Conceptual flexibility as a postclassical way to conceptualize the elusive unity of the world

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The world is always present everywhere, but it always inevitably eludes any our attempt to catch and pin it down. Classical philosophy used to seek “true being” as the most reliable and solid in its constant stability, but this search has proven futile; postclassical thought discovers the irremovability of the elusive world in plasmagma, which yields to a conscious purposeful effort to some extent, but then suddenly snaps back and can be recognized by certain indirect manifestations.

About the authors

V U Kuznetsov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vassilik@yandex.ru
GSP-1, Lenin Hills, Training and Research Corps “Shuvalov” 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Girenok FI. Uskol'zayushchee bytie. Moscow: IFRAN; 1994. (In Russ).
  2. Grigor’eva TP. Dao i logos (vstrecha kul'tur). Moscow: Nauka. Glavnaya redakciya vostochnoj literatury; 1992. (In Russ).
  3. Derrida Zh. Hora. Derrida Zh. Ehsse ob imeni. Moscow: Institut ehksperimental'noj sociologii; SPb.: Aletejya; 1998. (In Russ).
  4. Kanaeva NA. Tathata. Filosofiya buddizma. Ehnciklopediya. Moscow: Vostochnaya literature; 2011. (In Russ).
  5. Kastaneda K. Skazki o sile. Kastaneda K. Skazki o sile. Vtoroe kol'co sily. Kiev: Sofiya; 1992. (In Russ).
  6. Kastoriadis K. Voobrazhaemoe ustanovlenie obshchestva. Moscow: Gnozis; Logos; 2003. (In Russ).
  7. Kuznecov VYu. Edinstvo mira v postneklassicheskuyu ehpohu (K postanovke problemy). Voprosy filosofii. 2014; (12). (In Russ).
  8. Kuznecov VYu. Sdvig ot klassiki k neklassike i narashchivanie poryadkov refleksii v filosofii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2008; (1). (In Russ).
  9. Lao Czy. Dao Deh Czin. Drevnekitajskaya filosofiya. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl'; 1972. (In Russ).
  10. Latur B. Peresborka social'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki; 2014. (In Russ).
  11. Lo Dzh. Ob"ekty i prostranstva. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. 2006; 5 (1). (In Russ).
  12. Lo Dzh. Posle metoda: besporyadok i social'naya nauka. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara; 2015. (In Russ).
  13. Losev AF. Istoriya antichnoj ehstetiki. Rannyaya klassika. Moscow: AST; 2000. (In Russ).
  14. Malyavin VV. Kommentarii. Lao-czy. Dao-Deh czin. Moscow: Feoriya; 2010. (In Russ).
  15. Mejyasu K. Posle konechnosti: EHsse o neobhodimosti kontingentnosti. Ekaterinburg—M.: Kabinetnyj uchenyj; 2016. (In Russ).
  16. Svas'yan KA. Fenomenologicheskoe poznanie. Propedevtika i kritika. Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt; 2010. (In Russ).
  17. Serl Dzh. Otkryvaya soznanie zanovo. Moscow: Ideya-Press; 2002. (In Russ).
  18. Toporov VN. Vedijskij “veshchnyj” kosmos (“Slova i veshchi”: yazyk kak istochnik rekonstrukcii mira veshchej). Toporov V.N. Issledovaniya po ehtimologii i semantike. Vol. 3: Indijskie i iranskie yazyki. Moscow: YAzyki slavyanskih kul’tur; 2009. (In Russ).
  19. Malabou C. La Plasticité au soir de l’écriture. Dialectique, destruction, déconstruction. Paris: Éditions Léo Scheer; 2004.
  20. Malabou C. Plasticité. Paris: Éditions Léo Scheer; 1999.

Copyright (c) 2017 Kuznetsov V.U.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies