А.P. Chekhov and D.S. Merezhkovsky: controversy about the mission of the Russian intelligentsia
- Authors: Kirillina O.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State Specialized Academy of Arts
- Issue: Vol 29, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 7-15
- Section: LITERARY CRITICISM
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/literary-criticism/article/view/40020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2024-29-1-7-15
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YINAJY
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The author examines the dialogue of A.P. Chekhov and D.S. Merezhkovsky on the role of the intelligentsia in society. The study used comparative and cultural-historical methods. The analysis of the causes of the deep split among the educated part of society at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries is carried out and two fundamentally divergent vectors have been identified in solving the issue of the role of the intelligentsia in society. Based on a study of the dialogue between Chekhov and Merezhkovsky, which took place during personal communication, in correspondence and through critical articles, it was determined that in understanding the essence of intelligence (“intelligentnost”) as an internal sensation, the writers took opposite positions. An analysis of similar themes and motives in their work (the image of Italy, superman, Oedipus, ideas about beauty, about the healthy middle, attitude towards “idealists”) allows us to concretize their positions: Merezhkovsky preached the transformation of humanity into God-manhood through revolution, blood, Chekhov expressed longing for humanity. It is concluded that Chekhov, denouncing the “fathers”-idealists, called for serving people without being afraid of routine work, without idealizing the people, and Merezhkovsky supported the claims of the intelligentsia to the role of the true elite of society, resolute, rejec- ting the principles of traditional humanism and inspiring the masses.
Keywords
About the authors
Olga M. Kirillina
Russian State Specialized Academy of Arts
Author for correspondence.
Email: kirillinao@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0152-9665
Candidate of Philology, Professor of the Interfaculty Department of Humanitarian Disciplines
12 Rezervnyi Proezd, Moscow, 121165, Russian FederationReferences
- Chekhov, A.P. (1975). Letter from A.S. Suvorin December 9, 1890 Moscow. Complete Collected Works and Letters (vol. 5, pp. 138–141). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Chekhov, A.P. (1976). Letter from A.S. Suvorin December 30, 1888 Moscow. Complete Collected Works and Letters (vol. 2, pp. 108–116). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Chekhov, A.P. (1977). Complete Collected Works and Letters (vol. 7). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Chekhov, A.P. (1981). Letter from V.S. Mirolyubov December 17, 1901 Yalta. Complete Collected Works and Letters (vol. 10, pp. 141–142). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Chekhov, A.P. (1986). At dusk. Essays and stories. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Kapustin, N.V. (2021). Story by A.P. Chekhov’s Fear: Genre metamorphoses and overtones of meaning. Bulletin of Ivanovo State University, (2), 11–17. (In Russ.)
- Merezhkovsky, D.S. (1891). Letter from A.P. Chekhov September 14, 1891. GBL. F. 331. K. 51. Units hr. 58. L. 4–5. (In Russ.)
- Merezhkovsky, D.S. (1906). Chekhov and Gorky The Coming Boor Chekhov and Gorky (pp. 43–101). St. Petersburg: Izdaniye M.V. Pirozhkova Publ. (In Russ.)
- Merezhkovsky, D.S. (1908). Revolution and religion “Not peace, but a sword: Towards a future criticism of Christianity” (pp. 41–119). St. Petersburg: Izdaniye M.V. Pirozhkova Publ. (In Russ.)
- Merezhkovsky, D.S. (1990). Alexander I. Collected Works (vol. 3). Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russ.)
- Merezhkovsky, D.S. (1991). Acropolis: Selections literary-critical articles. Moscow: Knizhnaya Palata Publ. (In Russ.)
- Merezhkovsky, D.S. (2000). L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Tolstaya, E. (1994). Poetics of irritation: Chekhov in the late 1880s – early 1890s. Moscow: Radiks Publ. (In Russ.)