Causes of the Infodemic Outbreak: Media Coverage of the SARS Epidemic and the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Analysis

Cover Page

Cite item


The article raises the problem of the destructive impact of the infodemic phenomenon on the life of the society. In order to understand the today’s infodemic the author suggests conducting a comparative analysis of the media coverage of the SARS epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic to identify common features in the work of editorial teams during such global challenges as an outbreak of a new dangerous disease. After having analyzed all relevant aspects the author arrives to conclusion that the key features and characteristics of the process, which in 2020 was called “infodemic”, also took place during the SARS in 2003. Given the fact that the media have been following the same concept of coverage for years, it can be assumed that during a new pandemic, journalists will make the same mistakes and let infodemic get in the way of spreading truthful information again. Having analyzed in detail the algorithms of media coverage of the two mentioned pandemics, the author raises the following questions: increasing responsibility of media towards their target audiences for publishing fake news; deeper fact-checking of information that could pose a threat to the society.

About the authors

Alexander V. Zemlyanskiy

Moscow State Pedagogical University

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4795-0102

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Journalism and Media Communications Department, Institute of Journalism, Communications and Media Education

1 Malaya Pirogovskaya, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation


  1. Department of Global Communications. UN tackles ‘infodemic’ of misinformation and cybercrime in COVID-19 crisis. (2020). New York: United Nations. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from: %E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19
  2. Lee, A.Y.L. (2005). Between Global and Local: The Glocalization of Online News Coverage on the Trans-regional Crisis of SARS. Asian Journal of Communication. Vol. 15. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from:
  3. Houston, J.B., Chao, Wen-Yu, & Ragan, S.L. Newspaper coverage of the 2003 SARS outbreak. The Social Construction of SARS (pp. 203–221). Retrieved March 30, 2021, from: 2003_SARS_outbreak
  4. Benitez, M.A. Hong Kong bears brunt of latest outbreak. The Lancet. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from: https://
  5. Dixon, B. Editors sound the SARS alarm bells. Retrieved January 18, 2021, from: https://
  6. Larson, M.H.B., Nerlich, B., & Wallis P. Brendon M.H. Metaphors and Biorisks: The War on Infectious Diseases and Invasive Species. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from https://journals.
  7. Soloff, A., Gao, W., Tamin, A., D’Aiuto, L., Nwanegbo, E., & D’Robbins, P. Effects of a SARS-associated coronavirus vaccine in monkeys. The Lancet. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from:
  8. Laurance, J. It could be China’s Chernobyl. The Guardian. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from:
  9. Clinic of atypical pneumonia (21.04.2003). Retrieved January 18, 2021, from: https://
  10. Rezza, G., Marino, R., Farchi F., & Taranto, M. SARS epidemic in the press. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from: https://

Copyright (c) 2021 Zemlyanskiy A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies