Euphemisms in South African English economic discourse: Socio-cultural aspects

封面

如何引用文章

详细

South African English economic discourse remains underexplored despite its significance in shaping public perception and policy in the region. One of its critical understudied facets are euphemisms, which are heavily influenced by historical and social background and play a crucial role in moderating sensitive issues and managing communication across diverse societal norms. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying how euphemisms reflect and respond to South Africa’s socio-cultural setting. The study involved compiling a corpus of approximately 500,000 words sourced from speeches, interviews, and publications by South African specialists with subsequent identification of euphemisms. As a results, 338 euphemisms were found in the corpus. Through continuous sampling, the study then identified, categorized, and quantitatively assessed the socio-cultural aspects of euphemisms across various economic discussions. According to the study results, euphemism in South African English economic discourse correspond to five main thematic groups: Economic and Racial Inequality, Corporate Governance and Ethics, Impact of Migration, Healthcare Economics, and Influence of Globalization. Each thematic group demonstrates patterns of euphemisms occurrence that reflect intentional communication efforts to address or mask sensitive socio-economic issues. The study results posit that euphemisms emerge as a frequently leveraged linguistic device moderating South African English economic discourse. They reflect an adaptive response to South Africa’s socio-cultural setting where managing the multifaceted societal norms and historical sensitivities is imperative for effective communication and policy dissemination. The study argues for closer examination of the linguistic composition of South African English economic discourse. The findings contribute to the fields of sociolinguistics and intercultural communication as they expose how euphemisms function as a tool for managing complex socio-economic processes.

作者简介

Elena Malyuga

RUDN University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: malyuga-en@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6935-0661

Dr. Habil., Professor of Linguistics, Head of Foreign Languages Department at the Faculty of Economics, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia. She is Editor-in-Chief of the journals “Issues of Applied Linguistics” and “Training, Language and Culture”. Her research interests embrace theory and practice of intercultural professional and business communication, pragmatics, corpus studies, discourse analysis. She is an author/co-author of over 300 publications.

Moscow, Russia

Barry Tomalin

Glasgow Caledonian University

Email: barrytomalin@aol.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7192-0301

an expert in international communication, cultures and media, founder and coordinator of Business Cultural Trainers Certificate. He is Professor at Glasgow Caledonian University London (UK), author and co-author of a number of books on international business culture and communication.

London, UK

参考

  1. Ackers, Barry & Neil S. Eccles. 2015. Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: The case of King III in South Africa. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28 (4). 515-550. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1554
  2. Akopova, Asya. 2016. Manipulation as a component of efficient communication. Humanitarian and Social Sciences 6. 33-39. EDN: YHCPDN
  3. Akopova, Asya S. 2023. Euphemism construction in English: Thematic classification and statistical analysis. Issues of Applied Linguistics 50. 28-51. https://doi.org/10.25076/vpl.50.02
  4. Bamgboṣe, Ayọ. 2019. A recurring decimal: English in language policy and planning. In Cecil L. Nelson, Zoya G. Proshina & Daniel R. Davis (eds.), The handbook of world Englishes, 657-673. Amsterdam: John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Batibo, Herman M. & Margaret M. Kopi. 2008. The nature and origin of sex-related euphemisms in Setswana. Marang: Journal of language and literature 18 (1). 69-83. https://doi.org/10.4314/marang.v18i1.39327
  6. Beaugrande, Robert de & Linda Pearce Williams. 2002. Discourse and “democracy”: Some signals from the South African corpus of English. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 2 (1). 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982002000100002
  7. Burns, Justine, Lucas Leopold, Daniel Hartford, Lindokuhle Njozela & Arnim Langer. 2024. Exploring perceptions of advantage and attitudes towards redistribution in South Africa. Social Inclusion 12. 7607. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.7607
  8. Chernyavskaya, Valeria E. 2023. To be or not to be critical in academic communication? Pragmatics of evaluative language in Russian academic book reviews. Training, Language and Culture 7 (2). 55-63. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-2-55-63
  9. Deumert, Ana & Nkululeko Mabandla. 2017. Beyond colonial linguistics: The dialectic of control and resistance in the standardization of isiXhosa. In Pia Lane, James Costa & Haley De Korne (eds.), Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery, 200-221. New York: Routledge.
  10. Eslami, Zohreh, Tatiana Larina & Roya Pashmforoosh. 2023. Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (1). 7-38. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34051
  11. Epoge, Napoleon. 2013. Euphemism in Cameroon English: Sweet talking or deception. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research 2 (1). 1-10.
  12. Grishechko, Elizaveta G. 2023. Language and cognition behind simile construction: A Python-powered corpus research. Training, Language and Culture 7 (2). 80-92. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442x-2023-7-2-80-92
  13. Grishechko, Elizaveta G. 2024. The linguistic landscape of “controversial”: Sentiment and theme distribution insights. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 24 (1). 79-97. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2401-05
  14. Koot, Stasja, Robert Hitchcock & Catie Gressier. 2019. Belonging, indigeneity, land and nature in Southern Africa under neoliberal capitalism: An overview. Journal of Southern African Studies 45 (2). 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2019.1610243
  15. Lebedeva, Irina S. & Evgeniya V. Ponomarenko. 2023. Manifestations of politeness and power in problem-solving business telephone calls. Training, Language and Culture 7 (2). 64-71. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-2-64-71
  16. Mabela, Lefty, Charles Mann & Thabo Ditsele. 2020. Language and discourse in contemporary South African politics: A critical discourse analysis. Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Southern Africa 51 (3). 108-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2020.1842485
  17. Malyuga, Elena N. 2023. A corpus-based approach to corporate communication research. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (1). 152-172. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-33561
  18. Malyuga, Elena N. & Michael McCarthy. 2021. “No” and “net” as response tokens in English and Russian business discourse: In search of a functional equivalence. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (2). 391-416. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-2-391-416
  19. Malyuga, Elena N. & Wayne Rimmer. 2021. Making sense of “buzzword” as a term through co-occurrences analysis. Heliyon 7 (6). e07208. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2021.e07208
  20. Mudau, Mmbulaheni L. 2024. Political euphemisms in Tshivenḓa: A sociopragmatic analysis. South African Journal of African Languages 43 (sup1). 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2024.2322274
  21. Nakajima, Mika, Kam-Fong Lee & Mansour Amini. 2023. A corpus analysis of cohesion in World Health Organization speeches by the Director General on Covid-19 vaccination. Training, Language and Culture 7 (2). 39-54. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-2-39-54
  22. Nattrass, Nicoli & Jeremy Seekings. 2005. The “new (global) economy” and inequality in South Africa. In Melvin Ayogu & Don Ross (eds.), Development dilemmas: The methods and political ethics of growth policy, 141-170. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392294
  23. Ndhlovu, Finex. 2019. South Africa’s social transformation policies: Raciolinguistic ideologies and neoliberal rhetoric. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 14 (2). 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1592177
  24. Ndhlovu, Ketiwe & Rudolph Botha. 2017. Euphemism vs explicitness: A corpus-based analysis of translated taboo words from English to Zimbabwean Ndebele. South African Journal of African Languages 37 (2). 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2017.1378278
  25. Petrosyan, Gayane O. & Elizaveta G. Grishechko. 2019. Conflict management in political communication: Linguistic and methodical aspects. Modern Science: Actual problems of theory and practice. Series of Humanities 11. 100-105. EDN: LOITVZ
  26. Polzenhagen, Frank & Hans-Georg Wolf. 2021. Culture-specific conceptualisations of corruption in African English: Linguistic analyses and pragmatic applications. In Marzieh Sadeghpour & Farzad Sharifian (eds.), Cultural linguistics and world Englishes, 361-399. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4696-9_17
  27. Rossouw, Stephanié & Wim Naudé. 2008. The non-economic quality of life on a sub-national level in South Africa. Social Indicators Research 86. 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9178-3
  28. Sibul, Victoria V., Victoria V. Vetrinskaya & Elizaveta G. Grishechko. 2019. Study of precedent text pragmatic function in modern economic discourse. In Elena N. Malyuga (ed), Functional approach to professional discourse exploration in linguistics, 131-163. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9103-4_5

版权所有 © Malyuga E., Tomalin B., 2024

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##