for America? International Trends. 2004; 5: 130–137. (In Russ.).
  13. Bakina A. USA: Approaching the Issue of Soft and Hard Power in Terms of Global Dominance. Vlast’. 2007; 7: 92–98. (In Russ.).
  14. Prihod’ko O.V. American Internationalism vs European Multilateralism. USA v Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture. 2008; 10: 4–25. (In Russ.).
  15. Troitskij M.A. European Union in World Politics. International Trends. 2004; 5: 43–58. (In Russ.).
  16. Kulanov A.Е. Cultural Diplomacy of Japan. Yearbook Japan. 2007; 36: 116–130. (In Russ.).
  17. Lomanov A.V. The Soft Wins the Hard: Establishing the Modern Image of China. Widening Horizons for Science: 90 years of Acadmician S.L. Tihvinskiy. Moscow, Pamyatniki istoricheskoj mysli, 2008: 740–757. (In Russ.).
  18. Dejch T.L., Serikkalieva A.Е. Soft Power as a Political Tool of China in Africa. Asia and Africa Today. 2017; 3: 2–8. (In Russ.).
  19. Yag’ya V.S., Kovalevskaya N.V., Minfu L. Strategy of Soft Power in the Foreign Policy of PRC in Africa. Humanities, Social-Economic And Social Sciences. 2015; 9: 77–84. (In Russ.).
  20. Еgorov A.I., Gudgol’d A.M. Soft Power: German Experience. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. 2017; 1: 25–32. (In Russ.).
  21. Kovalevskaya N.V. The Role of the Spanish Language as Soft Power for the Foreign Policy of Spain. Istoricheskaya i social’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’. 2015; 7 (5–2): 141–145. (In Russ.).
  22. Kovba D.M. Soft Power as a Political Strategy of States in the Eastern Asia Region. Cand. Diss. (Polit.) Еkaterinburg, 2017. 173 p. (In Russ.).
  23. Boyarkina A.V. Soft Power as a Political Instrument for Realization of Foreign Policy od PRC between XX and XXI centuries. Cand. Diss. (Polit.). Vladivostok, 2016. 234 p. (In Russ.).
  24. Zubkova A.I. Soft Power Strategy in the Context of the Political System of the Turkish Republic Transformation in the period of 2002–2014. Cand. Diss. (Polit.). Moscow, 2015. 139 p. (In Russ.).
  25. Rustamova L.R. Soft Power in Foreign Policy of Modern Germany. Cand. Diss. (Polit.). M., 2017. 175 p. (In Russ.).
  26. Tarabarko K.A. Soft Power of the Culture of China: Conceptual Content and Practices of Realization. Cand. Diss. (Philos.). Chita, 2017. 216 p. (In Russ.).
  27. Haritonova Е.M. Soft Power in the Foreign Policy of a State: the experience of Great Britain (second half 1990s – 2010s). Cand. Diss. (Polit.). Moscow, 2017. 216 p. (In Russ.).
  28. Ageeva V.D. The Role of Soft Power in Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation in the Context of Globalization. Cand. Diss. (Polit.). St.-Petersburg, 2016. 279 p. (In Russ.).
  29. Kononenko V. Create an Image of Russia? Russia in Global Affairs. 2006; 2: 192–201. (In Russ.).
  30. Kazancev A.A., Merkushev V.N. Russia and Post-Soviet Space: Perspectives for Applying Soft Power. Polis. Political Studies. 2008; 2: 122–135. (In Russ.).
  31. Leonard M., Popesku N. Soft Power of New Russia. Russian Journal. 2008; May: 97–112. (In Russ.).
  32. Kortunov S.V. Soft Power of Russia in the Context of Globalization and Global Crisis. The World Economics. 2009; 12: 5–20. (In Russ.).
  33. Lebedeva M.M., For J. Higher Education as a Potential of Soft Power. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2009; 6: 200–205. (In Russ.).
  34. Fominyh A.Е. Soft Power of the Exchange Programs. International Trends. 2008; 16: 76–85. (In Russ.).
  35. Lupareva N.N. “The Love to Motherland”: Social and Political Activity and Views of S.N. Glinka. Conservatism Notebooks. 2015; 2: 61–116. (In Russ.).
  36. Kharitonova E. Soft Power Effectiveness: Problem Of Evaluation. World Economy and International Relations. 2015; 6: 48–58. (In Russ.).
  37. Keating V.C., Kaczmarska K. Conservative soft power: liberal soft power bias and the ‘hidden’attraction of Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2019; 22 (1): 1–27. DOI:
  38. Wilson J.L. Russia and China respond to soft power: Interpretation and readaptation of a Western construct. Politics. 2015; 35 (3–4): 287–300. DOI:
  39. Walker C. The Hijacking of «Soft Power». Journal of Democracy. 2016; 27 (1): 49–63. DOI:
  40. Grigas A. Legacies, coercion and soft power: Russian influence in the Baltic States. London: Chatham House, 2012. 16 p.
  41. Pallin C.V., Oxenstierna S. Russian Think Tanks and Soft Power. Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut (FOI). 2017 Sept. 09. URL: reportNo=FOI-R--4451--SE. Accessed: 12.12.2019.
  42. Van Herpen M.H. Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015. 319 p.
  43. Richter M.L. What We Know about RT (Russia Today) // Euriopean Values. 2017 Sept. 10. URL: Accessed: 12.12.2019.
  44. Kon’kov A.Е. The Softer One, the Stronger It: Hybridization of Power. Comparative Politic. 2016; 7 (4): 151–160. DOI: (In Russ.).
  45. Panova E.P. Power of Attractiveness: “Soft Power” in World Politics. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2010; 4: 91–97. (In Russ.).
  46. Davydov Y.P. Hard and Soft Power in International Relations. USA v Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture. 2007; (1): 3–24. (In Russ.).
  47. Kapicyn V.M. Cosmopolitism is a Component of Soft Power and Global Governance. Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal Obozrevatel’– Observer. 2009; 10: 70–79. (In Russ.).
  48. Lebedeva M.M. Soft Power: the Concept and Approaches. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2017; 3 (54): 212–223. (In Russ.).
  49. Filimonov G.Y. Relavant Issues of Forming the Strategy of Soft Power in the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation. Geopolitical journal. 2013; 1: 24–36. (In Russ.).
  50. Naumov A.O. Soft Power and Color Revolutions. Russian journal of legal studies. 2016; 1: 73–86. (In Russ.).
  51. Nisbett M. Who Holds the Power in Soft Power. Arts & International Affairs. 2016; 1 (1): 110–148.
  52. Andreev A.L. Soft Power: Arrangement of Senses, Russian Style. Polis. Political Studies. 2016; 5: 122–133. DOI: (In Russ.).
  53. Rusakova O.F. The Concept of Soft Power in the Modern Political Philosophy. Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law. 2010; 10: 173–192. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2020 Konkov A.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies